Discussion:
India’s Superpower Euphoria CIX
(too old to reply)
cogitoergosum
2010-11-15 23:32:28 UTC
Permalink
India’s Superpower Euphoria CIX
http://cogitoergosum.co.cc/2010/11/15/indias-superpower-euphoria-cix/

15 11 10 Written by navanavonmilita

China overtakes India as No. 1 source of foreign students in U.S.
By Valerie Strauss

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this post incorrectly said that
2009-10 was the first year China was atop the list of countries that
sent the most students to study in the United States. The information
includes some new data on China.

China zoomed past India as the main source of foreign students coming
to the United States to attend college, with a 30 percent jump in
Chinese students in a single year, according to a new report released
today.

The number of international students in the United States increased
2.9 percent in 2009-10 over the previous year, to 690,923 students.
The University of Southern California hosted the most of any other
school, and California was the leading state.

But there was a decline of 0.8 percent in the number of American
students who studied abroad for credit last year (260,327) from the
year before (262,416).

The data is part of the annual “Open Doors: Report on International
Educational Exchange,” published by the Institute of International
Education with support from the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Open Doors is a comprehensive
information resource on international students and scholars studying
or teaching at higher education institutions in the United States, and
U.S. students studying abroad for academic credit at their home
colleges or universities.

China overtook India as the main source of foreign students in the
United States, jumping 30 percent from 98,235 in 2008-09 to 127,628
last year. This is seen as a reflection of the growing Chinese
economy. Most of the Chinese students in the United States are in
graduate school, but there was a 50 percent increase in college
freshmen last year over 2008-09.

The second-largest increase of foreign students last year from the
year before were students from Saudi Arabia, which had a 25 percent
jump, from 12,661 in 2008-9 to 15,810 in 2009-10.

India, which had been in the top spot in recent years, stayed nearly
steady, with 104,897 students in 2009-10, up from 103,260 in 2008-09,
a 1.6 percent increase.

China sent no students to the U.S. from the 1950s until 1974-75. In
the 1980s, numbers of Chinese students grew dramatically, and in
1988-89, China displaced Taiwan as the leading sender and remained the
leading place of origin until it was displaced by Japan in 1994-95. In
1998-99, China became the leading sender again until 2001-02. From
2001-02 to 2008-09, India was the only place of origin with more
students in the United States.

Here are the top 10 states hosting foreign students in 2009-10:

1. University of Southern California — Los Angeles – 7,987
2. University of Illinois – Urbana-Champaign – 7,287
3. New York University 7,276
4. Purdue University – Main Campus West Lafayette, Ind. – 6,903
5. Columbia University New York City – 6,833
6. University of Michigan – Ann Arbor – 6,095
7. University of California at Los Angeles – 5,685
8. Michigan State University, East Lansing – 5,358
9. University of Texas at Austin – 5,265
10. Boston University – 5,172

Here are the top 10 countries sending students to the United States
and the percentage change from 2008-09 to 2009-10):

1. China 127,628 (up 30 percent)
2. India 104,897 (up 1.6 percent)
3. South Korea 72,153 (down 3.9 percent)
4. Canada 28,145 (down 5.2 percent)
5. Taiwan 26,685 (down 4.9 percent)
6. Japan 24,842 (down 15.1)
7. Saudi Arabia 15,810 (up 24.9)
8. Mexico 13,450 (down 9.4 percent)
9. Vietnam 13,112 (up 2. 3 percent)
10. Turkey 2,397 (up 2.0 percent)

Here are the top 10 states hosting foreign students in 2009-10 with
the percentage change from 2008-09 to 2009-10:

1. California 94,279 (up 1.2 percent)
2. New York 76,146 (up 1.6 percent)
3. Texas 58,934 (up 1.3 percent)
4. Massachusetts 35,313 (up 4.4 percent)
5. Illinois 31,093 (up 4 percent)
6. Florida 29,708 (down 2.2 percent)
7. Pennsylvania 28,097 (up 2.1)
8. Michigan 24,214 (up 2.5 percent)
9. Ohio 22,370 (up 7.9 percent)
10. Indiana 18,569 (up 8.6 increase)

Other facts from the report:

*New international student enrollment – students enrolling for the
first time at a U.S. institution in Fall 2009 – increased 1.3 percent
over the previous year.

*There were 113,494 scholars from 187 places of origin teaching and
conducting research at U.S. colleges and universities during the
2008-09 academic year.

Follow my blog every day by bookmarking washingtonpost.com/
answersheet. And for admissions advice, college news and links to
campus papers, please check out our Higher Education page at
washingtonpost.com/higher-ed Bookmark it!

2010

11
15
10
50

By Valerie Strauss | November 15, 2010; 10:50 AM ET

Categories: Research | Tags: china overtakes india, china tops india,
foreign students, international students, international students
increase, open doors

International Student Enrollments Rose in the United States Despite
Economic Downturn

Indian student enrollments in the U.S. for 2009/10 increased by 2%
over the previous year, while total foreign student numbers increased
by 3%

NEW DELHI, November 15, 2010—The number of students from India
studying at colleges and universities in the United States rose 2% to
a total of nearly 105,000 during the 2009/10 academic year, according
to Open Doors, a report published annually by the Institute of
International Education (IIE) with support from the U.S. Department of
State’s Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs. Indian students
represent 15% of all international students in U.S. higher education,
and India is now the second leading place of origin. In the previous
year, there were more than 103,000 international students from India
studying in the U.S., an increase of 9% from 2007/08. India was the
leading place of origin for international students in the United
States from 2000/01 through 2008/09.

