Muslim Terrorism - Jihad will continue - Jihad will escalate with Hindu Political Silence

Discussion:

(too old to reply)

and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)

2011-07-15 20:35:28 UTC

Forwarded message from S. N.

Jihad will continue - Jihad will escalate with Hindu Political Silence

The Jihad on Hindus - Mumbai is the starter

By Aron Aronite
Haindav Keralam
Thursday, July 14, 2011

First Hindus must acknowledge they are the Targets. Attackers have
repeatedly Declared Hindus and Jews are The Targets.

Secondly Attackers have declared it is Islamic Jihad.

Attackers are Islamist Jihadis from Pakistan with some supportive
outfits called Indian Mujahadeen an Islamist Indian group.

Thirdly, this Maharashtra State Government as well as UPA
administration had been sheltering Convicted mass murderers under
"mercy Petition to President of Republic' -- one being an attacker
against Parliament and murderer of Jawans defending Parliamentarians.

This is the worst Hindus had done -- endorse and extend such a Rule
and Pro-Jihadi Administration.

Lastly the Media had Obfuscated these Simple Facts.

Hindus continue to watch and patronise the same Liars.

The Result is what this mindless killings of Hindus yesterday. It
will continue as long as Hindus chose to do the above Escapist
Denials.

It is true non-Hindus too are its victims. But it is a cold Lie to
say then Terror has no colour or 'All are its victims'.

While targeting Hindus the Jihadi manuals say it is invertible and
permissible to incur non-Hindu and even muslim collateral damages.

This is not to mean Hindus are not the sole intended target, or that
it is indiscriminate killing.These Terror attacks have Self Declared
to be Islamist Jihad Targeting Hindus and Jews, and to pretend this
not the case is to keep its Targets and Killers Unrecognised and
enables the Targeting and Targeters remain Unrecognised.

Hindus will continue to pay a heavy price if they continue with this
nonesense. This makes Hindus believe in Denial of Threat and Denies
them Political Assertion of their legitimate Voting Rights to secure
a Governance by a Party that promises to protect them from Targeters
of their lives and properties, and take action against its Attackers.

Only 43% of Mumabaikars voted last elections- which is failure to
punish electorally the soft and Pro-Jihadi Rulers of Maharashtra
state and UPA.

You may have no better choice, but endorsing the Worst is
suicidal.Hindus must stop this Denial of Existential Threat and start
Demanding special Protection to them.

Attackers must be identified for what, why and whom they target.

Victim groups must be Identified and allowed to voice their Demands
for Protection.Hindus must quit Denial Lobbys like media that
perpetuate Myths and punish electorally and by boycott of those who
Refuse to acknowledge the Jihad against Hindus.

These attacks and much more in the future are inevitable as long as
Hindus chose to bury heads in sands like Ostriches.

The Islamist Jihadis will not go away, or stop targeting them. They
will celebrate like they celebrated Birthday of Ajmal Kasab who gets
long lease of life under protective custody when the Birthday of
Afsal Guru turns up.

This Denial mentality bestows long lives to murderers of Hindus, and
shortens the lives of Hindu public, and empowers the Treacherous and
cowardly bargain dealers with communal voters.

Finally -- Hindus must acknowledge the fact Pakistan State and Army
follow General Malik's motto -- "to serve and strive for Jihad in the
way of Allah".

Pakistan was created as a homeland for Muslims in United
India.Muslims have been magnanimously allowed to stay here in India
after creating such a Threat Nation as their Homeland.

This is a Courtesy and Not an Obligation.

If Hindu lives and properties are going to once again be threatened -
- then Hindus have the right to ask them to leave this part of India
and go live in the Homeland they have been granted.

They cannot continue to live inside India and make this Jihad
continue with their presence and voting rights that enthrone
Compromised and Pro-jihadi Rulers of Hindus.

If their presence among us endangers the lives of non-Muslim citizens
and makes difficult the protection of their lives and properties,
then Muslims must be asked to relocate in the Muslim Homelands
created for which they demanded and obtained.

