Discussion:
Of Dalliances and Unholy Alliances: Sid Harth
(too old to reply)
cogitoergosum
2010-05-02 19:47:31 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-alliances-sid-harth/

Political Bog: Sid Harth
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.indian.marathi/browse_thread/thread/5d86b6b19f65207c#

His fate undecided, Soren gets back to work
Indo-Asian News Service
Ranchi, May 02, 2010

First Published: 16:11 IST(2/5/2010)
Last Updated: 16:13 IST(2/5/2010)

With his fate still hanging in the balance, Jharkhand Chief Minister
Shibu Soren on Sunday went back to work by clearing files in his
office and inspecting a road.

"Guruji (Shibu Soren) inspected an under-construction four-lane road
at Pijthoria (outskirts of Ranchi). He also attended his office,"
Safiq Ansari, Soren's press advisor, said.

A day after a marathon meeting in New Delhi between the Bharatiya
Janata Party (BJP), the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM) and allies on
forming an alternative government ended in a stalemate, Soren went
back to his official duties.

It was decided at the meeting that Shibu Soren will remain at the helm
till a decision is arrived at.

According to sources, the JMM wants a graceful exist for Shibu Soren
and the party is insisting that he be allowed to continue till June
30. Shibu Soren, a Lok Sabha MP, is not a member of the state
assembly. He can remain chief minister till June 30.

However, the BJP is against the proposal and wants new arrangements,
the sources said.

"We have agreed to meet again to evolve a consensus on the political
situation of Jharkhand," Hemant Soren, son of Shibu Soren and JMM
general secretary, told reporters in New Delhi after the meeting
Saturday night.

Jharkhand is facing political uncertainty since April 28 after the BJP
decided to withdraw support to the Soren government after the chief
minister voted against the party's cut motions in parliament. However,
the party on April 30 decided to put on hold the decision and started
exploring the possibilities of forming a new government in the state.

The BJP summoned the leaders of the JMM and other coalition partners
All Jharkhand Students Union (AJSU) and Janata Dal-United (JD-U) to
New Delhi for a meeting on Saturday.

Showing 1-1 of 1 comments

Sort by Popular nowBest RatingNewest firstOldest first Subscribe by
email Subscribe by RSS
KCM 7 hours ago

2 people liked this.

BJP is another idiotic party with idiots and always after power. And
the party has not learnt nothing from it's past deeds. It had
coalition with Mayawati's BSP and that suffered a miscarriage and same
fate with Kumarswamy's Govt.at Karnataka not long back and now they
are again with Sibu's JMM and we the unfortunate people of Jharkhand
are suffering from the misdeeds of so called a party not long ago
professed to bring back SURAJYA and believe in Ramrajya and it is very
much sure even Ravan would have last laugh after seeing the today's
power hungers and their and ways to cling to power at any cost.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/jharkhand/Fate-undecided-Soren-gets-back-to-work/538500/H1-Article1-538396.aspx

BJP wants letter of support from all 18 JMM MLAs
Press Trust Of India
New Delhi/Ranchi, May 02, 2010

First Published: 22:33 IST(2/5/2010)
Last Updated: 22:49 IST(2/5/2010)

Wary of reported rebellion among JMM MLAs in Jharkhand, BJP leadership
has sought letters of support from the 18 JMM legislators to provide a
stable BJP-led government in the tribal state, failing which the
alliance will fall through.

BJP has insisted that the JMM MLAs give their letters of support to
the party by Tuesday. A BJP leader told PTI that in the meeting held
on Saturday, BJP President Nitin Gadkari had categorically told
Hemant, son of JMM chief Shibu Soren, that all JMM MLAs will have to
pledge their support as BJP could not form a shaky government in
Jharkhand.

"Even if one of the 18 JMM MLAs says he will not support a BJP-led
government, we may decide not to form a government. We do not want to
give the impression that we are dying to form a government in
Jharkhand or that we are hungry for power," the BJP leader said.

As political uncertainty in Jharkhand continued for the sixth day, JMM
today asserted that Shibu Soren will stay
on as chief minister for now.

"As of now Shibu Soren is Chief Minister and will continue in that
post... Our talks with the NDA leaders in Delhi were very
constructive," Hemant, Soren's son and JMMLP leader, said in Ranchi
after meeting the BJP leadership
in Delhi to end the deadlock.

The apprehension in the BJP, which has 18 MLAs, is that in case it
forms a government with the support of JMM,
AJSU and JD(U), it would face a bigger embarrasment than it is facing
today.

BJP has threatened to withdraw support to the Shibu Soren government
when the JMM chief voted with the Congress-led regime during the cut-
motion in Lok Sabha.

"If the government, led by a BJP Chief Minister, falls soon after
being formed, the party will lose credibility," a member of the BJP
Parliamentary Board said.

While six of the 18 JMM MLAs had raised the banner of revolt, two of
them- Teklal Mahato and Champai Soren-
backtracked and joined Hemant in the meeting with Gadkari and other
Jharkhand leaders on Saturday.

Three of the rebels are Christian MLAs and have reservations about
supporting a BJP government. The main concern within the BJP still
remains a President's Rule in the state. This would virtually mean a
Congress rule in Jharkhand as the UPA would control everything from
the Centre.

"Under President's Rule, Congress is likely to poach our and JMM MLAs
to form a government in Jharkhand," a BJP
Central unit leader said.

BJP leaders are now engaged in finding a way out which would keep its
image and ideological stand - of being a
party with a difference-remains intact.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/newdelhi/BJP-wants-letter-of-support-from-all-18-JMM-MLAs/Article1-538500.aspx

Shibu Soren will continue as chief minister, says son
Indo-Asian News Service
Ranchi, May 02, 2010

First Published: 20:20 IST(2/5/2010)
Last Updated: 20:21 IST(2/5/2010)

Hemant Soren, who has emerged as the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha's (JMM)
key negotiator with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to save the
Jharkhand government, claimed on Sunday that his father Shibu Soren
would continue to be the chief minister.

Talking to reporters at Ranchi airport after his arrival from New
Delhi, Hemant Soren said: "At this moment Shibu Soren is chief
minister and he will continue on the post."

He refused to divulge details of the meeting with the BJP in New Delhi
Saturday.

"The talks with BJP leaders took place in a good atmosphere and
further talks will be held."

Hemant Soren returned to Ranchi along with BJP state president and
Deputy Chief Minister Raghubar Das and the All Jharkhand Students
Union's (AJSU) chief and Deputy Chief Minister Sudesh Mahto.

The JMM-BJP government is supported by AJSU and Janata Dal-United
legislators.

Jharkhand plunged into political crisis after Shibu Soren voted in
favour of the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance on the cut
motions in parliament moved by the BJP April 27.

The following day, the BJP parliamentary board decided to withdraw
support to his government, but has put the decision on hold and is
examining possibilities of forming an alternative government.

The BJP, JMM and AJSU leaders, at their meeting in New Delhi Saturday,
are believed to have agreed to continue Shibu Soren as chief minister
till they decide on their next move.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/jharkhand/Shibu-Soren-will-continue-as-chief-minister-says-son/Article1-538456.aspx

Soren stays CM for now, BJP sets conditions
Gautam Mazumdar and Shekhar Iyer, Hindustan Times
Ranchi, May 02, 2010

First Published: 20:04 IST(2/5/2010)
Last Updated: 00:05 IST(3/5/2010)

The Jharkhand government has got temporary respite following the
crisis created when the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha voted against the cut
motion brought by ally BJP.

On April 28, the BJP parliamentary board had decided to withdraw
support from the state government, led by Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM)
President Shibu Soren.

However, the decision has been put in abeyance after the BJP
leadership had a discussion on this with alliance partners JMM, Janata
Dal (United) and All-Jharkhand Students’ Union Party.

Soren, by all accounts, will remain chief minister for now.

JMM legislature party leader Hemant Soren, who is the chief minister’s
son, had suggested to BJP President Nitin Gadkari a change of guard in
the state.

However, the BJP reportedly could not thrash out a solution because
there were differences on the issue of leadership.

There were several candidates for the post of chief minister: party
general secretary and former CM Arjun Munda, former finance minister
Yashwant Sinha, and deputy CM Raghubar Das. The name of Lok Sabha
Deputy Speaker Karia Munda was also considered.

Meanwhile, the BJP has set three conditions against the JMM’s offer to
back a new coalition arrangement in the state.

First, all the JMM MLAs must stay united and commit themselves to
supporting a government headed by the BJP. Second, the JMM must give
the commitment that the arrangement will hold until the term of the
present assembly expires. And finally, the JMM has to agree to a
common minimum programme for improving governance and development.

BJP chief Nitin Gadkari conveyed this to JMM leaders, led by Hemant,
during more than four hours of discussion on Saturday. The BJP’s
parliamentary board may meet on Tuesday or Wednesday to decide on the
matter after the JMM’s response.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/eastindia/Soren-stays-CM-for-now-BJP-sets-conditions/Article1-538451.aspx

BJP to decide on govt formation in Jharkhand tomorrow
Press Trust Of India
Chennai, May 02, 2010

First Published: 16:32 IST(2/5/2010)
Last Updated: 16:42 IST(2/5/2010)

Amid efforts to break the stalemate over government formation in
Jharkhand, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Sunday said that it
would take an 'appropriate decision' on Monday on forming the ministry
with JMM support.

"There is no confusion in our party. Our parliamentary board has
already decided to withdraw support to JMM. Subsequently, JMM gave a
proposal that they will support us to form a government. A final
decision will be taken tomorrow in this regard," BJP leader Venkaiah
Naidu told reporters in Chennai.

The BJP on Wednesday withdrew its support to the four month-old Shibu
Soren government when the Chief Minister voted against the cut motion
in Lok Sabha.

The BJP, however, put on hold its decision after Shibu's son Hemant,
who is now playing a key role in talks between the two parties, wrote
a letter to party chief Nitin Gadkari expressing support to a BJP-led
ministry.

Showing 1-5 of 5 comments

Parminder 3 hours ago

BJP is a party with double, triple, quadrupule standards. It screams
morality to others and does a flip flop when it comes to its own
ambitions.For grabbing power, it can jettison Ram, Lakshaman, Sita and
even their "Mukhotas".

Vijay 4 hours ago

What moral grounds BJP will use to justify it's decision of taking
support of JMM, when just a week ago it pulled it's support from it
citing wrong doing?
Politicians don't even consider moral proprietary any more.

onlooker 6 hours ago

What kind of party BJP is? Look, its like JMM supports BJP to stay in
power than nothing else. At the same time rebuffs BJP's decision and
BJP's hunger for power is highlighted like "i want that candy" now its
my turn.
They are happy even when JMM went against them so far they hand them
power. So issues are not important but to remain in power is
hummmm....

rvjayaraman 6 hours ago

Withdrawal of support by BJP to Shibu Soren is a good decision. When
Shibu's son Hemant, comes to terms with the BJP, BJP leaders must take
the support of JMM. BJP should form the government with the support of
JMM and rule effectively bringing economic upliftment of that state.

Expand ⇗Guest
A.M.FAZIL 7 hours ago

1 person liked this.

IF ADVANI AND VAJPAYEE HAD BEEN IN THERE AT KEY POSITIONS IN BJP, THE
PARTY WOULD NOT HAVE MADE SUCH A MEAGRE AND DISGRACEFUL DECISION. THE
LEADERS NOW AT THE HELM IN THE PARTY ARE DESPERATE.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/chennai/BJP-to-decide-on-govt-formation-in-Jharkhand-tomorrow/Article1-538401.aspx

Now listen here
Manas Chakravarty
May 01, 2010

First Published: 22:34 IST(1/5/2010)
Last Updated: 22:38 IST(1/5/2010)

I met the government’s Director of Phone Tapping (DPT) a.k.a. the
Chief Bugger last week. He was most informative, explaining that they
had many notable near-successes. “Listen to this conversation we
picked up from Shibu Soren’s phone,” he said:

Voice: Sir, have you decided on who you are going to appoint as the
Chief of Police?

Soren: Eh?

Voice: The chief of police, sir, of Jharkhand?

Soren: Oh, I appoint Kishenji.

Voice: Eh?

Soren: Do you have Alzheimer’s?

Voice: But sir, Kishenji is a Maoist.

Soren: So?

We nearly got Shibu that time, said the DPT, but he was saved by a
whisker because he said he had Alzheimer’s disease and had made a
mistake. “Did you know we almost got the RBI governor too?” he
smirked. He played the audio for me.

Voice: We need a bigger money supply, sir.

Governor: M1?

Voice: M3.

Governor: Ah. How much?

Voice: Well, it’s around Rs 56 lakh crore now, sir.

That’s when I got excited, interjected the Chief Bugger.

Governor: Ok, let’s increase it by 20 per cent.

Voice: Much depends on how much foreign money comes in, though.

Obviously these guys were doing a huge deal and with foreign funds
too, said the Chief Bugger, that’s why they used codes like M3. “But
they got away by pretending they were talking about the country’s
entire money supply”, he said sorrowfully.

“We also thought for a while we were on to Nitin Gadkari”, he
continued and made me hear this conversation:

Gadkari: Swear that nobody will know.

Voice: I swear most solemnly.

Gadkari: After I fainted during that rally, I don’t want to be seen as
weak. So you’ll deliver it at dead of night. That way, nobody will
know.

Voice: This will be top secret, sir.

Gadkari: Right then, send it tonight.

Voice: Just to confirm, we’ll be sending you one slimming sauna belt,
deluxe, guaranteed to reduce fat in 30 days for Rs 2,399 — cash on
delivery.

We went nowhere with that one, said DPT ruefully. I pointed to another
tape marked “Strictly confidential”. “Oh that one,” said the Chief
Bugger, “that nearly gave me a heart attack. I couldn’t believe what
Soniaji was saying. Here, listen to it.”

Sonia: First, chop off the head.

Voice: What about all the blood?

Sonia: Wash it off, silly.

Voice: What do I do with the head?

Sonia: Throw it away.

Voice: This is a respectable neighbourhood. What will people say?

Sonia: Does the rest of it fit?

Voice: No, it doesn’t, it’s so big.

Sonia: No problem. Take a sharp knife and cut it into three parts.

Voice: This is revolting. Yes, it fits now.

Sonia: Now bring the oil to a boil, put the three fish pieces into the
saucepan and fry them.

Chief Bugger told me he had his heart in his mouth before he realised
that Sonia was merely teaching Rahul how to fry fish.

Before I left, DPT played another recording. “That’s from the Finance
Minister’s phone,” he said. “It sounds like somebody gargling,” I
said, “or perhaps a strange language, probably Tibetan.” The language
experts said it was no known language, said DPT, so we finally got in
a good friend of his.” “What did he say?” I asked, all agog. He said
Pranabda was trying to speak Hindi, chortled Chief Bugger.

Manas Chakravarty is Consulting Editor, Mint

The views expressed by the author are personal

http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/columnsothers/Now-listen-here/Article1-538107.aspx

Too many BJP aspirants for Jharkhand CM
HT Correspondents, Hindustan Times
Ranchi, May 01, 2010

First Published: 00:43 IST(1/5/2010)
Last Updated: 09:36 IST(1/5/2010)

With Jharkhand Chief Minister Shibu Soren having announced his
readiness to give up his seat to the BJP to atone for his mistake of
voting for the wrong side in Parliament on Monday, the race to become
the next chief minister of the state began in earnest on Friday.

The three frontrunners are BJP general secretary and former Jharkhand
CM Arjun Munda, former union finance minister Yashwant Sinha and
current Jharkhand deputy CM Rabhubar Das.

Munda has the advantage of being a tribal in a state which has never
had a non-tribal CM. But many in the BJP high command would rather see
Sinha lead the state, given his vast administrative experience, as
well as Munda’s mixed performance the last time he ruled.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/newdelhi/Too-many-BJP-aspirants-for-Jharkhand-CM/Article1-537810.aspx

Video: BJP puts Jharkhand withdrawal on hold NDTV.com

http://news.google.com/news/search?aq=f&pz=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=Shibu+Soren

'BJP to take final decision over new Jharkhand Govt. tomorrow' Sunday,
May 2, 2010, 14:48 [IST]

Chennai, May 2 (ANI): Senior Bharatiya Janata Party leader M. Venkaiah
Naidu on Sunday said that his party would take a final decision on
formation of new government in Jharkhand with the support of Jharkhand
Mukti Morcha (JMM) over the next 24 hours.

"The party had decided to withdraw support to Shibu Soren;
subsequently JMM leader wrote a letter to the party president (Nitin
Gadkari) and to Advani ji saying a mistake has happened and they want
to extend support to BJP government to prevent the Congress party from
coming to power. The party is discussing the issue. There is no
confusion whatsoever; we are very clear in our mind. A decision will
be taken by tomorrow," said M Venkaiah Naidu.

It may be recalled that the BJP had withdrawn support to Shibu Soren's
JMM-led coalition government in Jharkhand on April 28 after he voted
for the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance government during a
cut motion brought up by the Opposition in Lok Sabha on April 27.

JMM president and Jharkhand state chief Shibu Soren, and his son,
Hemant Soren, had subsequently written letters to BJP leaders,
expressing their preference at remaining aligned with the BJP.

The National Democratic Alliance (NDA) headed by BJP expressed hopes
of ending the impasse over formation of a new government in Jharkhand
after the JMM offered to support a BJP-led government.

BJP leadership had recently held talks with its Jharkhand allies-the
regional Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM) and All Jharkhand Students Union
(AJSU) and the Janata Dal (United) and others.

The JMM-BJP coalition government in Jharkhand was formed about four
months ago. (ANI)

http://news.oneindia.in/2010/05/02/bjpto-take-final-decision-over-new-jharkhand-govttomorro.html

Pick of The week

fe Bureau
Posted: Monday, May 03, 2010 at 1835 hrs IST
Updated: Monday, May 03, 2010 at 1835 hrs IST




Font Size
Print
Feedback
Email
Discuss ■Valentine Gift's■■■: Sad state

The young state of Jharkhand was roiled once again by its shifty
politics. Last week, the BJP pulled the plug on the JMM-led government
after Shibu Soren voted for the Congress-led UPA and against the
Opposition-sponsored cut motions in Parliament. Soren tried to put it
all down to a ‘mistake’, he even tried to duck behind ‘alzheimer’s’.

The immediate provocation may vary but it is the same breakdown in
Jharkhand. The state that was born in the year 2000 has seen seven
governments in nine years. There has even been a government led by an
independent, and supported by political parties from the outside.
There have been fractured mandates and hardly any coherent politics in
the state.

Dear Mr Hooda

Rahul Gandhi made a trip to Mirchpur, the village in Haryana that saw
the latest incident of horrific caste violence in the state. On April
21, two persons, including a physically challenged girl, were burnt
alive when a mob belonging to the dominant Jat community torched
several houses belonging to Dalit families.

While Rahul dropped in unannounced at the homes of the victims, Sonia
wrote a letter to Haryana chief minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda,
expressing concern and demanding a report.

Hooda defied incumbency and delivered the state again to the Congress
kitty in October last year. But the intervention by the two Gandhis is
a warning signal: his politics must not be Jat-centric, or seen to be
so.

Diggy is sorry

Senior Congress leader and general secretary Digvijay Singh apologised
— well, sort of—for publicly taking on Union home minister P
Chidambaram on the sensitive issue of the government’s Naxal policy.
He had not intended to embarrass the Congress party or government,
said Singh.

But Singh’s belated expression of regret in Lucknow is unlikely to
tamp down the speculation that has raged in Delhi about the apparent
disconnect between party and government—or between two prominent
leaders of the party. Of course, the other theory doing the rounds
sees the apparent disconnect as orchestrated.

Opposition unity?

Last week, Uttar Pradesh chief minister and BSP chief Mayawati sprang
a surprise by siding with the UPA government on the issue of cut
motions moved by the Opposition in Parliament. Lalu and Mulayam Singh
Yadav also refused to vote along with the Left and the BJP against the
Congress. Opposition unity, much talked about after the united walk-
out during the tabling of the Budget on February 26, was left in...

More from Politics

Tough battle ahead, predict CPM district units
http://www.financialexpress.com/news/tough-battle-ahead-predict-cpm-district-units/614024/
Father, son and a state called Jharkhand
http://www.financialexpress.com/news/father-son-and-a-state-called-jharkhand/614023/
26/11: Judgment day
http://www.financialexpress.com/news/26-11-judgment-day/614022/
SH Kapadia appointed new CJI
http://www.financialexpress.com/news/sh-kapadia-appointed-new-cji/613601/
In Lalgarh, Maoist infighting escalates, claims lives
http://www.financialexpress.com/news/in-lalgarh-maoist-infighting-escalates-claims-lives/613600/
Manmohan, Gilani break Indo-Pak ice at Thimphu
http://www.financialexpress.com/news/manmohan-gilani-break-indopak-ice-at-thimphu/613141/
BJP pulls the plug on Jharkhand government
http://www.financialexpress.com/news/bjp-pulls-the-plug-on-jharkhand-government/612606/

http://www.financialexpress.com/news/Pick-of-The-week/614025/

JVM MLA demands fresh probe into Soren's Kudko case
Sanjiv Shekhar, TNN, Apr 17, 2010, 09.47pm IST

Tags:JVM|Soren's Kudko

RANCHI: Launching a scathing attack on the functioning of the 108-day-
old led Shibu Soren government in the state, Jharkhand Vikas Morcha
(JVM) MLA Pradeep Yadav requested the high court to conduct a fresh
probe into the Kudko killing in which Soren is the prime accused.

He said the court should look into the matter afresh as to whether the
state was trying to influence the court at the lower level owing to
which the case has been transferred to another court and the judgment
deferred till May 15.

Yadav was speaking to the press on Saturday and left no stone unturned
while narrating the continuous failure of the government ever since it
assumed charge on December 30, 2009.

Shibu Soren has been named accused in the murder of two persons
following a dispute over two goats at Kudko village in Giridih
district in April 1974. The JVM MLA demanded the resignation of Soren,
who has been holding a coveted post in an unconstitutional manner and
is not even the member of the Assembly either.

"Soren should resign with immediate effect or else we'll be compelled
to take to the streets," Yadav warned. The firebrand JVM leader, also
a former minister, who had cornered the Soren government on many
fronts in the recently concluded budget session of the Assembly,
minced no words in castigating BJP that is supporting Soren. "This
(read BJP) was the party that had stalled Lok Sabha proceedings and
dubbed Shibu Soren as criminal. But now, the party has decided to grab
power by hook or crook," claimed the JVM leader.

He said a Congress-JVM delegation would be meeting the Governor on
April 30 to demand the dismissal of the Soren government. "Then, we
will move court," said Yadav.

The JVM leader strongly held that the government has not even moved
108 centimetre in 108 days. All it's claims mentioned in the 100-day
agenda has proved to be a fiasco. The decision taken at the cabinet
meeting was never executed like the manner in which providing
residential certificate in seven days, providing ration card within 15
days, providing rice to the poor, repair of tube wells despite rising
temperature and re-survey of the below poverty line population, have
not been implemented. The latest announcement of holding panchayat
polls by June 30, too, would prove to be a blatant lie on part of the
government as it was not competent enough to hold elections, Yadav
asserted.

He alleged that the government was anti-government and was doing
everything possible to hamper the interest of the common people.
Citing examples, Yadav said the enhancement of VAT in diesel from 14%
to 20%, withdrawal of subsidy for LPG and hike in the Kujju diversion
budget from Rs 7 crore to 11 crore to serve the interests of a
particular minister are some of the glaring instances. "We will be
staging a demonstration at the Kujju diversion under the leadership of
former chief minister Babulal Marandi to highlight the malicious
intention of the government," said the JVM leader.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ranchi/JVM-MLA-demands-fresh-probe-into-Sorens-Kudko-case/articleshow/5825898.cms

Judgment in murder case against Soren deferred
2010-04-17 11:20:00

A fast track court Saturday deferred the judgement in a 36-year-old
double murder case involving Jharkhand Chief Minister Shibu Soren and
will hear fresh arguments May 15.

Soren appeared in court Saturday and the judge asked the two sides
whether they wanted to make fresh argument in the case. Both sides
agreed and the court posted the matter for hearing May 15.

The case is related to murder of two people over a dispute over
killing of two goats. The murders took place at Kodko village of
Giridih district in April 1974.

Soren was made accused of inciting a mob to kill Chundi Singh and
Khirodhar Singh, who were accused of stealing two goats and killing
them. There were a total 10 accused in the case. The charge sheet
against all accused, including Soren, was filed in 1978. Eight accused
were acquitted in 1986 and one died during trial.

The case against Soren was pending as he failed to appear in court
earlier. A warrant pending against Soren surfaced in 2004 and he then
surrendered. He was later released on bail.

The murder case was transferred to the fast track court of Mohammad
Qasim in Giridih just three days before the judgment date. On April 3,
Soren had appeared in the court of Additional District Judge N.N.
Singh. The hearing was completed and the judgment was reserved and was
scheduled to be delivered Saturday.

But just days before the judgment day, Singh separated himself from
the case and Giridih District Judge Sanjay Kumar transferred the case
to the fast track court of Mohammad Qasim.

http://sify.com/news/judgment-in-murder-case-against-soren-deferred-news-national-kerlucegjig.html

2 days before ruling on Soren, judge opts out, murder case
transferred5 Comments | Post CommentLarger | Smaller Manoj Prasad
Tags : Shibu Soren, Kudco murder case, Mohammed Kasim

Posted: Saturday , Apr 17, 2010 at 0305 hrs
Ranchi: Valentine Gift'sDiscussionBlogsWhat's bedi's own co... - By
amit
What sort of unworth... - By Abhishek
Well played team ind... - By Dr. Cajetan Coelho
Du:scientific way of... - By Gagan Sharga
Iaea probing du - By J.M.Manchanda
Sad: stupid smartnes... - By Vijay
Techie - By Peter

Out of turn?Excellence through the GitaThe Cricket MonsterLeapords
lost in Haryana

The Kudco murder case, in which Jharkhand Chief Minister Shibu Soren
is an accused, has been transferred to another judge — two days before
the ruling was to be made. Arguments and counter-arguments in the
case, which took years to record evidence, will now begin afresh.



Giridih additional district and sessions judge N N Singh had fixed
April 17 as the date for judgment in the Kudco murder case. But on
April 13, he sent a letter to district and sessions judge Sanjay
Prasad, seeking transfer of the case to some other court. “My
submission is based on some reasons,” Singh stated in his letter.



Prasad accepted his plea and transferred the case to the court of
Mohammed Kasim. Evidence and statements will now have to be placed in
the court of Kasim where the prosecution and defence will begin
arguments afresh.



The case dates back to April 15, 1974 when two residents of Kudco
village in Giridih, Chundi Singh and Khirodhar Singh, were killed in a
group clash after they allegedly stole and killed some goats,
according to the chargesheet submitted by police on December 14, 1978
against 10 accused, including Soren.





There were 19 witnesses including three ASIs. While nine witnesses
have since died, another five including the ASIs and the doctor who
conducted the post-mortem, could not be traced.

Eight accused were acquitted earlier. Soren was to be present in the
court of Singh to hear the verdict

on April 17.

5 Comments |

This is a shame on Judiciary
By: Manoj | Saturday , 17 Apr '10 12:02:23 PM

This a shame on the part of the Judiciary, Chief Justice of India and
Prime Minister's must be looking into this case as they have shown
concerns over the long trials. If the cases can not be concluded in 36
years then where India is going you know.

This is Indian judiciary and democracy. Wow
By: Ayyappa | Saturday , 17 Apr '10 11:30:49 AM

This is democracy for the criminals, by the criminals and of the
criminals. The whole system is a rotten system and there is no merit
in spending money on these people. Those who are powerful will escape
punishment with the overt tactics of people like these. They need only
the salary not the duty.

Oops 1974 and yet going on
By: arun kumar | Saturday , 17 Apr '10 10:32:08 AM

It has taken 36 years still the decision is pending. Does it explain
the real condition of Judiciary in India? Is India not a failed state?

What does it indicate?
By: Santokh Singh Sahi | Saturday , 17 Apr '10 5:32:02 AM

Another day, the judge who passed death sentence in a case in the
State of Haryana,is feeling insecure.Today. a judge who was about to
announce the judgement, has asked for transfer of the case for
personal reason.Is it not alarming? What does it indicate?If the
judges feel threatend and tend to succumb to the threats, who else
will dare to speak/act? Is the State powerless?Does Constitution
permit it?What will happen to rule of law for aam admi?Who can protect
citizens? These and many more such issues need to be answerd by all
the institutions and individuals,who get paid by the taxes. It is
time, WE the PEOPLE have to take courage and fix responsibilty on
those forces, who are trying to play with the system.It is still time
to ensure safety and security of all the citizens and not only of the
few privileged.Let us see what the authorities take action to ensure
that rule of law and not man prevails.

Soren and BJP
By: s ramji | Saturday , 17 Apr '10 4:18:54 AM

Hello BJP you do remember one name called sibu soren - You stalled the
proceedings saying that he should be dropped from the ministry - just
as you are now asking for Mr Shashi Tharoor's resignation. Do you know
where sibu soren is now. Do you know anything about these cases and
papers appearing in the newspapers. Who will have to ask for
resignation of Soren and who has to stop the Parliament- So if Shashi
Tharoor defects to BJP alliance, it would be alright but if he is in
the other camp - Parliament will have to be stalled . A good lesson to
learn from BJP.

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/2-days-before-ruling-on-soren-judge-opts-out-murder-case-transferred/607641/

Who said 'united' opposition can't give rocking time to one and all?
29 Apr 2010, 0330 hrs IST,C L Manoj,ET Bureau

Topics:Congress Mulayam singh Deve Gowda Shibu Soren Bhajan Lal Ajit
Singh Janata Dal Soren government Chadrashekhara Rao

NEW DELHI: Blame it, if you may, on CBI, shoddy skills of BJP-Left
strategists or killer instincts of seasoned Congress managers. But
Saffronites
and Reds, who wove a broad spectrum, overcoming an ideological gulf,
find themselves in a state of `political maya’ after their comical
self-goal on cut motions.

Mr Shibu Soren’s spectacular cross-voting, Mulayam-Lalu duo’s
`socialist betrayal’ of comrades and Mayawati’s `game-changer’ googly
were only a few highlights of a show that once again demonstrated that
in realpolitik, spin doctors cannot match the gameplan of silent
performers. A day after the ‘floor collapse,’ BJP and Left find
themselves in a piquant situation: They can’t tell who all are with
them and who all have taken them for a ride.

While the Yadav duo openly derailed the Left’s latest 13-party third
front, another fellow-traveller threw a spanner with his absence. The
three Janata Dal (Secular) MPs led by Deve Gowda failed to turn up for
voting. A day after the vanishing act, a much-relaxed Gowda was seen
in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday.

The two-member TRS led by Chadrashekhara Rao and ‘Congress rebel’
Bhajan Lal, whom the ‘grand opposition alliance’ counted in its ranks,
too gave the show a timely miss.

While clueless BJP managers had flown in Shibu Soren, only to gift a
vote to the rival camp, the cool confidence of Congress managers was
evident when they called off their plan to ferry in ailing MPs — one
from Congress and the another from the Trinamool — on realising that
they had secured the numbers. BJP, on the other hand found 5 of its
MPs were missing. Party managers are to seek an explanation from three
of them.

The indirect support to UPA extended by BSP, SP and RJD also spoilt
Left `ally’ Ajit Singh’s secret plot. Mr Singh, leader of five-member
RLD, had been secretly negotiating with Congress till a week ago. Ajit
Singh had been seeking a Cabinet post, while Congress managers were
telling him to settle for a minister of state post for son Jayant when
the scales suddenly tipped in the government’s favour, leaving him
stuck with the Opposition.

Though the 14-member BJD voted along with the Opposition, some of its
leaders had conveyed to the Left that they were in no tearing hurry to
vote out the UPA government and face elections.

Having won the last election without BJP, Mr Navin Patnaik’s party was
keen on retaining its anti-Congress image but not by being a camp
follower of Left or BJP.

Left leaders are busy counting the number of times Mr Mulayam Singh
has ditched them.

They recollect at least five instances: Samajwadi Party rocking the
1999 bid to form a `secular’ government after the fall of the second
Vajpayee regime; demolishing Left resistance against

NDA presidential nominee Abdul Kalam in 2002; Mulayam becoming chief
minister with NDA blessings in 2003; torpedoing Left’s anti-nuclear
deal crusade and now the under-cutting in the Lok Sabha.

However, the unkindest cut of Mulayam-Lalu was their parting shot:
Asking the Left to explain their `joint-venture’ with ‘communal’ BJP.
Congress is re-playing the query in West Bengal and Kerala, with an
eye on the minority votes.

The most bitter mouthful for BJP came at chief Nitin Gadkari’s dinner
on Tuesday night, to which Mr Soren was invited before his voting
preference on the cut motions became evident.

Guruji turned up for his dinner appointment with a shaken BJP chief,
which turned out to be the ‘last supper’, given BJP’s decision to
withdraw support to the Soren government in Jharkhand subsequently.

Who said the ‘combined Opposition’ can’t provide a rocking time to one
and all?

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/Who-said-united-opposition-cant-give-rocking-time-to-one-and-all/articleshow/5870535.cms

Corruption in high places
Cut in Delhi, run in Ranchi
M J Akbar

'The DMK movement has lost its dynamic hold as it has succeeded in its
caste-empowerment agenda.'

A cut motion is moved in the Lok Sabha to wound the Congress alliance
in Delhi and a BJP alliance a thousand miles away, in Ranchi, begins
to bleed to death. Is there a rational connection between cause and
consequence apart from the compulsions of an ageing politician
suspected of more crimes than we can count without being a
professional mathematician? If the story were only about the addictive
duplicity of a drama-centric Shibu Soren, it might be worth a fleeting
sneer but not much comment. If the BJP has made its bed with Soren,
then it can hardly afford to get hysterical at infidelity. Some
politicians do not offer their souls at wholesale rates; they bargain
for small pieces, a bit at a time, at rates negotiated by market
value. If the price is occasionally set by police officers of the CBI,
that is par for the course in an age of turbulent corruption. The
great merit of the Congress is that its expertise in the use of power
for the benefit of the party, whether through public policy or private
pressure, is unmatched. When the BJP tried similar tactics, it fell on
its face. Its nose is still in disrepair.

Cause and consequence may both be obscured by facts. The turmoil in
Delhi, with the ruling alliance being hammered for corruption on a
scale unprecedented in the history of the UPA, is not accidental. Very
little happens by accident; and information is certainly never leaked
inadvertently. There are political reasons why a spat between the look-
alikes Shashi Tharoor and Lalit Modi blew up like an Iceland volcano,
and spread a cloud of ash over the ruling alliance that has left the
biggest of big boys wheezing and a number of small boys in self-
pitying tears. The telephone tapping brouhaha that followed did not
fall into the lap of journalists like nature’s gentle rain from
heaven. The transcripts which exposed DMK’s A Raja did not multiply by
themselves, like excessively enthusiastic amoeba. Someone leaked that
evidence, and it was not the hand of God. The fingerprints belonged to
someone in government.

The massive Raja scam, with heavily-lubricated PR agencies, semi-
lubricated journalists, and triple-dealing corporations, could have
been news more than a year ago. It was not. The general elections had
not taken place, and the allies would have been foolish to injure each
other before an election. On the face of it, the UPA victory of 2009
reinforced the status quo. In reality, it energised the momentum for
equations of the second decade of the 21st century.

Multi-party partnerships

The first decade began with the NDA victory under Atal Behari
Vajpayee. Those 10 years were stable precisely because of multi-party
partnerships. Every member of the group was allotted a relevant share
of the cake, inducing comfort. The NDA was so comfortable that it
became complacent, and was punished. Both the Congress and the BJP are
aware, even if they do not find it expedient to say so, that the next
stage in the evolution of Indian democracy will be the gradual
elimination of the smaller parties, many of whom are making themselves
irrelevant, either because of their inflexible attitude to leadership
or because the issues that brought them into power have outlived its
utility.

The paradox can be cruel: the DMK movement, for instance, has lost its
dynamic hold on Tamil affections precisely because it has succeeded in
its caste-empowerment agenda. It has ruled, in one form or the other,
since 1967. A new generation awaits a new agenda, and there is no sign
of it. DMK leaders have no idea what to do next, except repeat squalid
and vicious wars of succession that went out of fashion in the 18th
century. If that is the story of the apex, then the leaders on the
rung just below are busy looting with a voracious and inexhaustible
appetite. Who can blame the Congress for hoping that it can replace
the DMK? The squeeze has begun through an exposure of sleaze. Such
exposure played a crucial part in the decimation of Lalu Yadav in
Bihar. Lalu did not believe he was being sliced in a pincer; neither
does the DMK. It will find out when it is too late.

It is equally obvious that the Congress is not entirely unhappy over
the tribulations of Sharad Pawar; Maharashtra is another large state
where it can bid for sole supremacy. Once again, the spillage of
sleaze on a partner’s reputation does not hurt the Congress, but
creates space that it can capture when time creates the opportunity.
This is not a drama of continual thunder and lightning; it is a play
dominated by long periods of silence, interspersed by occasional bouts
of decisive intervention. So stories will rattle through media only to
disappear, and then reappear when the optimal moment arrives.

The BJP has begun to realise the futility of allies that take more
than they offer. If it wants to return to the spotlight, it must
reconstruct; and the architecture of reconstruction cannot be left to
the fringe. We will see a gradual but inevitable effort to expand by
the Congress and BJP, and in doing so they will disturb the patterns
of the last 10 years. There will be patches in the new quilts as well,
but far less patchwork.

http://www.deccanherald.com/content/67138/cut-delhi-run-ranchi.html

...and I am Sid Harth
navanavonmilita
2010-05-15 13:03:28 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/political-bog-sid-harth-2/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-2/

Huddle of 8 MLAs thickens JMM plot
SUMAN K. SHRIVASTAVA

Ranchi, May 14: The anti-Hemant Soren lobby became active again today
to drum up support in favour of chief minister Shibu Soren taking
advantage of the BJP’s inability to declare a chief ministerial
nominee.

At least eight MLAs went into a huddle at a hotel in Jamshedpur and
vowed to ensure that Soren wasn’t replaced by a BJP nominee. They
included Simon Marandi, Teklal Mahto, Champai Soren, Deepak Birua,
Vidyut Baran Mahto, Lobin Hembrom, Nalin Soren and Lobin Hembrom.

The group also claimed support of two other MLAs, namely, Soren’s
daughter-in-law Sita and Paulus Surin, who is in jail.

Simon told The Telegraph the MLAs were firm in their support for
Soren. “It is inhuman to humiliate and oust Guruji, who has struggled
for 40 years for a separate state,” he maintained.

Though none would admit it, party sources claimed the MLAs might have
got tacit support from Soren himself. “Soren senior might be using
these MLAs to cut Hemant to size,” a source close to Guruji said.

Chaibasa MLA Deepak Birua said the political stalemate was sending a
wrong message to the people. “So, we decided to ask Guruji to tell the
BJP clearly that he will be continuing till June 29,” he said, adding
the BJP’s indecisiveness was leading the state to President’s rule.

However, their rivals claimed the MLAs’ stand was denting the
credibility of the JMM further. “We are already known for taking
whimsical decisions. So, if we go back on our pledge to the BJP, no
political party will be willing to do business with us in future,”
said a source close to Hemant.

For now, the JMM has constituted an 11-member core committee to take
decisions on the organisational issues in view of the changing
political scenario. The members include Hemant Soren, Teklal Mahto,
Haji Hussain Ansari, Champai Soren, Hemlal Murmu, Sudhir Mahto,
Shashank Shekhar Bhokta, Mohan Karmakar, Supriyo Bhattacharya,
Jagannath Mahto and Vinod Pandey.

The notification was signed by Soren.

Ajsu chief and deputy chief minister Sudesh Mahto appeared cut up and
said the BJP and JMM should behave responsibly to end the impasse
immediately in the larger interest of the state.

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100515/jsp/frontpage/story_12451393.jsp

RSS whip only way out of govt deadlock

- Gadkari holds late night discussions with Rajnath, Advani; plans to
meet Bhagwat in Nagpur today
RADHIKA RAMASESHAN

New Delhi, May 14: The RSS is expected to finally step in and sort out
the BJP’s sticking points that have thwarted a resolution to the
Jharkhand impasse, a final decision on which is likely by Saturday or
Sunday.

BJP president Nitin Gadkari will be in Nagpur — the RSS’s headquarters
— on Saturday and will meet “sarsanghachalak” Mohanrao Bhagwat and his
aides to thrash out the problems. It will be communicated to New Delhi
after which a formal announcement is likely.

The BJP president was back in New Delhi late this evening from a three-
day visit in Punjab and went into a meeting of party general
secretaries to sort out organisational matters. Late tonight, he held
a meeting with Rajnath Singh and L.K. Advani on the Jharkhand impasse.

Gadkari was spending his last few hours in New Delhi because after his
Nagpur stopover he would proceed to Mumbai and fly to Europe on a
vacation. He will be back on May 27.

But if the RSS made up its mind and by implication the BJP’s, the
announcement could be made by Rajnath or another central leader.

Among the outstanding issues were Advani and Sushma Swaraj’s
opposition to the JMM’s demand for a “28-28” arrangement that
essentially entailed sharing the chief minister’s post for those many
months between the BJP and the JMM.

Since other leaders were inclined to accepting the formula, the RSS
might decide to disregard Advani and Sushma’s objections and go with
the majority view.

This apart, the JMM hasn’t complied with any of the BJP’s primary
demands. Soren and Co is yet to issue a comprehensive letter of
support to a BJP-led government. The letter would have to be signed by
all its 18 MLAs so that the BJP was certain there was no split in the
party.

The BJP also sought Shibu Soren’s resignation letter simultaneously.
So far, there has been no sign of that.

Lastly, the BJP, too, hasn’t been able to firm up its chief
ministerial candidate.

Arjun Munda, the projected front-runner, is camping in New Delhi,
having enlisted the patronage of a Mumbai-based corporate house with
mining interests in Jharkhand. “Friends of this industrial house, it
is reliably learnt, have been meeting MLAs and some central leaders to
push for Munda, a former chief minister and now MP from Jamshedpur.

Munda, who refused to take calls today, is backed by Rajnath Singh,
M.Venkaiah Naidu and Ananth Kumar.

To scuttle Munda’s chances, a couple of central leaders opposed to
Rajnath, floated former Union minister Yashwant Sinha’s candidacy,
resting their case on the point that Jharkhand needed “good
governance” and he had the experience and skills for providing it.

Sinha, who hasn’t been on the best of terms with any of those leaders,
was baffled when his name cropped up and has since made himself
incommunicado for fear of falling foul of the RSS that might suspect
him of leveraging his perceived image.

Gadkari and BJP general secretary in charge of the organisation Ramlal
have favoured the deputy chief minister Raghubar Das. Their clout with
the Sangh — Ramlal is the designated pointsperson dealing with the RSS
— might boost Das’s chances but for the fact he was a non-tribal.

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100515/jsp/frontpage/story_12451426.jsp

Shibu Soren fails to appear before court
PTI
Saturday, May 15, 2010 17:53 IST

Giridih (Jharkhand): Jharkhand chief minister Shibu Soren today failed
to appear before a local court, which is hearing afresh the 1974 Kodko
double murder case in which Soren is the lone accused.