President Obama’s visit to India on November 7-10 and the Obama-Singh
21st Century Knowledge Initiative signal a strong commitment by both
countries to building partnerships that help foster US-Indo
educational and economic cooperation. In addition, a visit to India
this month by representatives from 10 U.S. campuses, led by the
Institute of International Education as part of the International
Academic Partnership Program, funded by the U.S. Department of
Education’s Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education
(FIPSE), seeks to increase the number of international partnerships
between higher education institutions in the U.S. and those in India.

The United States is by far the leading destination for students from
India who study outside of their own country, followed by the United
Kingdom and Australia. With nearly 105,000 Indian students in U.S.
higher education, the United States hosts nearly three times as many
Indian students as the UK, which hosted about 36,000, and four times
as many Indian students as Australia, which hosted approximately
21,000 Indian students according to currently available estimates.

The total number of international students at colleges and
universities in the U.S. increased by 3% to 690,923 during the 2009/10
academic year, a record high number of international students in the
United States. This growth was primarily driven by a 30% increase in
enrollments of students from China. The number of Chinese students in
U.S. higher education rose to a total of nearly 128,000, or more than
18% of the total international student population, making China the
leading sending country. There are tens of thousands more students
from India in U.S. higher education than from any other country except
China. In 2009/10, there were approximately 72,000 students from South
Korea.

Together, the top three sending countries—China, India and South Korea—
comprise nearly half (44%) of the total international enrollments in
U.S. higher education. Canada, Taiwan and Japan each represent close
to 4% of the total international student population, with these top
six places of origin comprising 56%. Each of the other sending
countries represents 2% or less of the total number of international
students in the United States.

Open Doors 2010 reports 2009/10 enrollments, affected by decisions
made in a period of economic downturn in the U.S. and in many
countries around the world. The data reveal a complicated picture of
international student enrollment in U.S. colleges and universities,
with enrollment patterns varying widely according to place of origin
and academic level. There were strong increases in the number of
students from a few countries, but more than half of the top 25
sending countries showed decreases, resulting in a slower rate of
overall growth than had been seen in recent years. Open Doors 2010
reports increases in enrollments of 6% or less from India, Vietnam,
Turkey, U.K., Brazil, France, Nigeria, Malaysia and Venezuela.

According to Open Doors 2010, 65% of Indian students studied in the
U.S. at the graduate level in 2009/10, and the top three fields of
study for Indian students were engineering, math and computer science,
and business and management. While several studies have shown that the
United States remains the preferred destination for Indian students
who go overseas for higher education, recent reports also indicate
that changes in the home country economy and higher education sector
in recent years have encouraged Indian students to pursue graduate
education or enter the job market in India.

Minister of Human Resource Development Kapil Sibal has committed
himself to policies focused on building capacity within higher
education in India to educate more students. Policies also support
developing linkages with foreign partners to advance the country’s
participation in international education. The Institute of
International Education presented Minister Sibal with the Stephen P.
Duggan Award for Mutual Understanding, IIE’s highest honor, at an
awards dinner in New York in September, in recognition of his resolute
support of global collaboration in education.

Minister Sibal’s leadership plays a role in the larger context of the
Obama-Singh 21st Century Knowledge Initiative, designed to build an
enhanced India-US strategic partnership in education. The initiative
was announced in November 2009 and is being finalized in 2010, with
both the governments pledging $5 million each that will fund
university partnerships and faculty development.

The United States-India Educational Foundation (USIEF) will play a
role in working with U.S. higher education institutions on developing
partnership programs. USIEF serves as the Fulbright Commission in
India and has been a longstanding partner with IIE. Since 1950, more
than 5,000 Indian students and scholars have come to the U.S. and more
than 3,100 American teachers, scholars and students have gone to India
since 1950 through the Fulbright Program. IIE has administered the
Fulbright Program activities in the United States since the program’s
inception more than 60 years ago. The U.S. and Indian Governments
recently signed a historic new Fulbright agreement, effectively
doubling the number of Fulbright-Nehru grants for American and Indian
students and scholars.

Open Doors also reports figures for American students who study
abroad. Open Doors 2010 reports that 260,327 students studied abroad
for academic credit during academic year 2008/09. This is a modest
decrease of 0.8% from the previous year, following decades of steady
growth, with increases of 9% and 8% in the preceding two years. The
figures released today were for study abroad that took place during
academic year 2008/09, representing decisions made by students and
parents during the economic downturn. Early indications from an online
survey conducted in October 2010 show that these numbers are already
beginning to rebound, with 55% of campuses reporting that they saw an
increase in the number of their students who studied abroad in 2009/10
compared to the previous year.

India is one of the top 25 study abroad destinations for U.S.
students, with close to 2,700 U.S. students receiving credit for study
abroad in India in 2008/09, despite a decline of nearly 15% from the
previous year. However, the number of U.S. students who study abroad
in India has increased dramatically since a decade ago, when Open
Doors reported that only about 700 Americans studied in India in
1998/99.

Background: building institutional partnerships
From November 7-12, a delegation of leaders from ten U.S. colleges and
universities are visiting India as part of the International Academic
Partnership Program, an IIE program funded by the U.S. Department of
Education’s Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education
(FIPSE). Participating campuses represent the full diversity of the
U.S. higher education system, including women’s colleges, large
research institutions, liberal arts schools, and historically black
colleges and universities (HBCUs).

Accompanying the delegation are Eduardo Ochoa, Assistant Secretary for
Postsecondary Education, along with Molly Maguire Teas, Senior Advisor
for Education at the Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs, U.S.
Department of State. The study tour includes visits to potential
Indian partner campuses and international organizations in Bangalore,
Mumbai and Delhi. It is the culmination of a year-long training
program focused on implementing and sustaining partnerships with
higher education institutions in India. Visit www.iie.org to read the
delegation press release.