This is their responsibility.

As long as Hindus deny these bitter truths and facts, they will
continue to pay with its results. Pakistan will not cease its Jihad,
and the Muslims here will remain as a wing of that Jihad.

Brigadier S.K. Malik of the Pakistani army produced an authoritative
military manual on jihad called The Quranic Concept of War. It is a
required reading of Pakistan's military officers.

Malik writes: "the Holy Prophet's operations are an integral and
inseparable part of the divine message revealed to us in the Holy
Quran. The war he planned and carried out was total to the infinite
degree. It was waged on all fronts: internal and external, political
and diplomatic, spiritual and psychological, economic and military.
The Quranic military strategy thus enjoins us to prepare ourselves
for war to the utmost in order to strike terror into the heart of the
enemy, known or hidden. Terror struck into the hearts of the enemy is
not only a means; it is the end in itself."

So, this is a conflict from which there is no escape and Hindus and
Jews have no option but recognise this War declared upon their
people.

The longer it takes to come out of its Denial, the larger the price
Hindus will have to pay, with their dear lives and properties and
freedoms.

Electoral support to Pro-Jihadi parties is an act of War that is
Jihad

The Muslim minority in India enjoys unequal special rights and
privileges.These rights and their right to vote have so far been
exercised in Electoral decisions to empower the Parties that Deny
this grave danger and go soft on its Jihadis and outfits.

This is a common threat to the nation but their responses have been
Pro-Jihad.

To stop this Jihad within Indian soil- these Rights must be redefined
as not automatic or though it were an entitlement- but as a gesture
of goodwill and trust.

These Rights have been denied to an equal number of Hindus, Sikhs,
Christians and Bhuddhists who were unfortunate to remain in the
ancestral homelands that was carved out through Jihad of Direct
Action Day -- as East and West Pakistan's.

The onus of reassuring their solidarity with the targeted national
community and nation, remains with the Muslims who have been let to
remain even fatre creating a Muslim Homeland.

If they fail to do so, then Hindus can request their Relocation to
the Muslim Homeland to secure their lives and properties from their
Jihad activities.

All Jihad attacks must stop henceforth and if they continue, then all
Jihad elements must be removed from the National territories and its
borders.

Failure or refusal to do so, is an act of treason and endangers the
lives of non-Muslims who are the Declared targets of Islamist Jihad.

Hindus and non-Muslims must identify such pro-Jihadi political
lobbies and outfits as endangering their lives and properties and
must come together to formulate a Political Course Correction.

Jihad against non-Muslims must be recognised and response to it must
be with Zero Tolerance to Terrorism of any kind.

Electoral support to Pro- Jihadi Parties must be looked upon as an
act of Jihad.

Those who want to do electorally empowered Jihad inside India
therefore must not be granted such a democratic Right to murder non-
Muslims.

Jihad has no place inside.

Dismantle the Anti-Hindu Political Establishment

Dr Moorthy Muthusway a spokesperson of Indian American Intellectual
Forum and a Nuclear scientist states -

"Evidence-based reasoning suggests that India is undergoing a
civilisational transformation -- a process of de-hinduising, powered
by Article 30-induced egregious deprivations.This shows that the
majority community in India has not yet matured enough to protect its
core interests from being unfairly trampled. While the minorities'
politisation of their religious institutions have helped them
mobilize their community to vote and to leverage the voting power to
advance their interests,[51] the lack of politisation of the majority
community's religious institutions has not helped.

These contrasting roles played by the religious institutions of the
minority and majority communities can be traced to centuries of rule
by alien powers.

In order to mitigate potential challenges to their hold on power, the
alien entities ensured de-politising of the majority community's
religious institutions.

It's a long article -- and rightly so since it touches on a important
matter which cannot be discussed meaningfully in sound-bite sized
pieces. Here is a bit more from it.

Among the capable segments of India's population, the middle class,
upper middle class, and even the rich members of the majority
community have remained apolitical -- by largely shying away from
voting -- due to their disappointment with the political process in
the nation.[52]

They could afford to, as the booming economy of the past two decades
has created educational and job opportunities for them.