You may also want to see

Girl raped and murdered in Jharkhand
http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_girl-raped-and-murdered-in-jharkhand_1383437
Maoist leader Kishenji calls for 48-hour bandh in five states
http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_maoist-leader-kishenji-calls-for-48-hour-bandh-in-five-states_1383300
BJP top brass fail to decide on forming govt in Jharkhand
http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_bjp-top-brass-fail-to-decide-on-forming-govt-in-jharkhand_1383269
JMM MLAs want Soren to continue as chief minister
http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_jmm-mlas-want-soren-to-continue-as-chief-minister_1383184

The court of ADJ (Fast-track-9) Mohammad Qasim's court fixed June
three as the next date for hearing.

The court will start fresh hearing after the case was transferred to
it following a request by the First Additional District and Sessions
court of NN Singh, on April 16, which had already concluded hearing
and reserved its judgement on April 3.

An FIR was filed on April 15, 1974 by one Bahadur Singh accusing Soren
of heading a group that allegedly killed Khirodar Singh and Chundi
Singh following slaughter of a goat at Kudko village under Pirtand
police station. The charge-sheet was filed in 1978.

Soren is the sole accused now since eight others were acquitted in
1986.

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_shibu-soren-fails-to-appear-before-court_1383478

...and I am Sid Harth
navanavonmilita
2010-05-15 17:57:29 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/political-bog-sid-harth-2/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-2/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliancesand-unholy-alliances-sid-harth/

should end suspense, says AJSU; Cong waits in Jharkhand
Updated on Saturday, May 15, 2010, 20:32 IST

Tags: Jharkhand, BJP, AJSUBuzz up! Share Ranchi: With the BJP still
indecisive over formation of a new government in Jharkhand, an ally of
the Shibu Soren government Saturday urged the saffron party to end the
suspense, while the opposition Congress said it was still waiting and
watching.

"We would like the BJP to take a decision at the earliest to end the
suspense," AJSU vice-president Pravin Prabhakar said.

In the 82-member Jharkhand Assembly, the new coalition will have 45
members. JMM and BJP have 18 members each, AJSU five and JD-U two. Two
Independents are also in this grouping.

Jharkhand PCC president Pradeep Kumar Balmachu, on the other hand
said, "We are not in favour of pushing out somebody from his chair or
in favour of a mid-term poll. We are just observing. If a situation
emerges, then we will see what can be done."

Asked about the reported meeting between him and some JMM MLAs led by
Simon Marandi, who has been demanding that Shibu Soren continue as
chief minister, he said "every day he talks to me."

Marandi at a meeting with eight JMM MLAs yesterday in Jamshedpur had
said they favoured continuation of Soren as chief minister and there
was no need for replacing him midway.

He had also accused Delhi-based political parties of hindering
Jharkhand's development and said he did not want Jharkhand to run on
"remote control" or "Delhi's interference".

http://www.zeenews.com/news626963.html

BJP blackmailing JMM, claims JPCC president Balmuchu
Updated on Friday, May 14, 2010, 22:46 IST

Tags: BJP, blackmail, JMM, JPCC, president, BalmuchuBuzz up!
Share Ranchi: With the uncertainty over formation of a new government
in Jharkhand due to differences between the BJP and JMM, JPCC
president Pradeep Kumar Balmuchu on Friday claimed that the BJP was
"blackmailing" its ally.

"The BJP has been blackmailing the JMM for seventeen days now ... they
have failed to decide on ending the political uncertainty in
Jharkhand," Balmachu said here.

He said he would go to Delhi tomorrow to apprise the party leadership
about the political situation in the state and meet the governor on
his return.

Meanwhile, five JMM MLAs -- Champai Soren, Bidyoot Barun Mahto, Ramdas
Soren, Dipak Birua, who had yesterday demanded that Shibu Soren
continue as chief minister for the first 28 months of a new
government, were meeting in Jamshedpur.

Senior party MLA Simon Marandi was also joining the meeting, a
Jamshedpur report said.

PTI

http://www.zeenews.com/news626791.html

Dissolve Soren Govt: Marandi
Updated on Thursday, May 13, 2010, 18:57 IST

Tags: Marandi, Soren Govt, DissolveBuzz up! Share Ranchi: Former
Jharkhand Chief Minister today urged Governor M O H Farooq to dismiss
the Shibu Soren government "as the Chief Minister was not inclined to
enter the assembly by June 30".

"As it is there is no time left for the Chief Minister to fight a
bypoll and enter the assembly. This is the third time Shibu Soren
became the chief minister without being a member of the house. This is
against constitutional norms," Marandi who led a party delegation to
the Rajbhavan told newsmen.

Soren, who took oath on December 30, should enter the house by June
30. There is no vacant assembly seat in the state.

Heading a delegation of his Jharkhand Vikas Morcha (Prajatantric),
Marandi said the 17-day stalemate between the BJP and the JMM had
halted the state's development work, "putting the state's future in
jeopardy'.

"At first we want dissolution of the house. After that we will see,"
Marandi said when asked whether he had requisite numbers to claim
formation of government.

Meanwhile, the BJP is still to make a formal announcement on its chief
ministerial candidate and the JMM's demand for power sharing on 50:50
basis.

PTI

http://www.zeenews.com/news626446.html

JharkhandI work for the people: Soren
Updated on Thursday, May 13, 2010, 14:26 IST

Tags: Jharkhand, Shibu SorenBuzz up! Share Ranchi: Keeping everyone
guessing about his intentions on the formation of a new government in
Jharkhand, JMM chief Shibu Soren on Thursday said that he "worked for
the people as a social worker and not as a politician."

"I work for the people... I don't go to anybody nor do I call
anybody," Soren told a news agency apparently referring to the
lingering stalemate over the vexed issue of government formation.

He evaded giving a clear reply on the BJP's insistence of heading the
government for the remaining four-and-a-half year term and his party's
demand for a rotational government.

"Jharkhand was destined to be created, and I have struggled hard for
this... but things did not happen as desired," the JMM chief,
popularly known as Guruji, said.

PTI

http://www.zeenews.com/news626345.html

http://www.zeenews.com/search.html/Shibu%20Soren

...and I am Sid Harth
navanavonmilita
2010-05-16 12:23:53 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/political-bog-sid-harth-2/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-2/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliancesand-unholy-alliances-sid-harth/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-3/

BJP squabbling holds Jharkhand decision hostage
Neena Vyas

During the long dialogue, JMM kept changing its “offer”

NEW DELHI: The more the Bharatiya Janata Party leadership discusses
the Jharkhand tangle, the more it seems confused and unable to move
forward. Even if a decision is taken in a day or two, the BJP would
still have taken about 20 days to resolve the crisis it had created
for a government, in which it is a partner.

The issue, it seems, has now become hostage to the BJP's internal
squabbles that were papered over in the first few months of Nitin
Gadkari's presidentship as individual leaders tried to influence him
to make appointments of their political ‘chelas' and flunkeys.

After hastily announcing withdrawal of support to the Shibu Soren
government, the party quietly put that decision on hold. It suddenly
dawned on the BJP that withdrawal of support would be like cutting off
one's nose to spite the face.

It would have meant loss of a government in the mineral-rich State and
much else. Worse, imposition of President's Rule by the Centre,
justifiable given the fractured mandate of the last Assembly election,
would send a wrong political signal to Bihar, where Assembly elections
are due in 4-5 months.

And all this for what? After all, what did Mr. Soren do except vote
against the NDA-sponsored cut motion in the Lok Sabha? The Jharkhand
Mukti Morcha was under no obligation to follow the BJP's diktat on the
vote, it is a separate party with its own views on various matters. It
is not even a member of the National Democratic Alliance, which the
BJP leadership was fond of emphasising as a conglomeration of
alliances at the State level. For years various NDA partners fought
elections against one another except in those States where an
electoral understanding had been reached.

Just a day before the cut motion, Leader of the Opposition Sushma
Swaraj herself pointed out that only three parties were the BJP's NDA
partners — the Shiv Sena, the Janata Dal (United) and the Akali Dal.
The JD (U) voted differently from the BJP on the crucial women's
reservation Bill in the Rajya Sabha quite recently, while the Sena had
refused to follow the BJP line in the presidential election,
preferring to vote for the United Progressive Alliance candidate,
Pratibha Patil. The BJP then did not threaten to break the alliance
with the JD(U) in Bihar and bring down the Nitish Kumar government, or
snap its decades-long relationship with the Sena. Then why the fuss on
the JMM vote?

When all this was discussed and the JMM dangled the carrot of
supporting a BJP-led government in Jharkhand, the leadership had to
give in and keep in abeyance its withdrawal of support decision.

Then began the long and painful dialogue with the JMM, which,
apparently, kept changing its “offer.” It first agreed to extend
support to a BJP Chief Minister for the remainder of the Assembly
tenure, but later insisted on rotation of the post between the two
parties.

Again, that was logical for, less than five months ago the BJP agreed
to support a JMM-led government for a full term of five years. (Both
parties have 18 MLAs each.) Most leaders agreed, except a few
including L.K. Advani. What his argument was against rotation was not
quite clear, as he himself had recommended such an arrangement in
other States.

Then as the BJP leadership began discussing possible chief ministerial
names, many leaders jumped into the fray either to get their man in
that hot seat or ensure that the person perceived to be the “other”
leader's man did not get the job. This led to tussles in the party
making a deal with the JMM difficult.

Party sources disclosed that the latest effort was to scuttle the
consensus on Arjun Munda — who is apparently the Jharkhand BJP
legislators' choice. One State leader, Raghuvar Das, who has the
backing of BJP general secretary (organisation) at the central level,
reportedly incited a few JMM legislators to make a new “first turn for
the JMM in the rotational arrangement” demand, knowing this would not
be accepted by the party leadership. There is a view that this is
being done deliberately to scuttle the consensus on Munda.

Here is where the matter is stuck. Mr. Gadkari will be away for 10-15
days on a holiday — that plan has been postponed by a day to enable
him to attend the funeral of the former Vice-President Bhairon Singh
Shekhawat on Sunday — and he is expected to authorise a couple of
senior leaders to take and announce a decision in his absence. There
are some in the party who are not happy about this delegation of
authority. And that is where the matter stands.

Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Sunday, May 16, 2010
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version

http://www.thehindu.com/2010/05/16/stories/2010051657541400.htm

Arjun Munda to become Jharkhand CM?
STAFF WRITER 16:59 HRS IST

Ranchi, May 16 (PTI) BJP MP from Jamshedpur Arjun Munda today appeared
to be the chief ministerial candidate in Jharkhand as the party has
given him the responsibility to explore government formation in the
state.

"The BJP leadership has decided that government should be formed in
Jharkhand, and has given me the responsibility to talk to the allies
in this regard," Munda, a former chief minister, said at the airport
here on his return from Delhi.

Asked whether that meant the BJP had officially named him as the chief
ministerial candidate, Munda said "A decision will be taken at a
meeting of the legislative party, where central leaders will be
present."

He said he would meet all the allies, including Chief Minister Shibu
Soren.

BJP sources said the party had not announced Munda's name for the CM's
post officially due to the death of former Vice President Bhairon
Singh Shekhawat yesterday.

http://www.ptinews.com/news/655375_Arjun-Munda-to-become-Jharkhand-CM-

Some parties are trying to divide votes: Mamata
STAFF WRITER 19:58 HRS IST

Kolkata, May 15 (PTI) In a veiled attack on Congress with which it
failed to reach a seat-sharing deal for the May 30 civic polls,
Trinamool Congress chief Mamata Banerjee today said some forces were
trying to divide votes to help the ruling CPI(M) win.

"Some are contesting to divide votes and help the CPI(M) win. But
Trinamool Congress is the actual anti-CPI(M) nationalist party,"
Banerjee told an election meeting in support of party candidates for
the Kolkata Municipal Corporation here.

She said that the last Lok Sabha election had shown that the CPI(M)
could be defeated. Of the 15 Lok Sabha seats which the Marxist party
had won in the state, seven were due to BJP, she claimed.

Banerjee alleged that the CPI(M) were intimidating people by saying
there would be bloodshed. "We don't compromise with CPI(M).

http://www.ptinews.com/news/654550_Some-parties-are-trying-to-divide-votes--Mamata

BSP to decide on contesting SGPC elections tomorrow
STAFF WRITER 21:47 HRS IST

Phagwara, May 15 (PTI) The BSP will take a final decision on
contesting the forthcoming SGPC polls tomorrow, its secretary Narendra
Kashyap said.

"The decision will be taken only after discussing the issue threadbare
with party colleagues at a meeting in Jalandhar tomorrow," Kashyap who
is also in charge of the party's affairs in Punjab told reporters.

Punjab BSP President and Rajya Sabha member Avtar Singh Karimpuri was
also present at the press conference.

He was here to address the state-level conference of BSP's newly-
constituted youth wing with Pritpal Singh Moga as its Convener.

http://www.ptinews.com/news/654711_BSP-to-decide-on-contesting-SGPC-elections-tomorrow

SP to extend issue-based support to UPA: Mulayam
STAFF WRITER 13:20 HRS IST

Ballia (UP), May 15 (PTI) After helping the UPA to breeze through the
cut motions in the Lok Sabha, Samajwadi Party supremo Mulayam Singh
Yadav today said his party would continue to extend "issue-based"
support to the Congress-led coalition.

"Samajwadi Party will continue to give issue-based support to the UPA
government though on people's issues it will continue to register its
protest," Yadav told reporters.

SP with 21 MPs in the Lok Sabha had bailed out the UPA during voting
on the cut motions on April 27 by staging a walkout.

Asked about chances of evolving a Third Front, Yadav said as of now he
was not making any efforts in this regard and has not talked with any
political party. SP was a key ally of the erstwhile United Front
government at the Centre.

http://www.ptinews.com/news/653975_SP-to-extend-issue-based-support-to-UPA--Mulayam

...and I am Sid Harth
navanavonmilita
2010-05-16 20:57:48 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/political-bog-sid-harth-2/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-2/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliancesand-unholy-alliances-sid-harth/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-3/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-4/

BJP's pick Munda meets Soren; consensus still eludes
STAFF WRITER 21:55 HRS IST

Ranchi, May 16 (PTI) After getting a nod from the leadership to go
ahead with government formation in Jharkhand, senior BJP leader Arjun
Munda tonight met Chief Minister Shibu Soren, but it appears that a
consensus is not evolved to end the three-week-old political crisis in
the state.

Munda, who was closeted with Soren and his son Hemant at the latter's
residence for about 50 minutes, drove away to his house without
speaking to the media.

The Sorens also did not speak to the waiting media, indicating that
there were some more "glitches" to settle among the allies before
installing a new government.

Earlier during the day, Munda said, "The BJP leadership has decided
that government should be formed in Jharkhand, and has given me the
responsibility to talk to the allies in this regard.

http://www.ptinews.com/news/655696_BJP-s-pick-Munda-meets-Soren--consensus-still-eludes

BJP objects to MLA's comments against party
STAFF WRITER 23:51 HRS IST

Batala, May 16 (PTI) A BJP MLA's comments against party today landed
him in trouble with some demanding his resignation from the
legislature.

Party also levelled allegations of corruption and nepotism against
Jadgish Sahni.

In a press conference, State President Bhartiya Yuva Janta Morcha
Vivek Sharma and city BJP president Ashok Modgil asked him to resign
from the post.

He had allegedly called BJP as a party of impotents and corrupt
people. They alleged that in the 2009 Lok Sabha polls, the
highhandedness and corrupt practices of the MLA had played a decisive
factor in the defeat of the SAD-BJP candidates.

"Before blaming others, Sahni should check this own deeds. He had
grabbed 30 and 12 marlas of land belonging to Sanatam Dharam Sabha by
transferring the land in the names of his relatives by using his
influence.

http://www.ptinews.com/news/655765_BJP-objects-to-MLA-s-comments-against-party

...and I am Sid Harth
navanavonmilita
2010-05-17 23:07:06 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/political-bog-sid-harth-2/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-2/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliancesand-unholy-alliances-sid-harth/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-3/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-4/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-5/

Munda finds going tough
SUMAN K. SHRIVASTAVA

Chief minister Shibu Soren comes out of his Kanke Road residence in
Ranchi on Monday. Picture by Hardeep Singh

Ranchi, May 17: BJP leader Arjun Munda is trying his best to get the
JMM on board to hammer out an amicable solution to the 20-day
political crisis facing the state government, but Shibu Soren is
proving to be a tough cookie by playing his cards close to his chest.

Munda spent the day holding a series of meetings with Ajsu chief
Sudesh Mahto and Speaker C.P. Singh and also spoke to BJP as well as
JMM MLAs to find a way out of the impasse.

He also held a closed-door meeting with his party’s organisational
secretary, Saudan Singh, Jharkhand in-charge Karuna Shukla and other
office bearers. Earlier in the day, state BJP chief Raghubar Das also
met Shukla.

According to high-level sources, the BJP was ready to accede to the
JMM’s demand for a rotational chief minister provided it got the first
shot at the chair. But, the JMM, it seemed, was opposed to this,
insisting that Soren be allowed to continue as chief minister.

“We want the JMM to lead the government for the first 28 months for
the sake of stability and continuity,” said Vinod Pandey, a member of
the party’s core committee, set up to take policy decisions in case of
political exigencies.

Munda wouldn’t admit the difficult nature of his assignment, claiming
to The Telegraph instead that his talks were positive and that a
solution was in sight. Guruji, too, was positive, he claimed.

For a moment though the BJP thought it was all over when word spread
that Governor M..H. Farook had met advocate-general R.S. Mazumdar,
sparking speculation that President’s rule was imminent in the state.

The governor is understood to have discussed his constitutional duties
under the present circumstances, but Mazumdar denied that politics was
discussed. “It was a general discussion,” he added.

Shukla said that Munda had been asked to work out a formula with the
JMM to run the government. But she clarified that the BJP won’t wait
till June 29 for Soren to step down.

“I believe the imbroglio will be over in a day or two,” she asserted.

However, a key BJP negotiator said that the JMM’s inner contradictions
were holding back a solution.

Soren, apparently oblivious of the BJP-led brainstorming sessions,
attended office today and cleared files for around three hours from 11
am to 2 pm. “He seemed relaxed… not worried at all,” said an aide.

The JMM was waiting for a final word from Soren. He had assured the
party’s core committee of arriving at a decision by Monday. “But he
has not given any signal to step down,” said a source close to Guruji.

Asked for a comment, Seraikela MLA Champai Soren said like everyone
else he too was waiting for Guruji’s decision. “We have nothing to say
when we have authorised him to take a final call,” he added.

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100518/jsp/frontpage/story_12460449.jsp

Congress test case in north
BARUN GHOSH

Mamata Banerjee at a civic poll rally in Calcutta on Monday where she
dubbed Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee “a blot on Left politics” and said her
politics needed no certificate from him. The chief minister had on
Sunday described Trinamul as a “violent, lawless and coercive party”.
Picture by Amit Datta

Calcutta, May 17: The collapse of the alliance with Mamata Banerjee
has presented a challenge before the Congress even in its citadels
like Cooch Behar, Jalpaiguri, Malda and Murshidabad.

In 2009, all the six Lok Sabha seats the Congress won were from the
north Bengal districts.

This time, it had almost stitched up the alliance with the Trinamul
Congress in seven municipalities across Malda, Cooch Behar and
Jalpaiguri when the alliance fell through following Mamata’s refusal
to give more than 25 wards to her ally in the 141-ward Calcutta
Municipal Corporation.

“Barring Murshidabad (where six municipalities are going to the
polls), the alliance with Trinamul was almost final in north Bengal.
But Mamata’s unilateral move to snap the alliance in Calcutta prompted
our leaders in north Bengal to field candidates against Trinamul
nominees,” said state Congress working president Pradip Bhattacharya.

The Congress is now fighting its ally to retain its pockets of
domination in the 13 civic boards across north Bengal.

The region is crucial for the Congress because that is where its
strength lies. Bhattacharya said if the party could reaffirm its grip
on north Bengal, “we would be in a position to enter a hard bargain
with Mamata over seat-sharing for the Assembly polls”.

“A good showing will also allow us to give a fitting reply to Mamata’s
humiliating offer in Calcutta,” a Congress source added.

However, it is easier said than done with Trinamul gnawing at the
Congress’s citadel.

“Going by the overwhelming response to our campaign for change, we are
optimistic about all 13 municipalities,” said Trinamul’s north Bengal
convener Gautam Deb.

Of the four municipalities going to the polls in Cooch Behar, the
Congress controls one — Cooch Behar. The others — Dinhata, Toofanganj
and Mathabhanga — are with the Left.

Much has happened in Bengal politics since the 2005 civic polls,
though.

“Despite our strong presence in Cooch Behar and Dinhata, we are facing
a tough contest from Trinamul nominees in all four municipalities.
Even in a Left bastion like Mathabhanga, Trinamul has two councillors
in the CPM-controlled board,” said district Congress president Biren
Kundu.

In the 2006 Assembly polls, Trinamul had snatched the Dinhata seat
from the Left.

In Jalpaiguri, the Congress controls Jalpaiguri municipality, but
Trinamul hopes to cash in on its infighting. “We shall also use our
victory in the adjoining Rajganj Assembly seat in 2006 as a plank,”
said Jalpaiguri Trinamul president K.K. Kalyani.

In Malda, the Congress and Trinamul together run the Englishbazar
municipality, while the Left controls Old Malda.

“This time, we are confronting Trinamul in both municipalities,” said
Congress district president and Malda South MP A.H. Khan Chowdhury.

In Murshidabad, Trinamul has for the first time fielded candidates for
all 103 wards in the six civic bodies — Murshidabad, Kandi, Beldanga,
Jiaganj-Azimganj, Jangipur and Dhulian. The Congress here controls
Murshidabad and Kandi while the Left controls the remaining four.

“To be able to field so many candidates in Murshidabad is itself a
proof of our strength,” said Utpal Pal, Trinamul’s district youth
president.

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100518/jsp/bengal/story_12461092.jsp

Congress secular jab at Left
SANJAY K. JHA

New Delhi, May 17: Panned over price rise, the Congress is hitting
back at the Left for “sitting in the BJP’s lap”.

Exactly a year after the May 2009 elections threw up signs of Congress
revival, the party claims to have become the sole protector of secular
politics, while accusing its former ally of digesting flagrant
violations by RSS outfits.

“Have we heard even a single strong statement condemning the BJP in
the last one year. Have the CPM and the CPI, continuously attacking
the Congress on price rise and even resorting to a Bharat bandh,
attacked the rent-a-riot saffron brigade of the Ram Sene?” Congress
spokesperson Manish Tiwari said.

“The leaders of the Left are found at the leader of Opposition Sushma
Swaraj’s door; we can say the Left is sitting in the BJP’s lap,” he
added.

Tiwari said the Left must clarify if the threat to India’s secular
polity had ceased, particularly when needles of suspicion for the
blasts in Malegaon, Mecca Masjid, Ajmer and the Samjhauta Express
pointed to outfits that had links with the Sangh parivar.

“The time has come for the government to holistically look at the
entire web of the larger RSS pantheon,” he said, before going on to
add: “Will the secular parties sacrifice their ideology at the altar
of anti-Congressism?”

When pointed out that the Left was only trying to forge parliamentary
strategies on policies they ideologically oppose, he said: “…We have a
simple question: has the threat of communalism died? The Left should
realise there is a permanent fault-line in Indian politics and that is
the RSS challenge to secularism. No party should ignore that.”

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100518/jsp/nation/story_12461132.jsp

Posted: Mon, May 17 2010. 11:55 PM IST

Quick Edit |

Farcical proceedings
Good governance is at a premium in Ranchi today

Someone once said that history repeats itself, the first time as a
tragedy and the second time as a farce. A plot of this kind is
unfolding in Jharkhand.

On Monday, a senior Jharkhand Mukti Morcha leader, Champai Soren, said
his party wanted Shibu Soren to continue as chief minister. This comes
at a time when the Bharatiya Janata Party is unable to decide on a
name for chief ministership, something that has been attributed to
internal squabbling in the party.

Something similar had happened in 2009 when Shibu Soren was asked to
step down by his alliance partner, the United Progressive Alliance. He
complied reluctantly. He is showing the same reluctance again, much to
the detriment of Jharkhand. At that time, too, indecision on the part
of his alliance partners hit governance in the state hard.

Today, the state is a bad advertisement for creating small states. Its
self-obsessed political elite has forgotten the promises made when it
fought for a separate state. Good governance is at a premium in Ranchi
today.

Tags - Find More Articles On: Quick Edit Jharkhand Mukti Morcha
Champai Soren Shibu Soren Bharatiya Janata Party United Progressive
Alliance READ MORE ARTICLES BY:

http://www.livemint.com/2010/05/17235556/Quick-Edit--Farcical-proceedi.html?h=A1

UPA II is proving even worse than UPA I
Last updated on: May 17, 2010 13:33 IST
Tags: Sonia, Manmohan Singh, Congress, Central Bureau of
Investigation, P Chidambaram
Email
thisSave to
My PageAsk
UsersWrite a
CommentAfter a long time, the Congress was being led by politicians of
conviction like Manmohan Singh [ Images ] and P Chidambaram
[ Images ]. But it is again returning to the bad old days of
manipulating vote banks -- the Left one day, the Mandal brigade the
next, the Dalit czarina on the third -- to stay in power.
Amulya Ganguli sums up one year of the United Progressive Alliance's
[ Images ] second coming. A new series to mark the political event:

The Manmohan Singh government's first term created the illusion that
the Congress party had finally been able to develop and implement the
concept of division of power between the party and government.

The ever-prevalent tension between the Congress president and the
prime minister, which used to be a feature of Congress rule earlier,
had apparently given way to an unusual rapport between Sonia Gandhi
[ Images ] and Manmohan Singh. While the latter focussed on running
the country, Sonia concerned herself with organisational affairs.

That this show of harmony did not reflect the reality has now become
evident. It is possible that Sonia was biding her time. She was only
waiting for the Congress's electoral gains, evident from its crossing
of the 200-seat mark in the Lok Sabha, before deciding to make her
presence felt more forcefully. In the process, she seems to have
shattered another illusion -- that she took a decision only after
broad-ranging discussions within the party.

It would be wrong to say that there were no signs of discord during
the government's first term. The most contentious of them was the
difference of opinion between the prime minister and the Congress
president over the nuclear deal with the United States. In fact, Sonia
nearly scuttled the deal before Rahul Gandhi [ Images ] intervened to
save it. The other, relatively minor, divergence of views was on the
rural employment scheme. That Manmohan Singh, as an economist, would
not have agreed to a project which would mean spending crores of
rupees without creating any permanent assets was only to be expected.

Sonia's stance, however, on both the nuclear deal and the employment
scheme was based purely on immediate political calculations without
any thought to long-term consequences. Her opposition to the nuclear
deal was intended to keep the Communists on board so that the
government's majority would not be threatened. She didn't know at the
time that the comrades were not all that indispensable. But she didn't
care that, along with the Left, China and Pakistan would be delighted
if the deal fell through and Indo-US relations remained what they were
in the days of the Cold War.

Sonia's 'socialistic' line on the employment scheme and on loan
waivers for farmers was also solely populist in nature which turned a
blind eye to economic considerations. Rahul Gandhi, however, voiced
his second thoughts on the loan waivers when he said that such
handouts could lead to bankruptcy. That Sonia continues to force the
government to formulate policies with the objective of keeping the
party in power irrespective of the after-effects is again in evidence.

For a start, she pushed through the women's reservation bill in the
Rajya Sabha only to keep its date with International Women's Day, when
it was obvious that there was no consensus on the subject. Her
objective was to win the support of the Communists and a section of
women and the middle class. The backtracking began, however,
immediately afterwards when Pranab Mukherjee [ Images ] had to assure
the disgruntled Yadav trio of Lalu Prasad, Mulayam Singh and Sharad
Yadav that an all-party meeting would be called to discuss the issue.

But Sonia's most portentous foray into areas where angels fear to
tread is with regard to the introduction of caste in the census
enumerations. That the government was clearly unwilling to take this
dangerously divisive step was evident, first from P Chidambaram's
observation that the census officials have no expertise in the matter
and, secondly, from Manmohan Singh's comment that the issue will be
considered by the Cabinet.

But Sonia again persuaded the ever reliable Pranab Mukherjee to
announce the fateful step. By doing so, Sonia was able to win over the
'social justice' group of Yadavs, who may now forgive her over the
women's bill. In any event, the bill is unlikely to become law in the
near future.

As in the case of the nuclear deal where Sonia wanted to retain the
outside support of the Communists, her playing of the 'caste in
census' card was intended to persuade at least two of the Yadavs --
Lalu Prasad and Mulayam Singh -- to continue to back the government
from outside. It is also worth noting that both the decisions on the
women's bill and on caste were taken without wide-ranging discussions
in the party and outside, causing a small section of Congressmen to
say, sotto voce, what was once unthinkable -- that her foreign
background makes her unable to gauge the ramifications of the caste
issue.

What is evident from these expedient manoeuvres, however, is that the
trademark cynicism of the old Congress is back along with its
opportunistic flaunting of its fake socialist credentials. It is
possible that the long years which Sonia spent with Indira Gandhi
[ Images ] made her learn both these tricks. Unfortunately, however,
she is playing these games at a time when India [ Images ] and the
world have changed.

Indira's Garibi Hatao slogan worked when the Berlin Wall was still
standing. Today it is recognised as a sham. Yet the fact that Sonia
retains her faith in her mother-in-law's faux socialism was evident
from her praise of the bank nationalisation of 1969 in the aftermath
of the recent worldwide financial crisis.

If socialism was Sonia's only obsession, one might have regretfully
waited for the country's return to the Hindu rate of growth. But the
Congress's other trait of cynicism is also up and running, as is
evident from the manipulation of the Central Bureau of Investigation
to further its partisan purposes.

A fallout from this ploy was Mayawati's [ Images ] decision to stand
by the government during the Opposition-sponsored debate on the cut
motions. Evidently, the message has gone out to her that the
government will not let the CBI pursue the disproportionate assets
cases against her too vigorously.

What this cosying up to the Dalit czarina also means is that the
Congress itself has undercut its heir apparent Rahul Gandhi's efforts
to rebuild the party's base in UP.

Another facet of the Congress's cynicism was to let the scam-tainted
Telecommunications Minister A Raja continue in office. Like keeping
Mayawati on board, the turning of a blind eye to the allegations
against Raja helps the Congress to keep the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam
[ Images ] on its side. The latter knows that it cannot withdraw
support lest the CBI officer who was transferred for trying to unearth
Raja's secrets is reinstated.

At the same time, Sonia does not seem to mind that the entire episode
shows Manmohan Singh in a poor light. First, it hurts his image of
probity and, second, Raja's continuance in the Cabinet shows that it
is the DMK, and not the prime minister, who decides who will be the
minister.

UPA II, therefore, is proving to be even worse than UPA I.

Any hope that the Left's absence will enable Manmohan Singh to push
ahead with the economic reforms has been dashed by Sonia's replay of
Indira's phony socialism. But an even greater danger than the
stymieing of reforms will be a toning down of the anti-Maoist
offensive, as the comments of factotums like Digvijay Singh [ Images ]
and Mani Shankar Aiyar [ Images ] suggest.

After a long time, the Congress was being led by politicians of
conviction like Manmohan Singh and Chidambaram. But it is again
returning to the bad old days of manipulating vote banks -- the Left
one day, the Mandal brigade the next, the Dalit czarina on the third
-- to stay in power.

But the mistake which Sonia is making is that the middle class today
is much more active and voluble than in Indira's and Rajiv's time.
Tricks like shooting down the Shah Bano judgment to please the
fundamentalist Muslims and opening the Babri Masjid [ Images ] gates
to please the communal Hindus, as Rajiv tried, will no longer work.

It is best for Sonia to let her inner voice tell her to retreat to the
background and let Rahul gradually come to the fore to stand by
Manmohan Singh.

Amulya Ganguli

http://news.rediff.com/column/2010/may/17/amulya-ganguli-on-the-upa-two-government.htm

Sonia slams Mayawati on lack of development in Uttar Pradesh
BS Reporter / New Delhi May 18, 2010, 1:42 IST

With Union Budget 2010-11 passed in Parliament defeating an united
opposition, and with no legislative agenda for the next two months,
the Congress today trained its gun on arch rival Bahujan Samaj Party
(BSP) on its turf, Uttar Pradesh (UP).

This time, the attack came from none other than Sonia Gandhi,
president of the Congress party.

During a trip to Rae Bareli, her Lok Sabha constituency, Sonia Gandhi
slammed UP Chief Minister and BSP leader Mayawati for “misrule and
lack of development”. The state is slated to go for elections in 2012.

The Congress, during the past few elections have maintained to go solo
and fight Mayawati’s BSP, Mulayam Singh Yadav’s Samajwadi Party (SP)
and the BJP simultaneously.

It may be recalled that during a vote on the Budget, when the Left,
the BJP and other parties had brought a cut motion against fuel price
hike, the SP and the RJD staged a walkout weakening the Opposition
strength and the BSP supported the government to pass the demands for
grants of the Budget.

Today, on the first day of her visit, Sonia Gandhi was faced with
angry protestors suffering from massive power cuts in her
constituency. Her convoy was stopped by large groups of angry
villagers on the way to Dalmau. Rae Bareli has been experiencing 10
hours of power cut almost every day, as the state reels from a power
deficit of 1,351 million units. The Congress president heard out the
grievances of the protestors.

Soon, she took up the issue of development to launch an attack on
Mayawati. She said: “A sorry state of affairs continues in the largest
electoral state.” She alleged that despite the Centre’s liberal
assistance, money was not being spent for development programmes.
“Though the Centre is providing crores of rupees to the state for
development and welfare schemes, I have been told that the people of
UP still face problems of shortage of seeds, fertiliser and potable
water,” she said at a party workers’ meet.

Taking a dig at Mayawati’s repeated allegations that the Centre
treated UP in a step-motherly manner, Sonia Gandhi said: “Everyone
knows how the state government treats Rae Bareli and Amethi.”

http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/sonia-slams-mayawatilackdevelopment-in-uttar-pradesh/395310/

Use Central funds properly, Sonia tells Uttar Pradesh



Atiq Khan



Says State government’s attitude towards Rae Bareli, Amethi is well
known







— Photo: AFP

Congress president and UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi interacts with
supporters at Rae Bareli in Uttar Pradesh on Monday.

LUCKNOW: Congress president Sonia Gandhi on Monday rejected Uttar
Pradesh Chief Minister Mayawati’s charge that the Centre was adopting
a step-motherly attitude towards the State and asserted that it was
the responsibility of the State government to ensure proper
utilisation of Central funds for development and welfare measures.

She referred to her constituency Rae Bareli and Amethi (represented by
her son Rahul Gandhi), saying the State government’s attitude towards
these constituencies was well-known.

The UPA chairperson, who started a three-day visit to Rae Bareli, was
addressing party workers in Saraini after inaugurating a sub-post
office. She said that notwithstanding several thousands of crores
given to the State in the form of Central funds, the situation on the
ground remained unchanged with people facing problems such as non-
availability of power and water and shortage of fertilizers and seeds.

“Monitor schemes”

Exhorting people, especially party workers, to keep a strict vigil on
the implementation of Central schemes, she said it was their social
and political responsibility to ensure that the fruits of development
reached the grass roots level.

Ms. Gandhi referred to the contribution of Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal
Nehru, Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi in nation-building, saying their
work stood as a source of inspiration.

After inaugurating the sub-post office, Ms. Gandhi paid tributes to
freedom fighters at the Shaheed Smarak before going to Dalmau, where
she inaugurated the Wi-Max service of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited.

On her way to Dalmau, her cavalcade was stopped on Saraini-Dalmau road
by the locals protesting against power cuts. Ms. Gandhi pacified them
and asked the officials to look into the problem.

Uttar Pradesh Congress Committee spokesman Akhilesh Pratap Singh said
Ms. Gandhi would inaugurate a road in Bela Tikai village, built under
the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana, on Tuesday and review the
progress of development schemes by paying surprise visits to the
villages in her constituency. She would visit some more villages on
Wednesday before returning to New Delhi, he added.

Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version

http://www.thehindu.com/2010/05/18/stories/2010051855651400.htm

44% not satisfied with UPA first year: opinion poll

New Delhi: An opinion poll conducted by NDTV news channel on Monday
said a majority of those surveyed expressed satisfaction with the
performance of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh but nearly half felt
Rahul Gandhi would make a better Premier.

Forty-four per cent of those surveyed felt they were worse off under
UPA II as compared to UPA I, with the bulk of both Congress and BJP
voters feeling “let down.”

The opinion poll said 41 per cent of the Congress voters and 49 per
cent of the BJP voters felt they were worse off compared to the
previous term of the UPA.

Happy with Manmohan

On the performance of Manmohan Singh as Prime Minister in the last one
year, almost 70 per cent expressed satisfaction.

However, nearly half of the surveyed population felt Rahul Gandhi
would make a better Prime Minister than Dr. Singh, and 55 per cent
felt Mr. Gandhi will be the next man in the post.

When it came to comparing Congress chief Sonia Gandhi with Dr. Singh
in terms of their influence, 63 per cent considered her to be more
powerful.

On the performance of Cabinet Ministers, 61 per cent rated Home
Minister P. Chidambaram as a “high performer.”

Sixty-seven per cent felt the government should use the Army to fight
Naxalites.

On Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee, 59 per cent lauded him, but 62
per cent felt they were very much affected by inflation.

Best performing CM

Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi was considered the best
performing Chief Minister in the last one year with those surveyed
giving him 85 per cent, just one per cent higher than Orissa Chief
Minister Naveen Patnaik.

About Telecom Minister A. Raja, a majority in Tamil Nadu (57 per cent)
believe he is guilty in the spectrum allocation scam.

A sharply divided response came from Kerala voters on Shashi Tharoor's
exit from the Union Ministry in the wake of the IPL controversy, with
37 per cent voting in favour his dismissal while an almost equal
percentage feeling it was a wrong action.

India-Pakistan ties

The response was also divided on what India's attitude towards
Pakistan should be, with 39 per cent believing that India can be
friends with the neighbouring country while 35 per cent opining that
India should fight Pakistan.

A majority (76 per cent) agreed with the verdict of capital punishment
for 26/11 convict Ajmal Kasab. — PTI

http://www.hindu.com/2010/05/18/stories/2010051862791400.htm

Soren's Tumble

VENKITESH RAMAKRISHNAN


Shibu Soren’s vote against the BJP-sponsored cut motions in the Lok
Sabha leads to a political crisis in the State.





PTI

Shibu Soren, after taking oath as Chief Minister in Ranchi on December
30.

THE theatre of the absurd in Jharkhand politics has been revived after
a reprieve of four months. This was the clear signal that emerged from
the developments in the State as well as in New Delhi in the last week
of April. During this period, the mainstream political class of the
State as a whole, primarily led by the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM)
and Chief Minister Shibu Soren, indulged in a series of political
twists, turns and somersaults, reaffirming the view that it consisted
essentially of self-serving individuals and groups who had no
commitment to political ideologies or norms of governance. Political
credibility became the biggest casualty, in the event.

Central to the developments were cracks in the four-month-old ruling
coalition of the JMM and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). These were
caused by the April 27 voting in the Lok Sabha on the cut motions
moved by the opposition parties, including the BJP, against the
Manmohan Singh-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government. The
BJP wanted to muster as many votes as possible against the government
and thus proceeded to invite Soren to join its strategy.

Soren, still the JMM Member of Parliament from the Dumka constituency
(he is yet to become a Member of the Legislative Assembly), responded
to the invitation and arrived along with his son to take part in the
proceedings. However, when it was time for the voting, he shocked his
alliance partner by supporting the UPA government.

The BJP took serious note of this “betrayal” and announced withdrawal
of support to the Soren-led Jharkhand government. Thus began the
crisis for the seventh Chief Minister of the nine-year-old State.

Opposition party leaders in the State and several supporters of the
JMM said the reason for Soren’s turnaround in the voting related to
another crisis in his life. According to BJP leader and former
Jharkhand Chief Minister Arjun Munda, it had to do with the Kudco
murder case in which Soren is an accused.

The case dates back to April 15, 1974, when Chundi Singh and Khirodhar
Singh of Kudco village in Giridih were killed in a group clash after
they allegedly stole and killed some goats. A charge sheet filed by
the police on December 14, 1978, names 10 persons and one of the
accused is Soren. The case witnessed some amazing twists and turns in
the last fortnight.

The judgment in the 36-year-old case was scheduled to be delivered on
April 17 in the Giridih Additional District and Sessions Court.
However, on April 13, the Giridih Additional District Judge, N.N.
Singh, sent a letter to District and Sessions Judge Sanjay Prasad
seeking transfer of the case to some other court. “I have reasons to
make this submission,” N.N. Singh stated in his letter. Sanjay Prasad
promptly accepted his plea and transferred the case to the court of
Mohammed Kasim.

What this means is that the entire process of presenting evidence and
statements, with the option of further examination and cross-
examination of witnesses, will have to take place in the court of
Kasim. If the track record of the original case is anything to go by,
this process would take a sufficiently long time. To start with, there
were 19 witnesses in the case, including three assistant sub
inspectors (ASIs). Nine witnesses have died in the intervening period.
Another five, including the ASIs and the doctor who conducted the post-
mortem, could not be traced.

Munda says that there are no prizes for guessing who stands to gain
from all this delay. “Somebody was obviously blackmailing him using
this case and he in turn was in need of some reprieve. He got that
reprieve and this answers Soren’s choice of the red slip in the cut
motion.”

Other BJP leaders of Jharkhand added that Soren was finding it
difficult to get an MLA to vacate a seat for him so that he could
fulfil the constitutional obligation of becoming an MLA within six
months of becoming the Chief Minister. This is seen as another reason
for his rejection of the BJP’s plea in the Lok Sabha.

However, what added to the absurd political situation was the JMM’s
response to the BJP’s withdrawal of support and the reactions that the
JMM’s own response evoked from other political parties, including the
Congress. Soren, and later his son, contended that the vote in favour
of the UPA had been cast by mistake. The ostensible reason for this
was that Soren suffered from Alzheimer’s disease. The BJP first
rejected the argument as unacceptable, but later made some amends when
the JMM leadership suggested that it was even ready to relieve Soren
of the chief ministership. At the time of writing this, the BJP was
actively considering this proposal. Whether this would find favour
with all sections of the BJP and whether it would help sustain the
alliance is to be seen.

The Congress, the other main party in the State, was not to be left
behind in this theatre of the absurd. Immediately after the BJP’s
announcement of withdrawal of support to the government, Keshav Rao,
the All India Congress Committee (AICC) member in charge of Jharkhand,
suggested that a new equation was emerging in the State politics with
a not-so-cryptic statement that “there is no untouchable in
politics”.

A possible new formula started doing the rounds immediately thereafter
in Ranchi’s political circles. This envisioned the coming together of
the JMM, the Congress, the Babulal Marandi-led Jharkhand Vikas Morcha-
Prajatantrik (JVM-P) and the All Jharkhand Students Union (AJSU) to
form a new government.

In the 81-member Jharkhand Assembly, the JMM and the BJP have 18
members each, the Congress has 14 and the JVM (Prajatantrik) 11. The
Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) and the AJSU have five MLAs each and the
Janata Dal (United) has two. Seven seats are held by local parties and
independents. The JMM, the Congress and the JVM (P) together can
rustle up a simple majority. The proposed contours of such a Ministry
presented JVM (P) leader Babulal Marandi as Chief Minister, as the
Congress does not have an acceptable tribal face, with the posts of
Deputy Chief Ministers going to the Congress and the JMM.