In March 2010, IIE’s President Dr. Allan Goodman and Dr. Martha
Kanter, the Under Secretary of Education, led a delegation of U.S.
higher education leaders in a week-long visit to India, to promote
U.S. higher education and to expand linkages with Indian higher
education institutions. During that visit, IIE released International
India: A Turning Point in Educational Exchange with the U.S., the
third in a series of Global Education Research Reports published with
support from the American Institute For Foreign Study (AIFS)
Foundation, bringing together the perspectives of Indian and U.S.
specialists to focus on U.S.-India higher education exchanges at a
critical moment in this important relationship.

About the Institute of International Education
The Institute of International Education is a world leader in the
international exchange of people and ideas. An independent, nonprofit
organization founded in 1919, IIE has network of over 20 offices
worldwide and over 1,000 member institutions. IIE designs and
implements programs of study and training for students, educators,
young professionals and trainees from all sectors with funding from
government agencies, foundations, and corporations. IIE also conducts
policy research and program evaluations, and provides advising and
counseling on international education and opportunities abroad.

The Institute of International Education has been engaged with higher
education in India for over 50 years and has had an office in New
Delhi since 2005. IIE India works closely with businesses,
governments, and non-governmental organizations in the region, and has
developed and implemented a strong set of activities in higher
education scholarship administration, leadership development, and
critical development fields, including energy.

Institute of International Education Leads Higher Education Delegation
to Build Linkages between India and the United States

Leaders from Ten U.S. Colleges and Universities Visit Bangalore,
Mumbai and New Delhi

NEW DELHI, November 7, 2010—The Institute of International Education
(IIE) led a delegation of U.S. higher education government officials
and high level administrators from ten U.S. colleges and universities,
who visited India as part of the International Academic Partnership
Program, funded by the U.S. Department of Education’s Fund for the
Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE). This program, an
initiative of IIE’s Center for International Partnerships in Higher
Education, seeks to increase the number of international partnerships
between higher education institutions in the U.S. and those in India.

Higher education institutions in the United States and India are
increasingly seeking out partnerships with counterparts to enhance
academic collaboration, expand curricular offerings, advance joint
research, and prepare their students with the international
experiences and cross-cultural tools needed in their careers. However,
many institutions face significant challenges in navigating education
systems in other countries, identifying appropriate partners and
developing effective institutional partnership strategies.

Representatives of ten U.S. institutions participated in a week-long
study tour in India, visiting potential Indian partner campuses and
international organizations in Bangalore, Mumbai and Delhi. The
November 7-12 visit was the culmination of a year-long training
program focused on implementing and sustaining partnerships with
higher education institutions in India. Eduardo Ochoa, Assistant
Secretary for Postsecondary Education, U.S. Department of Education,
joined the delegation, along with Molly Maguire Teas, Senior Advisor
for Education at the Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs, U.S.
Department of State.

The 2010 International Academic Partnership Program institutions are
California State University, San Bernardino, College of William and
Mary, Florida Atlantic University, Oakland Community College, Ohio
Wesleyan University, Spelman College, St. Cloud State University, The
University of Tulsa, University of South Carolina and Winston Salem
State University. These campuses were chosen from a competitive
candidate pool of more than 75 nominations and represent the breadth
of U.S. institutions seeking linkages with institutions in India,
including women’s colleges, large research institutions, liberal arts
schools, and historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs).

To begin the tour, participants attended an introductory workshop on
Indian Higher Education, and discussed U.S. and Indian priorities for
developing academic linkages. Speakers included Parwan Agarwal,
Secretary to the Government of West Bengal, Cooperation Department;
Madan Gopal, Principal Secretary for Higher Education, Government of
Karnataka; and Geetha Bali, Vice Chancellor, Karnataka State Women’s
University and General President, Indian Science Congress Association.
The Honorable Minister of Higher Education of the Government of
Karnataka Dr. V.S. Acharya chaired the afternoon Keynote Address,
“Higher Education in India: Government Priorities and Vision.”

The delegation visited higher education institutions and international
organizations in the selected cities to observe higher education in
India and learn about international partnership priorities from the
Indian perspective. The delegates will visit Dayananda Sagar and
National Law School Bangalore in Bangalore; Narsee Monjee Institute of
Management Studies, National Institute of Industrial Engineering
(NITIE), ICFAI Indian Business School, and Tata Institute of Social
Sciences (TISS) in Mumbai; and Lady Sri Ram College, Indian Institute
of Foreign Trade (IIFT), India Technical Institute PUSA (ITI PUSA),
IIT Delhi, and Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU) in
Delhi. IIE also facilitated B2B meetings on November 10 in New Delhi
with other Indian institutions.

The study tour culminated with a visit to the United States-India
Educational Foundation (USIEF) in New Delhi, which is the Fulbright
Commission for India and operates the EducationUSA advising center.
Several of the participants also joined the 2010 Federation of Indian
Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) Educational Summit, where
delegates presented on several panels and met with potential partner
institutions.

IAPP is one of several IIE initiatives targeted at strengthening
higher education bonds between the U.S. and India. In March 2010 IIE
published, with support from the American Institute For Foreign Study
(AIFS) Foundation, International India: A Turning Point in Educational
Exchange with the U.S., the most comprehensive volume in recent years
to focus on U.S.-India higher education exchanges at a critical moment
in this important relationship. The new book debuted at a reception in
New Delhi during a weeklong visit to India by a delegation of U.S.
higher education leaders, led by IIE President and CEO Dr. Allan
Goodman and Dr. Martha Kanter, the Under Secretary of Education, to
promote U.S. higher education and to enhance and expand linkages with
institutions in India.