It has become quite clear that the apolitical, and yet the capable
segments of the majority community now have to involve themselves in
the political process, in order to ensure a future for themselves and
their progenies. . .

Clearly, modern and "emergent" India has to do away with Article 30
in the present form.

The question remains what should replace it.

A window into answering this question comes from the United States of
America, arguable among the most developed secular democracies and
home to a multi-ethnic and multi-religious society. Discriminations
faced by the black minorities and to a lesser extent by non-Christian
and non-white immigrants from abroad (in employment, educational,
social and professional settings), compelled the United States to
enact the cornerstone anti-discrimination legislation: The Civil
Rights Act of 1964. . .

This article shouldn't be viewed as an attack on Christian minorities
or a call for undermining their rights, or an effort to stop
conversions altogether. The focus of this analysis is about the
egregious human rights violations of the 80 percent majority
community. By tracing these violations to Article 30 of the Indian
constitution, this piece offers ways of addressing this issue
objectively and fairly without infringing on anyone's rights. As a
modern and free nation, India ought to uphold the right of its people
to practice and importantly, change a faith as defined in the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, . . .

One could justifiably argue that India doesn't deserve to be called a
modern democracy unless it takes steps to stop the constitution-based
egregious discriminatory practices and unfair denial of empowerment
of one eighth of entire humanity. . .

If biodiversity is viewed crucial for the well-being of humanity, so
should cultural-religious diversity. For instance, India's western
neighbour Pakistan's relentless drive to eradicate cultural-religious
diversity within may have left it highly vulnerable to dead-end
ideologies. It is incumbent on humanity to ensure that ancient ways
of life are allowed to evolve, and not be extinguished by apartheid
practices.

Muslims staying inside India -- not a permanent privilege to help
Strategically Pakistan's Jihad

They must not only be denied this privilege to kill non-Muslims, by
helping with their votes to power such collaborators of Jihad, but
also asked to leave the country that is under siege by this Islamic
Jihad.

If Hindus and Sikhs could be displaced en masse from Indian
territories to carve out an Islamic Homeland, then the same can be
done again to secure the Hindu Homeland.

They should be asked to leave to their own Creation that is the Jihad
Homeland of two Pakistans.

As a Hindu I feel this must be stated to secure my progeny and their
lives from this incessant Jihad from outside from their Jihadi
Homeland, and the numerous outfits for Jihad and its Jihadis who
continue take our lives and destroy our hard earned properties at
will.

If Muslims could secure an Islamic Homeland, then it is hypocrisy to
criticise or condemn the very same right for non-Muslims.

Especially, when this murderous Jihad is launched against us from
this Jihad-land there and by a section allowed to remain amidst us
making its recognition and defeat all the more difficult.

Hindus and all non-Muslims in their turn, have no choice in this
matter, but to recognise this grave and perilous Existential Threat
and do a Rethink on their Survival Strategy and long pending
Resolution of root causes.

The Cause of this is not difficult to Recognise- it is openly
declared in the e-mails of the Indian Jihad outfit- which is Islamic
Jihad against Hindus.

Pakistan's Koranic Concept of War on Infidels. The choice is
therefore clear for both.

Are you with India and targeted Hindus or are you with this Jihad
from within and outside?

Those who cannot stand with Hindus must be asked to leave to take
their place with the Jihad outside and the Society and Armed Forces
readied to face this National Challenge.

End of forwarded message from S. N.

Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti

o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.

Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.