Banner of revolt

However, this was not to be, as five JMM legislators – Simon Marandi,
Teklal Mahato, Nalin Soren, Champai Soren and Lobin Hembrom – raised
the banner of revolt against Soren’s cross-voting. They criticised
Soren for “changing colour like a chameleon” and said that they would
not accept his decision. This reined in the Congress from jumping into
any arrangement. By all indications, the UPA leadership at the Centre
has come around to the view that another stint of President’s Rule in
Jharkhand would be very much in the interests of the party. Meanwhile,
a section of the JMM, led by a former tribal MP, is seriously trying
to lead the five rebel MLAs and some others to the Congress fold so
that the Congress can take the Chief Minister’s post.

Clearly, the political games are not over. Whatever their net result,
the developments have once again affirmed the impression that Shibu
Soren’s rule is always short-lived. This is the third time that he
became Chief Minister, and he is third time unlucky. He first became
Chief Minister in March 2005, but that tenure lasted barely 10 days.
He was not able to prove his majority in the Assembly after Governor
Syed Sibte Rizvi invited him to form the Ministry.

Following this, the BJP’s Arjun Munda came to power showing a majority
by winning over a number of independent MLAs to his side and giving
all of them ministerial berths. This government lasted for a year and
a half, until the very same group of MLAs – Madhu Koda, Enos Ekka,
Harinarain Rai, Joba Manjhi and the Nationalist Congress Party’s
Kamlesh Singh – toppled it. This led to the elevation of Madhu Koda as
Chief Minister with the support of the JMM. Koda’s rule lasted nearly
two years. But in August 2008 Shibu Soren forced him to quit and
became Chief Minister again. Four months later, he had to make an
ignominious exit as he was defeated in the byelection to the Tamar
constituency.

Soren had contested the byelection to fulfil the constitutional
obligation of becoming an MLA. There was a time when Soren was the
most popular leader of Jharkhand and was widely referred to as Dishom
Guru (Great Leader). Obviously the great leader has fallen from his
pedestal. In a sense, that fall symbolises the fall of Jharkhand
politics as a whole.

Volume 27 - Issue 10 :: May. 08-21, 2010
INDIA'S NATIONAL MAGAZINE
from the publishers of THE HINDU

http://www.frontlineonnet.com/stories/20100521271012000.htm

...and I am Sid Harth
navanavonmilita
2010-05-18 13:06:11 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/political-bog-sid-harth-2/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-2/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliancesand-unholy-alliances-sid-harth/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-3/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-4/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-5/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/?page_id=1056

Govt betrayed us, sent Bill to Cong-led panel: SP
ManojCG , Ravish Tiwari

Tags : SP, Congress, Nuclear Damage Bill, Mulayam Singh Yadav

Posted: Sat May 15 2010, 03:57 hrs

New Delhi:

UPA govt had sought Mulayam Singh's support in letting the N-damage
Bill being introduced in Lok Sabha.

Just when it seemed that the SP was moving towards evolving a working
relationship with the Congress, the government’s decision to refer the
Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill to the standing committee on
science and technology — and not the one on energy headed by Mulayam
Singh Yadav — has led to fresh heartburn between the two parties.

The government had sought Mulayam’s support in letting the contentious
Bill being introduced in Lok Sabha on the last day of the Budget
session on the assurance that he would anyhow have the opportunity to
suggest changes in the Bill as it would be sent to the committee under
him.

But the government seemed to have had a change of mind and, in a rude
shock to the SP, decided to refer the proposed legislation to the
standing committee on science and technology, headed by Congress MP T
Subbarami Reddy. The passage of the Bill by Parliament is essential
for operationalisation of the Indo-US civil nuclear cooperation
agreement.

Taken aback by this decision, a visibly angry SP general secretary Ram
Gopal Yadav called it a “betrayal” by the government.

“It (the government’s decision) is shocking and unbelievable. More so
because Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and his Minister of State
Prithviraj Chavan had personally assured me that the Bill will be
referred to the standing committee on energy,” Ram Gopal told The
Indian Express.

“This is a complete betrayal of the promise made by the government.
This decision casts aspersions on the impartiality of the standing
committee on energy. It is very unfortunate because it reflects a
clear bias on the part of the government based on party affiliation to
those heading the standing committees,” he added.

Endorsing Ram Gopal’s comments, an upset SP chief Mulayam Singh Yadav,
when contacted over the phone, said: “I need not add to what the party
general secretary has said... but it is clear that the government
sends bills to the committee which it trusts the most.”

The CPM was not to be left behind, particularly after Mulayam had
desisted from joining them in the walkout when the Bill was
introduced. When contacted, senior CPM leader Basudeb Acharia said he
would take up the matter with the Speaker. “I will write a letter to
the Speaker of Lok Sabha and will also speak to Mulayam on the
issue.”

Given its rigid line on the nuclear deal and stringent opposition to
this bill, CPM Politburo member Brinda Karat came out strongly against
the government move. “The government is manipulating the parliamentary
system of standing committees to suit its own interests. In this case,
we believe it would better suit them to have a chairman from the
Congress party for every standing committee,” she said.

On its part, the government clarified that it was only going by rules
on jurisdiction of standing committees which state that the Department
of Atomic Energy (DAE) falls under the ambit of the science &
technology committee. But the government seems to taking advantage of
a grey area as the standing committee on energy has been discussing
matters relating to nuclear power.

The confusion is mainly on account of the fact that the DAE has not
piloted any legislation since the late 1980s. The system of
parliamentary standing committees did not exist at that time. From
available records, all routine DAE matters, including Demands of
Grants, were dealt with by the standing committee on energy until 2005
but after that they have been handled by the standing committee on
science and technology.

What has incensed the SP is the fact that its leader had personally
discussed the matter with Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee on the eve
of the introduction of the Bill besides the PM’s personal assurance as
claimed by Ram Gopal.

Given that the government is keen on having the standing committee
complete its report by the monsoon session, Reddy being from the
Congress party is more dependable because the chairman holds all the
cards when it comes to timely report preparation and charting a
consensus. Still, the irony is that Ram Gopal and Mulayam’s son
Akhilesh Yadav are also members of the science & technology
committee.

In the context of what has happened, the committee proceedings are
bound to be more stormy than expected. The Yadav duo is unlikely to
make it easy for Reddy to fast-track matters, which may add to
Congress woes as it tackles a recalcitrant BJP and a firmly opposed
Left.

10 Comments |

mulayam-RJD-congress
By: s kumar | Saturday , 15 May '10 18:00:02 PM

in Kaliyuga- it is said the evil soul will have a pleasent looking
honest persons-face, they will rule to destroy the righetous, it would
have been better SP_BSP_RJD had merged in congress, and reaped the
apples, in the garden of eden. as it is congress is lost of all
gandhian values.as such slavery is rampant in it.

SP
By: Sk | Saturday , 15 May '10 12:58:25 PM

Mulayam and his Chief Sycophant Amar Singh took hundreds of crores
from Congress last year to save UPA-1 on nuclear issue. Now Lalu,
Mulayam and Mayawati are taking their share of corruption from
Congress. People of India are being made fooled by these pseudo
secular thugs on the name of secularism.

Congress-RJD-Mayawati-Maylyam
By: Madhusudan | Saturday , 15 May '10 20:54:37 PM

I agree with your view that all four parties are same & are working
for same motive to amass wealth by siphoning all resources of
country.The trio of Laloo-Maulyam-Mayawati have ruined Bihar & UP
which led to extreme poverty & backwardness in both states with lowest
income in India.Congress party is originator & protector of corruption
in India which inflicted corruption from top to bottom leading ti
serious danger for safety & integrity of country.
Betrayal
By: Varind | Saturday , 15 May '10 12:53:32 PM

Congress has not betrayed Mulayam Singh but has shown him his right
place. As the people of Bengal are bent upon to wipe the left for
their sin of supporting Congress and on the same anology people of UP
will wipe SP out. Mulayam and Lalu are catching a straw and this can't
keep them afloat for too long. Yadavs' end is more near than it
appears.

Betrayal
By: Madhusudan | Saturday , 15 May '10 21:16:27 PM

The public must finish this dirty game played by RJD,SP,BSP & Congress
by voting out in next elections. This is the weapon to be used by
public to punish such unscrupulous & brazen people who are deceiving
mass of country.They must be dealt strongly to save country from such
evils.

congress somersault
By: N.S.Rajan | Saturday , 15 May '10 12:40:43 PM

This comes as no surprise.What is indeed surprising is that even after
repeated betrayals and the use and discard instances of the past,
including the recent past,by the congress leadership,such veteran
leaders naively believe in assurances given.However,considering that
they too follow only opportunistic politics and are too eager to
compromise policies for practical gains, this is nothing less than
what they deserve.Mulayam will not find any sympathy from anyone other
than those in the same boat with him now.

Congress used you, and kicked you
By: Ash | Saturday , 15 May '10 11:59:07 AM

Really? Did you not betray the trust of all Indians by siding with
Congress, for the cut motion? Congress used you, and kicked you and
Lallu. Do you still believe that Gadkari, and not Congress think that
you are dogs?

SP, Yadavs and the Nuclear Bill
By: sailor | Saturday , 15 May '10 11:43:44 AM

Mulayam should have by now experienced more than once that he does not
command any respect however much he may try to lick the boots of the
congress. Right from the time of the gate crashing during UPA-I,
bailing out the Govt. and the recent U-turn, he still has not learnt
his lesson.

mulayam
By: yohan | Saturday , 15 May '10 11:24:37 AM

either you bow down or quit. you cant survive with this congress party
unless you surrender completed, and obey their orders. agree whatever
they say. dont raise your objections on anything. all purported
autonomous institutions are wagging their tails for the congress
bosses. hence you cant object to congress manipulations. if you do so,
the cbi, ec or even judicial machinery will stand against you. mulayam
and lalu will face more trouble, as congress has a new successful
friend in up, mayawati. mr mulayam, even if you are a zero, take a
firm stand and stand for that cause instead of dilly dallying.

What is the special bond?

By: Irshad Ali | Saturday , 15 May '10 10:10:56 AM
This has happened for the hundredth time between SP & congress.But
still, there is some magical bond between the two, which makes SP work
for the benefit of Congress.

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/govt-betrayed-us-sent-bill-to-congled-panel-sp/619226/0

Jharkhand: BJP, JMM to share power on rotation
Agencies

Tags : BJP, JMM, Jharkhand, Shibu Soren, Arjun Munda

Posted: Tue May 18 2010, 14:01 hrs
Ranchi:

BJP and JMM will share the power in Jharkhand for 28 months each with
the BJP taking over in the first phase.

Right To Equality?Sea Also CriesThought ControlUS dollar will die
slowly! Ending a three-week long political impasse in Jharkhand, the
BJP and JMM on Tuesday reached an agreement on sharing power on
rotational basis with a BJP-led government to take over within a
week.

"We have decided that BJP and JMM will share power for 28 months each
with the BJP taking over in the first phase," Chief Minister Shibu
Soren and BJP's chief ministerial candidate Arjun Munda told a joint
press conference here after a meeting of the coalition partners.

Asked when he would step down as chief minister, Soren replied "very
soon" without giving a date.

The BJP and AJSU leaders, however, claimed the powershift would take
place on May 25.

"Both Soren's resignation and Munda staking claim may take place on
May 25 simultaneously," a senior AJSU leader and a national BJP leader
said.

BJP had announced its decision to withdraw support to the Shibu Soren
government on April 28 after the JMM chief voted against the BJP-
sponsored cut-motions in the Lok Sabha.

However, after Soren's son Hemant made an offer to BJP to head the
government in the state, the BJP revoked its decision but a tussle
ensued on the power-sharing formula.

On May 8, the BJP announced that it would head a new coalition for the
remainder of the tenure with support from alliance partners JMM and
AJSU. The same evening Soren said the new government would be on a
rotational basis, causing a stalemate.

Both the JMM and the BJP have 18 seats each in the 82-member House.
Other members of the coalition are Janata Dal-United (JD-U) with two
seats, All Jharkhand Students Union (AJSU) which has five seats and
others two.

Soren and Hemant, who is also leader of the JMM Legislature Party,
were present at today's meeting where BJP was represented by senior
party leader Karuna Shukla, party general secretary Arjun Munda and
present Deputy Chief Minister Raghubar Das.

AJSU was represented by Sudesh Mahato. JMM leaders Teklal Mahato and
Hemlal Murmu- who were said to be opposed to Hemant's offer- were also
present.

Munda, party's tribal face, is set to lead the government as he has
the support of most MLAs, BJP sources said.

Comments (2) |

Well done..but BJP needs to perform and prove itself now
By: Dilip | 18-May-2010

BJP has promised so much now its time to prove its words. All the
best....

Shame on BJP
By: Chandramohanarao | 18-May-2010

This is most unfortunate. It smacks of rank opportunism and crass
commercialism on the part of BJP. The oafish manner in which the BJP
President conducted himself is nauseating, to say the least. In India
members of the most famished families share food on rotation. There
were instances reported in media about mother and daughter/daughter-in-
law sharing new clothes on rotation. Politicians, famished for power,
are sharing the spoils of office on rotation. All hopes of the country
having an alternative government of avowed values vanished totally.

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/jharkhand-bjp-jmm-to-share-power-on-rotation/620412/0

...and I am Sid Harth
navanavonmilita
2010-05-18 16:22:27 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/political-bog-sid-harth-2/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-2/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliancesand-unholy-alliances-sid-harth/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-3/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-4/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-5/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/?page_id=1056
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-6/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-7/

Marandi Seeks Dismissal of Soren Govt; Files Petition
New Delhi | May 18, 2010

Jharkhand Vikas Morcha Chief Babulal Marandi today moved the Supreme
Court seeking dismissal of Shibu Soren government for accusing him of
misusing the constitutional provision for occupying the post of Chief
Minister without being elected to the state assembly.

Marandi, who was the first Chief Minister of Jharkhand after the state
was carved out from Bihar, accused the JMM chief of misusing the
special provision under Article 164 (4) of the Constitution.

Article 164 (4) enables an unelected person to become Chief Minister
subject to the condition that he/she would get elected to the Assembly
within six months.

Marandi's petition filed through advocate Anurag Kumar alleged it was
the third time that Soren took advantage of the constitutional
provision and has been unable to get himself elected to the House.

He has sought a direction for the Governor to restrain Soren to
function as a full-fledged Chief Minister and from taking cabinet
decisions on policy matters.

The petition said it has now become impossible for the JMM chief to
get elected to the House as only 42 days are left for him to complete
six months as Chief Minister since he was sworn in on December 30,
2009, while the Election Commission takes around 47 days to complete
the process of bye-election.

Filed At: May 18, 2010 20:04 IST ,
Edited At: May 18, 2010 20:04 IST
Tags: Jharkhand | JMM | Shibu Soren | Babulal Marandi

http://news.outlookindia.com/item.aspx?682479

FIR Against Subhash Yadav
Patna | May 18, 2010

The police today registered an FIR against RJD supremo Lalu Prasad's
brother-in-law and Rajya Sabha member Subhash Prasad Yadav, his wife
Renu Devi and three others charging them with kidnapping a liquor shop
employee in the state capital.

The FIR was registered with the Shastrinagar police station here,
police sources said.

A Bihar court had on May 10 ordered registration of an FIR against
Subhash Prasad Yadav and others.

Chief Judicial Magistrate S P Singh had taken cognizance of the
complaint filed by Umesh Singh, the employee of the liquor Shop, who
had alleged that the five, including Yadav, had kidnapped him when he
had gone to "demand payment of dues for bottles of liquor" bought by
them.

Umesh Singh had on April 28, 2010 had move the court seeking probe
into the charges levelled by him against Subhash Yadav and others.

Filed At: May 18, 2010 21:08 IST ,
Edited At: May 18, 2010 21:08 IST
Tags: Bihar | Kidnap

http://news.outlookindia.com/item.aspx?682492

Rabri Devi Surrenders in Court, Granted Bail
Chapra (Bihar) | May 18, 2010

Rashtriya Janata Dal leader and former Bihar Chief Minister Rabri Devi
today surrendered before a Chapra court in connection with a case
charging her with making abusive remarks against former state JD(U)
president Rajiv Ranjan Singh and Chief Minister Nitish Kumar.

The leader of opposition in the Bihar Assembly surrendered before the
court of Chief Judicial Magistrate Y N Singh who granted her regular
bail.

The court on May 6 had issued non-bailable warrant of arrest against
Rabri Devi for her alleged remarks against Rajiv Rajan Singh alias
Lalan and Kumar during electioneering for the 2009 Lok Sabha polls at
Garkha for drumming up support for her husband and RJD chief Lalu
Prasad from Saran parliamentary constituency.

Sanjiv Sekhar, the then Sub-divisional officer, had filed the case
against Rabri Devi after she had made the alleged uncharitable
utterances.

Filed At: May 18, 2010 11:11 IST ,
Edited At: May 18, 2010 11:11 IST
Tags: Bihar | RJD | Abuse - Invective - Swearing etc | Rabri Devi

http://news.outlookindia.com/item.aspx?682419

Cong Wants DMK To Help Win 2 RS Seats in TN
New Delhi | May 18, 2010

Congress, whose outside support is crucial to survival of Karunanidhi
government in Tamil Nadu, is seeking to extract its pound of flesh in
Rajya Sabha elections next month by insisting on two seats from DMK in
the state.

Hard bargaining is on between the two parties over the issue with
Congress contending that it needed more seats in the Upper House given
the fact that it was in a minority there and wants to shore up its
numbers, Congress sources said.

DMK already has four members in Rajya Sabha and Congress' argument is
that it was in dire need for more members and the key ally should
reciprocate its gesture in Tamil Nadu by sacrificing two seats.

Biennial elections to Rajya Sabha for six seats in the state will be
held next month and the Congress High Command has to decide the issue
within a week.

Congress, which has a strength of 36 MLAs in 234-member Tamil Nadu
Assembly, could ensure the victory of only one candidate on its own
and wants DMK to give two seats.

As per the party arithmetic, AIADMK could have two seats with the
support from its allies like MDMK as also Left parties.

While no official word is available, UPA sources said the tough
bargaining has led to Karunanidhi agreeing to give one seat from his
party's share to Congress which, however, wants two.

Filed At: May 18, 2010 21:05 IST ,
Edited At: May 18, 2010 21:05 IST
Tags: Congress | DMK | Tamil Nadu | M. Karunanidhi

http://news.outlookindia.com/item.aspx?682490

Cong-KC(M) Discussions Fail to Make Headway
Aluva (Kerala) | May 17, 2010

Discussions between leaders of Congress and Kerala Congress (Mani)
failed to resolve the differences between them over the proposed
merger of Kerala Congress (Joseph) with KC (M).

"Leaders of both the parties agreed to disagree," UDF convenor P P
Thankachan, who was part of the discussions, told reporters.

While Congress leaders feel Kerala Congress(M), a UDF constituent,
should have held discussions with the front before taking a decision
on the merger, KC(M) leaders have held that the merger decision was an
internal matter of the constituent and there was no need to discuss it
with the UDF.

Thankachan, Opposition leader in the assembly Oommen Chandy, Kerala
PCC President Ramesh Chennithala and Kerala Congress(M) leaders - K M
Mani and P C George participated in the discussions.

Leaders of Congress and KC(M), who were meeting for the first time to
discuss the merger issue, decided not to air their views publicly on
the issue with the media.

Both parties also decided to cooperate wholeheartedly to ensure the
success of 'betrayal day' being observed tomorrow by the UDF,
protesting against the price rise.

Thankachan said discussions would be held with coalition parties on
convening a meeting of the front this month itself.

To a query, he said no discussions were held today on seat sharing.

The two Kerala Congress factions have decided to merge on May 27.
Kerala Congress (J) was hitherto with the CPI(M) led Left Democratic
Front.

Filed At: May 17, 2010 19:04 IST ,
Edited At: May 17, 2010 19:04 IST
Tags: Kerala | Congress

http://news.outlookindia.com/item.aspx?682353

No Pact With BSP; Will Fight For Better Future: Rahul
Mirzapur (U.P.) | May 18, 2010

Ruling out any political understanding with Mayawati-led BSP, Rahul
Gandhi today hinted that Congress may go it alone in the 2012 assembly
polls in the state.

"I am ready to fight your battle. Take me where ever you want.
Together, we will change Uttar Pradesh for the better," Gandhi said
addressing a rally here.

He dismissed suggestions of a political understanding reached with the
BSP to help the UPA government sail through trying times in
Parliament.

"Listen to me carefully. There will be no political understanding or
pact with the BSP. Congress will defeat the BSP government. The youth
of UP will help us achieve this," Gandhi said.

"During voting in Parliament on the cut motions, newspapers wrote that
Congress has struck a deal with the BSP. I would like to say there
will be no agreement with the BSP and no compromise with the future of
UP," he said.

The Congress leader claimed that successive governments led by BJP, SP
and BSP have failed to bring change to the state where people were
forced to seek employment in other states.

"You go to Maharashtra and are chased away. You go to Haryana and
Punjab and help those states progress. If UP strides to progress, the
entire country will make a beeline to this state," he said.

Gandhi exhorted the youth of the state to be drivers of change and
take UP to the heights of glory it enjoyed in the past.

"BJP said it will work wonders. SP played the caste card and BSP said
it has formed a government of Dalits. But have you ever asked the
Dalits, whether the government works for them," he asked aloud.

"The Dalits say there is no government in Uttar Pradesh and I know
that you will send the BSP packing as you did with the BJP and the SP
in the past," he said.

Gandhi claimed that the funds the Centre allocates to Uttar Pradesh
never reach the intended beneficiaries.

"Government at Delhi is sending crores of rupees to UP, but it is not
reaching the people. We are sending funds for MNREGS, but it is not
reaching the people it is meant to benefit," he alleged.

He said that the Centre launched MNREGS, where 100- day employment was
being provided to the people in the rural areas.

"While in other states the scheme is being implemented, in UP when I
visit villages and talk to people, they said that it is nowhere on the
ground," Gandhi said.

Gandhi also spoke about the power problem in this district. "Power
generated here is being used by the entire state, but you (people) are
not getting electricity even for five to six hours," he said.

Gandhi said no new power generation plants have been set up in the
state in the last two decades. "The number of power plants in the
state is same as it was in 1980," he said.

The Congress leader said that the state government was doing nothing
on the front of power, employment and development.

"You tried BJP which promised a miracle. Then came SP, which ruled for
five years and was later ousted by you and now the BSP government is
here," he said.

"We have to change the system and bring UP on the right track. We have
to restore the state's position where it was 20 years back," he said.

Rahul said that earlier UP used to show the path to the entire country
but now it was a different story.

With a population of over 18 crore, UP had the power to change the
entire country, but changing the face of the state would be the first
step, he said.

"It is the responsibility of the youth to bring this change and I
would like to tell you two things. First I am not going anywhere and I
am standing with you. I am ready to fight for your cause. Secondly we
would unitedly change the situation," he said.

"People from all walks of life in Uttar Pradesh appear to be in
turmoil primarily on account of the insensitive government. The
situation is even more pathetic in Poorvanchal. People hailing from
this area do well in other parts of the country and help other states
in their march towards prosperity. But, while at home, they find it
difficult to make a difference for want of a conducive atmosphere,"
Gandhi said.

In his brief address, the Congress leader refrained from making any
reference to the Maoist insurgency issue, even as the rally was being
widely viewed in the light of its venue being a Naxal-hit area.

A host of Congress leaders, including AICC general secretary in-charge
of Uttar Pradesh, Digvijay Singh, UPCC president Rita Bahuguna Joshi
and the party's leader in the state legislative assembly Pramod Tiwari
were also present at the rally.

Filed At: May 18, 2010 18:21 IST ,
Edited At: May 18, 2010 18:21 IST
Tags: Uttar Pradesh | Congress | BSP | SP | Government | Dalit | Youth
| Rahul Gandhi

http://news.outlookindia.com/item.aspx?682459

Cong Lashes Out at 'Deal' Between Opposition, Left
New Delhi | May 17, 2010

Concerned over the BJP and the Left attacking the government on
several issues in and outside Parliament, Congress today trained its
guns on the "opportunistic anti-Congress alliance".

Playing the secular card, the party asked the Left whether the threat
posed by communalism was over.

Congress spokesman Manish Tewari alleged that a "similar deal" between
the opposition parties in the 70s and 80s led to the rise of communal
forces in the late 80s and 90s, the result of which was disastrous.

"We want to ask these so called secular parties... Is the challenge
posed by communalism over?" The nation should know that once again the
responsibility of protecting secularism and the idea of India is on
the Congress," Tewari added.

The Congress' statement has come in the backdrop of the BJP and the
Left coming together on the issue of the cut motions in the Lok Sabha
as also on the issue of price rise and the Nuclear Liabilities Bill.

Tewari's comments also came at a time when it was seeking to mollify
Mamata Banerjee led Trinamool Congress in the wake of Congress and TC
parting ways in the upcoming Kolkata Municipal elections.

Trinamool Congress is the second largest party in the UPA after
Congress, which is pinning its hopes on capturing power in the Left-
ruled West Bengal in alliance with the party.

Tewari lamented that in the last one year of the UPA government, the
"opportunistic anti-Congress" alliance has compromised secularism.

"One salient political facet in last one year has been an
opportunistic anti-Congress alliance in the ranks of the opposition.
Like in the 70s and 80s, ideologically opposed political formations
are entering into various political deals," he said.

Giving the example of the reactions after the explosions allegedly
carried out by some right wing outfits and on the activities of
organisations like the Sriram Sene recently, Tewari said except for
the Congress, the condemnation by the so-called secular parties has
been "extremely muted".

Filed At: May 17, 2010 23:27 IST ,
Edited At: May 17, 2010 23:27 IST
Tags: Congress | Manish Tiwari

http://news.outlookindia.com/item.aspx?682404

Ban Any Organisation Involved in Terror Acts: Cong
New Delhi | May 17, 2010

In the backdrop of the NIA filing a chargesheet against 11 persons
from the right-wing Hindu outfit `Sanatan Sanstha' in the Goa blast,
Congress today said any organisation which is involved in acts of
terror should be banned.

"Any organisation which is involved in any act of terror should be
banned. There are no two views about it," party spokesman Manish
Tewari said when asked whether the Sanatan Sanstha should be banned.

Referring to the blasts at places like Malegaon (Maharashtra), Mecca
Masjid (Hyderabad) and Ajmer Sharif (Rajasthan), Tewari said there is
"suspicion" that organisations with close affinity to RSS have been
named.

Asked about the specific role of the RSS, Tewari said the
organisation's position has been made amply clear.

"Possibly... Time has come for the government to holistically look at
the interconnected organisations like Abhinav Bharat, Sriram Sene and
others as to where they fit in the RSS pantheon," the spokesman said.

Tewari said all the blasts took place in the run up to the Lok Sabha
elections and were intended to polarise voters.

"These blasts were intended to polarise the voters... Everybody knows
who was the intended beneficiary," he said, adding, there was need to
look into the whole nexus and the wider details and what kind of
relationship these organisations share with the RSS.

AICC General Secretary Digvijay Singh, who has been vocal about the
role of right wing organisations in such blasts, congratulated the NIA
for filing the chargesheet and said, "All such cases of bomb blasts
should be handed to the NIA. There is a common thread... I am
absolutely convinced that if the investigations are taken into a
logical conclusion, there will be startling disclosure."

Claiming that Sanatan Sanstha was a front, Singh said, "This is a
branch of a tree which is rooted in the RSS".

Filed At: May 17, 2010 20:37 IST ,
Edited At: May 17, 2010 20:37 IST
Tags: Congress | RSS | Terrorism | Manish Tiwari

http://news.outlookindia.com/item.aspx?682371

UPA Government Working For Common Man: Raju
Rajahmundry (AP) | May 17, 2010

Union Minister of State for Defence M M Pallam Raju today said the UPA
Government was working for the welfare of the common people.

Speaking at `2010-Praja Patham' programme, he said 44,000 operations
had been conducted, with an amount of Rs 134 crores, under Rajiv
Arogya Sri Scheme in Andhra Pradesh.

Also, 73 lakhs pensions had been sanctioned against 15 lakh during the
last five years in the Congress-ruled state, he said.

Raju said the Centre has spent crores of rupees to generate jobs under
the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Programme and
Andhra Pradesh has been a major beneficiary of the scheme.

The Union Government has brought Right to Information Act to ensure
transparency and accountability in all departments, the Minister said.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has introduced Right to Education Bill
with an aim to provide education to all sections of the people. The
UPA Government was now working on introducing Right to Food Bill, Raju
said.

State Ministers P Subash Chandra Bose and P Viswaroop were also
present at the function.

Filed At: May 17, 2010 23:12 IST ,
Edited At: May 17, 2010 23:12 IST
Tags: Andhra Pradesh | Congress | UPA

http://news.outlookindia.com/item.aspx?682402

Maharashtra Minister Under Fire for Criminal Past
Mumbai | May 16, 2010

Congress has taken cognisance of the flurry of media reports, about
the alleged criminal antecedents of Minister of State for Home Ramesh
Bagwe, with Chief Minister Ashok Chavan saying he would enquire into
the issue.

"I am looking into the matter...There have been several stories in
media," Chavan said after reports quoted police sources saying 19
offences were registered against Bagwe. The minister, in turn, has
accused police of "gathering proof to harass him."

Differences between Bagwe and Pune police commissioner Satya Pal Singh
have come to the fore with Bagwe accusing Singh of "creating hurdles
in renewing his passport for the past two years".

Bagwe blamed Singh, whose transfer he announced in legislature last
month, taking even Home Minister R R Patil by surprise, for the
‘inordinate’ delay in getting his passport renewed.

Bagwe said ever since he told the legislative council that Singh would
be transferred and "a more efficient official will be given the job"
to cope with the rising crime in Pune, the city police were trying
hard to collect evidence against him to harass him.

"The party has taken strong cognisance of the issue and asked the
Chief Minister to enquire into the matter," a senior Congress leader
told

A party loyalist in Pune also pointed to fresh reports about Bagwe
giving false information in the affidavit he filed during last year's
Assembly elections, about cases registered against him.

Pune's Deputy commissioner of police (special branch) Lakshmi Gautam
has said police received Bagwe’s passport verification form on January
8 this year and sent the report to the Passport Office on February 8.

"The police have records of 15 cognisable offences registered against
Bagwe and four non-cognisable offences," Gautam said.

The cases registered against Bagwe in the jurisdiction of the Pune
Police Commissionerate include 13 cases at Khadak police station. Two
cases registered with the Yerawada and Deccan Gymkhana police stations
are pending in the courts while in other cases, Bagwe has either been
discharged or acquitted.

Bagwe has alleged that a 'casteist' conspiracy was hatched against him
by some senior police officials to malign his image. "After being
acquitted in a case in 2009, I have never been to the passport
office," he said.

Filed At: May 16, 2010 12:40 IST ,
Edited At: May 16, 2010 12:40 IST
Tags: Congress | Maharashtra | Ashok Chavan

http://news.outlookindia.com/item.aspx?682229

...and I am Sid Harth
navanavonmilita
2010-05-18 22:21:51 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/political-bog-sid-harth-2/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-2/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliancesand-unholy-alliances-sid-harth/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-3/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-4/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-5/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/?page_id=1056
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-6/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-7/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-8/

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, May 19, 2010 There is unity in CPI(M), LDF: VS
Special Correspondent

The Hindu Kerala Chief Minister V. S. Achuthanandan. File photo
Related

Chief Minister V.S. Achuthanandan asserted here on Tuesday that there
was unity within the Communist Party of India (Marxist) and the ruling
Left Democratic Front (LDF).

Addressing a special press conference in connection with the fourth
anniversary of the LDF government, the Chief Minister denied that he
was not getting support from his party for his work as Chief
Minister.

Mr. Achuthanandan said the sudden exit of the Kerala Congress(J) from
the front had no justification. The Kerala Congress(J) leader P.J.
Joseph was working in cooperation with the others in the LDF. Now, as
he moved towards the United Democratic Front (UDF), dissentions had
surfaced in the Opposition front.

Munnar Mission

He said it was regrettable that the Munnar Mission had to be suspended
and that land-grabbers continued to corner government land. A three-
member team deputed to Munnar under the leadership of Additional
Secretary K. Suresh Kumar was effective in resuming encroached land.
He had to be withdrawn as controversies arose over the evictions.
Though several others had been deputed to continue the mission, they
were not effective. And their action attracted court cases.

The government had received reports that Harrisons Malayalam
Plantations Limited was holding excess land. The government was
examining whether the land could be resumed legally.

Kinaloor issue

The Chief Minister said the issue over land acquisition for a road to
the Kinaloor industrial park near Kozhikode would be settled amicably.
The recent police action there was an unexpected development. There
were concerns over the land acquisition for the four-lane road when
hardly any industry was coming up in the park. In view of the public
ire over the issue, he had decided to convene a conference of all
concerned. The land would be taken over only with the full consent of
the affected people. Evictees would be given alternative housing.

He said that though there were extremists behind the agitation, there
was nothing wrong in their being invited to the conference, as people
had lined up under their leadership. As they had taken up people's
issues, they could not be kept away. Industries Minister Elamaram
Karim and the Kozhikode Collector had invited them for talks.

Mr. Achuthanandan said the government proposed to increase the
procurement price for paddy further. Over the past four years, the
government had increased the price from Rs.7 to Rs.12 a kg. The
government had provided considerable succour to farmers and ended
suicides. There was little reason for the Opposition to observe the
anniversary of government as ‘betrayal day.' The government proposed
to increase the coverage of free health insurance and the scheme for
supplying rice at Rs.2 a kg to 35 lakh families.

The government had taken steps for the formation of eight public
sector units. The Kochi Metro and Vizhinjam international terminal
projects would take off shortly. One lakh job opportunities would be
created through the expansion of the Infopark in Kochi. New IT parks
would cater to the Malabar area.

Keywords: V.S. Achuthanandan, Communist Party of India (Marxist), LDF,
UDF

http://beta.thehindu.com/news/states/kerala/article433160.ece

KOLKATA, May 19, 2010 Mamata whips up communal tension: CPI(M)
Special Correspondent

The Communist Party of India (Marxist) has charged Trinamool Congress
leader Mamata Banerjee with creating an atmosphere of communal tension
through her election speeches, and urged the State Election
Commissioner to initiate action against her for violating the code of
conduct.

CPI(M) State committee secretary Biman Bose said the Railway
Minister's remarks at public meetings could lead to communal
disharmony. He said she claimed to have confidential reports on plans
to use the police to trigger communal clashes in the city.

On Tuesday, Mr. Bose sent a letter to the State Election Commissioner,
saying she had made statements levelling charges against the CPI(M) on
these grounds. Choosing to even identify areas where minority
populations live in, Ms. Banerjee told public meetings that the CPI(M)
was planning to engineer communal clashes there, he complained. “She
is trying to create undercurrents of terror.”

Thus, Ms. Banerjee violated sub-section 1 of Section 1 of the code of
conduct, besides abetting divisive forces and creating disharmony
among the various sects and communities. These sorts of statements
were also violative of Section 125 of the Representation of the People
Act, Mr. Basu said.

He appended to his letter newspaper reports on her public meetings.

Keywords: Mamata Banerjee, communal tension, CPI(M), election
commissioner

http://beta.thehindu.com/news/states/article433269.ece

KOLKATA, May 17, 2010 Hitlerian propaganda: Buddhadeb
Ananya Dutta

Describing the Trinamool Congress campaign for the upcoming civic
polls as reminiscent of “the false propaganda of the parties of Hitler
and Mussolini,” Chief Minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee on Sunday said
West Bengal had never seen electioneering sink to such low levels.

Referring to the Trinamool accusations that the Left parties had
deliberately set afire Stephen Court on Park Street and that they
might trigger riots in Kolkata, he said here, “the question of riots
during an election campaign has never been raised before.”

He appealed to people to oppose the “language of the criminal world”
that had crept into politics.

Mr. Bhattacharjee said the Trinamool “is breeding a new culture — one
of threats, terror and violence.”

Ruling out early Assembly elections, as suggested by Trinamool chief
Mamata Banerjee in her speeches, he said, “she neither knows nor has
read the Constitution….No one other than the State government can
propose that elections be held.”

Asked about the inter-party clashes across the State which claimed
many lives, Mr. Bhattacharjee said the issue was being dealt with at
the administrative level. But at the political level, the Trinamool
refused to cooperate with the government in resolving it.

“I have asked them in the past and still appeal to them to come for
discussions so that we can identify these areas and resolve the
issue…..But the opposition party has taken a unilateral decision to
not cooperate with the government.”

“Dark force”

Mr. Bhattacharjee also alleged that the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh,
Maoists, right-wing organisations and fundamentalists had formed “a
rainbow alliance” with the Trinamool to form “a dark, toxic force”
that wanted to wrest power from the Left.

Keywords: Buddhadeb, Mamata Banerjee, poll campaign, West Bengal
Assembly elections, TMC

http://beta.thehindu.com/news/states/article431765.ece

Kolkata, May 18, 2010 Delhi is not my home: Mamata
PTI

PTI Railways Minister and Trinamool Congress leader Mamata Banerjee.

In the face of criticism by the Opposition for her frequent absence
from Delhi, Railway Minister Mamata Banerjee has defended her stay in
Kolkata saying the national capital was not her home.

“Delhi is not my home. When there is no Parliament session, why should
I stay in Delhi? Kolkata is my homeland,” she told a public meeting
here on Monday while campaigning for her Trinamool Congress candidates
in the coming civic polls.

Ms. Banerjee’s remark came in the wake of latest criticism by
Opposition, including CPI(M), charging her of neglecting duty as
Railway minister following Sunday’s stampede at New Delhi Railway
Station, which left two persons dead and eight others injured.

“It is a ploy by the CPI (M) to send me to Delhi. No one can force out
me,” she said.

Keywords: Railway Minister, Trinamool Congress, Delhi stampede, West
Bengal politics

http://beta.thehindu.com/news/national/article432781.ece

KOLKATA, May 16, 2010 Buddadeb: Congress forced to oppose Trinamool
Ananya Dutta

The Congress was forced to oppose the Trinamool Congress at many
places in the coming municipal elections in West Bengal as the latter
was a violent political party without any agenda or sense of purpose,
Chief Minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee said here on Sunday.

At a press conference, Mr. Bhattacharjee said, “We have had several
experiences of alliances between Opposition parties. There have been
situations where alliances have been there and when they have failed.
But in this instance where the Congress is opposing the Trinamool at
many places, one thing that has become clear is that the Congress has
been forced to do so.”

He said the Trinamool Congress was a force that believed in violence.
It neither had an agenda nor intent. That party's agenda was divorced
from reality and was not based on policy or thinking.

Stressing on the Left Front's agenda of development for the coming
elections, he said the process of industrialisation was on track
despite the obstructionist view of the Trinamool Congress. The year
2009-10 saw an investment of Rs. 7,000 crore into industries in the
State.

Mr. Bhattacharjee also criticised the UPA government at the Centre. He
said it was not adequately dealing with the problem of price rise. He
reiterated the demand of State governments of allocating 50 per cent
of the taxes collected to them instead of the existing 32 per cent.

The Left parties would fare much better in the coming elections than
the 2009 Lok Sabha polls. “Even though a large section of the
electorate voted against us in the Lok Sabha elections, the people
have also experienced its consequence for one year. Public opinion is
not stagnant,” he said.

Keywords: Buddhadeb, Mamata Banerjee, West Bengal Assembly elections,
TMC

http://beta.thehindu.com/news/article431699.ece

KOLKATA, May 12, 2010 Congress has reason to grumble, but can it take
on Mamata?
Marcus Dam

Even as the Left Front maintains that the Congress and the Trinamool
Congress are working towards a covert understanding at the ground
level for the coming civic polls in West Bengal, the apparent break-up
in their alliance notwithstanding, the leadership of both parties has
cautioned against persisting with the blame game. For, after all, the
more crucial battle is the Assembly election next year.

If the Left Front's claim is true, the covert Congress-Trinamool
understanding will largely be for the elections in municipalities in
districts. In the Kolkata Municipal Corporation — the focal point of
the gridlock that resulted in the collapse of the electoral pact
between the two parties — the situation is somewhat different.

Here, their nominees are pitted against each other, not to speak of
the candidates of the Left parties, in most of the 141 wards that go
to the polls on May 30.

The outcome of the elections could well determine the bargaining
positions of the Congress and the Trinamool on seat sharing when it
comes to putting up a joint fight in the 2011 Assembly polls.

The two parties, partners in the United Progressive Alliance (UPA)
government at the Centre and which share in West Bengal the central
agenda of ousting the Left Front from power, forged an alliance, in
the first place, with an eye on the 2011 polls.

A section of the State Congress leadership, which resented the
Trinamool giving the party a raw deal in seat adjustments in the past,
particularly in the 2009 Lok Sabha polls, has reason to be
disgruntled.

This time round the Congress has not capitulated, at least not on
paper.

How the adversarial role it has opted for will affect the party's
prospects in the civic polls is one thing; and it is quite another
whether there will be any room left for manoeuvrability when the
Congress goes in a for a combined anti-Left Front fight with the
Trinamool on its side in the Assembly polls. The Congress is on a
sticky wicket, to say the least.

Reprehensible though the party might find the obduracy of the
Trinamool which, according to it, precipitated the collapse of the
electoral alliance, the Congress leadership in the State is only too
well aware that the high command would not like to upset the apple
cart when it comes to dealing with the partner in the UPA government.

Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee, who rarely minces words, has
expressed her disappointment with the Congress, not just for the
alliance for the civic polls falling through. She has not been taken
as seriously as she might have liked on various issues — whether it be
her opposition to the Centre's decision to carry out anti-Maoist
security operations in the State or its refusal to go as far as she
would have wanted it to (read President's Rule) on the ground of total
breakdown of law and order, an allegation she has made repeatedly.

Yet, the Congress has shown exemplary restraint in the face of the ire
Ms. Banerjee directed at it in recent times.

She has reminded the Congress that the government at the Centre is not
that of a single party but of an alliance which she will not like to
disturb provided her party is given due respect. Is there a veiled
threat one perceives somewhere? Or, is it another way of saying she
will have it her way if there is to be an anti-Left electoral alliance
for the battle royal next year?

Keywords: State political situation

http://beta.thehindu.com/news/national/article427610.ece

KOLKATA, May 11, 2010 Congress-Trinamool alliance split unfortunate:
Pranab
Ananya Dutta

Union Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee on Tuesday described as
“unfortunate” the break-up of the Congress-Trinamool Congress alliance
for the upcoming elections to 81 civic bodies in West Bengal and said
he accepted full responsibility for his party's stand during the
impasse over seat-sharing.

Mr. Mukherjee, who is president of the West Bengal Pradesh Congress
Committee, said that if needed, post-poll discussions could be held
and indicated that the development should not adversely impact the
prospects of a future alliance.

The Trinamool Congress was a “respected partner” in the government at
the Centre, and he would not like to blame anyone for the collapse of
the alliance. “I was involved in the discussions only at the
preliminary stage….But, whatever decisions taken by the local
leadership of the Congress are my responsibility,” he said.

Downplaying the rift between the two parties, Mr. Mukherjee said:
“Civic elections are very different from Lok Sabha elections or
Assembly elections: Lok Sabha elections and Assembly elections are
fought on the issue of governance — how the country or the State is
run.”

“That the alliance did not work out is unfortunate, but given the
nature and context of the municipal elections, this is not unusual,”
he said.

Mr. Mukherjee said the Congress's agenda was to dislodge the Left
front from power since the Left parties withdrew support to the UPA
government “without any reason” in 2008.