In September, the Institute of International Education presented
Minister Kapil Sibal with the Stephen P. Duggan Award for Mutual
Understanding, IIE’s highest honor, at an awards dinner in New York,
in recognition of his resolute support of global collaboration in
education. Minister Sibal’s leadership plays a role in the larger
context of the Obama-Singh 21st Century Knowledge Initiative, designed
to build an enhanced India-US strategic partnership in education. The
initiative was announced in November 2009 and is being finalized in
2010, with the governments of both countries pledging $5 million each
to fund university partnerships and faculty development.

According to Open Doors, a report published annually by IIE with
support from the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs of the
United States Department of State, Indian students in the United
States represent slightly more than 15% of the total international
student population in the United States. In 2008/09, there were more
than 103,000 international students from India studying in the United
States. The number of students from the United States studying abroad
in India has also increased rapidly in recent years, although from a
much smaller base. In the 2007/08 academic year, more than 3,000
students from U.S. colleges and universities received credit for study
abroad in India.

New data from Open Doors 2010 was released on Monday, November 15, and
was presented at a special press conference that afternoon in New
Delhi.
About the Institute of International Education

The Institute of International Education is a world leader in the
international exchange of people and ideas. An independent, nonprofit
organization founded in 1919, IIE has network of over 20 offices
worldwide and over 1,000 member institutions. IIE designs and
implements programs of study and training for students, educators,
young professionals and trainees from all sectors with funding from
government agencies, foundations, and corporations. IIE also conducts
policy research and program evaluations, and provides advising and
counseling on international education and opportunities abroad.

The Institute of International Education has been engaged with higher
education in India for over 50 years and has had an office in New
Delhi since 2005. IIE India works closely with businesses,
governments, and non-governmental organizations in the region, and has
developed and implemented a strong set of activities in higher
education scholarship administration, leadership development, and
critical development fields, including energy.

IIE’s Center for International Partnerships in Higher Education is
also working to strengthen linkages between the U.S. and other
countries in Asia. The IAPP activities for 2011 will focus on
developing linkages in higher education between the U.S. and China. In
addition, the Center has launched the U.S. Indonesia Partnership
Program for Study Abroad Capacity (USIPP) to help advance Indonesian
higher education institutions’ capacity to provide high-quality study
abroad programs for U.S. undergraduates. A two-year initiative
sponsored by the U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs, USIPP will bring together six U.S. institutions with
six Indonesian institutions to develop new, innovative study abroad
opportunities for U.S. undergraduates in Indonesia and ultimately help
Indonesian universities better prepare to host American students.
Institute of International Education Delegation to India
November 7 – 12, 2010
Participant List

U.S. Department of Education — Eduardo Ochoa, Assistant Secretary for
Postsecondary Education

U.S. Department of State — Molly Maguire Teas, Senior Advisor for
Education, Bureau of South and
Central Asian Affairs

U.S. Department of State — Ryan M. Miller, India Desk Officer, Bureau
of South and Central Asian Affairs

California State University, San Bernardino
Jotindar Johar, Marketing Professor
Tatiana Karmanova, Dean, College of Extended Learning
Chetan Prakash, Mathematics Professor

College of William and Mary
Stephen Sechrist, Assistant Director of International Students &
Scholars
Kathleen Slevin, Vice Provost for Academic Affairs/Chancellor and
Professor of Sociology

Florida Atlantic University — Catherine Meschievitz, Director, Office
of International Programs

Oakland Community College
Marilynn Kokoszka, Program Coordinator, Global Studies and History
Faculty
M. Cathey Maze, Dean, Academic and Student Services
Steven Reif, Campus President, Royal Oak/Southfield

Ohio Wesleyan University
Darrell Albon, Director, International and Off Campus Programs
Craig Ullom, Vice President of Student Affairs

Spelman College — Tinaz Pavri, Professor and Chair, Department of
Political Science

St. Cloud State University
Ben Baliga, Professor of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering
Todd DeVriese, Dean, College of Fine Arts and Humanities
Ann Radwan, Associate Vice President of Academic Affairs and
International Studies

University of South Carolina
Venkataraman Lakshmi, Department Chair, Earth and Ocean Sciences
T.S. Sudarshan, Chair, Electrical Engineering Department
Patricia Willer , Associate Vice President for International Programs

University of Tulsa
Cheryl Matherly, Assistant Provost for Global Education
Kalpana Misra, Associate Dean, College of Arts & Science

Winston-Salem State University
Jessica Bailey, Dean, School of Business and Economics
Jotinder Sekhon, Director of International Programs
Peggy Valentine, Dean, School of Health Sciences

Institute of International Education
Shannon Harrison, Assistant Director, Higher Education Services
Lisa Long, Program Officer, International Partnerships
Ajit Motwani, Director, IIE-India
Daniel Obst, Deputy Vice President, International Partnerships
Preetika Sachar, Special Program Coordinator, IIE-India

IAPP Advisory Board Member—Susan Buck Sutton, Associate Vice
Chancellor of International Affairs, Indiana University Purdue
University Indianapolis and Associate Vice President, Indiana
University

Kapil Sibal
Minister of Human Resource Development, India

IIE presents the Stephen P. Duggan Award for Mutual Understanding to
The Honorable Kapil Sibal in recognition of his vision of global
education and commitment to internationalizing Indian higher
education.

Gala 2010

At its 2010 International Awards Gala, IIE presented awards to visual
artist and Fulbright alumnus Chuck Close, Microsoft, India’s HRD
Minister Kapil Sibal, and Denise Benmosche and Amy Brandt.