Topaz

2011-07-16 10:21:13 UTC

Permalink

Tiptoeing around Our Problems
By Dr. William Pierce

"We've been talking about the very dangerous situation in the Middle
East recently, just because so much is happening there, and
undoubtedly we'll be talking about it much more in the future. For
that reason I want to make very clear what my motives and sympathies
are, lest I lead anyone astray and be thought a hypocrite for doing
so. First, regarding Palestine: although my sympathies definitely lie
with the Palestinians rather than with the Jews, it is not horror at
what the Jews are doing to the Palestinians that motivates me. What
motivates me is horror that my country is being used by the Jews in
their war against the Palestinians. If America were not involved at
all in the Middle East I still would sympathize with the Palestinians
and I would wish that they could be successful in driving the Jews
into the sea and annihilating the abomination that is Israel, but that
conflict between Jews and Palestinians would not be a major concern
for me. At least, my
concern there would be dwarfed by my concern for problems more
directly involving my own people in America and in Europe and in
southern Africa.

Even now, with money and weapons being supplied by America and used to
slaughter Palestinians, my concern is much less with monsters like
Ariel Sharon who are doing the slaughtering than it is with the filthy
creatures among my own people in America who are collaborating with
Jews here to keep the weapons and money flowing to Sharon -- and are
ready to do whatever else the Jews require of them here or abroad.

So when I tell you about Jews in occupied Palestine shooting
Palestinian children, and disapproval and anger are evident in my
voice, what I really am angry about is that the American people, my
people, are being used for this murderous activity. I am angry that
America's whole foreign policy has been perverted to serve Jewish
interests at the expense of American interests. I am angry that
America's political system has been perverted to ensure that we always
have so-called "leaders," whether Democrat or Republican, who are
dependent on the Jewish media or Jewish money or both for their
election and consequently will do the bidding of the Jews. I am angry
that our whole government is riddled with Jews -- Jews in our Defense
Department, Jews in our State
Department, Jews in our Immigration and Naturalization Service, Jews
in our Justice Department, Jews in the President's speech-writing
staff - who really set the policies of our government behind the
scenes, while the politicians are out front in the spotlight making
speeches and kissing babies - and doing as they're told by the Jews
behind the
scenes.

Did you know that it was a Jewish speechwriter, David Frum, who put
the phrase "axis of evil" in George Bush's mouth to justify America's
ongoing war against Israel's enemies? Did you know that a clique of
Jews in the Defense Department and among George Bush's foreign policy
advisers are the people actually running the so-called "war on terror"
in Afghanistan: a war that they intend to expand to Iraq and any other
Middle Eastern country that gets uppity, in order to make that part of
the world safe for Israel at American expense? Secretary of Defense
Donald Rumsfeld is a front man for his nominal subordinates, Deputy
Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz and Deputy Undersecretary of
Defense for Policy Douglas Feith; and George Bush's official foreign
policy adviser, Condoleezza Rice, helps him meet his Black quota for
the Cabinet, but it is the Jew Richard Perle, chairman of Bush's
Defense Policy Board, who gives him his foreign policy directives.

As I've said on more than one occasion, George Bush is a feckless
nincompoop who couldn't come up with a defense policy or a foreign
policy on his own if he had to -- which is why he's President. The
real policymakers behind the scenes certainly don't want a man in the
White House who has ideas of his own, because those ideas might
conflict with theirs.

And it is nothing but empty sophistry to make a distinction between
Jews in Israel, such as Ariel Sharon and Simon Peres, and the Jews in
Mr. Bush's administration formulating his policies or the Jews
controlling our mass media. They all are Jews, and that's what really
matters.

There are many knowledgeable Americans besides me who think that it's
not a good thing to have Jews using America to advance Israel's
interests at the expense of America's interests. They know how the
system works: how the Jews exert their control through money and media
and a well-entrenched network of Jewish operatives, such as Wolfowitz
and Feith and Perle. And many of these knowledgeable Americans also
understand how Jewish subterfuge and deceit work: they understand that
the Jews throw up a lot of smoke to conceal their control and make it
appear that they have much less influence than they actually do.