Without spelling out the reason for the split even after two weeks,
the Trinamool Congress also highlighted the need for targeting the
Left Front for what it called its failure to deliver the goods.

During the day, Mr. Mukherjee launched the Congress campaign. There
was commotion at a conference of party workers at Panihati in North 24
Parganas district after a scuffle among party supporters.

Keywords: Congress-Trinamool split, Pranab Mukherjee

http://beta.thehindu.com/news/national/article427397.ece

Kolkata, May 16, 2010 Buddhadeb rejects Trinamool demand to advance
Assembly poll
PTI

PTI A file picture of West Bengal Chief Minister Buddhadeb
Bhattacharjee. Photo: PTI Related

West Bengal Chief Minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee on Sunday rejected
Trinamool Congress’ demand for advancing 2011 Assembly elections in
the State, saying it was only the State government which could make a
recommendation in the matter.

“We have thought over holding the elections on scheduled time. Only
the State government can take a decision to hold elections early or
not,” Mr. Bhattacharjee said.

Addressing a press conference at the CPI(M) party office in Kolkata,
the Chief Minister, without naming Mamata Banerjee, said the person
who made this demand was not conversant with the Constitution.

“The careless utterances indicate reckless and whimsical thoughts,” he
pointed out.

He alleged that forces like the RSS, Maoists, ultra-rightists and
foreign forces have joined together to fight the Left.

Mr. Bhattacharjee said RSS mouthpiece Organiser recently said the
Trinamool Congress should come to power in West Bengal, indicating
that the two organisations had united against the Left Front.

“Those leaders from the BJP who have joined the Trinamool Congress
have links with the RSS,” he claimed.

Attacking the Trinamool Congress, Mr. Bhattacharjee said whereas the
Left parties want the progress of West Bengal, Trinamool wants to take
the State backward.

Mr. Bhattacharjee accused Trinamool Congress of facilitating the
support base for the Maoists in West Bengal by consistently denying
their existence.

Questioning the rationality of Trinamool Congress’ argument that there
was no Maoist in West Bengal, he argued how could they be absent if
Naxals existed in neighbouring States of Jharkhand and Orissa.

“Even the Centre will never accept the argument of Trinamool
Congress,” the Chief Minister said.

Maoists were blatantly used by Trinamool Congress to create violence
in Nandigram, he alleged.

The Congress had realised that the party was a violent and reactionary
force and this led to the opposition to its former ally on the issue
of civic polls, he said.

The Chief Minister also mocked Trinamool’s “impossible” claim of
transforming Kolkata into a London-like city if it won the May 30
civic elections.

“The claim is utterly divorced from reality prevailing in the State or
for that matter in the country.”

Mr. Bhattacharjee also questioned Railway Minister Mamata Banerjee’s
frequent announcements of new trains. “We do not know where trains
like ‘Duranto’ or others are going,” he said.

Keywords: Buddhadeb, Mamata Banerjee, West Bengal Assembly elections,
TMC

http://beta.thehindu.com/news/states/other-states/article431484.ece

LUCKNOW, May 18, 2010 Congress will defeat BSP in 2012: Rahul
Special Correspondent

PTI AICC General Secretary Rahul Gandhi checks a bow and arrow
presented to him by a tribal supporter during a rally at Harora in
Uttar Pradesh on Tuesday. Related

Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi on Tuesday declared that the
ruling Bahujan Samaj Party in Uttar Pradesh would taste defeat at the
hands of his party in the 2012 Assembly elections.

Mr. Gandhi scotched rumours of a tie-up between the Congress and the
BSP in the light of the latter's support to the UPA government on the
cut motion in Parliament. There would be no understanding between the
two parties, he said.

The Amethi MP alleged that dalits were unhappy in the present regime.
Whenever he asked them about the functioning of the State government
during his visits, they said, “yahan to sarkar nahin hai” (the
government is non-functional here), he said.

There would be no compromise on the State's development and youth
would emerge as the fulcrum of the impending change, he said. He was
ready to be at the vanguard of the struggle to bring about a regime
change. “This government will go, but the future of the State is a
relatively bigger issue than mere defeat of the BSP.”

Addressing a public meeting at Ahraura in Mirzapur district on
Tuesday, his second in the State since the launch of the Congress
“sandesh yatras” on April 14, Mr. Gandhi said thousands of crores was
given to the State in the form of Central funds. But the money was not
put to good use and the benefits of the central measures were not
reaching the poor. The State government's record on implementation of
welfare schemes and providing power and employment was dismal. The
Mayawati regime's stand that the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural
Employment Guarantee Programme would not benefit the poor was not
right.

The power units in the Mirzapur-Sonebhadra region supplied electricity
to the entire State, but the villages here were given barely five to
six hours of power supply. Compared to U.P., which had a population of
18 crore, Punjab with a population of just 3 crore was generating more
electricity.

Mr. Gandhi said the State people had rejected politics based on
religion pursued by the BJP and caste politics pursued by the
Samajwadi Party and the BSP. “U.P. of the last 20 years has to
change,” he said.

Mr. Gandhi also pointed out that U.P. was the biggest power-bloc in
India and if it prospered, the nation would progress.

“U.P. has the power to change the equations in the country, but the
first step is to enforce a change in the State.”

Keywords: AICC, Rahul Gandhi, BSP, Mayawati

http://beta.thehindu.com/news/states/other-states/article433128.ece

...and I am Sid Harth
navanavonmilita
2010-05-19 16:13:23 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/political-bog-sid-harth-2/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-2/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliancesand-unholy-alliances-sid-harth/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-3/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-4/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-5/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/?page_id=1056
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-6/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-7/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-8/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-9/

Soren hogs limelight with controversies
May 19th, 2010 - 5:03 pm ICT by IANS -
By Nityanand Shukla

Ranchi, May 19 (IANS) Jharkhand Chief Minister and president of the
Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM) Shibu Soren always hogs the limelight —
but for controversial reasons.

His critics call him a hard bargainer and an unpredictable politician
who uses constitutional provisions for self-interest.

In July 2004, Soren, who was then central coal minister, allegedly
caused embarrassment to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh by trying to
evade arrest against a warrant issued in connection with a three-
decade-old massacre case.

Soren seems to be the only politician in the country who became a
state’s chief minister thrice without being a legislator.

As per constitutional provisions, a person, who is not a legislator,
can be sworn-in as chief minister but he has to get elected to the
state assembly within six months.

“Soren has made a mockery of the constitution. He became chief
minister thrice without being a legislator,” said former chief
minister and president of Jharkhand Vikas Morcha-Prajatantrik (JVM-P)
Babulal Marandi.

Marandi has filed a petition in the Supreme Court challenging Soren’s
continuation as Jharkhand chief minister without being a member of the
assembly.

Soren became chief minister for the first time in March 2005 despite
the fact that the numbers were against him. At that time he was
central coal minister and a Lok Sabha MP. He had to quit as chief
minister after he failed to prove his majority in the house.

He became chief minister for the second time in August 2008. At that
time, Soren was a Lok Sabha MP and lost the Tamar assembly bypoll in
January 2009. As a result, he was forced to quit as chief minister.

Soren’s third stint as chief minister started Dec 30 last year. He is
still not a member of the state assembly.

He was undecided about fighting an assembly poll when the present
political crisis in the state began. The crisis was sparked April 27
when he voted in favour of the United Progressive Alliance government
on a cut motion moved in the Lok Sabha by his ally in Jharkhand,
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

The BJP reacted sharply for his act and April 28 announced withdrawal
of support from his government in Jharkhand.

On Tuesday, soon after the JMM and the BJP inked a deal for sharing
power in the state for 28 months each, Soren announced he will quit as
chief minister.

Arjun Munda, BJP national general secretary and former chief minister,
is likely to head the new government. According to BJP leaders, Soren
will quit May 25.

“History will remember Soren for using constitutional provisions for
self-interest. This is the worst example of misusing the provisions,”
Shailesh Sinha, Jharkhand Congress general secretary, told IANS.

http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/politics/soren-hogs-limelight-with-controversies_100366254.html

Shibu Soren waits for Court to decide his fate
Pratyush | Dec 4 2006

Shibu Soren, Former Union Coal Minister, has been shifted to Tihar
jail hospital from AIIMS on Sunday.

He has been found guilty in the connection with murder of his personal
secretary, Shashinath Jha in 1994.

Later he was admitted to AIIMS after complaining of severe chest pain.

Soren will be taken to the court from the Tihar Jail hospital. The
court will deliver the nature of punishment for him on Tuesday.

According to the Law officer of Tihar jail, Sunil Gupta, the jail
doctors have said that Soren will be able to go to court on Tuesday.
He said further that the doctors are planning to shift him to his cell
in the evening.

Soren has been made accused under the charges of criminal conspiracy,
abduction and murder case. Now, on Tuesday, the Tis Hazari court will
decide Soren’s fate.

Read 47021

Tags: Shibu Soren, Tis Hazari Court, Shashinath Jha, AIIMS, Tihar
Jail, Global, India

http://www.indiadaily.org/entry/shibu-soren-waits-for-court-to-decide-his-fate/

...and I am Sid Harth
navanavonmilita
2010-05-20 12:52:00 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/political-bog-sid-harth-2/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-2/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliancesand-unholy-alliances-sid-harth/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-3/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-4/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-5/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/?page_id=1056
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-6/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-7/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-8/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-9/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-10/

SC refuses urgent hearing to petition of Marandi
STAFF WRITER 10:59 HRS IST

New Delhi, May 20 (PTI) The Supreme Court today refused to give urgent
hearing to the petition filed by JVM chief Babulal Marandi seeking
dismissal of Shibu Soren government for misusing Constitutional
provision by occupying the post of Chief Minister without being
elected to the state Assembly.

A vacation bench comprising Justices G S Singhvi and Chandramouli
Prasad said that there was no urgency in the matter and it will be
heard during the routine course.

Marandi, who was the first Chief Minister of Jharkhand after the state
was carved out from Bihar, accused the JMM chief of misusing the
special provision under Article 164 (4) of the Constitution.

Article 164 (4) enables an unelected person to become chief minister
subject to the condition that he/she would get elected to the Assembly
within six months

http://www.ptinews.com/news/660541_SC-refuses-urgent-hearing-to-petition-of-Marandi

No problem with Achuthanandan, says Vijayan
STAFF WRITER 15:17 HRS IST

Thiruvananthapuram, May 20 (PTI) CPI(M) state secretary Pinarayi
Vijayan today said there was no difference of opinion between him and
Chief Minister V S Achuthanandan as portrayed by the media.

"Achuthanandan has no problem with the party or with me as reported by
the media," he said during a meet-the-press programme organised by
Kesari Memorial Journalist Trust here.

Vijayan had yesterday described former chief minister and slain CPI(M)
leader E K Nayanar as a team captain who paid due attention in taking
care of cabinet colleagues at times of crisis.

It was seen as an indirect attack on Achuthanandan who had a bitter
fallout with Vijayan over the SNC-Lavalin case, in which the latter is
being prosecuted by the CBI.

"I have not criticised Achuthanandan. I only talked about Nayanar and
his personal qualities. But the media gave a wrong picture about the
statement," he said.

http://www.ptinews.com/news/660823_No-problem-with-Achuthanandan--says-Vijayan

Ker CM downplays Vijayan's criticism against him
STAFF WRITER 14:50 HRS IST

Thiruvananthapuram, May 19 (PTI) Kerala Chief Minister and senior
CPI(M) leader V S Achuthanandan today downplayed criticism that he was
"not protecting" his cabinet colleagues, though holding the highest
executive post in the state.

"Some baseless media reports are coming out with these kind of
allegations. I am not taking them seriously", he told reporters to a
question during a cabinet briefing.

He was answering a query that CPI-M State Secretary Pinarayi Vijayan,
considered his bete noire, had levelled such a charge at a function at
Kannur.

At the function, organised in memory of former Chief Minister and
veteran CPI(M) leader E K Nayanar, Vijayan had reportedly stated that
Nayanar had always protected his cabinet colleagues and won the
admiration of all and that he was a role model for all Communists to
follow.

Achuthanandan has been at loggerheads with the official faction in the
CPI-M, led by Vijayan.

http://www.ptinews.com/news/659289_Ker-CM-downplays-Vijayan-s-criticism-against-him

BJP helps CPI(M) during elections in Bengal: Mamata
STAFF WRITER 21:40 HRS IST

Kolkata, May 19 (PTI) Trinamool Congress chief Mamata Banerjee today
slammed former ally BJP for "helping" the CPI(M) during elections in
West Bengal.

"What strength has the BJP in Bengal? Their only task is to divide
votes during elections and help the CPI(M)," Banerjee told a rally for
the May 30 civic elections.

She claimed that the seven Lok Sabha seats that the CPI(M) won in 2009
Lok Sabha elections was because of division of votes by the BJP.

She said Assembly elections in West Bengal would be held within two to
three months and that the time had come for the Marxists to go.

"CPI-M has been in power in the state for 34 years.

Why should you vote for them?" she asked.

http://www.ptinews.com/news/660253_BJP-helps-CPI-M--during-elections-in-Bengal--Mamata

Sharad Pawar not to attend UPA-II anniversary event
STAFF WRITER 21:19 HRS IST

New Delhi, May 19 (PTI) NCP supremo Sharad Pawar will not be attending
the first anniversary celebrations of the UPA-II here on May 22.

Pawar, who is Food and Agriculture Minister, left for abroad today on
a week-long visit. It is not immediately known who will represent NCP
in the celebrations. Union Ministers Praful Patel and Agatha Sangma
represent the party in the government along with Pawar.

Trinamool Congress chief Mamata Banerjee will be present at the
celebrations and she conveyed her decision to Prime Minister Manmohan
Singh who had rang her up yesterday to invite her on the occasion.

DMK sources said that Union Minister M K Alagiri is unlikely to attend
the celebrations as he is on a personal visit to the US. DMK leaders T
R Baalu and Dayanidhi Maran are likely to attend.

Government sources said that DMK chief M Karunanidhi has also been
invited.

http://www.ptinews.com/news/660214_Sharad-Pawar-not-to-attend-UPA-II-anniversary-event

Naveen forging links with Cong to speed up Posco: CPI
STAFF WRITER 21:15 HRS IST

Paradip (Orissa), May 19 (PTI) Accusing Orissa Chief Minister Naveen
Patnaik of forging links with Congress leaders to speed up Posco
project near here, CPI leader A B Bardhan today alleged that police
cracked down on protesters last week on the instruction of the BJD
supremo.

"Naveen Patnaik has links with Congress. Whenever the BJD chief visits
Delhi, he holds talks with Congress leaders," Bardhan said at a
meeting at Balitutha, entry point to proposed Posco site, where many
people were injured in police operation against anti-project
agitators.

Though CPI always considered BJD as a friendly political party and had
entered into seat adjustments with it for the general elections last
year, Patnaik ignores us and interacts with Congress leaders when in
Delhi, he claimed.

http://www.ptinews.com/news/660206_Naveen-forging-links-with-Cong-to-speed-up-Posco--CPI

..and I am Sid Harth
navanavonmilita
2010-05-21 08:26:07 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/political-bog-sid-harth-2/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-2/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliancesand-unholy-alliances-sid-harth/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-3/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-4/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-5/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/?page_id=1056
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-6/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-7/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-8/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-9/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-10/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-11/

Small, Not Beautiful
May 21, 2010, 12.00am IST

Tags:BJP|Jharkhand|JMM|Shibu Soren

Has the creation of small states helped the cause of governance and
development? Jharkhand is a bad advertisement for small states, if one
chooses it as a test case. The end of Bihar's domination has not
brought better governance to Jharkhand's people, especially the
tribals. The state performs poorly on poverty and key human
development indicators. Such conditions reinforce Maoist propaganda
about underdevelopment. To top it all, there is the prevailing
political uncertainty.

A miffed BJP pulled its support from the JMM-led coalition government,
when the incumbent chief minister Shibu Soren failed to support BJP-
sponsored cut motions in the Lok Sabha. A power-sharing formula has
now been struck up with the JMM, with Soren agreeing to step down as
part of the deal. Soren's resignation, apparently, will pave the way
for an Arjun Munda-led BJP government in the state for the next 28
months, followed by a JMM-led government for the remaining 28 months.
Despite the latest arrangement, political uncertainty persists in the
state, as the JMM remains divided over allowing the BJP to head the
government first. The simmering discontent in both camps may erupt
over the distribution of cabinet portfolios, and will remain a
challenge for Munda. Moreover, the ability of the saffron party in
running such formula-based coalitions is in question. Its experiences
with Mayawati in UP in 1997 and H D Kumaraswamy in Karnataka in 2007
are ominous precedents.

Ever since its creation in November 2000, Jharkhand has become a
cauldron for coalition politics with no party getting a clear-cut
majority. It has seen seven chief ministers in the previous decade.
There's been rampant corruption over its mining leases. Madhu Koda, a
former chief minister, was accused of stashing away Rs 4,000 crore
garnered through mining scams. The current power-sharing formula, if
at all it lasts, will produce another two chief ministers before the
state goes to assembly elections in 2014. Compare that to Chhattisgarh
and Uttarakhand, which have seen stable governments and a decade of
sustained infrastructure development.

Jharkhand's rulers have failed its people repeatedly on governance and
redressal of their problems. The state's political elites need to
remember their ideals when they fought for a separate state, and
arrest the slide now. Otherwise Jharkhand may end up illustrating
precisely the dangers of carving out small states when they happen to
be rich in resources: they are subject to capture by tiny,
kleptocratic elites.

Readers' opinions (2)

R.K.Malhotra New Delhi 21/05/2010 at 09:17 am
The adage or punchline 'small is beautiful' is right,provided it has
requisite carat,cut and clarity.The small state of Jharkhand is
endowed with mineral wealth--from Coal to Uranium--it is the small
minded polticians propped up by national parties which are proving its
bane.

Offensiverohitchandavarker panjim,goa 21/05/2010 at 08:57 am
The reason Soren is hankering for the CM's post has nothing to do with
improving people's lives

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/opinion/edit-page/Small-Not-Beautiful/articleshow/5954630.cms

Mayawati to attend UPA-2 dinner?
TNN, May 21, 2010, 03.54am IST

Tags:Dinner|UPA|mayawati|Mulayam singh

NEW DELHI: Suspense looms over BSP chief Mayawati's attendance at the
UPA-2 dinner on Saturday but SP chief Mulayam Singh Yadav has
regretted his absence with a letter that contains a strong vote of
support for the ruling coalition.

The biggies from Uttar Pradesh have been invited for the dinner to
celebrate UPA-2 completing a year in office, a gala which seeks to put
focus back on how Congress is ruling the polity without much
challenge. BSP surprised manyby voting against Opposition-sponsored
cut motions in the budget session of Parliament. The decision was seen
as tactical as there was no real threat to the government.

DMK is likely to be represented by parliamentary leader T R Baalu,
though there may be additions. Trinamool Congress chief Mamata
Banerjee has agreed to attend the dinner despite being caught up by
civic elections in West Bengal.

While the railways minister was seen to have been upset over Congress
decision to not accept her terms of seat-sharing, it is learnt that
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh personally spoke to her over telephone.
Her absence would have robbed the celebrations of some of their sheen
with a message of dissonance in the ruling camp.

SP chief Mulayam Singh's absence is unlikely to be felt as he has more
than compensated with an "effusive and friendly" letter to the PM. He
is learnt to have praised the UPA's tenure in office for its
achievements and committed his continued backing of his 21-MP outfit.

Mulayam Singh will be busy with the SP national executive being held
in Kolkata from May 21-23, where the party is expected to chalk out
its agitational plan against the Uttar Pradesh government headed by
rival Mayawati.

Other allies like NCP will be present though Sharad Pawar is
travelling abroad. This is a changed UPA set up with sharp decline in
the number of allies owing to a handsome tally notched up by Congress
in 2009 Lok Sabha polls.

The event will be preceded by the release of a `report to people' on
the government's performance in office. The ritual show of strength
will see Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Congress chief Sonia Gandhi
and leaders of allied and supporting parties in attendance.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Mayawati-to-attend-UPA-2-dinner/articleshow/5955450.cms

A wasted year: The common man's woes only increased
May 20, 2010 16:37 IST
Tags: Sonia Gandhi, Lal Bahadur Shastri, United Progressive Alliance-
II, Rahul Gandhi, Rajya Sabha
Email
thisSave to
My PageAsk
UsersWrite a
CommentIn first year of the UPA-2, non-performance is visible in all
areas of governance, writes Virendra Kapoor.

If you asked the aam aadmi if there was anything to celebrate at the
end of one year in office of the United Progressive Alliance-II
government, the answer would be a big yawn. The ubiquitous aam aadmi
never had it so bad. His staple dal-roti has become so costly that he
has had to cut down on the family's monthly rations.

Never mind the rising costs of electricity, petrol, cooking gas,
public transport, schooling etc. Besides, the law and order situation
even in the big metros has worsened further in recent months. In
short, the Congress-led coalition has failed to protect the interests
of the very aam aadmi in whose name it had won the second successive
mandate.

Indeed, the non-performance is visible in all other areas of
governance. After winning the second term in office, it was hoped that
Manmohan Singh [ Images ] would emerge from the shadows of the
Congress President Sonia Gandhi [ Images ], and conduct himself as a
leader in his own right. But, then, he has got where he has being self-
effacing and modest.

A lifetime's habits are unlikely to change at this late stage even if
the manna from heaven in the form the prime ministership of the
world's largest democracy literally fell in his lap.

In a newspaper column, author and historian Ramachandra Guha compared
Singh with India's [ Images ] second Prime Minister Lal Bahadur
Shastri [ Images ]. It is quite off the mark. For one, Shastri was a
politician of long standing. As an understudy of Nehru, he was the
natural choice for heading the government following the death of the
former. Yes, initially Shastri did evoke ridicule in some quarters but
that was not due to his performance as prime minister.

It was his physical stature which caused titters whenever he figured
in the obligatory documentaries screened in cinema halls. However
following the 1965 war with Pakistan, such ridicule stopped as Shastri
gained political stature in his own right. As against Shastri, one has
been waiting in vain for six years for Singh to acquire that status in
the popular mind.

So, Singh continues to be the non-leader he was when sheer destiny
first catapulted him into the prime ministerial gaddi in May 2004. The
failure of the prime minister to acquire a stature of his own has had
a deleterious effect on the quality of administration. For, when the
constitutional head of government is a cipher and is obliged to take
orders from someone outside the government, his authority stands duly
undermined.

Given that the exigencies of coalition politics had inevitably freed
ministers belonging to the allied parties from the obligations usually
enjoined upon them by the Cabinet system of government, the scant
importance Congress ministers accorded the prime minister in matters
of governance has further emasculated his authority. To begin with,
the peculiar arrangement of government formation wherein the real
power vests in the party chief is infelicitous to the smooth
functioning of government.

Yet, if the UPA-I gave a relatively better account of itself, a lot of
credit must go to the Leftists who provided it stable ideological
moorings. With the luxury of enhanced numbers, and without the stern
monitoring of the Communists, UPA-II was supposed to act far more
decisively in implementing its electoral promises. But from the word
go, the prime minister has faltered at every step.

Whether it was the stand-off before the ministry formation with the
DMK, or the allocation of portfolios, the impression created was one
of a weak and wavering leader who was entirely clueless about the ship
of State he was obliged to steer by sheer default. On their part, the
Gandhis were not ready yet to ascend the ~gaddi~ formally that they
considered theirs by right because the chosen heir, Rahul Gandhi
[ Images ], was still not through with his `discovery of India.'

The question, therefore, that must be asked is as to why the nation
must suffer for want of an effective leader, a leader in his own
right, who can command the ship of the State with a degree of
authority. As things are, it looks as if Singh is assailed by self-
doubt that he is a mere caretaker meant to keep the prime ministerial
~gaddi~ warm till the anointed one can take his rightful place.

The resulting confusion shows in official decision-mak ing. So, you
had the Women's Reservation Bill introduced with great fanfare in the
Rajya Sabha and duly passed with the willing support of the BJP and
the Communists. But those who had pushed the prime minister to take
the bill to the Rajya Sabha so that they could take credit for having
it passed on the centenary of the International Women's Day -- and
could be shown by an obliging Doordarshan being facilitated by hordes
of women from the party stable -- did not help the PM in finding a
solution to the logjam over it in the Lok Sabha.

Likewise, there is stalemate over the proposed food security bill, the
latest bee in the bonnet of the jholawalaas who have emerged as the
chief mentors of Sonia Gandhi. Even within the government there is no
consensus on the actual number of the below-the-poverty-line families,
and on whether the free monthly ration should be 25 kilos or 35
kilos.

Again, the nuclear liability bill, without whose passage the prime
minister cannot roll out the controversial Indo-US civil nuclear deal,
is mired in controversy, though the government has tricked the
opposition by sending it to a parliamentary committee headed by a
Congressman.

Of course, the biggest disaster is the anti-Maoist policy. After the
Pune terror attack and the systematic slaying of the police and
paramilitary jawans by the Naxals, Union Home Minister P Chidambaram
[ Images ] no longer struts his act as arrogantly as he had done till
only the other day.

It is notable that the prime minister has not said a word edgeways
even as Digvijay Singh [ Images ], Sonia Gandhi and other Congress
biggies have weighed in with `considered' opinions on the home
minister's initial all-out confrontation with the armed guerrillas.
The prime minister's stony silence is all the more shocking given that
only a few months ago he had described the Maoist insurrection as the
'biggest internal security challenge' to the country. In what is a
clear admission of failure of its pro-active policy, the central
government has now taken to shifting the onus for taming the Naxal
challenge to the state governments.

Or take the terrible political management of Manmohan Singh. He
continues to shoulder the deadweight of the tainted Telecom Minister A
Raja [ Images ] without mustering the courage to at least move him to
a less lucrative charge. After the ejection of the voluble but error-
prone junior minister for foreign affairs, Shashi Tharoor [ Images ],
the PM has had to contend with the frequent indiscretions of the
Minister of State for Environment and Forests Jairam Ramesh
[ Images ].

Then there is the Sharm-el-Sheikh faux pas and the flip-flop on the
resumption of composite and not-so-composite dialogue with Pakistan.
The failure to pursue an independent foreign policy so that our
national interest, say, in the case of Iran vis-a- vis hydrocarbon
security, could not be jeopardised.

Yes, on the positive side you would say that the economy is still
growing at a decent clip. It is. But it is no thanks to the
government. Our economy was never heavily export-reliant. So it was
able to withstand the global financial tremors after the Wall Street
collapse better. Besides, the famed entrepreneurial energies of
Indians were in full play the moment the government vacated space and
stopped messing around with business and industry. However, remember
that during the year no further progress was made on structural
reforms, or in opening up key sectors of the economy like insurance,
health, defence, etc.

Honestly, there is nothing to gloat about the performance of the
government these past 12 months. Yet, in spite of it being a wasted
year, with the government having nothing to show except that it
survived somehow -- even if that meant blackmailing the Yadav duo of
Mulayam and Lalu and that eponymous mountain of Maya called Mayawati
[ Images ] -- the prime minister faces no serious threat from the
opposition. It is because the opposition seems to be in a bigger mess
than even the UPA.

If the UPA leadership is uninspiring, so is the case with the
leadership of the opposition, with a second-rung leader from Nagpur
thrust as the head of the main opposition party.

For sure, the government would muddle through in the coming months as
well till the strange arrangement devised by the family to keep the
gaddi warm for Rahul Gandhi is terminated.

Meanwhile, the aam aadmi can continue to put up most stoically with
the humungous rise in the prices of his staple food.

Virendra Kapoor

Discussion Board



Write a message







total 14 messages

Completing 5 yrs term is of no use
by vijaya kumar on May 21, 2010 12:25 PM

Manmohan singh n his team of ministers have done nothing in the by
gone years. Only thing special about him is that he his loyal to 10
Janpath and would not ditch her. He is a good person, simple , loyal
etc etc, but , that does not serve purpose politecally since he needs
to be vigilent and show place to corupt ministers, bureacrates, must
take quick decisions/actions to curb price rise and he has been
failure so far naxalites are concerned. There is no movement of
judicial department, anarchy, no cohesion even among congress chief
ministers. Frankly, there is no bite in their functions. His govt. is
thriving because of lack of co operation among oppositions. Completing
full 5 yrs term is no use, what u did during this period is more
important. Indecisive actions on Afzal Guru n Kasab n playing all
cards to appease minorities to strenthen vote bank policy is what
Congress all about.

Can the PM really solve any problem?
by kiran paranjpe on May 21, 2010 12:15 PM

Dear Sir, India in 1947 was already a populated country with 330Mn
people. The problems that Pt Nehru mentioned were humongous even then
but fresh with the euphoria of freedom, the people were hopeful and
patient too.
Congress Govts that followed since '47, followed a policy of
cultivating vote banks to stay in power. We are now tasting the fruits
of rampant populism, vote bank politics taken to rediculous levels,
and the rise of the elections industry where our leaders do nothing
beyond securing their power for the next election.
The Bureaucracy, once the steel frame of the British Empire has now
become a deadweight and a dampener of any inititative of the Govt.
Lastly, a nexus of the most powerful classes: the Politicians, the
Bureaucrats, the local thugs and the irresponsible Media have made the
country ungovernable.
Our PM is the first of the appointee prime minister. Now we are also
seeing appointee CMs who cannot manage a motley crowd of legislators
and ministers on their own.
Is it any surprise that our country is sliding into chaos and
lawlessness. Can our PM really do anything?

Not easy to run 120 Crore popullated country
by amit mittal on May 21, 2010 10:37 AM

We should appreciate that it is not a joke to run a country with 120
crore popullation . Specially at a time when global economy was going
through deep recession , we managed to survive , only because of able
leadership of a
economist ie Dr Manmohan Singh .

You may recall chandrasekhar FIASCO , when goverment has to deposit
their gold reserves to run the country. Thanks god , situation is much
better this time.

Kudos to manmohan , chidambaram , pranab and sonia team.

Re: Not easy to run 120 Crore popullated country
by Lokesh Kumar on May 21, 2010 10:55 AM
rightly said.... congress really managed recession well

Congress mantra of
by Sumeet Mali on May 21, 2010 08:58 AM

I erally appreciate the writers views as he has clearly mentioned the
failures of UPA in almost all areas. Congress has made a fool of all
Indians by their false commitments. I wish there had being NDA
government and our country would be on right track. As of now we as
common people have no other option apart from waiting the congres to
complete their teerm. Lets pledge to outstead COngress in next
Loksabha election and make sure NDA government is formed.

MMS is a do nothing PM
by vijaya kumar on May 20, 2010 06:17 PM

MMS is a do nothing PM. In his first tenure he was just enjoying the
spill overs of the successes of the previous NDA govt which prevailed
for much of the first half of UPA1. In second half he and his PMO
cronies made the people believe that the obstructionist Commie block
and the BJP in opp are a big impediment in implementing his visions.
But now after a year in UPA2 it is clear that he is a do nothing PM .
He leads a bunch of corrupt ministers who are out there to loot the
nation and cheat the people under a variety of pretext luring them
with temporary trinkets while they cause this nation irreversible
damage.

What about
by ganapathi on May 20, 2010 05:53 PM

bringing back our money from Swiss bank?

Re: What about
by Rajesh Modi on May 20, 2010 06:31 PM
THAT MONEY BELONGS TO GREAT GREAT GRANDSON OF R.G.(AN NOT YOUR AND
MINE) TO LORD OVER INDIANS WHO CANNOT HAVE PM OF THEIR OWN.

UPA 1 YR.
by Krishnan Rajan on May 20, 2010 05:42 PM

UPA has done nothing in 1 yr.The rt. to educn bill is not going to
give better education to our children.The % of dropouts is not going
to change.Our educated people are still wanting in their skills as per
industry stds.The reservn system and lowering of stds. see to it our
children fare well below in job intervews.Agriculture sd never be
relegated and our education system need tobe changed altogether to
suit the needs of the country.Vliiage structure has to be maintained
and rural economy strengthened.People who have never seen villages are
formulating policies.Though mfg.is an essential part of economy
negative agricultural growth is going to affect our growth sooner or
later.

Re: UPA 1 YR.
by srinivasan mv on May 20, 2010 06:00 PM
If you score 35% or 45% you are assured of a BE seat on the basis of
caste. If that person can not score even 50% why should he
unnecessarily waste the govt.'s money and go to an Engineering
college? God can only understand this TN govt.'s logic. How can I
trust such an Engineer for building my house?

Poor going poor and rich going rich in congress govt
by anil sharma on May 20, 2010 05:41 PM

Article analysis is excellent and practically every body is disturbed
with high cost of living and value of money going down when buy living
hood items.
This shows UPA-2 is against the acceptation of the large poor indian
citizens those are earning less then one lac per annum.
Poor want govt hospital, govt school, govt colleges, govt job or 365
days jobs as per education of the unemployed youth as well as till 55
years old persons.

wated opportunity
by Prem Gutty on May 20, 2010 05:33 PM

good analysis. Unfortunately Congress party has mastered the art of
managing the media today. So truth and analysis like this do not
create any effect.

Re: wated opportunity
by srinivasan mv on May 20, 2010 06:03 PM
Wait!! UPA will come back to power again. We have the key. Reservation
for Minorities. That is it we get majority.

stud=vijaykumar
by amritha chaithanya on May 20, 2010 05:30 PM

sour grapes!

stud=vijaykumar
by amritha chaithanya on May 20, 2010 05:30 PM

sour grapes!

guys
by ankyr on May 20, 2010 05:19 PM

jaago ,,,,otherwise coming times wil not allow u to hv a nice
sleep,,,cast ur vote properly,,,

Writer after Writer is slamming this...
by Stud on May 20, 2010 05:08 PM

AXIS OF EVIL called Congress lead UPA.

I am glad that everybody is feeling the pinch, I want people to be
even more harassed till such time they realize the price they have
paid to maintain this PHONY SECULARISM practicing government.

Congress led UPA is India's AXIS OF EVIL.

Thank you Virendra Kapoorji, I enjoy reading your articles in the Free
Press Journal.

Re: Writer after Writer is slamming this...
by neelam on May 20, 2010 05:57 PM
Actally rediff hasn't recceived its hafta from kongi.

UPA is a total failure
by vijaya kumar on May 20, 2010 05:07 PM

UPA is a total failure. Just tell me one field/area where UPA has done
okay forget well. Rising food prices, fuel prices, now energy(power)
prices, corruption, national security, foreign affairs/policy, dealing
with rogue nations, internal security, maoist violence, 2G/3G spectrum
auction, even its UID project where now Mr. Nilekani is being let
down, diastrous nuclear policy. All are shiny examples of this
governments total failure.

Re: UPA is a total failure
by Indian Citizen on May 20, 2010 05:12 PM
In one line: UPA is a total disaster led by an Economist of emminense.

Re: Re: UPA is a total failure
by kristalsoldier on May 20, 2010 07:10 PM
In one line the answer to your question Vijaya Kumar is:

The UPA has done well in exhibiting incompetence and fostering
corruption.

What do you think? Right on the mark?

Re: UPA is a total failure
by Sumeet Mali on May 21, 2010 09:02 AM
Very rightly said !!
Congress mantra of "Aam AAdmi" is a pure bluff !!

UPA- I & II all are failure
by vijaya kumar on May 20, 2010 05:04 PM

UPA II have started off promptly from where & what they left in their
first turn of mess up of country for the period May 2004 - May 2009.
Same old things - Minority Appeasement, Hindus bashing, pseudo
secularism, stench of corruption all through without any abandon,
rising prices & inflation, dearth of agricultural production & food
stuff due to short sighted policies, dilly dallying to face any
corrupt issue or bungling done by the party or alliance leaders, MM
Singh silent & help less spectator not only to the Italians but also
to the indisciplined Junior grade ministers, not reigning in Corrupt
Pawar / Patel / Azhagiri / Baalu for their misdeeds. Let them continue
in the same fashion for 4 more years. But I am doubtful whether our
innocent voters would have realised the folly of their mandates of
2004 & 2009 pARLIAMENTARY Elections & redeem themselves & the country
of this corrupt & inefficient rule. God or Narendra Modiji only can
save this country

Re: UPA- I & II all are failure
by vijaya kumar on May 20, 2010 05:05 PM
contd....

This Govt has reached zenith of its arrogance of power,bunch of joker
politicians/Minsters,sycophants and insensitive set of guys towards
cause of common people of this country. While we have many stalwarts
who can comment on International policies and so on but as a common
man I can share that this Govt has failed miserably to control
commodity prices,has has left criminals to operate in this country as
per their wish. In case they are caught and proved guilty then very
evidently trying to avoid executing even court orders for narrow
political consideration. And all these are happening on the cost of
people of this country. The security of common people are in danger
but arrogant set of Ministers or Congressman are busy blame games
instead of taking action against proven guilty.
No clarity on major issues relating to people of this country at all.
It is very shocking...and disturbing

http://news.rediff.com/column/2010/may/20/a-wasted-year-the-common-mans-woes-only-increased.htm

..and I am Sid Harth
navanavonmilita
2010-05-21 15:25:52 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/political-bog-sid-harth-2/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-2/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliancesand-unholy-alliances-sid-harth/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-3/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-4/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-5/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/?page_id=1056
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-6/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-7/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-8/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-9/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-10/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-11/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-12/

JMM-led Jharkhand Govt to complete its five-year term: Soren
Friday, May 21, 2010, 13:16 [IST]

Bokaro (Jharkhand), May 21 (ANI): Jharkhand Chief Minister Shibu Soren
on Friday said the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM)-led Government would
complete its full five-year term in the state.

"I have formed the government for five years, and shall complete the
tenure. Who will remove me?" said Soren exactly three days after he
had agreed to form the government in Jharkhand on a rotational basis
with the help of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

"The question of a change of government comes if there is no
development. But now development is going on," said Soren giving
indications that there was no deadline for his resignation.

Earlier on Thursday, Soren did not rule out the contesting by poll to
enter the house, which he must do constitutionally by June 30, as he
is a Member of Parliament (MP).

Meanwhile, Soren's son Hemant said: "The party has to abide by
whatever decision the president (Soren) has taken or will take."

The JMM-BJP coalition government plunged into a political crisis after
the BJP withdrew support to government in the wake of Shibu Soren
voting in favour of the UPA during the cut motion in parliament on
April 27.

The BJP first announced it would immediately withdraw support from the
JMM-led government, which would have brought it down and effectively
led to the imposition of President's Rule or attempts by the Congress
to form an alternative government.

However, by April 29 when the party received a letter from Hemant
Soren, offering to support the BJP in leading the coalition, the
withdrawal of support was "put on hold" and a dialogue was pened.
(ANI)

http://news.oneindia.in/2010/05/21/jmmled-jharkhand-govt-to-complete-its-five-year-termsoren.html

LUCKNOW, May 21, 2010 Manmohan's dinner invite puts Mayawati in the
soup
Atiq Khan

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's invite to Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister
Mayawati to a dinner he is hosting to commemorate one year of the UPA-
II government has created a piquant situation for the Bahujan Samaj
Party. For, it is gearing itself to stage a State-wide public protest
(janhit andolan) the same day, Saturday, against the economic policies
of the Congress-led government at the Centre. The protest programme
was finalised about a month ago by the Chief Minister herself.

Dr. Singh has invited all UPA allies and those who have extended
outside support to his government. Ms. Mayawati and Samajwadi Party
president Mulayam Singh fall in the second category. The SP chief, who
is in Kolkata in connection with the national executive meet of his
party, has expressed his inability to attend the dinner.

There is no official word till Friday on whether or not the Chief
Minister will attend or send a representative to the dinner, the
invitation was received a couple of days ago. Officials in the Chief
Minister's office here remain tight-lipped, as were BSP sources.

As the invite clearly mentions one year of the UPA-II government, the
BSP ranks see the dinner party as a political gathering of its allies
and supporters. As it is not an official function, Ms. Mayawati is
under no obligation to attend, say sources.

Dr. Singh's invitation to Ms. Mayawati assumes significance in the
backdrop of the BSP's support to the UPA government to defeat the BJP-
sponsored cut motion in the Lok Sabha last month. Ms. Mayawati then
said her party wanted to thwart communal forces coming to power at the
Centre.

Members of the SP staged a walkout when the motion was put to vote.

Ms. Mayawati's support notwithstanding, both the BSP and the Congress
were quick to dispel suggestions of any bonhomie between the parties.
For, each wants to score points over the other ahead of the 2012
Assembly elections.

Ms. Mayawati blamed the UPA government for the State's backwardness
and even saw in it a Congress-designed conspiracy.

During a visit to her constituency, Rae Bareli, on May 17, UPA
chairperson and Congress president Sonia Gandhi said the Mayawati
government was not putting Central funds to judicious. The very next
day, Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi predicted the defeat of
the BSP at the hands of his party in 2012. Addressing a rally in
Mirzapur district, he rejected the possibility of an understanding
between the two parties.

Tags: Manmohan Singh, UPA, Mayawati, Bahujan Samaj Party

http://beta.thehindu.com/news/states/other-states/article435260.ece

..and I am Sid Harth
navanavonmilita
2010-05-21 18:42:23 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/political-bog-sid-harth-2/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-2/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliancesand-unholy-alliances-sid-harth/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-3/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-4/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-5/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/?page_id=1056
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-6/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-7/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-8/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-9/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-10/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-11/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-12/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-13/

Defiant Soren challenges BJP
Agencies

Tags : Shibu Soren, BJP, L K Advani, Sushma Swaraj, Arun Jaitley

Posted: Fri May 21 2010, 17:27 hrs

Jharkhand/New Delhi:

Jharkhand appears to be headed for another spell of political
uncertainty with a defiant Chief Minister Shibu Soren refusing to
resign and a frustrated BJP saying that state has become a ‘theatre of
the absurd’.

"I have formed the government for five years, and shall complete the
tenure. Who will remove me?" Soren asked while backtracking on his own
announcement on May 18 that BJP and JMM will share power for 28 months
each.

Echoing growing resentment in the BJP top brass over JMM's flip-flops,
senior party leader M M Joshi told reporters in Delhi that the state
"has become a theatre of the absurd. I would not like to say anything
more on this."

Several members of the BJP Parliamentary Board including L K Advani,
Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley, were in favour of withdrawal of
support to the Shibu Soren government in the tribal state.

Under the JMM-BJP power-sharing deal, BJP's Arjun Munda will lead the
coalition in the first phase. The BJP-led government under him was to
be sworn-in on May 25.

Why Is Congress Playing Favorites? And How Does This Impact You?

Soren, who had agreed to the arrangement, told reporters in Bokaro
there was no deadline for his resignation.

"The question of a change of government comes if there is no
development. But now development is going on."

Jharkhand had plunged into a political crisis last month when Soren
voted against the BJP's cut motion in the Lok Sabha.

The BJP threatened to withdraw from the coalition but refrained from
doing so when he offered the CM's job to the party. Since then Shibu
has been saying yes and no to going with the BJP, putting the saffron
party in a quandary.

Soren will have to step down in a month's time if he fails to get
elected from any assembly seat since the six- month period.

But the chief minister has also not ruled out contesting a bypoll to
enter the house by June 30 by when the six-month period to get elected
from the day he assumed charge of the post, gets over. He will have to
step down if he doesn't get elected within this period.

Soren's son Hemant, the JMM legislature party leader, who made an
offer to the BJP to head the government in the state after it had
announced its decision to withdraw support on April 28, said, "The
party has to abide by whatever decision the president (Soren) has
taken or will take."

Soren today presided over a meeting of the JMM legislators in Bokaro.
JMM and BJP have 18 MLAs each in the 82-member assembly.