View Minister Sibal’s website

At the Institute of International Education’s awards gala in New York
City on September 21, IIE presented Kapil Sibal, Minister of Human
Resource Development in India, with its Stephen P. Duggan Award for
Mutual Understanding, named for the Institute’s founder. The award is
given to outstanding individuals who further IIE’s work in
international exchange. In presenting the award, IIE trustee and
dinner co-chair S.A. Ibrahim praised Minister Sibal for his “vision of
global education and commitment to internationalizing Indian higher
education, especially through partnerships with U.S. institutions,
promises to provide greater higher education access across India and
open India’s doors to increased global collaboration.” Sam Pitroda,
Advisor to the Prime Minister of India, joined Mr. Ibrahim in
presenting the award.

In accepting the award Minister Sibal said he was “indeed honored to
have been conferred this very prestigious award…We are confronting
enormous challenges that afflict the global community for which we
will need solutions and the only way that that can happen is through
empowerment through education. There is no other way that we can
combat the challenges of the 21st century.”

“The challenges are truly global, the challenges of hunger, poverty,
of global warming and climate change, of energy, of the way we deal
with nature. And all of those challenges cannot be confronted by
nations acting on their own. They’ll have to be confronted by the
global community working together. Education is about intense
collaboration in an environment of competitiveness. The environment
must be competitive, but the exercise must be collaborative. And it is
in this spirit that we in India approach education. It is in this
spirit that I come here this evening to reach out to you and to say
that it is time for us to hold each other’s hands to confront the
challenges of tomorrow.”

IIE’s Center for International Partnerships in Higher Education is
working on a special partnership initiative this year between U.S. and
Indian higher education institutions, and the Institute published a
book in 2010 on educational exchange between the United States and
India.

A Member of Indian Parliament for over 10 years, Minister Sibal
previously served as Union Minister for Science, Technology and Earth
Sciences in the First Manmohan Singh Cabinet. Among his many
initiatives, Minister Sibal is committed to providing greater access
to higher education across India, in particular through
internationalization and partnerships with U.S. institutions. He has
pioneered efforts to open India’s doors to increased global
collaboration, competence and understanding. As Minister for Science,
Technology, and Earth Sciences, Minister Sibal supported advances in
Indian science and technology as the foundation for building a more
modern, globally competitive India.

Born in Jalandhar, Punjab, Minister Sibal received his MA in History
from St. Stephen’s College, University of Delhi, and a law degree from
the Faculty of Law, University of Delhi. In 1977, he received an LLM
from Harvard Law School.

Minister Sibal is a published author and poet. He and his wife Nina
have two sons, Amit and Akhil. In 2006, the Government of India
honored him with the ‘Padma Bhushan’ award for his distinguished
services in the field of Public Affairs.

…and I am Sid Harth

News, Views and Reviews

India’s Superpower Euphoria CVIII
Anti-DabianchenVirus
2010-11-16 04:56:18 UTC
Permalink
Proof that abianchen/Meichi/report2009 is not "a guy from Taiwan",
like she claims, but an ugly Philippino dyke.
Hey Psycho Xangdi (aka Chairman Mao Says), not sure you want to prove
abianchen is your Chinese daddy or Meichi is your Filipino mom or
report2009 is your Chinese grandpa? I am sure abianchen has no problem
being your Chinese dad since he is your mom's best client. Who knows,
maybe abianchen is your bio daddy, want to test DNA?
Unable to refute the overwhelming evidence proving that shit face 狗屎
Meichi/Dabianchen/report2009 is an ugly Philippino lesbian
pathological liar, she reverts to her moron mode of childish taunts
against Xangdi's parents, going as far as to present herself as
"Xangdi's father"! This sort of writing can only come from a demented
person with no self-respect and certainly no morals.

Proof that abianchen/Meichi/report2009 is not "a guy from Taiwan",
but
an ugly Philippino dyke:
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/31e3f301c13dbbbe...
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/fc81fe43d9c693e2...

Proof that abianchen/Meichi/report2009 can't read/write Chinese other
than cutting-and-pasting from the internet:
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/7576019d05116a21...
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/2820117f3da3ac55...
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/83029bb548080af5...
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/dd8518ec6dab245a...

Proof that abianchen/Meichi/report2009 is a pathological liar:
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/ee41fc07a8921a88...
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/995a71070728ba0c...
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/fdeab5e65d151e9c...
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/4bdc7458cbd88491...
mode=source
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/90a8fd496d942f91...
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/240eb703ddb7713e...

Proof that abianchen/Meichi/report2009 makes persitent childish and
girlish claims:
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/7d3d15d1e66e4876...

Proof that abianchen/Meichi/report2009 is a loser:
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/8af8fda3a280e511...

Proof that abianchen/Meichi/report2009 is childish and repetitive:
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/5646b3ef057db25d...
cogitoergosum
2010-11-16 12:09:27 UTC
Permalink
India’s Superpower Euphoria CX
http://cogitoergosum.co.cc/2010/11/16/indias-superpower-euphoria-cx/

16 11 10 Written by navanavonmilita

Videos: CAG Report on 2G Scam-1

2G spectrum scam: Some highlights of CAG report

NDTV Correspondent, Updated: November 16, 2010 17:01 IST

New Delhi: The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report on the
allotment of 2G Spectrum licences, tabled in the Lok Sabha today, has
held former Telecom Minister A Raja responsible on many fronts for
violating guidelines, indulging in favouritism and costing the
government Rs. 1.76 lakh crores by mishandling the allocation of the
2G spectrum in 2008.

The report, bits of which had become known in the days before it was
tabled, has the Opposition parties up in arms and demanding a joint
parliamentary committee inquiry. Parliament has not functioned for a
single day in the Winter session with the Opposition forcing
adjournments.