Despite this degree of understanding that many knowledgeable Americans
have, there seem to be very few who are willing or able to draw the
necessary conclusions. What I keep seeing are comments about the need
to get the so-called "peace process" going again in the Middle East,
and how there are hardline supporters of Israel who are obstructing
the "peace process" because they think that it will give too much to
the Palestinians or will compromise Israel's security, or whatever.
These knowledgeable Americans seem to believe that if we could just
get around the Jewish hardliners somehow -- if we could just
neutralize Jews such as Wolfowitz and Feith and Perle; if Ariel Sharon
could be replaced by a "moderate" Jewish prime minister -- then the
"peace process" could proceed, America could gradually reduce its
involvement in helping the Jews keep the Palestinians repressed, and
eventually Israel no longer would be using America, and everything
would be rosy. And so these knowledgeable Americans expend all of
their wit and energy in these trivial pursuits.

Listen! Do you know what the most hopeful aspect of the conflict
between Jews and Palestinians is now? It is the ongoing radicalization
of the Muslim masses throughout the whole Middle East. The
collaborator governments in Pakistan, in Egypt, in Saudi Arabia are
terrified of the reaction they see among their own people to what
Ariel Sharon is doing to the Palestinians. When Sharon's Jewish troops
shoot Palestinian children, Muslim mobs riot, and governments that now
collaborate with the United States quake. Ariel Sharon is the best
thing that has happened in the Middle East in the last 54 years.

The Palestinian tactic of suicide bombing is being denounced by every
politician and every media spokesman over here now. It's nothing but
terrorism, they all say. There's no justification at all for suicide
bombing, they tell us. Of course, whenever you hear that sort of
unanimity from the politicians and the media people you should be
suspicious. In fact, suicide bombing is the best tactic for the
Palestinians to use now, because it provokes the Jews to step up
reprisals. And the reprisals radicalize the masses in every country in
the Middle East. If just one of the collaborator governments falls,
the spines of all the rest will be stiffened, and the Bush government
will be far less likely to find collaborators for building its
so-called "coalition" to do the will of the Jews in the Middle East.

Suicide bombers now hardly put a dent in the population of five
million Jews in occupied Palestine, and Sharon's bloody reprisals
hardly put a dent in the overall Palestinian population. But if
conflict of this sort continues until just one collaborator government
is overthrown, that ultimately will be worth more than ten thousand
successful suicide
bombings in which only 20 or so Jews are killed each time. In the long
run there can be no real peace in the Middle East and no end to
America's shameful role there -- and no future for the Palestinian
people -- as long as there is an Israel. There seems to be a better
understanding of these things among knowledgeable Palestinians than
among knowledgeable Americans.

Shallow thinking and the pursuit of trivial goals is even worse among
knowledgeable Americans when it comes to domestic problems. They
really do not want to grasp these problems with both hands and deal
with them in a forthright way. Look, for example, at what uncontrolled
immigration has done and is doing to America. And what do
knowledgeable Americans propose to do about that? Very little, really.
They make much of the fact that several of the al-Qaeda hijackers who
carried out the September 11 attack were in the United States only
because of very lax immigration policies, and so that's a good reason
for tightening up the policies.

How about simply rounding up all illegal aliens immediately -- all 12
million of them -- and booting them and all of their offspring out of
the country without further ado?

Oh, no, no, no! We can't do that! Why not? Well, the media never would
stand for it. The media would be all over anyone who even proposed a
mass expulsion of illegal aliens. They would denounce any political
leader who tried to do that as a "racist" and a "neo-Nazi." And so
knowledgeable Americans, who understand the immigration disaster quite
well, continue tiptoeing around it, afraid to do or even say anything
really significant about it: terrified even to think about really
radical solutions that might actually end the problem. And it's the
same with the rest of our domestic problems. Lots of people understand
these problems and are worried about them, but they won't tackle them
in any
significant way. They let the Jews -- the Jewish media and Jewish
money and the entrenched Jewish network -- have their way, for all
practical purposes.