Munda, who has been entrusted by the party leadership to deal with the
crisis, refused to speak to the media.

BJP now seems to have set a final deadline for May 25.

"BJP will hold a Parliamentary Board meeting on May 25 at 3 pm to
discuss the Jharkhand issue," a party leader said.

Sources said the meeting has been scheduled as a back-up plan in case
the JMM doesn't stick to the agreement.

If JMM goes back on its word, BJP is likely to withdraw support to the
Shibu Soren government by evening, sources said.

Munda and Soren had on May 18 announced the agreement to share power
on a rotational basis with the BJP to take over for the first 28
months.

6 Comments |

Jharkhand - uncertain politically

By: TAHariharan | Friday , 21 May '10 20:16:01 PM

In view of the political uncertainty President's rule is the only
option available for good administration. Earlier the better. I hope
after the President's rule, people will be wise enough to elect their
representatives in Jharkhand.

Jharkhand Joke
By: R Varadarajan | Friday , 21 May '10 19:40:04 PM

It is unfortunate that the national party BJP in its over enthusiasm
to acquire power in Jharkhand agreed to everything demanded by JMM -
Now SS is taking its pound of flesh. This drama will continue for some
more time and the state would be thrown into chaos and confusion.
There will be some instant solution the moment President Rule is
proposed by the Governor - because none of the parties have guts to
face the public again!!

Atleast now !
By: chanakya | Friday , 21 May '10 19:31:34 PM

The party which boasts of intellectuals and tongue-in-cheek orators,
must now demonstrate that it has some bones . If BJP really means
business, it must pull down the governemnt with out any delay. If it
stikes any understanding with other parties it is good or else let
President rule be imposed till Naxal problem is resolved. Mr.Shibu
must be restricted to his house and should not be allowed to play this
dubious role of politician cum trader. But does BJP have guts to do
that ?

Shibu Soren
By: Kalpathy Venkataraman | Friday , 21 May '10 19:20:53 PM

In Indian politics, there is basically no difference between the UPA
and the BJP. Both parties are power hungry and are willing to go to
any length to achieve that objective. Look at UPA's coalition
partners; Karunanidhi, Lalu, Pawar, Muulayam et.al who are masters in
corruption management. If they wer in China, they would have been
hanged long time ago for their crimes. BJP is no different. How can
have any association with a murderer like Shibu Soren? Although he was
acquitted by the court system, everyone knows that he was a killer.
How can you blame the Naxalites when you have killers of democracy in
your midst?

PATHETIC
By: Krishnan | Friday , 21 May '10 19:09:26 PM

Please ask Mr.Soren to have a shave so that what he speaks will be
heard loud and clear. SIMPLY PATHETIC

J.M.M. SUPREMO C.M. SHIBU SOREN CHALLENGE TO B.J.P A CONSPIRACY

By: RAJAT KUMAR MOHINDRU .JALANDHAR CITY .PUNJAB | Friday , 21 May '10
18:37:07 PM

The J.M.M. supremo is clearly Quoting that he will successfully run
his Government for Five Years . As no party had secured full mandate
to form Government of its own in Jharkhand . As it is pertinent to
note that Which Party has now decided to give its support to Soren to
rule for Five Years as B.J.P. is in dilemma over the statements of Mr
Shibu Soren . If J.M.M. would have been sincere to B.J.P. there M.P.'s
would have never switched off there Loyalty towards N.D.A. during Cut
Motion in the Parliament . As no doubt who ever rules the State the
mandate by Public will be an eye opener for the B.J.P. whether in the
present circumstances Will the B.J.P. -J.M.M. alliance will go on in
future or there will be another starting period of misunderstandings
between both the Political Parties or Jharkhand will be once again
heading towards Mid Term assembly Polls .

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/defiant-soren-challenges-bjp/621954/0

Hindus face reservation threat: BJP
Agencies

Tags : Pon Radhakrishnan, BJP

Posted: Fri May 21 2010, 17:03 hrs

Madurai:

BJP will launch a major 'awakening Campaign' in July to highlight the
'threat' facing Hindu students due to reservation for minorities (read
Muslims) and monthly Education (Financial) assistance (EFA), party's
Tamil Nadu president Pon Radhakrishnan said here today.

During the campaign from July 4-31, the party will press for similar
EFA for Hindu BCs, SCs, STs and MBCs, he told reporters here after the
party's State Executive Committee meeting.

Government was giving Rs.350 as EFA for minority school students(doing
5th-10th std),and Rs.500 for vocational course students. Besides other
concessions on tuition fee were being given to the minority students.
On an average each student was being given Rs.35,000 a year, he
claimed.

He alleged that Government was encouraging conversions by such moves.

The DMK, which started a big agitation on a ''non-issue like "Anti-
Hindi" agitation, which ultimately affected Tamil students, should now
help the Backward,SC and ST people and get them the EFA, he said.

"There are economically and socially backward people in majority Hindu
community also, who were not able to pursue education like minorities,
who should be helped", he said.

Comments (2) |

Reservations
By: R Varadarajan | 21-May-2010

Reservation is the biggest curse on this country which would
eventually divide the population instead of the thought " India and
Indians ". These cheap pubilicity and vote bank politics ( this is
applicable to all parties ) which has given rise to more than 1000
political in this country whose main aim is to gain some votes from
their respective community instead of the population as whole. The
only reservation should be on the basis of financial backward ness
which no party wants to talk about. These reservations have only
helped the affluent in these communities to a large extent and the
poor have not been benefited by these !!

Politicians ruining the country
By: Aravind | 21-May-2010

Of what use is it to make education free and compulsory for every
child in India if politicians still resort to such cheap gimmics to
remain in power endlessly.

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/hindus-face-reservation-threat-bjp/621948/

Jharkhand has become theatre of the absurd: BJP
Agencies

Tags : BJP, JMM, Arjun Munda, Jharkhand, M M Joshi

Posted: Fri May 21 2010, 16:23 hrs
New Delhi:

BJP appeared to have set a deadline of May 25 for a government led by
its leader Arjun Munda to take charge.Valentine
Gift'sDiscussionBlogsLalu the deshdrohi - By Indian

Reflecting growing resentment in a section of BJP top brass over
continuing political uncertainty in Jharkhand, senior party leader M M
Joshi on Friday said the state had become "a theatre of the absurd".

"It has become a theatre of the absurd. I would not like to say
anything more on this," Joshi told reporters when asked for his views
on JMM dilly-dallying over support to a BJP-led government.

His statement came as BJP appeared to have set a deadline of May 25
for a government led by its leader Arjun Munda to take charge, once
JMM chief and Chief Minister Shibu Soren resigns as promised.

"BJP will hold a Parliamentary Board meeting on May 25 at 3 pm to
discuss the Jharkhand issue," party sources said.

They said the meeting has been scheduled as a back-up plan in case JMM
creates a last minute hitch.

If JMM goes back on its word, BJP is likely to withdraw support to the
Shibu Soren government by evening of May 25, the sources said.

After JMM Legislature Party leader Hemant Soren pledged support in
writing to a BJP-led government, his party has gone back and forth on
its word several times.

While Joshi refused to cross the "laxman rekha" of party discipline
and did not elaborate on the issue, party sources said several members
of BJP Parliamentary Board including L K Advani, Sushma Swaraj and
Arun Jaitley were opposed to government formation and favoured
withdrawal of support to the Shibu Soren government in the tribal
state.

"The best option was to continue with the first Parliamentary Board
decision the day after Soren voted against the cut-motion in Lok Sabha
and we should have withdrawn support to his government," a BJP leader
said.

The BJP Parliamentary Board had been unanimous in its decision on
April 28, sources said.

6 Comments |

who is absurd
By: khushwant singh gill | Friday , 21 May '10 18:34:06 PM

who is absurd Soren or BJP which stands for bhartiya jhoothi party who
is so power hungry that common man does not know . moral: politicians
and diapers need to be changed for the same reason .thanks gill

U TURN BY C.M.SHIBU SOREN IRKS BJP LEADERS
By: RAJAT KUMAR MOHINDRU .JALANDHAR CITY.PUNJAB | Friday , 21 May '10
18:09:41 PM

Jharkhand Chief Minister Mr Shibu Soren U turn have once again upset
the prospects of the B.J.P. -J.M.M. colition . As Mr Soren has always
betrayed with the trustworthy Colition Partners in the past as per
history records available . As B.J.P. had full trust in JMM , but in
the cut motion the role of JMM M.P.'s blotted the mutual relations of
JMM with B.J.P. , No doubt B.J.P. had a proposed pact of 28 months for
each Colition Parter to rule the State , But JMM supremo has clearly
rejected the proposal as it was expected by the political analysist .
As B.J.P. is in dilemma over the role of JMM Chief Mr Shiby Soren that
what new he is going to bring .As there will a colition Government
formation in Jharkhand Lets see that What new Political Equations will
be formed How to rule the State as the masses have given mandate of
hung Assembly .

BJP is behind this absurdity..
By: Disgusted | Friday , 21 May '10 17:36:43 PM

The BJP is actually very weak in Jharkhand. There is internal rivalary
within BJP of Raghubar Das the current Dy.C.M. who sees this as his
chance of life time to become CM but does not have the support of
Central Leadership, Arjun Munda who has developed a rapport with the
Central leadership after becoming MP and is favored by them for CM,
and Yashwant sinha who thinks he is the most enlightened of them all.
It is these factions which is instigating JMM to keep changing its
mind when there wishes do not seem to get fulfilled. By now BJP has
also lost its credibility amongst it support base in Jharkhand. I
think Congress has been the biggest gainer in this theatre of absurd
played by BJP factions and ever dithering JMM and Shibu. The writ of
BJP cemtral leadership hardly runs in the state.

JHARKHAND POLITICS
By: somesh ponmani/Delhi | Friday , 21 May '10 17:33:16 PM

Wah BJP Wah! Way to go. You are setting the right example as to how to
hold on to the gaddi. Continue with your game and you may still be
able to sit in the CM's chair in J'Khand. Good Luck!

Politicians surviving on blackmail
By: (Dr.) B.N.Anand | Friday , 21 May '10 17:30:10 PM

Sir I think political leaders like Shibu Soren, Jaylalita, Mayawati,
Mamta Bannerjee, Kumaraswamy all belong to a class of politicians who
thrive and survive in national politics on the basis of political
blackmail alone . It is a pity that the people of the country have to
bear with such class of politicians. BNA

My sympaty with BJP
By: Sandeep Gaur | Friday , 21 May '10 17:19:55 PM

I think Guruji is never going to learn from his mistakes. I think
there must be old proverb which should say something like "It is not
necessary that you get wiser as you grow older". Start learning
Guruji, people of other states are also watching you.

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/jharkhand-has-become-theatre-of-the-absurd-bjp/621931/0

..and I am Sid Harth
navanavonmilita
2010-05-23 23:22:56 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-14/

Soren indicates to continue, UPA backs
May 23rd, 2010 Anand S.T. Das

Tags: BJP, chief minister, Congress, Jharkhand, JMM, leader, party,
Shibu Soren

May 23: The possibilities of the JMM breaking its ties with ally BJP
and continuing to head the Jharkhand government with support from the
UPA rose on Sunday as the beleaguered Chief Minister and JMM supremo,
Mr Shibu Soren, indicated that he was unlikely to resign on May 25,
the deadline agreed between the JMM and the BJP for a change of
guard.

Even as an unruffled Mr Soren sprang another surprise on Sunday by
claiming that he already had received an offer to become a Union
minister in return for the UPA’s support to the JMM-led government in
Jharkhand, the state’s Congress leaders spoke more candidly about
possibilities of a UPA-backed government coming up to end the
stalemate between the JMM and the BJP lingering for nearly a month.

With the JMM having decided to start its efforts on government
formation entirely afresh, all the party’s MLAs were asked to reach
Ranchi from their various locations like New Delhi, Kolkata and Bokaro
to assemble for a meeting at Soren’s Ranchi home on Monday.

Mr Soren himself returned to Ranchi from Bokaro on Sunday. But he told
reporters in Bokaro, "I am in no hurry to resign by any date. I
already have a proposal to become a minister at the Centre. It is now
for me to decide what I choose". Both he and his son Mr Hemant Soren,
the leader of the JMM Legislature Party, had said in Bokaro on
Saturday that the JMM was in touch with both the BJP and the Congress.
The JMM sources and Mr Soren’s aides said the JMM chief was "most
unlikely" to resign on May 25.

The senior Congress leader, Mr Rameshwar Oraon, described the JMM as a
"natural ally because the JMM has continuously maintained a distance
from the communal forces in the past". The Jharkhand Congress
spokesman, Mr Radhakrishna Kishore, said, "The Congress wants neither
another election after such a short span of the last one nor the
imposition of President’s Rule once again. We will take our steps
after the JMM breaks up with the BJP."

Mr Kishore also refuted speculations that the Congress might have to
distance itself from its ally JVM, led by the former chief minister,
Mr Babulal Marandi. The JVM is known to be opposed to any tie-up with
the JMM.

Meanwhile, in Patna, the senior NDA leader and Bihar Chief Minister,
Mr Nitish Kumar, appeared unhappy with the BJP over Jharkhand’s
prolonged impasse. "When they (BJP) took the first decision (to
withdraw support on April 28), we (JD-U) supported them because it was
the only option left. But they only know what negotiations they had
subsequently," said Mr Kumar on Sunday.

NDA convenor and JD(U) national president, Mr Sharad Yadav, however,
said he would speak to the BJP leaders after reaching Delhi on Sunday
evening. "We will see what we can do. We will try to find out a
solution," said Mr Yadav in Patna.

The JMM’s frequent U-turns and its increased interactions with the
Congress have rendered the BJP in Jharkhand almost speechless. Senior
BJP leaders remained incommunicado throughout Sunday.

http://www.deccanchronicle.com/national/soren-indicates-continue-upa-backs-213

Opinion » Columns »

Siddharth Varadarajan
May 23, 2010 A year of living indecisively
Siddharth Varadarajan

The Hindu Congress president Sonia Gandhi with Prime Minister Manmohan
Singh at her residence after their win in Lok Sabha elections 2009 in
New Delhi on May 16, 2009. Photo: S. Subramanium Related

The inability of the Prime Minister and the Congress president to push
official policies in the direction of meaningful social change leaves
the public confused.

As Manmohan Singh completes the first year of his second term as Prime
Minister, it has become something of a cliché to accuse him of
weakness. His inability to take action against Ministers accused of
corruption or sheer inefficiency is an obvious indicator of his lack
of power within the government. The dissonance on various crucial
policy matters is another. However, these symptoms are more a
reflection of structural weaknesses in the current ruling system than
of individual failing on Dr. Singh's part.

There are, in fact, two sources of weakness in the United Progressive
Alliance arrangement. The first is induced by the compulsions of
coalition government, the second by the nature of the ruling party
itself. Though the Congress won many more seats in 2009 than it did in
2004, it is still dependent on smaller parties whose agendas are
mercurial and unpredictable. But this is a derivative problem,
something of mere arithmetic importance, because it begs the question
of whether the current problems faced by the Prime Minister would
evaporate if the Congress had a majority of its own. Would the
examples of rent-seeking, influence peddling, patronage, inefficiency
and insensitivity we see in the functioning of various Ministries and
government departments disappear if they were run by Congress
Ministers? Would the government have the ability to deliver on its
promise of social and economic inclusiveness if it were staffed only
by the Congress? Only the hopelessly naïve would believe that.

Of the two structural flaws that have weakened the Prime Minister and
his government, then, it is the second which is the more decisive. The
nature of the Congress is a serious, foundational weakness, a
constitutive flaw standing in the way of policy changes that could
allow it to transcend the current political constraints and deliver to
the people of India the kind of governance they deserve.

Much as the Bharatiya Janata Party would like us to believe it, the
existence of two power centres in the government is not unique to the
UPA. It is true that as Prime Minister of the NDA government, Atal
Bihari Vajpayee was also the undisputed leader of the BJP. But the
dyarchy in that arrangement involved a split between the authority of
the party and the sangh parivar, rather than between party and
government, and Mr. Vajpayee was certainly not the head of that
family. As Congress president, a Member of Parliament and head of the
UPA, Sonia Gandhi has a legal and political mandate of the kind the
RSS never had. But the problem is that she is not being decisive in
the exercise of her mandate. Many of the problems the NDA regime ran
into sprang from the sangh parivar's assertiveness. In contrast, the
UPA's problems arise from Ms Gandhi's failure to lead from the front.

Within the Congress party today, there are at least three ideo-
political trends competing for dominance and the divisions and
differences between them are apparent on a number of issues. There is
first the social democratic paternalism of the party machinery as
represented by Ahmed Patel but also Pranab Mukherjee, A.K. Antony,
Veerappa Moily and others. This school recognises the importance of
inclusiveness not as an end in itself but as an instrument to put
political space between the Congress and the BJP. It cannot move
beyond the paradigm of tokenism, little alliances and reservation.
Instead of boldly embracing the Sachar committee's comprehensive
recommendations on ending Muslim marginalisation, for example, or
pushing for a Communal Violence bill that has real teeth, or
encouraging the emergence of dynamic Muslim leaders within the
Congress, this group is more comfortable making a deal with a clerical
section of the community. It is not a coincidence that this group is
also the one making the demand for the inclusion of caste enumeration
in the census as a short-sighted means of beating the OBC parties at
their own game.

The second ideological trend within the Congress is that of
technocratic populism, as represented primarily by Union Home Minister
P. Chidambaram and Ministers like Kamal Nath and others. This section
has a certain disdain for the ‘consensual,' accommodative politics of
the old school but ends up being quite anti-political in its approach.
Not surprisingly, their approach finds the widest resonance with the
mass media and upper middle classes. The Telangana fiasco was the
first disastrous product to emerge from the technocrats but there have
been other bad ideas as well. Mr. Chidambaram rightly questioned the
logistical difficulties involved in conducting a caste census but sees
no problem in the state's ability to collect and keep confidential the
iris scans and ten finger prints of 1.2 billion Indians. The Maoist
insurgency is seen as something that can be ended through an “expanded
mandate” to use military means, and healthy debate and disagreement
are looked upon with suspicion. The technocratic populists are also
impatient with environmental norms and public hearings if they come in
the way of highways and roads and factories and mines.

There is a third trend, too, but this is currently the weakest,
despite being led, in a manner of speaking, by Rahul Gandhi as he
attempts to renovate the Congress from the bottom up. Though there is
a strong modernising element in Mr. Gandhi's approach, his approach is
inherently political and calls for greater attention to be paid to the
voices and aspirations of those who have become disconnected from the
socio-economic mainstream over the past two decades. This trend within
the party, whose ranks include Digvijay Singh, Salman Khurshid, Mani
Shankar Aiyar and also Jairam Ramesh, believes that the Congress can
have a political future only if it reflects the concerns of the
marginalised. It knows the limits of the paternalistic and
technocratic approaches and is pitching for the emergence of the
Congress as a modern political party that is democratic in its outlook
and approach and its internal functioning — something which it is not
today.

To be sure, the boundaries between these three groups are not neatly
drawn. Depending on the specific issue, shifting coalitions get formed
and Ms Gandhi often ends up mediating one way or another.

What makes this struggle within the Congress even more interesting is
that it is happening against the backdrop of big money making greater
and greater inroads into the corridors of power. As is clear from data
on the rising net worth of MPs and MLAs, formal political structures
may be getting atomised but the dominance of super-rich national and
local elites is getting more and more consolidated.

The principal achievements of UPA-I came because Ms Gandhi and the
Congress party provided strong political backing to initiatives like
the Right to Information and the National Rural Employment Guarantee.
But in UPA-II, so far at least, that political backing appears absent.
The fact that there is dissonance within the Congress and the
government on diverse issues is a good sign, an indication that
contestation is under way. But the inability of the Prime Minister and
the Congress president to mould and shape this debate and push
official policies in the direction of meaningful social change leaves
the public confused. Initiatives are being proposed or taken, like the
Women's Reservation Bill and the Food Security Bill, but there is a
danger of these ending up as incomplete measures even as attempts are
made to roll back the gains already made like the Right to
Information.

The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act remains unchanged despite
promises. The land acquisition and rehabilitation policy of the
government is in a mess, affecting the lives of millions of people.
There is a danger that militarisation and securitisation will take the
place of politics as a means of resolving internal conflicts. On the
first anniversary of the UPA's second mandate, it is time Sonia Gandhi
and Manmohan Singh took urgent stock of their joint enterprise.

Keywords: UPA, Manmohan Singh, Sonia Gandhi

http://beta.thehindu.com/opinion/columns/siddharth-varadarajan/article436571.ece?homepage=true

Propping UPA
Vinod Sharma , Hindustan Times
New Delhi, May 24, 2010

First Published: 00:30 IST(24/5/2010)
Last Updated: 00:39 IST(24/5/2010)

Where will Sharad Pawar go?” It was a counterblast to suggestions from
the media that the Congress’s seemingly strained ties with Pawar’s NCP
are hurtling towards a breaking point. And it came from a senior
member of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government.

He couldn’t have put the situation in lesser words. The UPA is on a
strong footing because there is no visible and credible alternative to
it. Not yet. The TINA (there is no alternative) factor will keep
coalition partners rooted to their seats of power until they have
better options. Politicians, like brigands, don’t shoot without a pre-
arranged scoot. More so when they build coalitions primarily to share,
retain or wrest power. Apply the test to Pawar, Mamata Banerjee and
Karunanidhi and you would get your answers.

The NCP shares power with the Congress in Delhi and Mumbai. The
Trinamool and DMK have to wrest and retain power with its help in
Kolkata and Chennai. The UPA wouldn’t unravel so long as the
dependence is mutual and fruitful.

The Congress-led coalition’s wafer-thin majority in the House is at
best a worry for its floor managers. What counts is the ground
situation, which the protagonists know isn’t ripe for fresh polls or
for political realignments that would call for a leadership change
from within the 15th Lok Sabha.

With little help from friends

The Bharatiya Janata Party would have one believe that the UPA misused
the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to make its disenchanted
‘outside supporters’ — Mayawati of the Bahujan Samaj Party, Samajwadi
Party's Mulayam Singh Yadav and Lalu Yadav of the Rashtriya Janata Dal
who are under probe for graft charges — break ranks with the
Opposition and bail out the government in the Budget session. It’s
possible. But what really sobered them up was the prospect of early
elections.

Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee drove home the point to reject
insinuations of BSP’s support for the Budget coming in as a
consideration. Even the SP and RJD members walked out to save UPA from
the life threatening cut motions brought by the Opposition.

“It’s one thing to pose a threat but another to translate that into
reality and face the consequences,” said Mukherjee. The consequence
would have been another general election — something the parties are
unwilling to face just yet.

That apart, the political implications of siding with the BJP against
the “secular” UPA were never lost on Mayawati, Mulayam and Lalu. The
Yadav duo joined up briefly with the saffron party and the Left on the
price-rise issue, in the hope of a give-and-take that never
materialised on the women’s quota Bill.

Lalu admitted it in as many words: “I get nothing from voting for the
cut motions? The government wouldn’t fall and I’d be bracketed with
the communal BJP.” What drove him and Mulayam out of the House was the
cost-benefit analysis of merely exposing the government’s dwindled
numerical strength. The Yadav chieftains were all along aware of the
UPA’s simple majority after discounting their votes.

The symbolism of a numerically weakened UPA had little value for
either of the two — especially Lalu, who needs to keep his distance
from the BJP to present himself as a better choice for Bihar’s Muslims
than the saffron-stained Nitish Kumar. He cannot afford to lose that
space to a resurgent Congress in a triangular fight in the Assembly
polls due later this year.

What’s true for Bihar is applicable to UP. The parties slugging it out
for Muslim support there are the BSP, SP and the Congress. In the no-
holds-barred game it will be difficult for Mulayam and Lalu to live
down even the pretence of opposing the “secular” UPA in tandem with
the BJP.

Out of power and pitted against governments in their home states, the
Yadav leaders are pragmatic enough not to open another battlefront at
the Centre. The Congress, for its part, has kept them engaged by going
slow on the women’s quota Bill that could be the UPA 2’s parallel to
the Indo-US nuclear deal, on which the Left withdrew support from UPA
1.

State polls will tell

The BJP’s stakes in the six assembly polls due in 2010-11 are
restricted to Bihar and, to some extent, Assam. For the Left, however,
it’s a do or die. Its profile at the national level hinges on its
performance in Kerala and West Bengal, where it will be hard put to
retain power. The equations within the UPA will be determined by the
outcome in all states — notably, the alliances the Congress has with
the Trinamool in Bengal and the DMK in Tamil Nadu and Puducherry.
Hung Assemblies in these states and Bihar will enhance the Congress’s
bargaining power, more so if it wrests Kerala and, by some luck,
retains Assam for a third term.

At some stage, the Congress’s long-term agenda of recouping base in
UP, Bihar, Jharkhand, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal and Orissa is bound to
bring it into conflict with regional groupings that count so much in
setting up and running mixed regimes.

But what was possible against Rajiv Gandhi in 1988 — when the Left
teamed up with the BJP to prop up V.P. Singh — wouldn’t be easily
achievable against Rahul and Sonia Gandhi. The BJP today is
floundering, the Left gasping for breath. The Third Front they jointly
parented cannot be regrouped as a credible entity.

Beyond that, only a clairvoyant can tell.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/Propping-UPA/Article1-547653.aspx

Rahul: First among equals?
Pankaj Vohra, Hindustan Times
New Delhi, May 24, 2010

First Published: 00:22 IST(24/5/2010)
Last Updated: 00:25 IST(24/5/2010)

In a democracy, the call on who may succeed an incumbent remains
pertinent at all times. There was the question of after Nehru, who?
And so it has been with all leaders. Therefore, it’s almost a
necessity to ask the same of Manmohan Singh.

On the face of it, the answer is not difficult. Each political party
is looking for leaders who are young, who are close to the average age
of the country. Leaders who are evolving with the times, are credible
and can carry the party with them. In this context, if there is anyone
who can fill the shoes of Manmohan Singh after he goes, it is Rahul
Gandhi.

The AICC general secretary carries the burden of a great legacy, that
of the Nehru-Gandhi family. But if anything, it’s made his claim more
formidable. He is a two-time Lok Sabha MP from Amethi and, at 39, he
is the only national leader of the next generation in sync with the
demographics of this country.

The choices get voices

As with Rahul in the Congress, almost every party is pushing younger
people to leadership roles. The roles for the children of the current
generation of leaders are becoming clearer.

The National Conference has installed Omar Abdullah, 39, as chief
minister in Kashmir. The Akalis are looking at Sukhbir Badal, 47, who
is deputy chief minister of Punjab. Sharad Pawar and Purno Sangma have
brought in their daughters — Supriya Sule, 40, and Agatha Sangma, 29 —
on to the centrestage. M. Karunanidhi is looking at son M.K. Stalin,
57, as his successor in Tamil Nadu. In Maharashtra, there is a battle
to corner the Sena votebank between cousins Raj, 41, and Uddhav
Thackeray, 49. Mulayam has chosen son Akhilesh, 36, to be the future
face of Samajwadi Party. Even the BJP felt compelled to give a ticket
to Varun Feroze Gandhi, 30. The average age of leaders is set to drop
all over.

Rahul’s shot at prime ministership will depend on two important
factors. One, the Congress has to lead the next government or be the
largest entity in the coalition. Two, Rahul himself has to be willing
to occupy the position. What’s certain is that in either scenario he
will be a strong contender, or at least be a kingmaker like his
mother, Sonia.

If the two factors are met, and Rahul becomes PM, the duality of roles
at the Centre will end. He may become the first Congress President
since P.V. Narasimha Rao to also head the Union government.

Way to the throne

Whether he accepts the top leadership or not, the AICC general
secretary has his eyes firmly on the long-term health of the party. No
other party leader is seen working so much to strengthen it at the
grassroots. At the heart of Rahul’s efforts is his desire to revive
his party in Uttar Pradesh, which returns 80 MPs to Lok Sabha and
where the Congress once ruled. He has also breathed new life into the
youth and student wings of the party.

And in choosing this route, Rahul has played by the rules of the
family in which everyone — Nehru downwards — was first a key
functionary within the organisation.

Rahul’s detractors say he has not made his mark in Parliament, that he
is reluctant to intervene in major debates. The reason for this is
obvious. An intervention by him could be interpreted as either an
indictment of the government, or his view on its functioning. Either
way, it could create an embarrassing situation. Since it is a
government headed by his party, he has never hesitated to publicly
praise the Prime Minister or lend support to his programmes.

If Rahul decides to wait a little longer, his party’s choice will lie
within the current generation. The top contenders for the top post
could be Pranab Mukherjee, the most experienced politician in
Parliament, P. Chidambaram, the articulate home minister, A.K. Antony,
a strong party loyalist, and Sushil Kumar Shinde, the most capable and
acceptable Dalit leader in the party since Babu Jagjivan Ram.

For the moment, however, Skipper Singh has his hands securely on the
steering wheel.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/Rahul-First-among-equals/Article1-547647.aspx

Rahul Gandhi's Youth Congress gets overwhelming response
Puneet Nicholas Yadav / DNA
Monday, May 24, 2010 1:37 IST

New Delhi: Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s call for greater youth
participation in the political systemseems to be getting an
overwhelming response.

If membership figures from states and union territories where the
Indian Youth Congress (IYC) has completed its enrollment drives are
anything to go by, the Amethi MP’s ambition of making IYC the “world’s
largest youth body in politics” may soon bear fruit.

IYC units in Punjab, Gujarat, Puducherry, Tamil Nadu, Tripura and
Daman & Diu — where the membership drives have been completed — have
collectively enrolled over 25 lakh members.

The figure is a quantum leap from the abysmal two lakh members that
these units collectively had just two years ago when Rahul had taken
over the responsibility of “reinventing and rejuvenating” this nearly
defunct frontal organisation.

The biggest achievement for IYC, so far, has been its membership drive
in Tamil Nadu, where the Congress has long played second fiddle to
regional satraps like DMK and AIADMK. IYC in Tamil Nadu has enrolled
12.50 lakh members.

“Earlier, IYC membership drives were largely an eyewash. Rahulji
disbanded the old system under which bogus members were enrolled. His
interaction with the youth across the state has led to the
overwhelming response to the drive which otherwise drew just over a
lakh members,” said M Yuvaraj, the newly elected president of IYC in
Tamil Nadu.

The membership drives had begun to yield a good response during the
tenure of former IYC president Ashok Tanwar, who was succeeded by
Maharashtra MLA Rajeev Satav, in February.

“Earlier the membership in states like Gujarat and Punjab would range
between 28,000 and 40,000, while union territories like Puducherry,
Daman & Diu and north eastern states like Tripura would enroll just a
few thousand members. Even in a big state like Tamil Nadu, the
membership would hardly cross a lakh. Also, a large section of these
members would be bogus as then there was no genuine database
maintained,” said Tanwar.

Satav has been instrumental in streamlining the processes advised by
Rahul. “In the earlier system, there was no way to check whether the
enrolled members even existed. Now, we have a complete database of
members with their photo-IDs, residence proof and professions,” said
Satav.

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_rahul-gandhi-s-youth-congress-gets-overwhelming-response_1386926

PM Manmohan Singh to face media after four years today
Anil Anand / DNA
Monday, May 24, 2010 1:54 IST

New Delhi: Prime minister Manmohan Singh will address the media on
Monday in the national capital. This will be the PM’s first full-
fledged encounter with the media in the last four years.

Manmohan Singh calls for better coordination among Saarc nations
The press meet comes in the wake of the Air India (AI) crash at
Mangalore on Saturday that claimed 158 lives and led to the
cancellation of a dinner organised to mark the first anniversary of
UPA-II. Singh was to release the UPA-II report card, which has been
deferred now.

It is not just the AI crash that would be weighing upon the prime
minister’s mind as he faces the mediapersons on Monday, he would also
have to take many uncomfortable questions relating to UPA’s internal
issues.

Almost relentless violence from left wing extremists and a bitter
internal divide within the ruling Congress on the approach to tackling
this problem is an area of core concern. Ministerial indiscipline
within the Cabinet too has touched a new low with members locking
horns publicly.

His crisis managers have been able to ward off any serious political
challenge to the stability of the UPA-II during the previous budget
session of parliament, but the ability of the government to push
through crucial legislations on its agenda remains constrained. For
instance, the Centre preferred to wait before pushing the Women’s
Reservation Bill through Lok Sabha.

With the 3G auction netting more than Rs67,000 crore, the government
is better placed in terms of fiscal situation, but the main concerns
of the overall price situation still remain unanswered.

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_pm-manmohan-singh-to-face-media-after-four-years-today_1386923

PM to address nation on UPA-II's first anniversary in office
ANI
Sunday, May 23, 2010 21:57 IST

New Delhi: As the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance Government
marks first anniversary of its second inning at the Centre, the Prime
Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh is expected to unveil his Government’s
achievements and talk about the road ahead on Monday.

Manmohan Singh calls for better coordination among Saarc nations
On this occasion, Dr. Singh will address a press conference at Vigyan
Bhavan in the national capital.

The UPA government achieved many milestones in the first year of its
second term despite the global economic crisis and the challenge posed
by naxalism and terrorism.

The country returned to higher growth path in the period and allocated
massive funds for social and infrastructure development to ensure
inclusive growth.

Large scale reforms were also carried out in education and legal
sectors.

Enhancing its strategic partnership, India powerfully put forth its
point of view on climate change and mobilizing global opinion to
tackle the menace of terrorism, particularly emanating from its
neighborhood.

It also inked several Civil Nuclear agreements to meet the growing
energy demand are some other areas that also hogged the limelight.

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_pm-to-address-nation-on-upa-ii-s-first-anniversary-in-office_1386845

'Political circus' in Jharkhand 10-year old: Brinda Karat
PTI
Sunday, May 23, 2010 21:39 IST

Ranchi: Dubbing the unsettled issues in government formation in
Jharkhand as 'political circus', CPI(M) leader Brinda Karat today
accused chief minister Shibu Soren of sticking to chair either with
the support of BJP or Congress.

"It is a great Jharkhand political circus in which each (party) is
trying to become the ring master with Soren having only one-point
agenda -- sticking to the chair either with the support of the BJP or
of the Congress," Karat said here.

"In ten years (since its formation), Jharkhand has had seven
governments. This itself speaks volumes about the politics in the
state... which in turn affects the tribal and the poor," the politburo
member said.

Accusing the Congress of destabilising the state government to save
its government in Delhi by getting a vote from Soren during the April
27 cut motion, she alleged that the BJP was no less responsible for
the turmoil by making Soren the CM after the fractured mandate last
year.

Karat claimed that there were 86,000 cases on dispute with regard to
tribals' claim over forest land or produce, and the unstable
governments only made it more difficult in solving their problems.

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_political-circus-in-jharkhand-10-year-old-brinda-karat_1386834

Ranchi, May 24, 2010
BJP to withdraw support to Soren government
PTI

A BJP team will hand over letter of withdrawal of support to Governor

Frustrated over Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM) backtracking on its power-
sharing deal in Jharkhand, the Bharatiya Janata Party has decided to
withdraw support to the Shibu Soren government on Monday. “The BJP
will withdraw support to JMM government tomorrow,” BJP spokesman
Sanjay Seth said on Sunday, a day after Mr. Soren asserted that he
would continue as the Chief Minister and was in touch with the
Congress.

A BJP delegation will meet Governor M.O.H. Farrooq and hand over the
letter of withdrawal of support.

Keywords: JMM, BJP, power sharing crisis

http://beta.thehindu.com/news/states/other-states/article436646.ece

..and I am Sid Harth
navanavonmilita
2010-05-24 18:35:43 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-14/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-15/

Seeking Soren: BJP out, Congress in

NDTV Correspondent, Monday May 24, 2010, New Delhi

After dragging their feet for nearly a month, the BJP finally withdrew
support to the Shibu Soren Government in Jharkhand as it became clear
that the chief minister had no intention of stepping down to allow a
BJP-led government to take over.

"The JMM has been talking in many voices all this while. We really had
no option but to withdraw support," said BJP leader Raghuwar Das said.

And into the breach, has come in the Congress.

"We are trying to form the government. We will try and give a stable
government to the state," Congress MP from Jharkhand Subodh Kant Sahai
said. But Soren is not negotiating with the Congress.

But this is easier said than done.

Soren needs 23 MLAs more to remain in power. The Congress has 14. And
Babu Lal Marandi - who has 11 MLAs and runs his own political outfit
Jharkhand Vikas Morcha - isn't playing ball.

"There is no question of going along with Soren," Marandi said.

Soren has seven days to prove his majority. But Congress managers may
need to explain why they need to support Soren having been embarrassed
by his criminal and corruption cases before.

Shibu Soren is now negotiating with the Congress party. But democratic
values have limited role in what has happened or will happen as money
bags and power brokers still have unlimited mandate in Jharkhand.

http://www.ndtv.com/news/india/seeking-soren-bjp-out-congress-in-27587.php

No deal with Mulayam, Mayawati or Lalu: PM
Indo-Asian News Service
New Delhi, May 24, 2010

First Published: 17:24 IST(24/5/2010)
Last Updated: 17:25 IST(24/5/2010)

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh Monday denied any deal with Bahujan
Samaj Party (BSP) chief Mayawati, Samajwadi Party (SP) leader Mulayam
Singh Yadav and Rashtriya Janata Dal's (RJD) Lalu Prasad during the
opposition-sponsored cut motions last month.

"There was no deal....Whatever misconceptions you have in your heart,
kindly get rid of them," Manmohan Singh said in reply to a question at
a press conference held to mark the first year of the second United
Progressive Alliance (UPA) government.

During the cut motion moved in the Lok Sabha on budget proposals to
hike the prices of fuels and fertilisers, the leaders of the BSP, SP
and Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) walked out and abstained from voting,
thus ensuring the survival of the ruling coalition.

Mulayam Singh Yadav had recently said his party had offered issue-
based support to the UPA in the event of the Trinamool Congress'
Mamata Banerjee withdrawing support from the ruling coalition.

Opposition parties, led by the BJP, had charged the government with
using the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to pressurise
Mayawati, Yadav and Lalu Prasad over a disproportionate assets cases
to garner their support.

In response to another question, the Prime Minister, however, refuted
the charge that the government had misused the CBI.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/No-deal-with-Mulayam-Mayawati-or-Lalu-PM/Article1-547902.aspx

..and I am Sid Harth
navanavonmilita
2010-05-25 08:47:59 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-14/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-15/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-16/

First year of UPA-II is of reasonable achievement: PM
Agencies
Posted: May 23, 2010 at 2029 hrs IST

New Delhi Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on Monday described the first
year of UPA-II as one of "reasonable achievement" but said his
government could have done more.
"I believe that the record of our first year of UPA-II is a record of
reasonable achievement. I am the first person to admit that we could
have done more," Singh told a press conference here.

He said one should not be satisfied with "what we have achieved".

"There is always room for improvement and for better outcome. But I do
believe that the record of our first year is a record of reasonable
achievement," he said.

It is for historians to judge my legacy: PM

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on Monday left it to the historians to
judge his legacy, saying he was more concerned about the task at
hand.

"I am not bothered about the legacy issue. I have a task to accomplish
to the best of my ability. It is for the historians to pronounce
judgements (on my legacy)," he said at a press conference here to mark
one year of UPA-II.

Singh was responding to a question on what accomplishment he would
consider as his legacy.

He described the first year UPA-II as one of "reasonable achievement"
but said his government could have done more.

"I believe that the record of our first year of UPA-II is a record of
reasonable achievement. I am the first person to admit that we could
have done more," he said.

Following are the highlights of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's news
conference:

* Expects inflation to moderate to 5-6 per cent by December 2010

* Expects 8.5 per cent GDP growth in FY11

* Targets to achieve 10 per cent economic growth annually in medium
term

* Prices showing signs of moderating trend

* Prices continue to be matter of deep concern

* Containing inflation is government's top priority

* To take more steps together with state governments to cool prices

* India willing to discuss all outstanding issues with Pakistan

* Nuclear agreement with the United States will move forward

* Prime Minister hopes all political parties will support nuclear
liability bill

CIVIC AMENITIES , LITERACY DRIVE , AGRICULTURE SECTOR , INFLATION
NEEDS MORE ATTENTION
by RAJAT KUMAR MOHINDRU .JALANDHAR CITY .PUNJAB on 24 May 2010
The first Year of the second term of UPA-II under Prime Minister
S.Manmohan Singh has not fulfilled the expectations of the masses .
Inflation could not be curbed and the Prices of essential commodities
inflated breaking the back bone of the common man . In regard to
Foreign Policy towards Pakistan , Diplomats of both the countries are
heading towards peace talks , but really Pakistan will be sincere in
curbing the Terrorism activities . The Union Ministers quote there
statements that creates controversy between the Party Leaders . The
main issue like MAREGA , Literacy Drive through Education in remote
areas ,providing basic civic amenities in rural areas , uplifting of
the poor and weaker sections of the society, supply of Hygenic Water
in the rural areas ,providing of Loans on less rate of Interest to
Farmers, Programmes Like Chalo school Chalen Hum , Saksharta Abiyan ,
providing Employment to Youths and above all Curbing terror of Naxals
and Maoists needs more attention in future .

Where Rahul can fit in in the Ministry!
by Bolar Ghanshyam on 24 May 2010
The most spoectacular achievent of Sonia's Govt through her apron
holder Manmohansing is cent percent rise in corruption and each one of
the Corrupt Minuistrs and Government at the highest post is given a
cleanchit by this DUO justas shemanaged to procure a clean chitnfor
herslf and ner clan through corrupt officialsministers and judges!It
is time Rahul with all hisexperience in corruption aa white clothes
can no longer hide his and families black sides and spots any longer.

Gandhi family
by kms on 24 May 2010
I heard that Sonia emulate her mthr in lw India Gandhi. the way she
walked, talked, encouraged corruption. actually, corruption has taken
a deep root during Indira's time and since then it is flourishing. Mam
Sonia as a true Gandhi family member just carrying forward it.

Yes Could Have Done a Lot
by Indian on 24 May 2010
Probably PM stands for Poor Man,Puppet Man but not the real prime
minister of Great India.He is only a name sake and as he said he could
have done better if 1. No Sonia interference 2.No Shashi 3. No Raja
4.NO PC 5.No Congress BI 6.No corruption etc with out all these guys
he is a zero that is what happened and he can fool the poor Indians as
long as they go for this UNHOLY PARTY OF ALLTIME. JAIHIND

HDD, VP,Chandrashekhar
by Azz on 24 May 2010
I always thought the governments headed by Deve gowda, VP Singh &
Chandrashekhar were the worst in India's history, but UPA-2 has
changed my stand.Without any doubt, by a long way, UPA2 is the worst
collection of people & the so called government has failed on
everything.Without a doubt, MMS is also the worst pm

achievement
by amit on 24 May 2010
If price rise, corruption and terrorism is not an issue then the
present govt has done an excellent job so far and I bet these aren't
any issue for electronic media and the govt and their secular agents.

Puppet PM
by hsk on 24 May 2010
The big achievements of UPA-II are: Inlation, currption like
supporting of currept ministers of allies , killing of innocent
persons and para-military forces by naxalites and bending under the
pressure of US etc.