The CAG report makes several damning conclusions about what Raja did
incorrectly. On Tuesday afternoon, the auditor addressed a press
conference to explain its report and to answer questions on it. Using
power point presentation slides, CAG officials recounted the entire
audit process and how it had reached its conclusions.

Here are some of the points made by the CAG Report:

* Raja ignored advice of PM, Law Ministry, Finance Ministry
* Spectrum was rare national asset, should have been auctioned
* Allocated 2G spectrum to new players at throwaway prices
* Allocation of 2G spectrum led to loss of Rs. 1.76 lakh crore
* Calculation of loss based on 3G auction earlier this year
* Cut-off date for license letters advanced arbitrarily by a week
* This went against time-tested procedures of government functioning
* Entire process lacked transparency
* Undertaken in arbitrary and inequitable manner
* Rules circumvented to benefit Swan: CAG
* Reliance given spectrum ahead of others: CAG
* Idea and Spice not given spectrum on grounds of proposed merger-
this was against the rules

CAG on Prime Minister

‘The PM had stressed on the need for a fair and transparent allocation
of spectrum….. Brushing aside the advice, the Department of Telecom
(DoT) in 2008 proceeded to issue licences for 2G spectrum at 2001
prices, flouting all rules and procedures’

’85 licenses were issued to companies which suppressed facts,
disclosed incomplete information and submitted fictitious documents to
DoT and thus used fraudulent means of getting licenses and thereby
access to spectrum.”

The CAG report, tabled in Parliament on Tuesday, has made it clear
that former Telecom Minister A Raja bent the rules for accommodating a
few new operators in 2008 without reconsidering the old entry fee
discovered in 2001, ignoring the advise of the Prime Minister.

Stating that the 2G spectrum allocation process lacked transparency,
the report said Raja’s decision had cost the exchequer Rs 1,39,652
crore and that 85 of the 125 licences issued were found to be given to
companies which did not satisfy basic eligibility criteria.

2G scam: Raja bent the rules, says CAG

It also points out that the PM’s advice for transparency and the
finance minister’s advice that the EGOM should be consulted were
ignored. It also says that the DoT did not follow guidelines and that
the TRAI remained a helpless spectator to the entire mess.

he report has named Reliance Communications saying that undue benefits
were given to the company. According to CAG, Reliance Communications
was given spectrum ahead of others service operators.

Pointing out irregularities, the report said the spectrum was
allocated to Swan Telecom by keeping out Idea Cellular.

Idea was at the No 2 position in the priority list whereas Swan was at
4th spot.

Meanwhile, the AIADMK said it wanted the allocated licences to be
cancelled and a case filed against Raja.

In an unprecedented move, the CAG held a press conference on its
finding in the 2G spectrum scam.

Deputy CAG Rekha Gupta said that the CAG audit revealed many
discrepancies in allotment of Spectrum by DoT. “DoT had not practiced
its own first cum first serve basis. The Law minister’s advice was
treated as out of context by the Telecom minister. The PM’s suggestion
was also overlooked,” she said.

Gupta also said that loss ascertained by the CAG is only assumptive.
“We have worked out a presumptive loss. There is a loss that cannot be
denied.”

Indicating that Raja was not the only one to be blamed for the 2G
scam, Gupta said,” We have not given any clean chit to anyone. CAG has
put across the facts that were found during the audit.”

Comments:

BAK

Platinum

89 Followers

2G scam: Raja bent the rules, says CAG (2 comments)

Tracked by : 0 boarders

This Raja must be slapped in front of other parlimentarians and it
should telecast to entire nation… he says belongs to Dalit and
represented based on that but what we got from him???

about 44 min 47 sec ago

MMB Messenger

Platinum

4118 Followers

The CAG report, tabled in Parliament on Tuesday, has made it clear
that former Telecom Minister A Raja bent the rules for accommodating a
few new operators in 2008 without reconsidering the old entry fee
discovered in 2001, ignoring the advise of the Prime Minister.

http://t.in.com/0bRe

Price when posted : [Reliance Comm - BSE:Rs. 161.80 NSE:Rs. ]

about 55 min 23 sec ago
1 replies to this message

2G Spectrum Scam: 85 companies got licenses by suppressing facts, says
CAG

Shweta Rajpal Kohli, Updated: November 16, 2010 17:02 IST

New Delhi: The latest revelations on the 2G scam suggest a careful
confluence between the Telecom Ministry, when it was headed by A Raja,
and a series of big business houses.

“85 licenses were issued to companies which suppressed facts,
disclosed incomplete information and submitted fictitious documents to
DoT and thus used fraudulent means of getting licenses and thereby
access to spectrum” -this is one of the more biting conclusions of the
report prepared by the government’s auditor, the Comptroller and
Auditor General (CAG). (Read: Report Highlights) | (Watch: CAG
explains 2G report) | ( Read: Full text of report)

The report -which was leaked to the media last week and forced Raja’s
resignation – was tabled in Parliament today.

It is unflinching in its indictment of Raja, blaming him for violating
guidelines, indulging in favouritism and costing the government Rs.
1.76 lakh crores by mishandling the allocation of 2G spectrum in 2008.
(Read: What is the 2G spectrum scam?) | (Who is A Raja?)

The report says that the Department of Telecommunications (DoT)
circumvented the rules to help Swan Telecom, which effectively acted
as a front for Reliance Telecommunications. The charges in the CAG
report are that Swan should not have been considered for a license
because Reliance Communications held 10.7% stake in Swan – and
according to the rules, a telecom operator cannot own more than 10%
stake in another telecom company operating in the same service area.

The application should have been rejected by the Department of Telecom
(DoT), according to the CAG report.

The report also says that Reliance Telecommunications was among those
who got undue benefits, and that Reliance was allotted spectrum ahead
of the others. According to CAG, Idea and Spice were wrongly denied
spectrum on the grounds of a proposed merger.