Why? Why are the Jews permitted to get away with all of their
destructive policies and activities without being challenged or
opposed in any significant way? Part of the reason is that the Jews
are very powerful, and therefore many people are afraid to cross them.
They're afraid of the sort of media reaction I just mentioned in
connection with immigration. Everyone understands that the Jews stick
together and will viciously attack anyone who opposes them. It's the
old story, so aptly expressed by the late-16th-century writer, Sir
John Harington. Harington wrote: "Treason doth never prosper: what's
the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason." Today the
Jewish power structure is
prospering, and none dare oppose it or even call it what it is. Well,
that's only part of the reason Jews are permitted to get away with so
much. There's more to it than that. There's a mystique the Jews have
built very carefully around themselves and nurtured diligently. It is
a mystique of piety and injured innocence. It is a mystique that says
to the Gentile world: "We are a gentle and inoffensive race, and
because of this everyone hates us. We're smart and we work hard and
achieve success, and because of this everyone hates us. We are a
highly moral and ethical race, and because of this everyone hates us.
We are a very talented race, with many gifted members, many geniuses,
and because of this everyone hates us. We are a very altruistic race,
a race of philanthropists who only want to make a better world for
everyone, and because of this everyone hates us."

Many simpletons among the lemmings simply accept these claims at face
value. Many knowledgeable people, however, who can see through these
claims to the real Jews hiding behind them, still hesitate to
challenge them. Part of the Jewish mystique is the so-called
"Holocaust." In its most simpleminded form the "Holocaust" story is
the claim that the
Germans hated the Jews for the reasons I just mentioned -- for their
gentleness and their success and their morality and their talent and
their altruism -- and because of this hatred roasted six million of
them during the Second World War in "gas ovens," to use one of the
Jews' favorite "Holocaust" phrases.

Actually, the "Holocaust" is a very powerful part of the Jewish
mystique. The Jews crafted the "Holocaust" story with great care and
great effort -- well, actually not with as much care as they might
have used: it's as full of holes as a Swiss cheese, but still it is
sufficient to make most people, even those who understand what Jews
are really like, hesitate to attack them. People don't want to be seen
as bullies. They don't want to be seen as so insensitive that they
would criticize the Jews, who already have suffered so much, poor
dears, at the hands of anti-Semites.

In several past broadcasts we've looked at a number of the lies and
exaggerations and distortions that make up the "Holocaust" story.
There are a number of good books available on the subject from the
sponsor of this broadcast, National Vanguard Books, including Norman
Finklestein's excellent book The Holocaust Industry, which I discussed
in an earlier broadcast. The point is that despite the lies, despite
the fact that many knowledgeable Americans are aware of the lies, the
"Holocaust" still serves its purpose for the Jews. People are afraid
of the image conjured up by the "Holocaust."

Perhaps it's that American life is too soft... Whatever the reason,
many otherwise knowledgeable and hardheaded Americans just can't
entertain the idea of rounding up the Jews and getting rid of them,
even when the situation is as urgent as it is in America today. And
really, in the long run that is the only way to solve the Jewish
problem.

The Germans understood that, back in the 1930s, and they had the
courage and the foresight to act on their understanding. Unlike
Americans today, they had an honest government concerned above all
with the survival, welfare, and progress of the German people, and
they began doing what was necessary, forcing the Jews to emigrate
wholesale from Germany beginning in 1933. And because of that the
Jewish propaganda machine has attacked the Germans so viciously, has
so blackened and demonized their image, that today even knowledgeable
people are afraid to be associated with that image. They are afraid to
say that the Germans were right, that the Germans were justified, and
that we need to do the same if we are to survive. So, as I said, the
"Holocaust" story, despite its
glaring discrepancies and lies, still serves as a shield for the Jews;
it still protects them from criticism.

Well, mostly. In parts of Europe not quite as poisoned by Jewish
propaganda as America is, the shield has slipped a bit. A large
British department store chain, Selfridges, has yielded to demands
from anti-Israel demonstrators and has removed from its shelves
products marked "Made in Israel." Last week the second largest
supermarket chain in Norway, Coop Norge -- which is to say, Norway
Coop, announced its decision to boycott all Israeli imports. That
decision was not the result of pressure from anti-Israel demonstrators
but was based on the feeling by Coop Norge management that it would be
immoral to continue supporting the Israeli economy by selling Israeli
imports under the
present circumstances. That is a step forward, though it is a long way
from what is needed.