Congress
by Bharath on 24 May 2010
Whom is the present PM trying to Fool?If the Government wants to take
a hard decision, why is it burdening the POOR and giving relief to 60%
of Tax payers %u2013 to the extent of Rs. 26,000 Crores.Why relief to
TOY BALLOON manufacturers? Who is it going to benefit?(Last year PC
gave relief to DOGGY FOOD because he loves pets I don%u2019t know whom
else he will give tax relief to, in the future.Also IPL.Fortunately he
is no more an FM)Let us be clear, The Congress Party wants to recover
all the money it spent in bribing the poor electorate and %u201COTHER
EXPENSES%u201D, to win this election of 2009.Lakhs of Crores must have
been spent and they are in a hurry to recover it before they loose
Power at the Center. This is Congress Arrogance at its height.

UPA-II
by S.L.Singh on 24 May 2010
First thing what was the need for press conference? As far First
year's Govt of UPA-II achievement is concerned even PM accepted that
govt. could not do as expected. In the opinion of the public of India,
govt has failed in all the disciplines such as: Price Rise of food
items rather covt contribute to rise the prices(refer food
&Agriculture Minister), Terror and Naxals ,curruption,Prices of
Petrolium products,Power,Water for drinking and irrigation (left to
nature)Employment,Mismanagement of railways & Airlines under control
of Govt.and......... end less list. What is theit contribution is high
inflation and miseries to the people, indiscipline in party as well as
their constituent of UPA -II

Resonably well
by JNS on 24 May 2010
I just dont know how to describe this man who heads the Government of
India. Internal Security, External Security, Economy, Food Prices,
Ever Increasing Poverty, MIND BLOWING CORRUPTION everything has
suffered under this mans watch. And today, he says this. May god
punish these people severely.

The success/failure of present government should be judged by progress
and development
by Devji kumar on 24 May 2010
The success/failure of present government should be judged by progress
and development in lives of majority of indian citizens,effective use
of hard earned public tax money in terms of supply of
water,electricity, housing, jobs, infrastructure, educuation, health,
social welfare. GDP figures are misleading because most of time it
accounts for ruling/elite classes who benefit directly from profits of
public spending, but very little of that profit is put back into the
society which helps generate the same. State CMs are using funds from
central government for personal benefit first and for retaining power
by payment.Congress bureau of investigation(CBI) is being used to
silence opposition.Bills before house passed and bank votes by
payment,appeasement policy to muslim minority votes,CBI political
clean chit,ruling classes/elite are more concerned about retaining
power and wealth that progress of whole nation. Dynastic designer name
Gandhi is no relation to Mr Mohandas Gandhi.

Reasonable Job????
by JNS on 24 May 2010
May be this man is hallucinating in broad day light, does he call his
blunder at Sharm el sheik good? Does he call his inaction on Pakistani
Terrorism as good? What is the matter with this man? Does he think
that he can openly insult Indians by treating them as bottomless
stupid and get away with it? Dr. Singh you are sick man.

Congress slaves
by ina katkar on 24 May 2010
Everybody knows MM Singh is PM due to Gandhi's,he was not elected in
open elction, he has no followers in congress party and most important
he is in the position till Rahul finish his training period. All the
ministers are busy making money to recover money spent in last
election and prepare for next election's higher expenditure .
Everybody knows UPA model is better because no party is powerful and
everybody can get bite of flesh. MM Singh is doing it right and
helping all members of UPA to get piece of pie. Each ministry public
sector sell off, power,agricultue,telecom,petrloleum have made
billions.And of cours IPL. So it is a gang of 'Phulandevi'

Yes, the balance achievement will make atleast 50% of Indians
committing suicide
by Umesh on 24 May 2010
The price rise alone, is the key issue with common people. They give a
damn about Afal Guru's hanging, relationship with Pakistan or the 8.5
growth rate in the coming FY. They need a govt who can provide them
with at least "DAL - ROTI". If the price will rise like this our
country will gain 50% growth in the coming two years, as the common
man is find it difficult to live in this / his own country. While the
politicians and beaurocrats and businessmen have their own ways to
amaze fortues for 100 of their own generations, it is the commonman
who suffers and when he is out of control, it will all bend on the
ruling govt. Dont forget, the people made you the rulers.. they can
and they will get you down in no time.. address their concern... make
them feel that they too are part of this country!

India's worst PM of India
by freddie on 24 May 2010
The world worst PM of India Mr.MMS. Stop playing dirty politics your
days are numbered. Only muslim minority vote will saved you. We have a
CM who is telling lies and now we have a PM who is telling lies to the
public. Please PM if you are not fit for the job please.... please
step down and retire that will be good for you.

BJP Lover!
by Iquebal Ahmed on 24 May 2010
The lovers of BJP and their offscuhtes can be easily recognized by the
words they put to use. 'Minorities' 'Missinories' 'Appeasement' 'Vote
bank' 'Italian madam'.....Hell with you guys.

Freddie is right
by anand on 24 May 2010
What freddie said is very much right.Infact he told less things.This
is a puppet government encouraging corruption.The govt.is more
communal,as they bend on appeasing muslims in all manners,just to stay
in power

upa phase 2
by Surjeet on 24 May 2010
munshiji( HE is not the leader of the party,he is Sonia's trusted
munshi). ON all fronts; pakistn,prices,internal security, Raju's
corrupion, Terror he has failed.

What do you expect.....
by Roy on 24 May 2010
from an inept opposition whose hunger for power makes the RAVAN sleep
with the RAKSHAS...Jharkand. Lets ask the BJP empathiozers who have
nothing else to offer except for criticism of a government who by far
is acceptable to a vast majority of Indians sans the extreme right
wing.

Blind Lover of Gandhi Family
by kms on 24 May 2010
Mr Roy Dada, corruption, external,internal security, sky rocketing
price rise, all these does not matter to you. u r simply a great
chamcha of Gandhi Sonia family.

Reply to Roy
by anand on 24 May 2010
Being a christain Mr.Roy,i can understand your partiality towards
Italian madam sonia.

LOL
by Stud on 24 May 2010
Viral Marketeer...so now Congress calls Soren Secular wants to form a
government there is all right with you? Stop your antics and live
happily under a superb BJP government. I am ashamed of thankless
people like you.

Ravan
by N Gulati on 24 May 2010
Dear Roy sir, If congress would have gone with Soren, it would have
been OK. BJP is also not good but that does not make Conress any
better. They only ruled for nearly 60 years

Congress,Gandhi
by Bharath on 24 May 2010
Let us not foregt govt backing Raja even after a he is proved to be
culprit.BJP did the same what is being taught by first family & first
party to the nation.Indira Gandhi institutionalized corruption by
holding both the posts of the Prime Minister and party president.By
doing so she was herself controlling the party funds, which gave birth
to the money power in politics.Indira was instrumental in
institutionalizationof corruption in politics.

Weak PM
by Naresh on 24 May 2010
This man has yet again proved to be a failure on all fronts whether
countering terrorism-naxalism, to foreign dimplomacy, price rise,
checking of corrupt coalition partners and the entire rotten congress
machinery. he has indded made his peace with the unsavory characters
in politics by becoming a politician himself.

simply unimpressive!!!
by ranjib on 24 May 2010
The prime minister holds a press conference in the national capital
after a gap of 4 years and ends up with more confusion just like UPA
2. the way he was dealing with the questions was something like the
cong spokespersons are used to.uttering few words and moving on to the
next question is not a PM's way to address issues. be it naxalism,
price rise, relations with pakistan, afzal guru, job reservation in
private sector. he couldnt present his government's view point
properly. only patting his own back for so called 'reasonable
achievment'is not going to impress any one. The govt should act, and
act fast, else electoral history of india has ample examples how
people dump an ineffective govt

UPA-II's achievment
by arun kumar on 24 May 2010
Sri Buta Singh, Sri N.D.Tiwari, and Sri Tharoor are few achievements
of UPA-II. Price rise of Petroleum items, vegetables and pulses are
minor achievements though. Our countrymen are never bothered about
corruption, nepotism and dynasty but are too particular about
secularism and leave no stone unturned to throw stone at Narendra Modi
and Amitabh Bacchan. Yadavs, Mayavati are supporting the UPA-II to
save skin and delay cases in CBI. Laloo is still waiting in wings to
be summoned and given a ministerial birth. However the biggest
achievement of UPA-II is to spend 2 crore a day to promote the prince
Rahul who in turn will take the place of MMS soon.

Failure is written all over
by Welingkar on 24 May 2010
Mr Manmohan Singh has painted his government's year long reign as one
that made reasonable achievements. He has made a brave attempt at
glorifying a failure. Your ship is in tatters Mr Singh. We have all
known Mr Singh worked hard in his childhood years and as a young man,
and rose up in life. However, if that same young lad were to live
under Mr. Singh's present government, he would have not had a fighting
chance to do anything besides fending off wolves from the door. He
would have been busy working to feed the family, earning barely enough
to live to work another day. The record level of inflation and the
steep rice in food items is his government's most important failure.
There are still more, but his inability as an Economist to control
what is under his purview is an indicator that on other fronts this
govt cannot deliver.

welldone, UPA
by shashank on 24 May 2010
Here some ignorent Monsters commenting against Congress. Every body
does mistakes no one is faultless except God. Whatere has done since
Independence by Congress party was right according to such situation
then. People were poor uneducated then. If Congress was not ruling
this country longer periods of time since independence than there
would have been many pieces of this country. It would have been
another paksitan. Here Hindu terrorist led by BJP would have created
same situation like Pakistan. Thank God still Congress party leading
by Nehru-Gandhi family. Unless BJP led terror orgonisations(VHP, RSS,
Bajrangdal) not finished till violence and all kinds of evil
activities of killing inocent people & communial violence will
continue in India, These party operating means like curse on India.
Thank God because of this UPA Govt. we r recognise world wide not
because of BJP & it's allies. BJP=Pakistan. Under UPA only we r strong
Nation. Long live Congress!! Long LIve INdia

Fool to the core
by anand on 24 May 2010
India is divided by none other a congress P.M,the greedy Nehru.Then
what u talk about BJP.They have ruled only 6 years.Gujarat-Bihar r the
best ruled states in India

Confused state
by CMR on 24 May 2010
The country under congress rule is as confused as you and as your
language.

COMMUNAL CLASH - WRONG POLICIES OF CONGRESS
by shirasatish on 24 May 2010
Dear Shashank Pakistan was created by Congress only to appease
Muslims. It is not due to BJP or its wing. If the Nation is witnessing
communal clashes it is due to the wrong policies of Congress. Congress
is ruling our country since independence and it is not able to contain
the communal clashes. This only proves that Congress itself is giving
birth to communal clashes. This being the case how can BJP, RSS, VHP
or Bajarangdal can divide the country?

Congress,Gandhi
by Bharath on 24 May 2010
Today Bharat is divided as India & Pak.Credit goes to power greedy
Nehru.People were poor uneducated then-Nehru was a foreign degree
holder,bornm with silver spoon.Your comments shows your ignorance.

Distant Relative of Congress (I) Inflation or Inability
by Guessooh on 24 May 2010
Mr Shashank, you have every right to appreciate Congress but when
comparing on performance of congress since Independence, you made
utter foolishness in comparing with another party BJP who barely ruled
1 term. At present still Indis is realing under Poverty @ 60%, Price
Inflation @ 18%, TERRORISM & NAXALISM cannot be rooted out or
controlled by your so called CONGRESS. Then why do they still ruling,
answer is you know, CORRUPTION, tell me which CONGRESS Minister or
many Leader are not CROREPATIS, mind you their money can make a INDIAN
GOVERNMENT BUDGET. Dont fool the common man with this nonsence opinion
of yours. Better watch the world on who is doing what. From your
writing, many readers of this article, you are a CONGRESSMEN. We
already have PM chamchagiris at the gates of Italian, tell me how many
more generations you require to develop this nation. Jai Hind.

The Gandhis can never be wrong
by Welingkar on 24 May 2010
Go on Sashank, lick some more boots. You will be with the 'high
command' some day if you continue at it.

India needs a government which keeps up its promises
by T.Raj Kumar Singh on 24 May 2010
The people of Telangana are a dissatisfied lot. The UPA-II is no
better when it comes to perpetuating the imposition of Andhra region
people on Telangana people. In fact it is much worse as it has failed
to keep its promise of separate Telangana state which was declared on
December 9 of 2009. Whenever the Telangana people voice their
aspiration the Centre silences them by forming a committee or
commission. If the Government goes back on its promises with any rogue
nation or militant organisation it is understandable but fooling its
own people is outrageous and may lead to disastrous consequences. This
kind of putting lid approach is highly reprehensible.

Reasonable achievement ?? Is that a joke.
by AMIT on 24 May 2010
"reasonable achievement" UPA ministers are seen at IPL matches...GOVT
does not tax IPL matches. Farmers are still dying. Terror is hiding in
the bylanes of India. Prices are skyrocketing. UPA govt has most of
the Media in its pocket. NDTV always shows UPA like a god send govt. A
remote control PM cannot clean the mess which is causing increase in
poverty. Please PM first learn how to control your ministers and then
talk about achievements.

UPA -2 ONE YEAR OLD !!
by M S VAISHNAV on 24 May 2010
UPA APTLY REPRESENTS THE 'ONE YEAR CHILD' WHO IS BORNE IN POOR FAMILY
IN INDIA ! UNDER NOURISHED, WEAK AND SUFFERING FROM NUMEROUS AILMENTS !
WE DAILY SEE SUCH CHILDREN FIGHTING FOR FOOD IN STREETS AND OUR
MPs(majority of of them crorepati)in PARLIAMENT !! and FEASING THEM ON
'SUBSIDISED CAFETERIA' MEANT FOR THESE 'HARD WORKING ' REPRESENTATIVES
OF OURS !UNLIKE STREET CHILDREN, MOST OF THEM ARE OVERWEIGHT !!THEY
ARE "HOMELESS' AND SO DO NOT VACATE THE GOVT PROVIDED ACCOMODATIONS
EVEN AFTER LOSING IN ELECTIONS ! I REALLY FEEL SORRY FOR OUR LEARNED
AND GENTLEMAN PM THAT, WHETHER HE LIKES IT OR NOT, BUT HE HAS TO EAT
'COLLIATION ' KHICHDI TO SURVIVE !!

worst
by vishaal on 24 May 2010
i just want to ask a question? do we really have a democracy? a
useless government is getting elected despite price rise, corruption,
bad foreign policy etc just because we dont have a powerfull and
united opposition. In such a circumtances people dont have option just
to vote for useless people who are united. we are forced to vote even
without given a fair option of selection. also people have power to
vote but they dont have power to discart a govt. if they find that
governmnet is not doing enough. They only depend upon opposition for
this matter. i hope i m able to express myself properly.

http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/First-year-of-UPAII-is-of-reasonable-achievement-PM/622649/



Will support UPA if Trinamool withdraws support: Mulayam
Express news service

Tags : Samajhwadi Party, Mulayam Singh Yadav, Trinamool Congress

Posted: Mon May 24 2010, 00:32 hrs

Kolkata:

Samajhwadi Party chief Mulayam Singh Yadav on Sunday made it clear
that his party was ready to become part of the UPA government in case
the Trinamool Congress walked out of the alliance. “Yes it is true,”
Mulayam Singh said when asked whether his party had told the UPA that
it was ready to join the ruling alliance if the Trinamool Congress
withdrew its support.

“We want stability and prosperity of the country. We also want to keep
communal forces away. In fact, our support to the UPA government is
issue-based and only to keep the communal forces at bay. But our
relationship with the Left is as friendly as it has been before. We
have together done a number of programmes and taken a number of
decisions together,” said the SP chief.

He also said Amar Singh, the former party general secretary who quit
the party early this year, had no chance of coming back to the SP
fold. “Neither he will come to us, nor we will accept him. That
chapter is closed,” Mulayam told reporters in Kolkata at the end of
the party’s three-day executive meet.

Mulayam said neither the votebank of the SP nor that of the Left Front
had reduced after the Lok Sabha polls. He said two SP candidates were
contesting municipal elections in the KMC on the support of the Left
Front. The SP chief said Kironmoy Nanda, who has been appointed the
general secretary after the ouster of Amar Singh, had been given the
charge of strengthening party base in West Bengal.

On the issue of why the SP did not vote with the Left Front on cut
motions, Mulayam shrugged off the issue saying instances of “this sort
happened in politics”.

He also criticised a number of policies of the UPA government relating
to price rise and tackling Naxalism.

“Their policies are not in the interest of the people. According to
the Planning Commission, the number of poor in the country has
increased from 27 crore to 40 crore. I have raised questions in
Parliament a number of times on the issue,” Mulayam said.

On Naxal menace, he said the issue could be solved by discussions.
“This issue cannot be solved by guns and sticks and putting forces
behind them. They have some valid demands. This issue should be solved
by discussions and consulting all parties,” the SP chief added.

Comments (3) |

SP will support UPA
By: peshori ahuja | 24-May-2010 Reply | Forward

Mulayam Singh is the opportunist no. 1. Even UPA leadership knows it.
Quite often he has used the plea "to keep communal forces out". By
"communal forces" he means NDA "BJP and its associates". NDA stands
for equality for all backward/less blessed people, Hindus, Muslims,
Sikhs, Christians, and others without regard to their religion while
Mulayam Singh and his SP stands only for Muslims. Same is the case
with Congress and its colleagues in UPA. He is after power. This very
Mulayam Singh, in his desire to become the PM,joined hands with
Congress and sabotaged the Govt. of Dedowda.

Mulayam support to UPA
By: SANTHANAM | 24-May-2010

hE SHOULD HAVE SAID TILL cbi CASES ARE WITHDRAWN i WILL SUPPORT upa .
instead of telling i will support to keep communal forces awayThis is
nothing but thinking that people are fools. of course they are .
otherwise they will not be voting for these Goons

poverty in Bimaru states - Control population
By: S RAMJI | 24-May-2010

The main reason for poverty going up in numbers is due to increase in
population and not because government has not done enough for these
sections of the population. Let all political leaders make it a point
to drill the fact of family control among the population of the Bimaru
statues and one will find the poverty levels dropping steadily even at
the current level of investments .

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/will-support-upa-if-trinamool-withdraws-support-mulayam/622722/0

Won’t retire till I finish tasks: PM1
Express news service

Tags : Manmohan Singh, UPA

Posted: Tue May 25 2010, 03:53 hrs

New Delhi:

Sending a clear message that he was here to stay till he finished the
tasks he had been assigned, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh today
dismissed notions of any gaps in his equation with Congress president
Sonia Gandhi, saying they met every week to discuss major issues.

At a 75-minute press conference, his first as executive head of UPA
II, Singh was repeatedly asked questions about his legacy, retirement,
relationship with Sonia Gandhi and any “succession” plan involving
Rahul Gandhi.

Maintaining that he had stated in a number of instances that younger
people should take over, he said: “As and when the Congress party
makes that judgment, I will be very happy to make place for anybody
chosen by the party.”

He said Rahul Gandhi was “very qualified” to join the Cabinet and said
he had requested him on a number of occasions to do so but the young
MP had declined saying he wanted to give his attention to party-
building. “Whenever he (Rahul) is ready, he will be an appropriate
addition to the Cabinet,” he said.

In his understated yet firm style that characterises his persona,
Singh tackled several questions, including one on whether it was time
for him to step aside. “I have been given this task. It is still
unfinished. Till I finish the tasks, there is no question of
retirement.”

Rejecting speculation on lack of coordination between the government
and the party, Singh said there was a mechanism in which he met Sonia
Gandhi every week to discuss major issues.

“There is no dearth of effective coordination mechanism. I think I am
very fortunate to have the benefit of constant advice and guidance by
the Congress president. Invariably, we meet every week to discuss all
major issues that need to be discussed.”

He spoke at unusual length on the 2G spectrum controversy.
Acknowledging that there were questions to be answered, he laid out
what Telecom Minister A Raja had said in his defence. But Singh also
pointed out that the CBI and the CVC were on the case.

“The CVC has asked the CBI to look into this and that process is on.
Pending that investigation, it is not proper for me to express any
definite opinion.”

He reiterated the government stand on J&K to have a dialogue with all
groups provided they shun violence, rejected the opposition charge
that the CBI was being misused and made a clear distinction that
terrorism was not bound by religion and was condemnable in all forms.

He underlined that the National Advisory Council was not a “super
cabinet” but an advisory body which made meaningful contribution in
developmental programmes.

Asked if he missed the structured support of Left parties, Singh
underlined the pragmatic approach of the UPA to indicate that there
was no use conjuring up imaginary situations. “If wishes were horses,
beggars would ride,” he said, but quickly added that he would welcome
all like-minded parties which supported the government’s policies of
“inclusive growth” to join hands to carry them forward.

He also used the press conference to send a clear message to senior
ministers, especially Railway Minister Mamata Banerjee, to restrain
themselves from rushing to the media if their views were at variance
with the government’s or with Cabinet colleagues.

“It is not good that ministers should air their differences in public.
For the past six years, our Cabinet has met almost on schedule every
week. So the ministers have enough opportunity to air their views. If
the views are aired in the Cabinet, I think that is the right thing to
do,” he said.

On the inclusion of caste in the ongoing census, the Prime Minister
said his government would take a decision soon on the issue. “I made a
statement in Parliament in which I said that we shall take into
account the views expressed in Parliament by various sections... and
that I will ask the Cabinet to consider them. That process is on.” He,
however, evaded questions on the possibility of a Cabinet reshuffle or
expansion.

The Prime Minister revealed a humorous side when, responding to a
question on whose advice he benefited most, his wife Gursharan Kaur’s
or Sonia Gandhi’s, he said: “I have the benefit of being advised by
both. But both of them deal with different subjects.”

18 Comments |

Dr MMS talks as a congress man and not as a PM
By: ramkesav | Tuesday , 25 May '10 11:47:17 AM

The robust talk of Dr MMS lacks truth. In his last tenure he knew
this. He was like a yogi on whom power was thrust by an accident. Now
he says he is not for retirement and will retire only in favor of
Rahul. What a contradiction. People did not trust Sonia they believed
MMS will do a goodjob , being a well known economist. Alas! MMS is
surving only for the MNCs and the US.He will leave no stone unturned
to make America happy at any cost. The hurry in which the atomic
damages compensation bill was passed despite protests, is self evident
as to whom serves. He boasts inflation is down. Let him ask a common
man in the street whether food prices are tolerable. The acute
corruption and favoritism in the govt has reached new limits in his
Second term. He is silent on misuse of CBI. He is a new age
Dhruthrashtran. But he has a little conscience in himself that he has
not given any mark. He knows that his govt is unqualified to be even
evaluated. But it is the people who failed.

SINGHJI - IT IS NOT UP TO YOU WHEN TO RETIRE
By: n.r.i. | Tuesday , 25 May '10 10:55:15 AM

SARDARJI - YOU LIVING IN CLOUD CHOKOO LAND . IT IS UP TO WHITE MADAM
AND SON TO DECIDE WHEN TO RETIRE .IT IS SHE WHO RUNS THE COUNTRY AND
WILL RUIN IT .YOUR DAYS ARE NUMBERED AND YOU WON'T BE ABLE TO FINSIH 5
yrs TERM . JUST WAIT AND WATCH .

PM ANSWER TO CRITICS
By: P.C.LUTHRA | Tuesday , 25 May '10 10:47:40 AM

PM LD DR MANMOHAN SINGH HAS RIGHTLY SAID "WON'T RETIRE TILL I FINISH
TASKS". PM'S ATTENTION IS ALSO INVITED TO OTHER THREE MAIN TASKS I.E.
NAXALS, SKYHOLING PRICES OF FOOD & DAILY ITEMS AND TIGHTENING OF
DISCIPLINE SO FAR AS HIGHSPEED VEHICLES ARE KILLING INNOCENT ON ROADS.
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

WON;T RETIRE TILL WORK IS FINISHED- PM
By: P N SUKHEJA | Tuesday , 25 May '10 10:41:42 AM

Whatever Mr Advani says, you are one of the best PM india ever had,
Your courage, handling the difficult situation is marvelious. Nation
will always remember you in years to com.

Unfinished tasks?
By: Indi | Tuesday , 25 May '10 9:47:48 AM

We have not seen any tasks from your side Mr.PM apart from appeasing
ur vote banks and protecting terrorists and criminals like afzal and
ur madam friend Qutrocchi. If these kinds of tasks r ur unfinished
tasks, then we Indians r really afraid. God save the nation. Request
you to please list out your unfinished tasks and give us a time line
when u r going to accomplish it. Hope these tasks are not detrimental
to India and its security as has been the case ever since upa has come
to power.

What tasks?
By: Chengappa r | Tuesday , 25 May '10 9:37:03 AM
So you have a task list? If its a alphabetical list Afzal should be on
top of it. Or have you sorted it based on the 3rd letter and AfZal
comes in the end...?

Most important task being.....
By: Hari | Tuesday , 25 May '10 9:24:40 AM

He has so many tasks to accomplish... the most important task being to
install the blue blooded prince Rahul Gandhi to the throne... and then
see some other small tasks like protecting and defending Raja, the
very honest and purest of the Ministers, may be to put Shibu Soren as
Governor of a state for his honourable deeds, to ensure that the law
take its own lengthy course in regard to Afzal Guru who accidentally
happened to wage war on India by attacking a small structure called
the parliament of India, to see that CBI functions impartially by
first implicating and then relieving.. so on and so forth Mayawati and
other politicians..etc. He has already accomplished certain tasks like
giving clean chit to Jagdish Tytler, to drop the case against Ottavio
Qutrochi .. etc.

Mr.
By: DP | Tuesday , 25 May '10 9:16:57 AM

His task it seems is to finish the country economically. So far, his
economics has failed him. It is Kaliyug and we have the weakest PM in
history, to go with it.

Mr.
By: DP | Tuesday , 25 May '10 9:11:27 AM

His failures don't deter him from being more power crazy. Why should
government make others retire at age 60 or 62 when the PM, CM et.al
can have pay, perks and undercuts above age 72 ?

We should be very proud!
By: Srinivas | Tuesday , 25 May '10 9:04:55 AM

He will retire when his madam tell him to retire and then like any
other nut case tells that he has finished his tasks. So, Sonia will
decide when and whether he has finished his job. Great PM we have. We
should be very proud such arese hole.

The language of the President of Republics separated from ex USSR
By: arun kumar | Tuesday , 25 May '10 8:55:22 AM

Our MEA should be complimented specially the wing that looks at ex
USSR as they have done their homework very well. MMS has spoken
exactly same words spoken by the Presidents of CIS since 1991 when the
ex Soviet Union broke. Can one name change of guard even in Russia
where Mr. Putin the ex president has become PM now. All the Presidents
have been repeating the same dialogue since 1991 that they will not
leave until their task is complete, HAIL HITLER.

Delhi Money for K (DMK)
By: Tamil Selvan | Tuesday , 25 May '10 8:27:38 AM

How is he even be able to sleep in the night? Telecom Scam may be
worth about 1000 times Bofors'. At worst he collects investigation
reports and black mails DMK. Pranab says prove it. How do we do that?
ONLY govt and its agencies can and they know this pretty well. We need
a Democracy without professional black mailing politicians who want to
survive at any cost. We are already on TOP of the world in Corruption.
How many poor would have been fed with Rs. 60000 crores? Do these guys
need so much money?

Antonia factor
By: BM | Tuesday , 25 May '10 8:27:03 AM

NO, Manmohan Singh, Antonia Maino will decide when you go.

Wont retire till I finish tasks PM
By: santhanam | Tuesday , 25 May '10 7:38:37 AM

His main task is to sell india to U S.MOst of it has been achieved. by
signing Nuclear deal. nuclear liability bill ope.up india's business
including Agriculture etc. i dont know what else is there to sell

Wont retire till I finish tasks PM
By: santhanam | Tuesday , 25 May '10 7:38:37 AM

His main task is to sell india to U S.MOst of it has been achieved. by
signing Nuclear deal. nuclear liability bill ope.up india's business
including Agriculture etc. i dont know what else is there to sell

clear message for all the critics
By: Arun Solomon | Tuesday , 25 May '10 7:20:29 AM

Rarely we get some one as good as Manmohan singh as prime minister.
People speculate over and over again that he will retire and
politicians have said he is the weakest prime minister. He has been
holding together a group of ministers and politicans to make the
government deliver services to the people. Has done exceedingly well.
His vison to continue to accomplish tasks is a good indication of his
commitment.

won't
By: Indian | Tuesday , 25 May '10 7:09:35 AM

Won't retire until I finish India My biggest achievement is I have
again forced people to compare India with Pakistan, not with China,
that is my achievement in my loyality towards the country of my birth.

Because sleeping
By: freddie | Tuesday , 25 May '10 6:13:57 AM

Did not complete his task because he was sleeping on the files like
Ms.Sheila Dixit. She was sleeping for the last 4 years and PM for
another 4 years?

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/wont-retire-till-i-finish-tasks-pm/623261/0

No mistrust between I and Sonia: PM
Agencies

Tags : Politics, Manmohan Singh, Sonia Gandhi

Posted: Mon May 24 2010, 11:08 hrs

New Delhi:

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh today strongly dismissed suggestions of
‘mistrust’ between him and Congress President Sonia Gandhi, saying he
receives constant advice and guidance from her.

Singh, who addressed his first press conference here in four years,
said there is not an ‘iota of mistrust or distrust between me and the
Congress President.’

"(There is) no question of gap in thinking between me and the Congress
President...She is the leader of the UPA and she is the President of
the Congress party and I am a Congressman," Singh said when asked
about reported differences between the government and the party on a
host of issues.

He said he meets Gandhi once in a week to discuss the political
developments as well as issues related to governance.

"Invariably we (Sonia Gandhi and me) meet every week to discuss major
issues. There is no basis to believe that there is no effective
mechanism to deal with issues between Congress and the government,"
the Prime Minister said.

"(There is) not an iota of truth in (suggestions) that there is any
mistrust or distrust between me and the Congress president," he said.

"(There is) no question of gap in thinking between me and the Congress
President...She is the leader of the UPA and she is the President of
the Congress party and I am a Congressman," Singh said.

21 Comments |

Sincere
By: Hariprasad | Tuesday , 25 May '10 9:47:44 AM

the whole nation know, only to whom, PM is 'Sincere' to!

PM
By: N.natarajan | Tuesday , 25 May '10 7:36:40 AM

A beggar didn't have choice

PM's press conferance
By: N.Ramamurthy | Tuesday , 25 May '10 3:54:47 AM

Dear Sir, Prime Minister Mr.Manmohan Singh's press conferance
hilighting the performence and the action paln for the future has
disappointed the nation more,among many other fronts, on two
accounte,ie tackilng Maoists menace and on 2G scam.. Clearing
Mr.Raja's name of the, mother of all scams, show he doesn't give
credence to the reports of CVC,CAG and Delhi H.C. ruling on the
matter.Then how he can expect his Pakistani counterpart Mr.Gilani to
give credence to 26/11 dossiers investigated and prepared by our
intlelegence agencies? In 2007 while addressing state DGP's conferance
he assured centre would set up special task fore under unified
command,involving states concerned to tackle the naxal extremism.
Three years passed nothing had happened and the irony is that even the
dynamicand proactive Home Ministter Mr.Chidambarm is not allowed
function for political reasons.It's shocking to read news, the PM now
calls it a law and order problem and responsibility lies with the
state govts

PM
By: Sangat Singh | Tuesday , 25 May '10 3:25:17 AM

YOU MEAN 'DIRECTION' MR. PRIME MINISTER?

Distrust between PM and Sonia
By: Amit Sharma | Tuesday , 25 May '10 1:58:46 AM

How can there be Distrust? One is a Master other a turbaned slave.
There cannot be any mistrust.

Ideal separation of responsibilities
By: Santokh Singh Sahi | Tuesday , 25 May '10 1:20:51 AM

For a successfule democracy,sharing of responsibility is good for the
individual,as well as for the country.Good governance needs
uninterupted concentration on the job in hand.Dr. Manmohan Singh PM is
fully devoted to goverance of the country.Mrs. Sonia Gandhi President
of the Congress Party takes care of the political issues along with
the interests of its allies.This is the reason that Congress party has
again been voted to power.Concentration of entire responsibility in
one hand is neither good for the person nor good for the party and the
country in the long run. I appreciate every-one's right of free
expression of views, but requests that civilized language be used to
give bent to their feelings. Democracy is all by discussion in side
and out side legislature.Through discussion good points come up.We all
have a stake in our country's accountable and transparent
administration.We all need to participate. Shared responsibility helps
to ensure rule of law more than one man rule.

Mistrust
By: Citizen | Tuesday , 25 May '10 1:14:57 AM

No one is bothered about your trust or mistrust.Every one knows how
you work as a bonded labourer with out any of your own intelegence.
You are a great economist but what happend to your economist brain
when loans were written off just for the sake of votes and its
repucussions on inflation etc.Same thing with corrupt ministers in
your cabinet the history probably will judge you as sardar of
scams.all this is aptly said by some one" PM presides and madam
decides" so where is this trust and no trust comes in work for INDIA
not for VANDEMATHA ROME.Jaihind
Manmohan Singh
By: Kalpathy Venkataraman | Tuesday , 25 May '10 0:36:51 AM Reply |
Forward
It is a real shame that a world renowned economist is receiving
constant guidance and advice from a person whose only credential is
Indira Gandhi's daughter in law. Manmohan Singh has clearly proven
that he is mem sab ka gulam in chief. Perhaps she may provide advise
and guidance to Manmohan Singh as to how he can help her get kick back
from lucrative defense business that the Indian Government is waiting
to conclude. Jai Hind.

Sonia Gandhi can give advice and provide guidance!!!!!!!
By: Jatin | Monday , 24 May '10 23:23:59 PM

It is great to know and also very surprising that Sonia Gandhi can
advice and provide guidance!!!!!!! Wow, that a news, indeed.

Sing is no King
By: Singh | Monday , 24 May '10 21:38:41 PM

MMS is not a politician, hes the one of the worst PM india has
produced, the sooner he quits the better for India!!

CommentsPost comment21 Comments |Which and what kind of trust?
By: romesh.sharma | Monday , 24 May '10 21:38:04 PM

Mr MMSingh,the PM of India who has nothing to say in the affairs of
governance and is blabbering and moving around as directed by the
remoter control wich is in the hands of Sonia.His obsequiousness has
enslaved him till death for he feels highly obliged because Sonia has
blessed/bestowed and sanctified/ what he is today;a person who never
won even municipal election.This reward has obfuscated his origin self
and changed the whole character;character of a cunning and crook
indulged in decpeption and whopping lies.He was liability at the
begining of first term and now he has become a turned into a curse
bringing all the calamities to the Nation and its people.He is
liar.HIs every effort to keep face/save face is mere self-consolatory.

Ex-CEO of bank of Baroda
By: Anant Sheth | Monday , 24 May '10 21:35:32 PM

The prime need for the country is a young PM. Manmohan Singh has done
a wonderful job and may like to retire gracefully before getting bad
name for the faults of his Ministers. I salute him. He deserves.

No Mistrust
By: Varind | Monday , 24 May '10 20:37:44 PM

Who is fooling who? Can anyone in Congress say that he/she does not
see eye to eye with Sonia Gandhi? Gandhi family name is Congress and
rest is 'Yes Boss".

Team Work---is our Strenth.
By: Dr.Sankabattula Venkata Rao | Monday , 24 May '10 20:14:10 PM

Some foreign elements want to make India as an unstable country by all
the odd ways to meet their vested interests.Our beloved P.M and
Congress President's ideal team work is the best reply to such
elements.

Reply to Makka Bhutta Chirkut Rao
By: Bharti | Monday , 24 May '10 22:29:01 PM

U r among the few eccentrics here who r supporting that congress.

Mistrust
By: Mr Singh Sahib | Monday , 24 May '10 16:52:13 PM

Mr. Manmohan Singh Ji. Do you remember the logo of HMV records?. I
hope you do, if not just look at your self.

best combination
By: Anand Kumar | Monday , 24 May '10 16:38:55 PM

why media and others are interested in mistrust%u2019 between him and
Congress President Sonia Gandhi. They are performing very well. India
is now politically stable and this stability leds india toward a
developed country. so please don't tease them.

Mistrust
By: Chandramohanarao | Monday , 24 May '10 14:35:42 PM

Who is bothered about mistrust between you and Sonia Mr.PM? People are
worried about the mistrust between them and you. Fill that gap first.

We all know that
By: freddie | Monday , 24 May '10 14:02:12 PM

We all know that you are a puppet and sonia is ruling you?

mistrust
By: ksk | Monday , 24 May '10 12:19:44 PM

No mistrust between I and Sonia ========it should be No mistrust
between ME and Sonia Do they proof read the articles or what????

Mistrust Trust
By: PK | Monday , 24 May '10 22:47:45 PM

PLEASE GO BACK TO GRADE SCHOOL TO LEARN WHICH IS CORRECT. OR TAKE THE
EASY WAY ASK IN GOOGLE. DON'T BE RASH ON MAKING JUDGMENTS ON EDUCATED
PEOPLE.

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/no-mistrust-between-i-and-sonia-pm/622894/

UPA report card far from reality: Mayawati
Press Trust Of India
Lucknow, May 24, 2010

First Published: 23:02 IST(24/5/2010)
Last Updated: 23:03 IST(24/5/2010)

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Mayawati on Monday said UPA-II's report
card presented by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has nothing to do with
ground realities and the first year of the alliance's second stint in
office has been disappointing for the people of the state.

"If tested on the basis of ground realities, the report card on UPA's
one year in the office presented by the PM through press conference is
frivolous," Mayawati said during a meeting of praty MLAs, MPs,
ministers and zonal coordinators.

"There is nothing wrong in saying that one year of the UPA regime was
disappointing for the people of the state on all fronts," she added.

Congratulating party leaders and workers for the success of their
statewide agitation on May 22 against price-rise and the Centre's
apathy towards UP, the BSP supremo asked them to intensify it.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/UPA-report-card-far-from-reality-Mayawati/Article1-548007.aspx

‘Tainted’ in past, but ‘reformed’ now, BSP men to stay on: Maya
Express News Service
Posted: May 25, 2010 at 0322 hrs IST

Lucknow Asserting that her party MPs and MLAs/MLCs with tainted past
have “reformed” themselves after joining the BSP, Uttar Pradesh Chief
Minister Mayawati assured on Monday that they would not be expelled
from the party. The chief minister also announced that tickets would
be given to all her party’s sitting MLAs in the 2012 Assembly
elections.
According to a BSP press release, the CM said such BSP MLAs who are
being targeted by Opposition parties on grounds of their alleged
criminal past have not done any wrong during her tenure and,
therefore, there is no reason for taking action against them.

The release said that by ensuring party tickets to all sitting MLAs,
the CM has put an end to all speculation raised by Opposition parties
who often made provocative statements against the ‘tainted’
legislators.

It seems the MLAs were falsely implicated in criminal cases as part of
political conspiracy in the past, the CM said in the release.

Mayawati, however, maintained the clean-up drive would continue
against criminal elements injected into the BSP by Opposition
parties.

The BSP had earlier undertaken a drive against criminal elements
within her party and the chief minister had announced the expulsion of
about 500 party leaders with criminal past, though their names were
not disclosed.

Mayawati, meanwhile, has called a meeting of her party MPs today to
announce the names of seven candidates the party will field in the
biennial polls to 11 Rajya Sabha seats, besides eight other candidates
who will contest biennial polls to 13 Legislative Council seats. The
terms of 13 members of the State Legislative Council, including Chief
Minister Mayawati’s, would end on July 6, and the BSP chief has once
again decided to enter the fray for UP’s Upper House.

Elated with the CM’s assurance of giving tickets to all sitting
legislators, a BSP MLA said: “She told us that BSP MLAs with tainted
past have not done anything wrong or illegal during her current
tenure.” Eleven members from the state, including BSP national general
secretary Satish Chandra Mishra and treasurer Ambeth Rajan, would
retire from the Rajya Sabha on July 4. Mishra and Rajan have both been
given BSP tickets to contest for a second consecutive term in the
Rajya Sabha. The other five BSP candidates are Yugal Kishore, Mohammed
Salim Ansari, Narendra Kumar Kashyap, Rajpal Saini and S P Singh
Baghel.

While MLC Yugul Kishore is BSP coordinator, Salim Ansari is a BSP old
horse and has been active in eastern UP. “Salim Ansari contested
Assembly polls against Mukhtar Ansari from Mau in 2002. In 2007,
Behenji had not given him a ticket from Mau,” said a BSP source,
adding Salim has been rewarded with the party ticket for the “honesty”
with which he has served the party.

“He would be BSP’s face against the Ansari brothers in eastern UP,”
said the source. S P Singh Baghel, a former MP, had joined the BSP at
the time of the trust vote over the N-deal issue in Parliament. He was
fielded as BSP candidate in the bypolls to Firozabad seat. The
biennial polls to the eleven Rajya Sabha seats, if required, would be
held on June 17.

Besides Mayawati, the BSP has fielded seven candidates for the
biennial polls to the 11 Council seats. They are Rishipal Gautam,
Satish Chandra Jatav, Ramkumar Kuril, Atahar Khan, Subodh Kumar
Parashar, Lalchand Nishad and Virendra Kumar Chauhan.

Mayawati introduced all the selected candidates to her party MLAs at
the meeting today.

“She requested us to cast our votes honestly and warned us against
cross voting,” a BSP MLA said, adding the party chief has asked her
workers to gear up for the 2012 Assembly polls.

http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/tainted-in-past-but-reformed-now-bsp-men-to-stay-on-maya/623221/

..and I am Sid Harth
navanavonmilita
2010-05-27 12:45:11 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-14/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-15/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-16/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-17/

5 NDA ministers give resignation letters to Jharkhand governor
PTIWednesday, May 26, 2010 21:10 IST Email

Ranchi: Five Jharkhand ministers belonging tohe BJP and JD(U)
submitted their resignation letters to governor MOH Farooq, who today
forwarded these to chief minister Shibu Soren.

Tourism minister Sudha Choudhary (JD-U) submitted her resignation
letter today while the four other ministers -- deputy chief minister
Raghuvar Das, food processing minister Barkuanr Gagrai, transport
minister Nilkanth Singh Munda and health minister Baijnath Ram (all
BJP) -- sent their letters to Farooq yesterday, Raj Bhavan sources
said.

They said the letters have been forwarded to the chief minister so
that these could come to the Governor through the right channel.

Soren, whose JMM-NDA coalition has been reduced to minority after BJP
withdrew support to the alliance on May 24, has been asked to prove
his majority on the floor of the Jharkhand Assembly by May 31.

The governor had asked Das, who is also the Leader of BJP Legislature
Party, about the signatures of other BJP MLAs when he had met Farooq
to hand over the letter withdrawing support to the Soren government.

Both BJP and JMM have 18 MLAs each in the 82-member Assembly.
Frustrated over JMM backtracking on its power-sharing agreement, the
BJP withdrew support when a defiant Soren asserted that he would
continue as the chief minister and was in touch with Congress.

Das had assured Farooq that he would submit a letter carrying
signatures of all BJP MLAs by May 25, but Raj Bhavan sources said
signatures of all party MLAs have not been received so far.

BJP sources said signatures of other MLAs were being collected as many
of them were out of station.

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_5-nda-ministers-give-resignation-letters-to-jharkhand-governor_1388187

Uncertainty in Jharkhand deepens, as BJP, JMM mull re-alignment
Indo-Asian News Service
Ranchi, May 27, 2010

First Published: 15:29 IST(27/5/2010)
Last Updated: 15:36 IST(27/5/2010)

In the shifting sands of political equations in Jharkhand, nothing is
quite as it seems. The ruling JMM and the BJP may have just parted
ways but most leaders of both parties are not averse to joining hands
again, say sources, even as the Congress explores possibilities of
forming an alternative government.