The political crisis continues

The stand-off between the government and the Opposition over 2G scam
continues. The Opposition wants a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC)
to investigate the 2G scam. The government has said there is no
question of agreeing to this. (2G scam: Opposition chants ‘we want
JPC’; No, says Government)

Parliament has not functioned at all this winter session – the
Opposition says it won’t let the House get to work till a JPC is
announced. (Watch: Let the law take its course, says A Raja)

There were loud and angry scenes in Parliament once again today – the
Lok Sabha has been adjourned till Thursday, since tomorrow is a
national holiday for Eid.

A lunch meeting with Opposition leaders called by Finance Minister
Pranab Mukherjee to try and end the deadlock, has ended without a
breakthrough. Mukherjee, who also met senior BJP leader LK Advani at
the latter’s Parliament office earlier, emerged from the lunch meeting
to say, “We are for discussion. No solution has been found yet. They
want a JPC.” (Read: No breakthrough at Pranab’s lunch meet)

Raja Ignored PM’s Advice, Says CAG Report

“The Honourable Minister of Communication & IT, for no apparent
logical or valid reasons, ignored the advice of Ministry of Law and
Ministry of Finance, avoided the deliberations of the Telecom
Commission to allocate 2G spectrum, a scarce finite national asset at
less than its true value on flexible criteria and procedures adopted
to benefit a few operators.”

The report also says Raja ignored the PM’s advice. “The PM had
stressed on the need for a fair and transparent allocation of
spectrum….. Brushing aside the advice, the Department of Telecom (DoT)
in 2008 proceeded to issue licenses for 2G spectrum at 2001 prices,
flouting all rules and procedures,” said the CAG report. (Report
Highlights) | Read: CAG must ensure fair reports, says PM | Full text)

(Watch: Raja vs Opposition on his resignation) | The phone calls that
led to Raja resigning)

For NDTV Updates, follow us on Twitter or join us on Facebook

Story first published:
November 16, 2010 12:18 IST

Tags: 2G scam, 2G spectrum scam, A Raja, CAG Report, Parliament

150 years of the institution of CAG: Full Text of PM’s speech

NDTV Correspondent, Updated: November 16, 2010 15:36 IST

New Delhi: The President of India, Smt. Pratibha Devisingh Patil
inaugurated the celebrations of the completion of 150 years of the
institution of Comptroller & Auditor General of India in New Delhi
today. The Prime Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh also addressed the
gathering. Following is the text of the Prime Minister’s remarks on
the occasion:

“I am very happy to participate in this inaugural function of the
150th year celebrations of the institution of Comptroller & Auditor
General of India. This institution has served our country very well as
an independent, competent and credible audit institution. I
congratulate all those who have been associated with this institution
for their solid achievements.

These are times of rapid change. In our country, a sustained period of
high growth has brought about transformations as never before. It has
also resulted in rising aspirations of our people. The additional
resources that have become available because of higher growth have
enabled our government to fund massive programmes in the social
sectors in pursuit of our goal of inclusive growth. In Education, in
Health, in Rural Development, outlays have been increased enormously
in the last five years. All these factors place tremendous demands on
our systems of governance and service delivery, which must need to
change quickly to meet the new requirements of the situation.
Traditional, time tested ways of doing things which lend credibility
to an institution in the public eye, may prove inadequate in the face
of rising aspirations and mounting pressure for quick and efficient
delivery of public services. While those in government grapple with
different and better ways of doing things, audit, with its vast
experience and deep insight, can contribute significantly to revamping
systems and procedures in government to meet the challenges of this
21st century. We look forward to the institution of the Comptroller
and Auditor General for such advice and guidance in the years that lie
ahead.

The importance of credible and effective accountability and oversight
institutions cannot be over-emphasized. The global economic crisis
that erupted in 2008 has served as a reminder to all of us of the need
for such institutions. Let me take this opportunity to re-affirm our
government’s commitment to strengthen the institution of Comptroller &
Auditor General of India, as part of our broader efforts to improve
transparency and accountability in the work of our Government. I am
aware of the concerns regarding the inadequate and delayed response to
the reports of the Comptroller & Auditor General. The Ministry of
Finance has taken a number of initiatives which I hope will lead to an
improvement in this area.

As I said earlier, in the last few years our government has allocated
huge resources to bring about improvements in the delivery of basic
services to our citizens, particularly those who are disadvantaged and
underprivileged. But, merely expanding the outreach of programmes for
employment generation, for education and for health is not enough. We
must do better than in the past in implementing our schemes if we are
to make a real dent in the problems of persistent poverty, ignorance
and disease that still afflict millions of our countrymen. To be
effective, the new or expanded schemes that are being implemented need
to be carefully designed, monitored and evaluated. We therefore need a
shift away from the emphasis on allocation and utilization of
financial resources, which our processes of budgeting and accounting
have come to reflect over the years. In the last few years we have
made efforts to measure outcomes to judge the effectiveness of our
development schemes. But we need to do much more in this area. The
emphasis on outcomes need to become pervasive in our system. I am sure
this would be receiving adequate attention in the institution of
Comptroller & Auditor General.

Over the years, there has also been a feeling that we might benefit
more if the focus of audit is not so much on minute, individual
transactions but on big ticket items on which large sums of public
money are expended. While the benefits of detailed, propriety audit
cannot be under-estimated, perhaps, there is a case for allocating
limited time and resources in a manner that big and systemic issues
get due attention and we get much greater value for money spent. It
might also be time to re-orient our approach so that auditors do not
rest with pointing out deficiencies. Suggesting methods of doing
things better and differently should be an integral part of the
evolving process of audit. Audit being a continuous process, such
suggestions would become, over time, an important and continuous
source of effecting improvements.