The Jews, of course, immediately began waving their "Holocaust" story
around, and now, as the boycott movement catches hold in Scandinavia,
they are trying to portray themselves as injured innocents being
attacked once more by "anti-Semites." They are comparing the growing
Scandinavian boycott of Israeli products to the German boycott of
Jewish merchants in the late 1930s. Certainly, a boycott of Israeli
products is a good thing, and the fact that such a boycott is even
thinkable by big businessmen today is a sign that the Jewish mystique
-- and in particular the Jewish "Holocaust" story -- is becoming a bit
shopworn. It no longer has the hypnotic power that it once had -- at
least, in some parts of the world. And I suppose that we should be
happy about that. The unfortunate fact remains, however, that in
America the Jews still have their money and
their media and their entrenched network of bureaucrats, and even if
the "Holocaust" story has lost some of its charm in Europe, it still
keeps most knowledgeable Americans intimidated.

Knowledge isn't enough. Courage and boldness also are necessary.
Honesty and forthrightness are necessary also. Tiptoeing around the
critical issues of our time isn't enough. Tiny reforms in our
disastrous foreign policy and in our disastrous immigration policy and
in a dozen other disastrous policies aren't enough. We need to stop
apologizing to the people who are destroying us and go full bore at
destroying them instead.

Instead of being hypnotized by the "Holocaust" story we need to look
with clear eyes at why there was a need for action against the Jews in
Germany in the 1930s and 1940s. The Jews' claim today that the Germans
were suffering from collective insanity and had no reason for trying
to get the Jews off their backs is as phony as George Bush's claim
that
Osama bin Laden had no reason for attacking America on September 11.

Wherever Jews go they corrupt and destroy. That is their nature,
always and everywhere. Let us be thankful to the Palestinians who now
are making such terrible sacrifices to help the world see what the
Jews are like. And I suppose we also should be thankful to Ariel
Sharon for demonstrating so forthrightly to the world what Jews are
like.

Let us hope that the conflict between Jews and Palestinians
intensifies and lasts long enough to wake up many more of our people
around the world and fill them with disgust at America's continuing
support for the Jews. Let us hope that it lasts long enough to bring
about the overthrow of every collaborationist regime in the Muslim
world. Let us hope that it brings about an airtight oil embargo
against the United States and shuts off the lights in every shopping
mall and every sports stadium in America long enough for the lemmings
to become restless and begin asking questions. Let us hope that it
makes the efforts of every fool and every traitor who is striving for
a resumption of the so-called "peace process" so obviously futile that
these efforts no longer have the power to deceive anyone.

Ultimately, of course, we must not depend on the Palestinian suicide
bombers or on Ariel Sharon's murder squads to do for us what we should
be doing for ourselves. Ultimately we must stop tiptoeing and begin
marching boldly and forthrightly toward solving our own problems."

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org

http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/

and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)

2011-07-17 00:33:40 UTC

Permalink

Topaz

2011-07-17 10:18:24 UTC

Permalink

Judeo Christians think it is the "end times" even though it has been
the "end times" for over two thousand years so far. They think the one
and only hope is for Jesus to return and straighten everything out.
And a big part of the plan is the destroy the world. They think wars
and everything being blown up is a great thing because it means Jesus
will return soon.

Marxists were murderous lowlifes but they said religion is the opium
of the masses. There obviously is some truth to that. Enemies often
have some truth in their arguments. On top of the opium there is the
Jewish propaganda started by Scofield.

Christians are great for telling what some of the problems are, such
as homosexual perversion, feminism etc. But to actually solve these
problems one should look elsewhere. Who do Christians hate the most,
first Hitler and then the Muslims. These are the two who actually
solved the problems that Christians are famous for speaking against.
Maybe the Muslims go a little overboard but they are the opposite of
liberalism. There is no way that "Brokeback Mountain" would be shown
in a Muslim country.

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org

http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/