According to Jharkhand Mukti Morcha insiders, 12 of the 18 legislators
are in favour of getting back with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

The JMM has also formed a two-member committee comprising Chief
Minister Shibu Soren's son Hemant and legislator Champai Soren to hold
talks with the BJP.

"JMM is open to going either with the BJP or the Congress. Most party
leaders want to again join hands with the BJP but it is too early to
jump to any conclusion. Everything depends on the response of the BJP
and rebel party legislators," a JMM leader told IANS.

He said the JMM is trying to pacify rebel legislators and persuading
them not to make any statements. However, so far the rebels are stuck
to their guns.

"We stick to our old stand. Six party legislators are with us," said
legislator Teklal Mahto, who along with Simon Marandi has been against
the tie-up with the BJP from the beginning.

Three days after the BJP withdrew support to the Soren government,
reducing it to a minority, the situation in the BJP is not too
different either. Former chief minister and BJP national secretary
Arjun Munda has said options were open.

Munda enjoys the support of a majority of the party legislators and he
was a front runner for the post of chief minister when the JMM
announced its support for a BJP-led government. Soren then said he had
changed his mind, and the arrangement ended before it had even begun.

According to sources, Hemant Soren is in touch with Munda to end the
bitterness and create a conducive environment to bring the two parties
together.

However, senior BJP leader Yashwant Sinha said: "The BJP will not take
the initiative to form government in the state." The Soren government,
in a minority after the BJP withdrew support on Monday, has been asked
by Governor M.O.H. Farook to prove its majority by May 31.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/india/JMM-BJP-Not-all-over-yet/Article1-549273.aspx

BJP ‘rethink’ adds to mess in Jharkhand
Gautam Mazumdar/HTC, Hindustan Times
Ranchi, May 26, 2010

First Published: 00:20 IST(26/5/2010)
Last Updated: 00:25 IST(26/5/2010)

The BJP could be mulling an alternative government in Jharkhand with
the support of Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM). The possibility has
cropped up after the delay of BJP ministers in resigning from the Sibu
Soren Cabinet.

The BJP had four ministers — Raghubar Das, Nilkanth Singh Munda,
Baidyanath Ram and Barkuwar Gagrai — in the Soren government from
which it pulled the plug on Monday. None resigned till Tuesday
evening.

According to insiders, Soren may quit on May 27 and support the BJP to
form an alternative government. But BJP state unit president Raghubar
Das is now not in favour of an understanding with JMM. At the same
time, BJP general secretary Arjun Munda is favouring a fresh tie-up
with Soren.

Munda’s parleys with Soren’s son Hemant and four JMM legislators have
added fuel to the speculation. Munda, unconfirmed reports say, has
managed the support of four JMM legislators.

BJP MP from Hazaribag Yashwant Sinha, however, said the party would
not enter into the process of any government formation and would vote
against the trust motion Soren would be moving.

The BJP is yet to submit to Governor M.O.H. Farook the letter
containing signatures of all 18 party legislators. The party had
withdrawn its support to JMM through this letter on Monday.

“This could not be done because most of our party legislators were in
their respective constituencies,” said BJP state spokesperson Sanjay
Kumar Seth.

However, lack of coordination is being blamed for the delay in the BJP
ministers resigning. The decision of withdrawing support to JMM was
taken late on Sunday. But as Baidyanath Ram told HT, the meeting of
BJP legislators on Wednesday could be the decider.

More than the JMM — it began courting the Congress on Monday — the
flip-flop over the past 48 hours appears to have tainted the BJP’s
reputation.

The Congress, meanwhile, is keeping its options open. “Nothing can be
ruled out,” said party spokesman Shakeel Ahmed.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/jharkhand/BJP-rethink-adds-to-mess-in-Jharkhand/Article1-548521.aspx

JVM-P not averse to forming government with Congress
Indo-Asian News Service
Ranchi, May 26, 2010

First Published: 21:02 IST(26/5/2010)
Last Updated: 21:05 IST(26/5/2010)

The Jharkhand Vikas Morcha-Prajatantrik (JVM-P) on Wednesday said it
was not averse to forming a government in alliance with the Congress
after the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Janata Dal-United (JD-
U) withdrew support to the Shibu Soren-led government.

JVM-P held a meeting of party legislators and party president Babulal
Marandi discussed the present political situation in Jharkhand.

"We are not averse to forming government in the state. We will
consider forming government in alliance with the Congress if we get
any proposal," party spokesperson Saroj said quoting Marandi's address
to the legislators.

Marandi, however, did not clarify who would lead the government in
case of a JVM-P and Congress alliance.

While Congress has 14 legislators, JVM-P has 11. The two parties will
need the support of Soren's Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM) which has 18
legislators in the 81-member state assembly.

Soren's government, which has been reduced to a minority after BJP
withdrew support on Monday, has been asked by the governor to prove
his majority by May 31.

But the JVM-P spokesperson said: "The governor should immediately
dismiss the Soren government, which has lost majority in the state."

JVM-P has demanded one of the two Rajya Sabha seats from Congress. "We
will seek one Rajya Sabha seat from the Congress," Pradeep Yadav, JVM-
P legislature party leader told reporters.

Elections to two Rajya Sabha seats from Jharkhand are scheduled to
take place in June.

In the 81-member assembly, Soren was enjoying the support of 18 BJP
legislators, two of JD-U and five All Jharkhand Students Union (AJSU)
legislators.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/JVM-P-not-averse-to-forming-government-with-Congress/Article1-548916.aspx

Cong wants Soren out, lead role in J'khand
TNN, May 26, 2010, 04.25am IST

Tags:Congress|Jharkhand|JMM|Shibu Soren

NEW DELHI: Congress has decided not to let Shibu Soren continue as
chief minister, and will step into the power game in Jharkhand only if
JMM agrees to let it lead the government. Congress wants JMM to knock
on its doors with the readiness to play second fiddle, calculating
that Soren may drop his claim to lead a new coalition to avoid the
prospect of the state being put under President's rule.

The party is expecting an early decision as with only four days left
for Soren to prove his majority, as directed by governor M O H Farooq,
there is little room for the beleaguered chief minister to
prevaricate.

The reluctance to join a coalition led by Soren is just one of the
reasons why the party does not seem keen to bail the chief minister
out. It also has to contend with its ally Babulal Marandi. Marandi has
defined himself in opposition to Soren and JMM and is unlikely to
countenance any arrangement which throws a lifeline to the fading
tribal leader. Congress sees Marandi as a useful asset.

Keshava Rao, AICC incharge of state, said on Tuesday, "We are waiting
and watching. The situation is of their (JMM-BJP) own making and
Congress has nothing to do with it. But as a responsible party, we
will address the issue when the time comes. All reports of
negotiations or contacts with JMM are incorrect."

After Jharkhand threw up a fractured house, Congress decided against
supporting Soren for the CM's post, thus goading the JMM leader to tie
up with BJP. Now that the JMM-BJP combination has collapsed following
a controversy triggered by Soren's cross vote during the cut motions
in Parliament, sources said Congress leaders are against a U-turn.

While there are demands that Congress should step in to keep BJP at
bay, the party feels taking the leadership of the state will be a
better way to do it.

Sources said JMM will have to act on its own to woo Congress as it
inches towards the governor's deadline this week. It can be helped by
the fact that Soren has to step down, in any case.He has not been
elected to the legislature till now and a byelection is not possible
in next 45 days.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Cong-wants-Soren-out-lead-role-in-Jkhand/articleshow/5975072.cms

After BJP, JD-U withdraws support to Soren
26 May 2010, 1827 hrs IST,IANS

Topics:BJPJharkhandJDUShibu Soren

RANCHI: The Janata Dal-United Wednesday pulled out of the Shibu Soren-
led government in Jharkhand, two days after the Bhartiya Janta Party
(BJP)
withdrew support.

Sudha Chaudhary, a minister in Soren's government and the JD-U
legislature party leader, faxed a letter to the Raj Bhawan informing
Governor M.O.H. Farook of the party's decision to withdraw support to
the government led by the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM) chief.

According to a Raj Bhawan spokesperson, Sudha Chaudhary also resigned
from the post of minister.

The JD-U has two legislators in the Jharkhand assembly.

The Soren government, which has been reduced to minority after BJP
withdrew support Monday, has been asked by the governor to prove
majority by May 31.

In the 81-member assembly, Soren was enjoying the support of 18 BJP
legislators, two of JD-U and five All Jharkhand Students Union (AJSU)
legislators. JMM has 18 legislators.

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/After-BJP-JD-U-withdraws-support-to-Soren/articleshow/5977411.cms

President's rule in Jharkhand likely
26 May 2010, 0634 hrs IST,ET Bureau

NEW DELHI: President’s rule in Jharkhand looked very likely as chief
minister Shibu Soren would find it difficult to prove his majority in
the
82-member assembly.

With the JMM reneging on its promise of handing over the reins of the
state to the BJP under a rotational formula, the latter had on Monday
withdrawn its support to the Soren government, reducing it to a
minority. Governor M O H Farooq had subsequently given the chief
minister time till May 31 to prove his majority on the floor of the
assembly.
The JMM supremo is now looking towards Congress to bail him out, but
the latter, which has 14 members in the Jharkhand assembly and is an
ally of Mr Babulal Marandi’s Jharkhand Vikas Manch, is unlikely to
oblige him by agreeing to renew his lease on the government.

The state Congress leadership has made it clear that it would not back
a JMM-led formation. Any alternative arrangement will have to be led
by it, or its alliance partner JVM. Mr Marandi, who has the backing of
11 MLAs in the assembly, is said to be amenable to the idea of
installing a Congress-led government, but is unwilling to join any
such coalition government which has JMM as a component . JVM, it is
learnt, will only extend outside support to such a regime.

The arithmetic of the state assembly is such that any three major
players have to join hands to provide a stable government. BJP and JMM
have 18 MLAs each, while Congress-JVM combine have 25. AJSU has five
members.

JMM and JVM are locked in a bitter turf battle to gain supremacy. Mr
Marandi, who commands a lot of respect in the state, especially among
tribals on account of his clean and honest image, is, therefore , said
to be unwilling to be part of any alliance which has JMM.

With the arithmetic being such, the governor would have no option but
to recommend President’s rule and place the assembly under suspended
animation.

As the drama in the state’s political arena plays out, BJP, which had
started nursing dreams of leading the state again, has been left
licking its wounds. The party has been bruised and battered by naked
display of greed for power, which has subjected it to popular
ridicule. The knives are out for former BJP president Rajnath Singh
and party general secretary Ananth Kumar, who forced the leadership
into playing ball with an ‘undependable and unreliable’ JMM.

Former BJP presidents L K Advani and Murli Manohar Joshi, Leaders of
the Opposition in the two Houses of Parliament, Ms Sushma Swaraj and
Mr Arun Jaitley , had warned the party brass against cutting any
`unwholesome’ deal with JMM, but were eventually pushed out of the
frame in the power-sharing discussions. Mr Singh’s insistence on
imposing BJP general secretary Arjun Munda as the state chief minister
is also said to have angered the JMM leadership.

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/Presidents-rule-in-Jharkhand-likely/articleshow/5975241.cms

..and I am Sid Harth
cogitoergosum
2010-05-27 16:28:36 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-18/

How has UPA-II fared in the first year?
20 May 2010, 0007 hrs IST,ET Bureau

Topics:Manmohan Singh India Salman Khurshid Arun Jaitley Brinda Karat
UPA II government

Brinda Karat, CPI(M), Polit Bureau Member & MP

The Left check is missing this time around — and it shows

The first anniversary of the UPA-II government does not give much
cause for celebration. Instead of utilising the electoral verdict in
its favour in a manner that could have benefited the large mass of
working people, the UPA leadership preferred to use its first year to
push through a set of policies and legislations to benefit powerful
lobbies and interests.

Delhi under this regime has a flourishing culture of crony capitalism
dominated by political patronage and murky deals.

Unlike the UPA-I that was dependent on the Left parties whose support
was linked to the implementation of a common minimum programme, the
present dispensation is dependent on allies less interested in policy
issues, affecting the people than their own specific agendas.

Thus, the ruling party can get away with pushing Bills like the
Foreign University Bill that grants concessions to foreign
universities and promises them a regime of no control over fees or
admissions or the Nuclear Liability Bill with its unconstitutional
provisions of capping compensation amounts in the event of a nuclear
accident, while it delays promised social legislations like the Food
Security Bill.

It can come to opportunist deals to not bring the Women’s Reservation
Bill in the Lok Sabha to ensure support on other issues. In contrast,
the role of the Left had ensured that the UPA-I brought draft
legislations of significant social significance within the first year
such as Right to Information (RTI), National Rural Employment
Guarantee Act (NREGA) and, later, the Forest Rights Bill.

The controversy surrounding the Food Security Bill is a telling
commentary on how far the government has moved away from a social
agenda.

The scandalous bargaining on the number of poor who should benefit
from such a legislation shows that the government is least interested
in scientific poverty estimations but only in cost estimations.

With a budgetary admission that Rs 5 lakh crore of tax revenue was
foregone in the previous year, Rs 80,000 crore of which was corporate
taxes, UPA-II has no excuses of resource shortfall to deny the largest
malnourished population in the world a legally-guaranteed universally-
applicable food security safety net.

This delay is all the more unjust in the context of the relentless
food inflation that has dominated UPA-II’s first year, reflecting the
utter failure of the central government.

It has stubbornly refused to take steps to tame the market effectively
even though it has a huge buffer stock of foodgrains of almost five
crore tonnes that, if distributed in a universal system, would have a
salutary impact on the market.

On sugar, big companies profited and consumers had to pay higher
prices because of a set of government policies, like the refusal to
build a buffer stock during good harvest period, to its incentivised
export and import policies. The budgetary hike in the excise and
Customs duties on diesel and petrol have ensured the continuation of
food inflation in spite of the satisfactory rabi harvest and
procurement.

The UPA-I had, under Left pressure, accepted a logical policy that
navratna PSUs would not be privatised. Public sector banks had been
protected, which saved India from the worst impact of the global
financial crisis. But within this one year, privatisation has begun in
earnest. That less than 1% of the PSU shares sold in the past were
bought by individuals and non-FIIs shows the utter duplicity of the
government claim that such a selloff is for people’s ownership.

The UPA-II is also marked by a disturbing process of centralisation
eroding the federal constitutional framework and the rights of state
governments.

Policy matters and cost-sharing on subjects on the concurrent list are
more frequently decided arbitrarily, sounding a red alert on the need
for healthy Centre-state relations.

These are issues that affect common people and the national interest.
It is the effort of the Left parties to mobilise people in struggle
for a reversal of policies that adversely impact their lives and
livelihood.

We mean business, and we wish to take everyone along

Evaluating one’s own government can sound either insincere or unfair.
Frankly, people have to judge, but one has to periodically check one’s
tracks to be sure of the path taken.

Being in the company of some of the best political brains does make
one self-conscious about personal performance as indeed it gives a
sense of elation to be part of the team. For us, this has been a
rewarding and exciting year, even if a bit boisterous at times in
Parliament.

UPA-II had a great deal of firm ground and sound foundations built
over the past five years to thank its predecessor government for. Yet,
the fresh tenure brought its own challenges. Terms of trade had to be
improved for agriculture even as the impact of loan waiver left a
positive perception amongst farmers.

So, inevitably, better prices had to precede greater investment. Yet,
inflation, particularly related to food items, posed a problem. We
handled it with confidence and determination. Hopefully, a good
monsoon will put to rest the sceptics and their doomsday
pronouncements.

One must not overlook two significant indicators of the new rural
India: steadily growing mobile penetration and steep upward graph of
two-wheeler sales.

The process of transforming the countryside has begun. All one has to
do is to go out at look at the Rajiv Gandhi Vidhyutikaran in action
and the Pradhan Mantri Gaon Sarak Yojna roads, and the difference
between yesterday and today will be obvious.

In education, law reform, gender justice, next-generation panchayat
reforms, regulatory regimes et al, great strides have been taken.

More are on the anvil. For minorities, the Sachar Committee commitment
is unfolding itself in a manner unimaginable in the past: Rs 3,700
crore directly being pumped into development of 90 minority-
concentrated districts and over 30 lakh scholarships for school and
university students, among other things.

The Waqf Amendment Act and restructuring of the NMDFC will empower
Muslims and fill a long-awaited opportunity for self-reliance. The
Equal Opportunity Commission will soon introduce a new syntax in
constitutional assurance of an equal society.

Affirmative Action will change the landscape of Indian politics beyond
the impact of the reservation regime. We will be able to pursue
empowerment without the risk of triggering the conflicts that have
diverted our attention in the past.

Soon, the finance minister will give us a modern and user-friendly
direct taxes code and a goods and services tax. The overdue Companies
Bill will reflect the realities of contemporary corporate culture best
practices even as corporate social responsibility and corporate
governance voluntary regimes become part of our daily business
conversation.

The capital markets will target the aam aadmi as 3,000 or more
workshops for the retail investor demystify investments and provide
financial literacy. The Competition Commission will ensure our own
jurisprudence for rational and effective growth of business.

UPA-II means business. But it is committed to business that takes
everyone along in an inclusive manner. The insurance for BPL citizens
is the beginning.

Food security will be the next step for the government that cares for
and comforts all. And, it has only been one year. There is a lot more
to come.

And all this must be attributed to the compassion, commitment and
vision of Congress president Sonia Gandhi and Prime Minister Manmohan
Singh.

Civil society is naturally becoming our partner in devising a
responsive government, and accountability principles are courageously
being applied to the judiciary as well, and as per their own wish.
Leadership is about more than merely administering. It is about
helping a nation dream and then helping it to make dreams come true.
Such is the leadership of UPA-II.

We would wish to debate our performance with our detractors. But the
fact that they avoid engaging in debate speaks of our delivery. As the
wise person would res ipso loqueter or the facts speak for themselves.
I rest our case for the people to decide.

Arun Jaitley, Leader of Opposition, Rajya Sabha

The govt favours the corrupt, and the PM is not in control

Normally, the first year is a very comfortable year for a government.
In common parlance, it is termed as the honeymoon period. But if you
ask me to lay down the positives and the negatives of the Manmohan
Singh government on the completion of its first year in office, let me
start by stressing the positives.

The UPA-II government started with a small majority. It got
opportunistic support from the Samajwadi Party, BSP and the RJD.
Notwithstanding this, it kicked off its innings with a huge element of
arrogance as a political culture. From the beginning, it shared an
uneasy relationship with the three regional parties.

On the eve of the Budget session, the government suddenly realised
that it had a slender majority of three in the Lok Sabha, while, at
the same time, being heavily outnumbered in the Rajya Sabha.

Of the four current allies, National Conference is too small a party.
The Trinamool Congress is too unpredictable. Ms Mamata Banerjee is a
minister, but is not bridled with ministerial discipline.

The DMK is plagued with a serious palace war. There is not only a
battle for political succession but also for sharing the profits of
the office. While in UPA-I, the flagship highway programme suffered
because of Mr T R Baalu, the UPA-II has been rattled by Mr A Raja’s
involvement in the 2G spectrum scandal. The NCP, the fourth partner,
lives in its own world. It shares a relationship of compulsion with
the Congress.

Politically, the government has become tolerant towards corruption,
has indiscreet and indisciplined ministers, and then uses the CBI to
stay in power.

Then the three parties — the SP, BSP and the RJD — comprise the
vulnerable and phoney section of the opposition. During the 2008 trust
vote and the 2010 cut motion, voting took place in Parliament, but the
gameplan was decided by the CBI in the corridors of the Supreme
Court.

Affidavits in the case of Mr Mulayam Singh Yadav were changed
depending on the circumstances when he supported the government or
when he opposed the government.

On the eve of the cut motion, the government fielded the Attorney
General in the Supreme Court, and he agreed to reconsider the DA case
pending against Ms Mayawati. The next day, she announced her party’s
support to the government against the cut motion.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s capacity to damage institutions to
remain in power, to remain silent in the face of the destruction of
these institutions — CBI, cash for vote, phone tapping and Election
Commission — has been stark. His only endeavour has been to maintain
his clean image, and to ensure that nothing sticks.

The downsides of the government’s first year in office have been many.
First, the prime minister’s reputation as an economist has taken a
beating. The government had said the prices will start moderating by
2010, but they still remain high. The prime minister has run out of
ideas on how to deal with the situation.

On all strategic and foreign policy issues, the prime minister comes
across as a person who wilts under international pressure too easily.
Witness the government capitulating under pressure on the nuclear
deal, Sharm-el-Sheikh, Copenhagen Summit, foreign secretary-level
talks, resumption of dialogue with Pakistan and the civil nuclear
liability Bill.

In the last year, we have been shocked by anarchic statements
emanating from key functionaries and MPs. Someone is supporting the
khap panchayats. The indiscretions of Mr Shashi Tharoor and Mr Jairam
Ramesh buttress the image of a prime minister who is not in control.

The government’s flip-flop on jehadi terrorism and Naxalism has been
baffling. It appeared for the first time that the government will have
a strong policy on the two issues, but the expectations have been
belied by the manner in which the home minister’s own party pulled him
down.

Summing up, it can be said that while governance has taken a back
seat, political management has taken the front seat in UPA-II’s first
year in office.

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/5951050.cms

Call-tapping now at Centre of controversy
24 Apr 2010, 0149 hrs IST,ET Bureau

Topics:Phones IPL Sharad Pawar Nitish Kumar Prakash Karat Digvijay
Singh Call tapping

NEW DELHI: The Manmohan Singh government’s “ethical governance” has no
place in this story. In a startling revelation that is bound to
unleash aIPL: Tharoor-Modi controversy

political storm that could even eclipse the IPL controversy
temporarily, the UPA government, it is alleged, used the latest phone-
tapping technology to monitor and tape phone conversations of
important leaders within the ruling alliance, in the Congress party,
and in the Opposition for routine surveillance as well as to gain an
upper hand over rivals at crucial times like the 2008 trust vote.

The expose could deal the Manmohan Singh regime’s credibility plank
its biggest and severest blow since it first came to power in 2004.

Among those whose phones were tapped, according to Outlook magazine,
are the likes of Congress leader Digvijay Singh, Bihar chief minister
Nitish Kumar, CPM general secretary Prakash Karat and even NCP chief
and Union agriculture minister Sharad Pawar.

The magazine names the National Technical Research Organisation
(NTRO), an agency created specifically to look after technical
intelligence gathering after the Kargil war, as the intelligence wing
that was tapping and recording the conversations.

Among the most serious revelations made by the magazine is the charge
that the phone-tapping technology was used “extensively to listen in
on the conversations of Opposition leaders during the July 2008 no-
confidence motion on the Indo-US nuclear deal”.

It also says recently, Mr Pawar’s conversation with IPL commissioner
Lalit Modi was tapped and possibly used to get him to procure Mr
Modi’s resignation. The article also recounts a tapped conversation
between AICC general secretary Digvijay Singh, a 10, Janpath loyalist,
and a Punjab Congress leader who was pushing his candidature for the
2007 CWC elections.

Mr Nitish Kumar’s routine conversation with a colleague—about getting
a better deal for his state from the Centre—was tapped from a phone
belonging to the Bihar resident commissioner in 2007.

The NTRO’s involvement—it is monitored by the National Security
Advisor (NSA)—raises questions about the role of the Prime Minister's
Office in the operation. It not just brings up legal questions but
also highlights ethical issues about using spyware meant for enemies
of the State on political rivals and opponents.

With the Congress building up Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s image as
that of an “upright” politician, the serious allegations about using
unfair means to gain a political upper hand, especially at times like
the trust motion, could weaken that script to a great extent.

The magazine says, for instance, that “one intelligence agency
targeted some leaders of the Left Front, including CPM general
secretary Prakash Karat, to fathom the Left’s strategy to bring down
the government”.

According to an intelligence source the magazine quotes, the
technology, brought to India by former NSA MK Narayanan in 2005-06,
“can be deployed anywhere” and works by “intercepting signals between
the phone and the cellphone tower” and “recording them (the
conversations) on a hard disk”, which can be removed and erased if
questions are asked.

Described in the article as an “off-the-air GSM monitoring device”,
the technology can tap conversations in a 2 km radius and the magazine
quotes a source as saying the whole process requires no authorisation
as there is no number at an exchange that is being tapped.
Interestingly, it says Mr Narayanan was the first person on whose
phone the technology was tested.

Mr Narayanan, who is now the West Bengal governor, was known to be
part of the prime minister’s inner circle and one of the key officers
entrusted with the job of making sure that the Indo-US nuclear deal
was not derailed by the no-confidence motion.

It be recalled that Mr Narayanan played an important role in arranging
the required numbers for the government through Samajwadi Party.

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/5850859.cms

Govt tapped phones of Opposition, alliance leaders: Report
24 Apr 2010, 0018 hrs IST,ET Bureau

Topics:Congress Sharad Pawar Nitish Kumar Prakash Karat Digvijay
Singh

NEW DELHI: The Manmohan Singh government’s “ethical governance” has no
place in this story. In a startling revelation that is bound to
unleash a
political storm that could even eclipse the IPL controversy
temporarily, the UPA government, it is alleged, used the latest phone-
tapping technology to monitor and tape phone conversations of
important leaders within the ruling alliance, in the Congress party,
and in the Opposition for routine surveillance as well as to gain an
upper hand over rivals at crucial times like the 2008 trust vote.

The expose could deal the Manmohan Singh regime’s credibility plank
its biggest and severest blow since it first came to power in 2004.
Among those whose phones were tapped, according to Outlook magazine,
are the likes of Congress leader Digvijay Singh, Bihar chief minister
Nitish Kumar, CPM general secretary Prakash Karat and even NCP chief
and Union agriculture minister Sharad Pawar. The magazine names the
National Technical Research Organisation (NTRO), an agency created
specifically to look after technical intelligence gathering after the
Kargil war, as the intelligence wing that was tapping and recording
the conversations.

Among the most serious revelations made by the magazine is the charge
that the phone-tapping technology was used “extensively to listen in
on the conversations of Opposition leaders during the July 2008 no-
confidence motion on the Indo-US nuclear deal”. It also says recently,
Mr Pawar’s conversation with IPL commissioner Lalit Modi was tapped
and possibly used to get him to procure Mr Modi’s resignation. The
article also recounts a tapped conversation between AICC general
secretary Digvijay Singh, a 10, Janpath loyalist, and a Punjab
Congress leader who was pushing his candidature for the 2007 CWC
elections.

Mr Nitish Kumar’s routine conversation with a colleague—about getting
a better deal for his state from the Centre—was tapped from a phone
belonging to the Bihar resident commissioner in 2007.

The NTRO’s involvement—it is monitored by the National Security
Advisor (NSA)—raises questions about the role of the Prime Minister's
Office in the operation. It not just brings up legal questions but
also highlights ethical issues about using spyware meant for enemies
of the State on political rivals and opponents.

With the Congress building up Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s image as
that of an “upright” politician, the serious allegations about using
unfair means to gain a political upper hand, especially at times like
the trust motion, could weaken that script to a great extent.

The magazine says, for instance, that “one intelligence agency
targeted some leaders of the Left Front, including CPM general
secretary Prakash Karat, to fathom the Left’s strategy to bring down
the government”.

According to an intelligence source the magazine quotes, the
technology, brought to India by former NSA MK Narayanan in 2005-06,
“can be deployed
anywhere” and works by “intercepting signals between the phone and the
cellphone tower” and “recording them (the conversations) on a hard
disk”, which can be removed and erased if questions are asked.
Described in the article as an “off-the-air GSM monitoring device”,
the technology can tap conversations in a 2 km radius and the magazine
quotes a source as saying the whole process requires no authorisation
as there is no number at an exchange that is being tapped.
Interestingly, it says Mr Narayanan was the first person on whose
phone the technology was tested.

Mr Narayanan, who is now the West Bengal governor, was known to be
part of the prime minister’s inner circle and one of the key officers
entrusted with the job of making sure that the Indo-US nuclear deal
was not derailed by the no-confidence motion.

It be recalled that Mr Narayanan played an important role in arranging
the required numbers for the government through Samajwadi Party.

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/5851827.cms

...and I am Sid Harth
cogitoergosum
2010-05-27 23:52:44 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-18/

Soren Meets AJSU Chief Mahato Ahead of Floor Test
Ranchi | May 27, 2010

Ahead of the May 31 trust vote, Jharkhand Chief Minister Shibu Soren
today met Deputy Chief Minister and AJSU president Sudesh Mahato
apparently to discuss how to prove majority in the state Assembly.

"The party-wise position in the 82-member House is such that nobody
has the numbers.The dispute between the JMM and BJP has created such a
situation.Under these circumstances discussions are on," Mahato told
reporters after the meeting.

Mahato, whose party has five MLAs, declined to divulge which way AJSU
will vote during Soren's floor test as advised by Governor M O H
Farooq after the JMM-led coalition was reduced to a minority when BJP
withdrew support on May 24.

"Our party's Parliamentary board will meet tomorrow to take a final
decision.As of now Guruji (Soren) is my leader and I am in his
Cabinet," Mahato said.

JMM leader and state minister Hazi Hussain Ansari claimed the party
was confident to sail through. "We will get the required figure of 42.
Wait and see," he said when asked how they would get the numbers.

JMM's Central Committee secretary Suprio Bhattacharya expressed
confidence about Soren's victory but refused to comment whether the
JMM chief was banking on Congress.

http://news.outlookindia.com/item.aspx?683472

Volume 17 - Issue 18, Sep. 02 - 15, 2000
India's National Magazine
from the publishers of THE HINDU

A leader in his labyrinth

An increasingly hostile political ally and the prospect of tough
battles on the legal front have heightened the predicament of Bal
Thackeray and his Shiv Sena.

PRAVEEN SWAMI
in Mumbai

ONLY a few weeks ago, images of a triumphant Bal Thackeray were on the
front pages of the newspapers. As he walked out of the court of
Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate B.P. Kamble on June 25, the
Shiv Sena chief must have felt that his centrality in Maharashtra
politics was beyond assault. But the magistrate's decision to
terminate criminal proceedings against Thackeray has proved just a
temporary reprieve. Now under pressure not just from the legal system
but parties of his own coalition, the S hiv Sena chief has never been
as vulnerable as he is now. It is almost as if Thackeray's life has
indeed come to resemble that of a character in a Salman Rushdie novel:
as if the colours of the June photographs have faded overnight, into a
worn sepia tin t.

VIVEK BENDRE
Shiv Sena chief Bal Thackeray announces the formation of a party-run
trust for former soldiers headed by Lieutenant-General (retired) P.N.
Hoon (right), the former Western Army Commander, in Mumbai on August
16.

Oddly enough, the Shiv Sena's friends have been in the forefront of
efforts to bring about its demise. On August 20, Bharatiya Janata
Party leader and former Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Gopinath
Munde turned a public rally at Kalyan into a platform to launch an
extraordinary attack on the Sena from the Hindu Right. Munde
complained bitterly that the Sena had chosen not to participate in a
Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP)-sponsored strike to protest the August 1
killings of Hindus in Jammu and Kashmir. "Weren't the Hindus killed by
militants at Amarnath our brethren," he asked, "or does the Hinduism
of the Shiv Sena only surface when their chief is being arrested?"
"Ours," Munde told party workers at the rally, "is not opportunist
Hindutva, for unlike the Sena, we have stuck with this ideology even
in bad times."

Munde's charges, coupled with the promise that the BJP would fight
alone in civic elections scheduled for September 17, stung the Sena.
Even more galling was the fact that the BJP had succeeded in ensuring
a bandh on a respectable scale on August 3 despi te the Sena's
decision not to participate in it. The bandh's success in Mumbai, a
traditional Sena stronghold, had underlined the decline in the
organisation's credibility even among its core constituency. Clearly,
Thackeray's arrest had done little to r evive its fortunes. The Sena's
decision not to participate in the bandh was, sources say, based on
legal advice. Sena advisers had argued that defiance of a Supreme
Court judgments against participation in enforced bandhs could
aggravate Thackeray's situ ation vis-a-vis the judiciary.

Given Munde's record of hostility to the Sena, his remarks in Kalyan
might under other circumstances have been attributed to purely
personal factors. What became clear at the Kalyan rally is that the
former Deputy Chief Minister's sentiments are widely s hared in the
BJP. Senior party leader Ram Kapse, whose speech preceded Munde's,
reminded his audience that the Sena had failed to implement the
promises it had made in its 1995 election manifesto. "Who," he asked,
"will vote for a party which has failed miserably on every count?" The
party's State vice-president Rajaram Salwi was enthused enough by
these sentiments to attack his own colleagues. "We were given
promises." he said, "but nothing was done for the sons of the soil."
"The people," Salwi concl uded, "expected better from the BJP."

IT is increasingly clear that the relationship between the Sena and
the BJP has reached breaking point. The BJP seems clear that it wants
an independent political presence in Maharashtra, an aspiration that
its new State president Pandurang Phundkar has expressed through the
slogan shat pratishat Bhajpa (cent per cent BJP). The slogan had its
origins at a meeting held in late June, when top BJP leaders had met
to discuss their approach towards the Sena. While then-BJP president
Kushabhau Thakre i s believed to have argued for a pragmatic
relationship, Munde and his mentor Pramod Mahajan, the Union
Information Technology Minister, opposed this line. Both asserted that
the BJP's long-term prospects in Maharashtra, and its ambition of
coming to powe r in New Delhi unencumbered by coalition allies, were
contingent on the party becoming the sole representative of the Hindu
Right.

Unfortunately for the Sena, it is simply no position to respond to the
BJP's unconcealed predatory intentions. The Sena's lack of options
became clear to its leadership in the build-up to Thackeray's arrest,
when their supremo ordered the party's represe ntatives in the Union
Council of Ministers to submit their resignations. Although the BJP's
central leadership did little of substance as a consequence to aid the
Shiv Sena chief, Thackeray chose not to force the issue. Mahajan,
sources say, bluntly told the Sena supremo that if he persisted with
an adversarial posture, he would find two governments, not just one,
determined to bring about his downfall. Now, with the Maharashtra
government having won the second round of the legal battle to
prosecute Tha ckeray, the Sena's options are even more limited.

On August 8, the Bombay High Court admitted a petition seeking a
review of Additional Metropolitan Magistrate Kamble's order throwing
out charges filed against Thackeray. Thackeray and two associates had
been prosecuted for inciting communal hatred throu gh articles and
editorials published in the Shiv Sena newspaper Saamna during the
Mumbai riots of 1992-1993. High Court Judge Vishnu Sahai left little
doubt about what he thought about the Magistrate's controversial
order. Kamble's decision to thr ow out the case, he said, had been
made "in indecent haste". The order itself he described as "improper".
In his oral remarks Justice Sahai said the Magistrate had
"misconstrued" the word "cognisance" as it figured in the Indian Penal
Code. The Magistrat e's contention that the prosecution was barred by
the statute of limitations, Justice Sahai suggested, defied the plain
language of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Although Justice Sahai did not commit his observations to paper saying
that he did not wish to prejudge the case, the tone of his comments
left few people in any doubt about the import of his remarks. It is
not yet clear, however, when arguments on the i ssue will finally be
heard in the Bombay High Court. Justice Sahai declined to grant a stay
on the implementation of the magistrate's order, on the grounds that
Thackeray's counsel were not present in court. Nor did he agree to
expedite the hearing of ar guments. The Maharashtra government has,
however, been given permission to appeal to the Chief Justice of the
High Court for expedited hearings, a move officials say they are
considering. The Shiv Sena counsel Adik Shirodkar attempted, however,
to put on a brave face, arguing that the High Court order had "no
effect on us". The admission of the State government's review
petition, he said, was "a necessary part of the process".

Legal observers say that given the political stakes in the case, the
High Court's final decision is almost certain to be challenged in the
Supreme Court. And that is precisely the Sena's real problem. Ongoing
hearings there on the Justice B.N. Srikrishna Commission of Inquiry
could also lead to fresh cases being filed against Thackeray. Over a
dozen criminal cases against the Shiv Sena chief had been withdrawn in
the face of widespread criticism, by the government which took power
in 1995. All of them a re at least as serious as the twin cases for
which Thackeray was arrested on June 25. Proceedings in the Justice
R.S. Librehan Commission of Inquiry, which is investigating the
demolition of the Babri Masjid, could also prove a future threat to
the Sena chief, who had publicly claimed that the outrage was authored
by his party cadre on his express instructions.

WORST of all for the Shiv Sena chief, the BJP's rebellion appears to
have shut down his sole route of escape, a political coup that would
bring down the Lokshahi Aghadi (Democratic Front) Government. In the
wake of his legal triumph of June 25, Thackeray had proclaimed that
the overthrow of the Lokshahi Aghadi was imminent. His recent
pronouncements have been more guarded. At an August 16 press
conference, Thackeray would only say that "the rains have been good;
the crops have come out; we are hoping fo r a good harvest". The press
conference was held to announce the formation of a Shiv Sena trust for
soldiers, headed by Lieutenant-General (retired) P.N. Hoon. Thackeray
refused to say whether non-Hindu soldiers would be benefited by the
trust. And Hoon, who retired as Western Army Commander, was unable to
name its trustees.

Hoon's desperate recruitment to the Shiv Sena's cause was an ill-
concealed effort to shore up its Hindutva credentials in the wake of
the August 4 bandh debacle. In fact, the Sena's chances of reaping any
harvest larger than the services of a retired Gen eral are minimal.
The organisation's sole real source of support within the Nationalist
Congress Party (NCP) has been former Maharashtra Chief Minister
Sudhakarrao Naik, who has been campaigning energetically for the
removal of Deputy Chief Minister Chha gan Bhujbal from office. But
Naik simply does not appear to command the numbers needed to bring
about a split within the NCP, and has publicly said he wishes to see
the Lokshahi Aghadi finish its term. Some of his supporters have in
recent weeks been spe aking of the possibility of setting up a new
party, the Maharashtrawadi Congress, a sign they simply do not have
much influence within the NCP.

None of this is to suggest that Bhujbal is without his own problems.
Some senior figures within the NCP, notably the dissidents grouped
around Vijaysinh Mohite-Patil, have been campaigning energetically for
his removal ever since the early failure of the effort to prosecute
Thackeray. NCP chief and former Union Minister Sharad Pawar is known
to have been more than a little unhappy about the prosecution move
from the outset. Interestingly, Bhujbal's name was missing from the
August issue of the NCP's hou se magazine, the Rashtravadi, as well as
invitation cards issued for a function where the journal was released.
Opinion is divided on whether the omission of Bhujbal's name was by
accident or design, but the fact that it occurred has provoked more
than a little speculation. At the same time, Bhujbal's decision to
prosecute Thackeray has won him not a few friends among the more
avowedly secular elements in the NCP and the Congress(I), the Lokshahi
Aghadi's largest constituents.

Most important, however, is the fact that the BJP's postures in Kalyan
suggest it has no interest whatsoever in bringing down the Lokshahi
Aghadi. Any accommodation with Thackeray at a point when the Sena is
arguably at its weakest would put a summary en d to the shat pratishat
programme, thus ending the BJP's ambitions to secure an independent
platform for itself in Maharashtra. Having seen the poor mass response
to Thackeray's arrest, and the public disgust with the Sena's threats
to make Mumbai burn, BJP leaders sense a real opportunity to emerge as
representatives of a less lumpen, more refined Hindutva. And while
some elements in the BJP have in the past suggested the prospect of a
BJP-NCP alignment, their numbers in the Assembly, coupled wi th the
anti-BJP postures of Lokshahi Aghadi constituents like the Samajwadi
Party, simply do not make such an arrangement workable.

The predicament of Mumbai's self-proclaimed tiger, then, perhaps more
closely resembles that of a hare with the hounds closing in. And
though the pack itself is riven by dissension and contradictions, it
shows no sign of losing scent of its prey.

http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1718/17180450.htm

...and I am Sid Harth
cogitoergosum
2010-05-28 20:57:02 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-18/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-20/

Soren may find it tough winning trust vote
Indo-Asian News Service
Ranchi, May 28, 2010

First Published: 15:22 IST(28/5/2010)
Last Updated: 15:24 IST(28/5/2010)

Jharkhand Chief Minister Shibu Soren might find it difficult to win
the trust vote his government faces May 31 as the major political
parties in the state are set to vote against him.

"BJP has a clear stand to vote against the Soren government. We will
go to the people of the state and apprise them about the prevailing
political situation," state BJP president Raghubar Das said.

He also blamed the Congress for playing dirty politics.

"Congress is trying to grab power by threatening imposition of
President's Rule in the state," Das said.

The Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM)-led government was reduced to a
minority after the BJP withdrew support on Monday. Two legislators of
the Janata Dal-United (JD-U) also pulled out on Wednesday.

The JVM-P, which 11 legislators, also declared that it would vote
against Soren.

"The Soren government should be dismissed immediately. If he goes
ahead to seek trust vote, then we will vote against it," JVM-P
legislature party leader Pradeep Yadav told reporters.

But the JMM is confident of winning the trust vote though party
leaders did not reveal who would support Soren.

The JMM has authorized Soren's son Hemant and legislator Champai Soren
to hold talks with the BJP and it has also authorised two legislators,
Simon Marandi and Teklal Mahto, to hold talks with the Congress.

The Congress, meanwhile, is following a wait-and-watch policy though
party sources said it would like Soren to quit before May 31.

"We are following a wait-and-watch policy," Jharkhand Congress general
secretary Shailesh Sinha told IANS.

In the 81-member assembly, Soren needs the support of 41 legislators.

The JMM and BJP have 18 legislators each. The Congress and JVM-P have
14 and 11 legislators, respectively, while Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD)
and All Jharkhand Students Union (AJSU) have five each. The JD-U has
two and the remaining eight are either independents or belong to
smaller parties.

At present, Soren enjoys the support of 25 legislators, including two
independents. JMM needs the support of at least 16 more legislators,
which is not possible without the support of either the Congress or
BJP.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/Soren-may-find-it-tough-winning-trust-vote/Article1-549773.aspx

Soren smiling photos add to unease
May 28th, 2010 -- ANAND S.T. DAS | Patna.

Jharkhand chief minister Shibu Soren may be finding his position under
siege after the BJP withdrew support and both the Congress and the
JVM(P) began eyeing the top post in return for their support to his
minority government. But the tribal satrap flashed his characteristic
smile in photos in newspaper advertisements his government released on
the occasion of Buddha Purnima on Thursday.

Most political parties in Jharkhand, except Mr Soren’s JMM, and
several intellectuals said the advertisements featuring Soren as chief
minister were at odds with the current situation of extreme political
turmoil prevailing in the state for a month and made little sense,
even though they admitted such advertisements were “technically
correct” because Soren is still “technically the chief minister”.
The advertisements were also described as indications of the 66-year-
old Soren’s “unseemly desire to cling to power” even after facing a
number of situations that were politically very embarrassing for a
leader of his stature ever since BJP first announced withdrawal of
support on April 28 and actually did so on May 24.
Obviously, when Mr Soren’s minority government is widely expected to
fail in proving its majority in the Assembly on May 31 and
consequently fail, it was a shock to many to see his smiling pictures
in government advertisements. But leaders of all the parties agreed
that Mr Soren would like to lose the trust vote and resign rather than
resign beforehand by reading the writing on the wall.
“It (the ad) presents a shocking contrast to the state’s political
reality. I would not have personally allowed release of government ads
of this nature in times like these, though technically there is
nothing wrong in it,” BJP leader Saryu Rai said.

Comments

Shibu Soren is smiling
ACCEPT THE REAL FACT!