I would also like to mention two developments which have altered the
patterns of spending public money phenomena. The first is the
progressive devolution of powers and resources to the Panchayati Raj
Institutions. Though progress in this area can not be said to be
satisfactory, we hope that in the years ahead the Panchayati Raj
Institutions will be empowered much more with finances, functions and
functionaries. The institutions of accountability therefore will have
to realign their processes to reflect this new emerging reality. The
other development is the increasing number of Public Private
Partnership projects both in the Centre and in the States. The Central
as well as many State governments have used this route successfully
for impressive investments in the infrastructure projects. With time,
Public Private Partnership will be increasingly used in diverse areas.
There is, therefore, a need to improve the structure of Public Private
Partnership arrangements to ensure that they are transparent, ensure
adequate competitiveness and adequately safeguard the public interest.
I expect that the Comptroller & Auditor General will play a leading
role in ensuring that these new initiatives deliver as intended.

I believe that the Comptroller & Auditor General is an active member
of the international community of public auditors and also the auditor
of several United Nations agencies. These roles give the institution
access to global best practices in governance, delivery of public
services and accountability. Since the jurisdiction of the Comptroller
& Auditor General extends to all the States of our Union, the
institution also has an opportunity to get an insight into the reasons
which make a programme more successful in some States than in others.
Therefore, the organization is well positioned to act as an exchange
house of solid good practices. I would urge that a system be developed
so that this wealth of information and experience is shared on an
institutionalized basis.

The reports of the Comptroller & Auditor General are taken very
seriously by the media, by the public, by the government and by our
Parliament. This casts a huge responsibility on the institution to
ensure that its reports are accurate, balanced and fair. Very often,
there is a very thin line between fair criticism and fault finding,
between hazarding a guess and making a reasonable estimate, between a
bonafide genuine error and a deliberate mistake. As an important
watchdog in our democracy, it falls upon this institution to sift the
wheat from the chaff, to distinguish between wrong-doing and genuine
errors, to appreciate the context and circumstances of decision making
processes. This requires a very high degree of professional skill and
competence. The institution of Comptroller & Auditor General has
acquitted itself very credibly in the past 150 years. However, times
are changing and so are our needs. The institution will have therefore
to further enhance its capabilities and its skills and re-orient
itself to deliver results that our nation expects of it in the years
that lie ahead.

In conclusion, I would once again like to acknowledge the immense
contribution made by the institution of Comptroller & Auditor General
and the Indian Audit & Accounts Service in ensuring accountability in
the processes of government. I have great faith in this institution
and I expect it to pay its rightful role in our efforts towards a
prosperous and equitable future for our people. With these words, I
wish the institution of Comptroller & Auditor General and its staff
all the very best in the years to come. You have served our country
with great distinction but I venture to suggest that the best is yet
to come. With these words, I thank you all for listening to me
patiently.”

For NDTV Updates, follow us on Twitter or join us on Facebook

Story first published:
November 16, 2010 14:09 IST

Tags: CAG 150 years, CAG report, Manmohan Singh speech, PM speech CAG

No breakthrough at Pranab lunch with Opposition leaders

NDTV Correspondent, Updated: November 16, 2010 15:17 IST

New Delhi: A lunch meeting called by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee
has ended without any solution to the impasse in Parliament over the
2G spectrum scam.

Parliament has not functioned for a single day this winter session-
the Opposition says it will not allow any work to begin till the
government sanctions a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) to
investigate the 2G scam. The Opposition contends that a CBI inquiry
already underway cannot be taken seriously because the CBI functions
as an extension of the government which uses it to protect allies and
settle scores with political rivals.

The government has stressed that a JPC is not required because a
thorough audit of the 2G allocation will be studied by the Public
Accounts Committee which is headed by a leader of the Opposition, and
will therefore not protect the government.

The report by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has been
tabled in parliament. It was leaked to the media last week and forced
the resignation of A Raja as Telecom Minister on Sunday night.

For NDTV Updates, follow us on Twitter or join us on Facebook

Story first published:
November 16, 2010 14:24 IST

Tags: a raja, CAG report, pranab lunch meet, spectrum scam

Karunanidhi: CAG should evaluate not only process, but outcome

NDTV Correspondent, Updated: November 16, 2010 15:34 IST

New Delhi: It was the Comptroller and Auditor General’s report (CAG)
that led to his minister, A Raja, exiting the government. And on the
day when that report on the 2G spectrum scam was tabled in parliament,
DMK chief, M Karunanidhi, shared his message for CAG.

At a function in Chennai to mark 150 years of the CAG, Karunanidhi
sent a statement that was read out by his son, MK Stalin.

Karunanidhi declared, “You have the valuable gift of power to
criticize and such unfettered power comes with responsibility. It’s
your bounden duty that this task is carried out in the best possible
manner and in public interest alone.”

The DMK is standing by Raja, insisting that his resignation does not
mean that the party has accepted his guilt. After stepping down on
Sunday evening, Raja said he should be credited with leading a telecom
revolution in the country. He said his decision to award licenses at
cheap rates in 2008 led to a massive increase in tele-density,
allowing millions of Indians to benefit.

Echoing that line, Karunanidhi said today, “CAG audit will be useful
if they could evaluate not only inputs and process but also outputs
and outcome. “

For NDTV Updates, follow us on Twitter or join us on Facebook

Story first published:
November 16, 2010 14:00 IST

Tags: 2G, A Raja, CAG Report, Karunanidhi, spectrum scam

…and I am Sid Harth

Category: News, Views and Reviews

India’s Superpower Euphoria CIX

Loading...