28 May 2010 - 09:43

Shibu Soren is smiling despite the fluid position the JMM is in. It is
maybe because he has kept his side of the bargain with the Congress
for a top-class quid-pro-quo. He will vote against the BJP-sponsored
cut motion in Parliament and then he would make fool of the BJP by
promising power to them but he would keep them hanging on for a long
time before the BJP finally cut ties. Everything is probably
acceptable in politics. But there is still a lingering doubt whether
the careful Congress leadership who are known for their standards of
principles would agree to this.

http://www.asianage.com/india/soren-smiling-photos-add-unease-176

‘JMM Leadership Is Completely Untrustworthy’

BJP spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad explains to KUNAL MAJUMDER why
his party withdrew support to the Jharkhand government twice

Photo: SHAILENDRA PANDEY

Why couldn’t the BJP reach an agreement with Shibu Soren in Jharkhand?
The Jharkhand situation is well known. The last election threw a
completely fractured verdict. Shibu Soren himself came to us. He knew
we had the numbers along with Sudesh Mahato, and said that he wanted
to be part of the NDA. Now he comes and votes against the cut motion
the NDA moved in the Lok Sabha. Rightfully, we took offence and
withdrew our support to his state government. That’s when he
apologised for it, saying, ‘Please, humko maaf kar dijiye (please
forgive me)’, and agreed that Jharkhand should have a BJP government.
He said he wants to be a part of NDA, so that the Congress doesn’t
return to power.

But given Soren’s past record, how could the BJP ever trust him?
The son [Hemant Soren] and the father wrote to us. We insisted on
having the assurance of all their MLAs, which happened as well. Once
again Shibu Soren went back on his promise. He refused to resign even
though his six-month grace period [to get elected as an MLA] was
ending on May 30. Then he suggested chief ministership on rotation.
For the sake of stability we even agreed on that. Continuing on his
flip-flop, he then went back on that as well. I mean, in politics
there should be some degree of commitment. For the sake of the people
of Jharkhand we agreed to try our best, despite this man being
completely undependable. We were very clear that we wanted to give a
stable government. Now he is asking the Congress to give him a
ministry. Maybe some secret talks were going on with them. At least
our reason for the latest withdrawal of support is very clear. In
spite of doubts about him in our party, we wanted to give him a chance
because he had apologised in public.

Wasn’t there a better way of handling the matter?
We handled it in the best possible manner, by going the extra mile to
accommodate him. It appears there is a wide disconnect within the
family itself. The father and the son don’t agree with each other on a
lot of issues.

The JMM has been exposed. We urge the people of Jharkhand to give the
BJP a clear mandate
But it looks as if the BJP is desperate to come to power?
Your accusation is completely misplaced. The day he voted against the
cut motion, we said we would withdraw support. Later they requested
us, issued apologies, saying: ‘Please please, choose the chief
minister yourself’. We didn’t believe the father-and-son then, so we
called all of them (MLAs) to show support, which they did. We were not
desperate. At least, we can face the people of Jharkhand and tell them
that we tried our best. Things went wrong because of other factors. It
is time for the people of Jharkhand to give a stable majority to the
BJP.

Senior BJP leader Murli Manohar Joshi calls the whole episode a
theatre of the absurd.
Murli Manohar Joshi is a senior leader. I don’t wish to comment on his
statement. but certainly, the way the JMM leadership has handled
itself, they have proven one and all that they are utterly
untrustworthy.

What’s next for BJP in Jharkhand?
One must remember that the BJP has been present in Jharkhand from the
days of the Jan Sangh, when it was part of bihar. Even now we have the
highest number of seats. We will increase our cadre. It is time for
the people to give a credible majority to the bJP so that we can
perform.

From Tehelka Magazine, Vol 7, Issue 22, Dated June 05, 2010

http://www.tehelka.com/story_main45.asp?filename=Ne050610incoldblood.asp

Editorial | Poor Jharkhand
Poor Jharkhand

The political circus being enacted in Jharkhand has led to a vacuum
and in the process derailing all development activities in this
potentially rich yet poor State. The entire drama was quite
unnecessarily set in motion by the decision of the Jharkhand Mukti
Morcha (JMM) supremo and Chief Minister Shibu Soren to vote with the
Congress led UPA government on the opposition sponsored cut motion in
Parliament. The BJP was naturally taken aback by Soren’s betrayal of
trust after all the former is giving support to the JMM led government
in Jharkhand. So obviously what followed was the BJP taking the stand
to withdraw support to Soren’s regime. But before this, in a
turnaround, Soren not only apologized to the BJP but amusingly gave
the specious argument that he i.e. the Chief Minister was not well and
therefore the inability to take the right decision (to support the cut
motion). The circus was only beginning to unfold and the next amusing
act was the offer to step down and pave way for a BJP Chief Minister
to lead the government in Jharkhand with the JMM. This offer from
Soren allayed the earlier disappointment within the BJP and
immediately, talks began to set the stage for a new Chief Minister.
Soren even came over to Delhi to meet the BJP top brass. Everything
seemed to have been ironed out. Then out of the blue, Soren did
another somersault, taking back his offer of Chief Ministership to the
BJP and pointing out that he was also talking with the Congress (his
former ally in the first UPA government). After the public humiliation
the BJP finally decided to withdraw support to Soren. As things stand
now, the Chief Minister has to prove his majority by May 31, 2010.
Going by past experience, one can be assured of more action in the
days to come.
The present uncertainty comes in the backdrop of a long spell of
President’s Rule in the State. People of Jharkhand would have finally
welcomed a duly elected democratic government. But to the
disappointment of many, the elected government in Jharkhand has not
been able to do justice. The sad tale of Jharkhand, the youngest state
of India, is testimony to the sheer neglect by the politicians.
Jharkhand is one of the most richly endowed states in India with huge
reserves of a variety of minerals. However massive corruption,
violence, political instability is the history so far of this
promising State. One is left to wonder as to what had gone wrong with
the state. Even as politicians in Jharkhand have become affluent, the
living condition/s of the common man has not improved. The rulers of
this young State irrespective of party have all been guilty of
allowing criminals and the corrupt to hold sway over the
administration and letting them to terrorize and loot the state.
Ironically, the so called loot of Jharkhand by Bihar was put forward
as the main reason for separation but in the last nine years more
outrageous corruption best exemplified by the Madhu Koda episode (Rs
4000 crores) has today pushed the state and its people to the brink.
Instability and selfish politicians is only going to further ruin the
State. This is the tragedy of our politics and in this case the victim
is Jharkhand and its people who can ill afford such kind of circus to
continue.

http://www.morungexpress.com/editorial/49457.html

Jharkhand Cong leaders meet Sonia, willing to form govt
28 May 2010, 0455 hrs IST,ET Bureau

Topics:Sonia Gandhi Congress UPA Soren Jharkhand government Shibu
Soren government Rajendra Prasad Singh Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM)
Radha Krishna Kishore Pradeep Balmuchu Congress Legislative Party

NEW DELHI | RANCHI: Congress has expressed its willingness to form
alternative government in Jharkhand. AICC Jharkhand incharge Keshava
Rao, state
Congress president Pradeep Balmuchu and Congress Legislative Party
(CLP) leader Rajendra Prasad Singh met party president Sonia Gandhi on
Thursday morning and apprised her of the current political situation
in the state in the wake of BJP withdrawing support from the Shibu
Soren government.

“The party is serious about forming an alternative government by
bringing together all secular forces. We do not want imposition of
President’s Rule in the state. However, we want to be assured that the
government will be a stable one,” said state Congress spokesperson
Radha Krishna Kishore. He added that there was no talk on the shape
and modalities of the proposed secular government. “All these issues
will be discussed only after trial of strength of the Soren
government, to be held on May 31. So far the chief minister has not
resigned,” he said.

Mr Kishore said: “As per our information, many Jharkhand Mukti Morcha
(JMM) MLAs are still in favour of supporting a BJP-led government as
per the previous deal struck between the two parties.” “The picture is
still hazy. Mr Soren is still claiming majority. Let the trust vote be
over. We will start holding negotiations with possible allies only
after May 31,” he said.

Congress’ party may find it difficult to form any such grouping as
both JMM and Jharkhand Vikas Morcha (JVM) have clarified that they are
not going to come together on one platform.

“Congress may go for a Congress-JMM-AJSU-RJD government. The four
parties have a collective strength of 42, one more than the magic
figure. A few Independents can also extend their support. But this
option appears to be a remote possibility as Congress may not like to
lose Babulal Marandi’s JVM, which is a part of the UPA,” said a
source, but added “in Jharkhand, nothing is impossible”.

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/Jharkhand-Cong-leaders-meet-Sonia-willing-to-form-govt/articleshow/5983317.cms

Sonia nods, Cong upbeat
Subhash Pathak & Aurangzeb Naqshbandi
Ranchi/New Delhi, May 28, 2010

First Published: 00:07 IST(28/5/2010)
Last Updated: 00:08 IST(28/5/2010)

Encouraged by the go-ahead from party president Sonia Gandhi,
Jharkhand Congress leaders have decided to explore the possibility of
forming an alternative government in the state.

The green signal came from Gandhi after her meeting with a team of
Jharkhand leaders, including state Congress chief Pradeep Kumar
Balmuchu and Leader of Opposition in Assembly Rajendra Prasad Singh.
Party in-charge of Jharkhand K. Keshava Rao, Congress president’s
political secretary Ahmad Patel and leader Oscar Fernandes were also
present in the hour-long meeting.

With this, the possibility of the Congress with 14 legislators forming
a broader alliance with Babulal Marandi’s Jharkhand Vikas Morcha
(Prajatantrik), which has 11 members in the house of 82, has
increased. The two parties could seek support from JMM (18), Rashtriya
Janata Dal (5) besides three independents, including Bandhu Tirkey, to
take their tally to 53, a comfortable majority to form the government.

Sources said Gandhi has asked the leaders to “tread carefully” and
“not act in haste” while cobbling up the numbers for forming the next
government. The party, she is understood to said, should not face any
embarrassment later.

The other option being explored by Congress is that the party extends
support to Soren and as quid pro quo ask the JMM to reciprocate by
getting its member elected to the Rajya Sabha. Two members from
Jharkhand are retiring from the upper house on July 17 and the
elections for these seats are going to be held on June 17.

At the meeting, the Congress leaders stressed on the need for the
party’s proactive role in preventing the state from President’s rule
or a mid-term poll. They argued the BJP had hatched up a plot to push
the state towards Presidents’ rule by withdrawing support to the Sibu
Soren-led government after their “design to grab power” from JMM
failed.

Singh told HT later Gandhi was peeved at the political crisis due to
BJP’s “hunger for power” in Jharkhand. “We have apprised her about the
state of affairs in our bid to form an alternative government of
secular forces,” he said.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/Sonia-nods-Cong-upbeat/Article1-549521.aspx

Congress leader claims party can provide stability in Jharkhand
PTIThursday, May 27, 2010 21:55 IST


Ranchi: A senior Congress leader today claimed that if the party
headed the government in Jharkhand it would be a stable one.

"If the Congress gets a chance to lead a government, it will
definitely last its full term because the party has never compromised
with ideals and pro-people progammes," senior Congress leader
Krishnanand Tripathi said.

"The people have also seen how the Manmohan Singh government did not
compromise on the nuclear deal though the Left parties ditched the
Centre," he said.

"This is enough evidence that the party can steer Jharkhand away from
instability," he said.

BJP state unit spokesman Sanjay Seth, however said, "The people have
given a fractured mandate. The BJP lent support not because of greed
for power, but for development's sake. So long as a clear mandate is
denied by the people there is very little possibility of stability."

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_congress-leader-claims-party-can-provide-stability-in-jharkhand_1388628

Political crisis in Jharkhand continues
Jharkhand

The political crisis in Jharkhand continues even as various political
parties are holding talks among themselves. On Thursday the Jharkhand
Congress President Mr. Pradeep Balmuchu will meet party President Mrs.
Sonia Gandhi at Delhi.

Mr. K. Kesav Rao who is the incharge of Jharkahdn state within the
Congress party, will also be present in the meeting.

On the other hand, the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha has started a fresh bid
to win over the BJP again. Senior Party leader Mr. Hemant Sourav and
Mr. Champai Soren has been entrusted with this task.

However, the BJP maintains that President Rule should be immediately
be imposed in the state so that the possibility of horse trading of
the MLAs be minimized.

http://www.samachartoday.com/political-crisis-in-jharkhand-continues/4523

JMM-BJP – from friend to foe and friend again?
Posted by IANS-CT in Politics

Ranchi, May 27 (Calcutta Tube) In the shifting sands of political
equations in Jharkhand, nothing is quite as it seems. The ruling JMM
and the BJP may have just parted ways but most leaders of both parties
are not averse to joining hands again, say sources, even as the
Congress explores possibilities of forming an alternative government.

According to Jharkhand Mukti Morcha insiders, 12 of the 18 legislators
are in favour of getting back with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

The JMM has also formed a two-member committee with Chief Minister
Shibu Soren’s son Hemant and legislator Champai Soren to hold talks
with the BJP.

‘JMM is open to going either with the BJP or the Congress. Most party
leaders want to again join hands with the BJP but it is too early to
jump to any conclusion. Everything depends on the response of the BJP
and rebel party legislators,’ a JMM leader told IANS.

He said the JMM is trying to pacify rebel legislators and persuading
them not to make any statements. But so far the rebels were sticking
to their guns.

‘We stick to our old stand. Six party legislators are with us,’ said
legislator Teklal Mahto, who along with Simon Marandi has been against
the tie-up with the BJP from the beginning.

Three days after the BJP withdrew support to the Soren government,
reducing it to a minority, the situation in the BJP is not too
different either. Former chief minister and BJP national secretary
Arjun Munda has said options were open.

Munda enjoys the support of a majority of the party legislators and he
was front runner for the post of chief minister when the JMM announced
its support for a BJP-led government. Soren then said he had changed
his mind, and the arrangement ended before it had even begun.

According to sources, Hemant Soren is in touch with Munda to end the
bitterness and create a conducive environment to bring both parties
together.

However, senior BJP leader Yashwant Sinha said: ‘The BJP will not take
the initiative to form government in the state.’

The Soren government, in a minority after the BJP withdrew support on
Monday, has been asked by Governor M.O.H. Farook to prove his majority
by May 31.

http://calcuttatube.com/jmm-bjp-from-friend-to-foe-and-friend-again/93652/

...and I am Sid Harth
cogitoergosum
2010-05-29 11:15:03 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-18/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-20/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-21/

Nitish snub to Modi and Varun
J.P. YADAV

Nitish Kumar

New Delhi, May 27: Nitish Kumar has put alliance partner BJP in a bind
by refusing to attend the party’s Bihar Swabhiman rally next month at
Patna’s Gandhi Maidan.

The Bihar chief minister has conveyed his reservations over sharing
the dais with Gujarat counterpart Narendra Modi and Varun Gandhi — the
proposed star speakers at the June 13 rally on the concluding day of
the BJP’s national executive meeting in Patna.

Sources said the Janata Dal (United) leader had communicated his
reservations to the BJP brass along with a request that in an election
year it would be in the interest of the coalition government if the
ally didn’t hold the rally to be addressed by “communal scarred”
leaders.

The BJP has christened the rally Bihar Swabhiman — Bihari dignity
being a pet theme of Kumar — and wants him to attend it to showcase
the bond between the ruling partners.

After Kumar’s refusal, the BJP is learnt to be looking for a way out
as the JD(U) is among the few valued NDA partners.

Modi and Varun

The sources said the options being discussed included cancelling the
public meeting or not allowing Modi and Varun to speak at the rally.
They said BJP president Nitin Gadkari’s “dog” barb at Lalu Prasad
could also be used as an excuse to cancel the rally as the RJD has
already threatened to organise a strong protest.

Gadkari had said Lalu Prasad and Samajwadi Party chief Mulayam Singh
Yadav were licking Sonia Gandhi’s feet like “dogs”, but later
apologised.

The BJP leadership had planned its national executive meeting in Patna
on June 12-13 in a bid to strengthen the party in Bihar and draw up
strategies ahead of the Assembly polls due in October-November.

But Kumar’s reservations are understandable as his government has
painstakingly cultivated the support of the substantial — around 16-17
per cent — Muslim population in the state. The NDA’s impressive
performance in the general election last year was attributed to the
support of Muslims and extremely backward sections.

In the past, Kumar had successfully used his influence on top BJP
leaders to block the entry of the two leaders. In the run-up to the
last Lok Sabha polls, Modi had toured the country but kept away from
Bihar at Kumar’s insistence.

When Modi had posed before cameras holding Kumar’s hand at an NDA
rally in Ludhiana, the JD(U) leader had clarified: “What can I do if
he (Modi) grabs my hand?”

A section in the BJP, however, is not ready to give in to the ally
this time. These leaders say Kumar has already dwarfed the party in
Bihar and if it succumbs this time, it would demoralise the cadres.
“We should not succumb. Narendra Modi is among the best chief
minister’s in the country. Is he going to spread communal riots in
Bihar? Nitish Kumar is free not to attend the rally,” said a BJP
leader.

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100528/jsp/nation/story_12496596.jsp

Nitish demands imposition of President's rule in Jharkhand
PTI, May 28, 2010, 07.21pm IST

Tags:Nitish Kumar|Jharkhand|Shibu Soren

KATIHAR (Bihar): Bihar chief minister, Nitish Kumar demanded
imposition of President's rule in Jharkhand to prepare ground for a
fresh assembly poll in the state.

"Jharkhand should be brought under the President's rule and a fresh
assembly polls be held to enable the people to give fresh mandate," he
told reporters.

He said President's rule would rid the state of the ongoing unethical
tussel by some political parties to gain power in Jharkhand, Kumar
said.

Kumar also disapproved BJP's repeated bids for power in Jharkhand over
the past one month and said that the saffron party should have stuck
to its decision to withdraw support to the JMM-led coalition
government headed by the chief minister, Shibu Soren after the cut
motion in Parliament.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Nitish-demands-imposition-of-Presidents-rule-in-Jharkhand-/articleshow/5986036.cms

BJP to decide future plan after May 31 trust vote in Jharkhand
assembly: Arjun Munda
PTI
Saturday, May 29, 2010 15:19 IST

Jamshedpur: BJP leader Arjun Munda today said his party would chalk
out future strategy after the vote of confidence in Jharkhand assembly
on May 31.

"Let May 31 come first, we will chalk out our future strategy only
after the vote of confidence on that date," he told PTI in reply to a
query whether BJP would favour fresh elections in case Shibu Soren
failed to muster majority.

Referring to the current political impasse in the state in the wake of
BJP withdrawing support to the Soren government, Munda said the
saffron party here stood by the decision of its parliamentary board
about withdrawal of support.

To a query if the BJP would take any initiative to form an alternative
government with JMM, Munda asserted "we are even ready to sit in the
opposition."

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_bjp-to-decide-future-plan-after-may-31-trust-vote-in-jharkhand-assembly-arjun-munda_1389350

...and I am Sid Harth
cogitoergosum
2010-05-30 22:45:33 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-18/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-20/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-22/

First resign and then talk: Cong tells Soren
TNN, May 29, 2010, 10.19pm IST

Tags:NDA|JD(U)|Jharkhand Mukti Morcha|Shibu Soren

RANCHI: Congress on Saturday set a precondition for talks with
Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM) on government formation in the state. The
party has asked JMM chief Shibu Soren to first resign from the chief
ministership and then clear his intention about joining hands with
secular forces in the interest of the state.

State Congress spokesman Radha Krishna Kishore said the party was not
in favour of President's Rule or mid-term polls. It onoy wanted to
form a secular government and is ready to explore every possibility
towards that end.

"Till now, Soren is part of NDA and that is evident from his not
accepting the resignations of five ministers, four of BJP and one of
JD(U). He is yet to accept their resignations although more than 72
hours have passed since the five put in their papers. If he wants to
join hands with secular forces, he must resign," insisted Kishore.

"The way Soren has violated the Constitution by not accepting the
resignations of ministers of a party that has withdrawn support to his
government is just not acceptable to our party," he added.

Kishore, however, averted the query on what will be the Congress stand
during the trial of strength in the Assembly on Monday. "We cannot
disclose our stand now. I can only say that we will respect the
feeling of the electorate in the House," he said.

Referring to a question on how his party could join hands with Soren
when he has done so many wrongs to save his chair and put development
work on hold for the past one month, Kishore said it was quite
premature to comment on that.

"First, he should resign from office and express his desire to join
hands with secular forces to give a stable government and not a five-
month rule as it happened with BJP. Only after he is ready for talks,
can we say anything on the matter including other questions like which
party and who will lead the government," said Kishore.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/City/Ranchi/First-resign-and-then-talk-Cong-tells-Soren-/articleshow/5982749.cms

Shibu Soren resigns as Jharkhand Chief Minister
PTI, May 30, 2010, 10.44pm IST

Tags:Jharkhand|Shibu Soren|M O H Farooq

RANCHI: An isolated Shibu Soren tonight resigned as Jharkhand chief
minister after failing to get the support of Congress and its ally
JVM(P) ahead of tomorrow's trust vote in the assembly.

Soren met Governor M O H Farooq and submitted his resignation. Soren
has been asked to continue as caretaker chief minister till an
alternate arrangement is made, Principal Secretary to the Governor
Sudhir Tripathi said.

With odds stacked against him, Soren, who has been holding on to his
post after reneging on a power-sharing deal with the BJP, made
overtures to the Congress which was not forthcoming.

"We appealed to the political parties to support the Soren Government
in the interest of the state and to prevent imposition of President's
rule. Till tonight, nobody has come forward," Deputy chief minister
Sudesh Mahto told reporters at Raj Bhavan after Soren put in his
papers.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Shibu-Soren-resigns-as-Jharkhand-Chief-Minister-/articleshow/5992350.cms

Shibu Soren resigns; trust vote today

Jharkhand Chief Minister Shibu Soren tendering his resignation to
Governor M. O. H. Farook in Ranchi on Sunday.

Ranchi: Three-time Jharkhand Chief Minister Shibu Soren resigned on
Sunday night after failing to get the support of the Congress and its
ally JVM(P) ahead of Monday's trust vote in the Assembly.

The Chief Minister, who has only 25 MLAs behind him in the 82-member
House, submitted the resignation letter to Governor M.O.H. Farook
shortly after 10 p.m. at Raj Bhavan. Mr. Soren needed to muster a
strength of 42 to sail through the vote.

Mr. Farooq asked him to continue as caretaker CM till further
arrangements, Principal Secretary to Governor Sudhir Tripathi said.

Mr. Soren's resignation came after he and his deputy, Sudesh Mahto,
failed to woo the BJP back into the fold.

The 18-member BJP, along with 2 from the JD(U), withdrew support to
his five-month-old government on May 24.

JMM legislative party leader and Soren's son Hemant said: “We tried
our best and appealed to all parties. If Guruji's remaining as Chief
Minister was a hurdle, that has been removed now.” — PTI

Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Monday, May 31, 2010
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version

http://www.thehindu.com/2010/05/31/stories/2010053158860100.htm

Volume 26 - Issue 24 :: Nov. 21-Dec. 04, 2009
INDIA'S NATIONAL MAGAZINE
from the publishers of THE HINDU

SCANDAL

Deep pockets of Jharkhand

VENKITESH RAMAKRISHNAN
in Ranchi and New Delhi

Tax sleuths close in on former Chief Minister Madhu Koda for amassing
ill-gotten wealth and money-laundering.

PTI

Madhu Koda being discharged from a hospital in Ranchi on November 8.
He complained of high blood pressure and stomach ache in the course of
interrogation by tax officials for alleged hawala transactions.

“JHARKHAND may be lagging behind in many areas of governance and
development, but we are ahead of most other States in one thing,
political and bureaucratic corruption,” Stephen Marandi, former Deputy
Chief Minister of Jharkhand, used to make this statement often,
referring to many of his political colleagues and officers who run the
government.

Marandi’s comment used to draw appreciation from those who viewed the
State’s politics objectively. It is also widely accepted within the
State’s political circles that he does have the moral and political
authority to make such a comment. He was perhaps the only non-
controversial member of two controversial Ministries – one led by
independent Madhu Koda between September 18, 2006, and August 27,
2008, and the other headed by Jharkhand Mukthi Morcha (JMM) chief
Shibu Soren between August 27, 2008, and January 18, 2009. He was
Deputy Chief Minister in both. Marandi used to refer to Koda’s name in
the context of his statement on corruption.

It took a year and a half after Koda’s departure from office and an
investigation by the income tax (I.T.) authorities and the Enforcement
Directorate (E.D.) to understand the independent legislator-turned-
Chief Minister had indeed operated on a scale unmatched by any other
leader in the State.

According to estimates doing the rounds, Koda and his associates
allegedly amassed approximately Rs.4,000 crore in his 23-month tenure
as Chief Minister and laundered it using various means during this
term and the period following his ouster from office. It was during an
E.D. investigation into an aide of former Governor Syed Sibte Razi
that the agencies stumbled on Koda’s money matters.

According to investigating officials in the E.D. and the I.T.
Department, Koda had amassed a large portion of the money by
facilitating mining contracts for iron ore and coal. On the face of
it, this was done by signing 26 Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs)
and by giving recommendations, on the basis of ministerial discretion,
to an equal number of applications seeking mining leases for iron ore
and coal. Clearances from several Ministries are normally required for
granting mining leases, but the Chief Minister and, in some cases, the
Minister for Mines, had discriminatory powers to recommend that an
institution or an individual could be granted a mining lease.

No Chief Minister of erstwhile Bihar (of which Jharkhand was a part
until November 2000) or Jharkhand itself is known to have used these
discriminatory powers as rampantly as Koda did. In the process, he
allegedly charged a certain fee for signing the MoUs and making the
recommendations.

Sources among the investigating officials told Frontline that Koda had
“charged” Rs.2 crore to Rs.20 crore for signing an MoU, depending on
the quantum of coal or iron ore that the respective mine would have
produced. The recommendations were sold at a price of Rs.30 crore to
Rs.80 crore, again depending on the produce of a particular mine. The
officials point out that Koda did not handle cash directly, but got
the money deposited directly or through some of his accomplices in a
Mumbai-based finance company or with hawala operators.

Koda’s associates in this included small-time businessmen such as
Vinod Kumar Sinha and his brothers Vikas Sinha and Sunil Sinha, based
in Chaibasa (Koda’s constituency), and businessmen brothers Sanjay
Choudhary and Dhananjay Choudhary based in Jamshedpur. The I.T. and
E.D. have also listed his former Cabinet colleagues Bandhu Tirkey,
Bhanu Pratap Shahi, and Kamlesh Singh as accomplices in the scam.
Tirkey was an independent MLA like Koda, while Shahi belonged to the
Forward Bloc and Kamlesh Singh to the Nationalist Congress Party
(NCP).

While Koda was directly involved in “striking the deals”, the money
was apparently handled by his “non-political” associates and laundered
by financial companies. The E.D. has booked Koda under the four-year-
old Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2005, which prescribes
punishment of up to seven years of rigorous imprisonment for the
guilty. The PMLA also provides for the freezing, seizure and
confiscation of the proceeds of crime. It imposes obligations on
banking companies, financial institutions and intermediaries to verify
the identity of clients, maintain records and furnish information to
the authorities. Koda is the first MP and former Chief Minister to
have been booked under the PMLA and his is the biggest case lodged by
the E.D. under the Act so far.

PTI

According to investigating officials, Koda amassed large sums by
facilitating mining contracts for iron ore and coal. Here, coal
waiting to be transported in the Khalari area of Jharkhand.

E.D. investigation has apparently revealed Koda’s money-laundering
exercises leading to massive deals and investments on a global scale.
He had reportedly made secret visits to Switzerland and other foreign
countries as part of this. The E.D. suspects that the former Chief
Minister has one or several accounts in Swiss banks and other banks in
tax havens. The E.D. has also reportedly collected “unshakable
evidence” about investments by Koda in mines in Thailand and Liberia.

Some of Koda’s accomplices, according to E.D. and I.T. investigations,
amassed movable and immovable property worth Rs.200 crore. These
include the companies Shiv Ram Sponge Iron Ltd and Rollin Mill, vast
quantum of land in Jharkhand and outside as well as several flats.

The Choudharys set up two companies – Blue Techno Projects Ltd and CP
Manufacturing – in Dubai and invested in more than a dozen ones in
Thailand, Indonesia, South Africa and Dubai. Kamlesh Singh, the
investigation points out, bought property worth Rs.50 crore in Mumbai,
Delhi, Bangalore and Ranchi. Shahi and Tirkey, too, have property
worth crores of rupees in and outside Jharkhand.

Larger dimensions

Koda, his associates among politicians and businessmen have all denied
the charges made by the E.D. and I.T. investigators. There is a view
among sections of the State’s political class and the administration
that, if properly probed, the Koda scam would reveal far more damaging
details than the ones that have come to light at present. It says the
Koda affair is not only about taking bribes for mining deals and money-
laundering but also about selling India’s iron ore cheaply to foreign
countries. Some contend that it could even have another dimension:
that of iron-ore smuggling. The argument is based on the premise that
the quantum of money involved is too large to be a scam involving only
bribes and money-laundering.

According to a senior government official, Jharkhand’s iron ore is
reportedly rich in ferrous content and is in great demand across the
globe, particularly in China where a construction boom has been for
sometime now. “It needs to be probed where the iron ore from these
mines have gone and which are the companies that sent it abroad,” the
official pointed out. It remains to be seen whether this angle would
be taken up by the investigating agencies or its masters.

Culprits all

PTI

At the Income Tax office in Ranchi on November 6, an official carries
bundles of documents seized from Koda's residence.

At the political level, the Koda affair is something for which almost
all political forces of the State, except the Left parties, will have
to take responsibility. Koda was the Minister for Mines during the
Arjun Munda-led Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government that ruled
from March 12, 2005, to September 18, 2006. He, along with three other
independent MLAs, was instrumental in bringing down that government.
Immediately after that he assumed the Chief Minister’s post with the
support of the Congress, the JMM and Lalu Prasad’s Rashtriya Janata
Dal (RJD).

During his tenure Koda had even publicly stated that he was into
“money-making”. “If I do not make money do you think that these big
parties and leaders will allow me to continue in office?” he had told
mediapersons. Obviously, none of the bigger parties in the State can
absolve themselves of the offence of letting Koda and associates loose
on the administration.

However, at the political level, the Koda scam seems to be helping the
Congress. This is partly because of the public perception that there
has been a greater impetus to probe corruption cases under the current
Governor K. Sankaranarayanan. There is a definitive impression that
Sankaranarayanan has been sent by the United Progressive Alliance
government at the Centre to correct the State’s mismanagement over the
past few years. Some of the welfare measures taken by the Governor’s
regime in the State, such as the strengthening of the public
distribution system (PDS) and the promotion of self-help groups,
particularly those among destitute women, have helped strengthen this
impression.

A number of political observers, however, believe that the pro-
Congress dimensions of the Koda scam could come tumbling out if the
former Chief Minister, who rose from the position of a construction
labourer to become one of the richest politicians in the State makes
bold to expose the “big parties and leaders” who allowed him to
continue in office, apparently for a price.

The other, and perhaps more important, question is whether the
investigating agencies will be ready to probe the doubts raised by a
section of the administration about iron-ore smuggling. Whether these
queries evoke affirmative or negative answers, there is little doubt
that the Koda story will have many more new chapters added to it in
the coming days.

http://www.flonnet.com/fl2624/stories/20091204262412300.htm

Volume 22 - Issue 06, Mar. 12 - 25,
2005

India's National Magazine
from the publishers of THE HINDU

POLITICS

Stuck in controversy

PURNIMA S. TRIPATHI
in Ranchi

In Jharkhand, the Congress-JMM alliance converts a possible victory
into defeat and benefits from a controversial decision by the
Governor.

ARUNANGSU ROY CHOWDHURY

Chief Minister Shibu Soren.

THE fate of the first elected government of Jharkhand is hanging in
the balance. The National Democratic Alliance (NDA) is up in arms
against Governor Syed Sibte Razi's "blatantly partisan" decision to
invite the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) to form the government.
Protesting against the decision, the Bharatiya Janata Party-led NDA
organised a day-long bandh on March 3, a day after the UPA government
was sworn in. On the same day, NDA leaders met President A.P.J. Abdul
Kalam in New Delhi to request him to recall the Governor. The NDA
presented before the President 41 legislators who, it claimed,
supported the coalition. The support of 41 legislators is essential
for a simple majority in the 81-member Jharkhand Assembly.

The Governor, who met the President on March 4, said the Shibu Soren-
led government would have to prove its majority on the floor of the
House before the March 21 deadline given by him earlier. Razi said:
"In normal circumstances 30 days' time is given to prove majority. But
I gave only 20 days. This will, however, have to be advanced now in
view of the recent developments. I shall announce the new date after
consulting everyone." He refused to divulge the details of his talks
with the President.

That the political situation in the State would become volatile was
clear from the fractured mandate. While the NDA, which was in power,
won 36 seats (30 for the BJP and six for the Janata Dal-United), the
Congress-Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM) alliance won 26 (17 for the JMM
and nine for the Congress). The Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), which
contested alone, won seven. Others, including independents and the
Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist), got 12 seats. The support
of "others" is crucial to secure a simple majority in the House. The
responsibility to assess the situation and invite a party or a combine
to form the government fell on the Governor.

The Governor's role has come under a cloud owing to the way he swore
in the Shibu Soren-led government. He allegedly denied the opportunity
to the NDA though it had submitted a list of 41 legislators supporting
it well ahead of the UPA. On March 1, when the NDA submitted its list,
the Governor said he wanted to speak to the independent MLAs
individually to satisfy himself of their position. On the other hand,
he did not impose the same condition on the UPA delegation, which met
him later in the day. In fact, the UPA submitted to him a list
containing the names of two legislators who were in the NDA list. Razi
held a more-than-two-hour-long discussion with JMM leader Shibu Soren,
who was accompanied by senior Congress leader Harikesh Bahadur, and
decided to invite him to form the government. A few hours before he
made the announcement, five independent MLAs, two of whom figured in
the UPA list too, met the Governor and pledged their support to the
NDA. However, Shibu Soren was sworn in Chief Minister on March 2 at
4.45 p.m.

The fact that the NDA, which had emerged as the single largest bloc in
the Assembly, was not going to find it easy to form the government
became clear soon after the results were out. Its leaders met the
Governor on February 28, a day after the results were announced, to
stake their claim to form the government. But Razi told them that
their claim was untenable unless they elected a legislature party
leader and presented him a list of supporting MLAs. The NDA elected
Arjun Munda as its legislature party leader on the same day and
submitted his name along with a list of 41 MLAs to the Governor at
noon on March 1. The five independent or other MLAs whose names
figured in the NDA list were Sudesh Mahto, Chandra Prakash Chaudhary,
Harinarayan Rai, Madhu Koda and Enos Ekka. The last two are from the
All Jharkhand Students Union, Madhu Koda is a BJP rebel, and Enos Ekka
is from the Jharkhand Party.

By 7.30 p.m. the JMM and Congress leaders, who meanwhile had ensured
the support of the RJD to the combine, met the Governor after electing
Shibu Soren the leader and submitted a list of 42 MLAs. The UPA list
contained the names of Enos Ekka and Harinarayan Rai. The others
included Stephen Marandi, the rebel JMM candidate, two members from
the United Goans Democratic Party, Bandhu Tirkey and Joba Manjhi, the
Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) member Kamlesh Singh and the
Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) and Forward Bloc members.

As news of the UPA delegation meeting the Governor spread, NDA leaders
sat on a dharna in front of the Raj Bhavan, demanding that they be
invited to form the government. The dharna continued through the night
of March 1. But even as the dharna was on, Razi announced that
exercising his powers under Section 164(1) of the Constitution he had
appointed Shibu Soren Chief Minister. The Governor added that he had
given Soren time until March 21 to prove his majority in the House.

V. SUDERSHAN

BJP president L.K. Advani and former Jharkhand Chief Minister Arjun
Munda (second from right) with five legislators from Jharkhand outside
the Rashtrapati Bhavan.

The oath-taking ceremony was organised in such a haste that Raj Bhavan
officials did not even have the time to put up tents on the lawns. The
function was organised in a small hall inside the Raj Bhawan. Besides
Soren, those who took the oath of office were Stephen Marandi, who was
made Deputy Chief Minister, Bandhu Tirkey, Joba Manjhi, Kamlesh Singh,
and Girinath Singh and Annapurna Devi of the RJD.

The Governor, while interacting with mediapersons after the ceremony,
justified his decision by saying that he used his discretionary powers
to infer that only Shibu Soren could give a stable government. When
asked whether his decision was based on the numerical superiority of
the UPA, he said: "It is not a question of numbers alone. If it is
only about numbers then what is the role of a Governor? Anybody
getting a majority can go and become the Chief Minister and form the
government. The Governor would not have been required there. The
Governor uses his discretion as per the powers given to him in the
Constitution to arrive at an inference as to who can provide a stable
government and who can command majority support in the House. The
Governor has no business counting the numbers. The Bommai judgment is
very clear that majority should be proved on the floor of the House."
He denied that he was acting under political pressure. Razi said: "I
have been a Union Minister. I have my own political experience and
have done a little study of the Constitution myself. There was no
political pressure on me whatsoever."

The Congress, which worked hard to install Soren as the Chief
Minister, has not joined the government yet. The credit for ensuring
that Soren assumed power goes to Congress leaders and Union Ministers
Subodhkant Sahay and Priyaranjan Dasmunshi, All India Congress
Committee secretaries Harikesh Bahadur and R.P.N. Singh, and former
Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Ajit Jogi. Dasmunshi said Congress
president Sonia Gandhi was yet to take a decision on the party joining
the government. He said: "We are a national party. Our commitment was
to install a secular government, which we have fulfilled. Now our
party president will decide when to join and who all will join. We
can't be seen jumping in at the very first opportunity to grab power."
He justified the Governor's decision saying that since the ruling
alliance (NDA) had failed to get a majority it had forfeited its moral
right to rule. Hence the Governor was right in giving the first chance
to the alternative available. "Besides, both the Sarkaria Commission
and [the Supreme Court's judgment in the] Bommai case are clear that
majority can be decided only on the floor of the House," he said.

THE post-election developments deflected attention from the results,
which have thrown up some important political indicators. It is
evident that the RJD, which held nine seats in the outgoing Assembly
and contested 51 seats on its own, spoiled the chances of the Congress-
JMM combine in several seats by splitting the votes. The margins of
defeat of the combine in several seats are smaller than the numbers of
votes polled by RJD candidate in those seats.

Meanwhile, despite antagonising its urban non-tribal support base, the
BJP managed to get its votes. It won seats mostly in urban areas such
as Ranchi, Dhanbad, Jharia, Jamshedpur, Chaibasa, Deoghar and
Daltonganj. The verdict proved that the Congress, which won only nine
out of the 33 seats it contested, has a long way to go before it can
claim to be a major force in the State.

The result came as a shock to Shibu Soren. Both his sons Durga Soren
and Hemant Soren, who contested from Jama and Dumka respectively, were
defeated. Hemant Soren lost to Stephen Marandi, a JMM rebel. The JMM
lost five seats in its stronghold region of Santhal Pargana. It seems
that Soren's decision to project his sons did not go down well with
JMM workers.

The percentage of votes each party and combine got offers an insight
into the electorate's mindset. The BJP, which was widely expected to
lose its support base to the Congress, held its ground. Along with its
ally, the Janata Dal (U), the party secured 27 per cent of the votes
polled, compared with 25.13 per cent in the 2000 Assembly elections
when Jharkhand was part of Bihar. The Congress and the JMM together
got 27 per cent, much less than their combined vote percentage of 36
in 2000. The RJD, which secured 11.56 per cent of the votes polled in
this region in undivided Bihar in 2000, fared much better this time
with 15 per cent. The RJD's performance belies the JMM-Congress
combine's stand that the party had no substantial influence in
Jharkhand. In fact, this belief prompted the combine to ignore the RJD
during seat-sharing talks. It goes without saying that if they had
contested together the outcome would have been different.

http://www.flonnet.com/fl2206/stories/20050325002002500.htm

Volume 22 - Issue 02, Jan. 15 - 28, 2005
India's National Magazine
from the publishers of THE HINDU

ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS

Alliance and a tug-of-war

PURNIMA S. TRIPATHI

The seat-sharing almost completed, the alliance led by the JMM and the
Congress in Jharkhand hopes to ride the anti-incumbency wave against
the ruling BJP in the Assembly elections.

Ticket-seekers with JMM chief and Union Minister Shibu Soren in
Ranchi.

THE Assembly elections in February are set to test the strength of the
bonds among the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) partners at the
Centre. If in Bihar, the ties between the Congress and Rashtriya
Janata Dal (RJD) would be put to test, in the tiny State of Jharkhand,
which has 81 Assembly constituencies, it is the Congress-Jharkhand
Mukti Morcha (JMM) relations that will be on test.

These will be the first Assembly elections in Jharkhand, which came
into existence in November 2000. An interesting contest is expected
between the Congress and the Shibu Soren-led JMM for the chief
ministership. The first round has gone in favour of the regional
party. After almost three days of marathon meetings, the Congress and
the JMM decided to contest 33 and 35 seats respectively. The remaining
13 seats have been earmarked for the RJD and the Left parties.

The Congress yielded ground to the JMM grudgingly when Shibu Soren
insisted on contesting "at least one seat more than the Congress". At
one stage, it appeared that the talks would break down as the Congress
leaders holding the negotiations, including Arjun Singh, Makhan Lal
Fotedar and Harikesh Bahadur, refused to grant Soren his wish.
According to sources close to Soren, he walked out of the meeting with
the Congress leaders, saying that he would hold any further talks only
with Congress president Sonia Gandhi. He was irked by the Congress
leaders' insistence on contesting an equal number of seats, that is,
34 each. It was only on Sonia's intervention (she personally called
Soren for a meeting the next morning) that the deal could be
clinched.

The RJD has nine sitting members in the outgoing Assembly. Besides, it
has four MLAs who broke away from the Janata Dal (United). These four
are not being counted either by the Congress or by the JMM for seat-
sharing purposes. "The RJD will have to give them seats from its own
quota if it so wishes," JMM leader and Rajya Sabha member Stephen
Marandi told Frontline.

Explaining the formula adopted to decide the number of seats for
parties in the alliance, Marandi said that "winnability" was the main
factor. For this, the number of sitting candidates and those who were
runners-up in the previous elections (held when Jharkhand was part of
Bihar) were considered. As per this criterion, the JMM had 22 seats
while the Congress had 25.

But the JMM insisted that this formula could not be followed because
the situation had changed after the creation of the State and more so
after the recent Lok Sabha elections, in which the party once again
proved its strength. According to JMM leaders, if it were not for the
JMM, the UPA would not have won all but one seat from the State. The
JMM and Congress together won 10 of the 11 seats they contested, while
the RJD won two. The Communist Party of India, which had the support
of the Congress and the JMM, won one seat, defeating former External
Affairs Minister Yashwant Sinha of the Bharatiya Janata Party. The
CPI's Bhubaneshwar Prasad Mehta defeated Yashwant Sinha by a
staggering margin of 1,05, 328 votes, which according to JMM leaders,
would not have been possible without their party's help.

The JMM also reminded the Congress of an understanding between them
during the Lok Sabha elections; according to this, the Congress was
given more seats in the Lok Sabha elections since it was a national
party, while he JMM would be given more seats in the Assembly
elections. Interestingly, the combined might of the UPA wiped out the
BJP-led National Democratic Alliance in Jharkhand in the Lok Sabha
elections. It could win only one seat: that of Kodarma, where BJP vice-
president Babulal Marandi, also a former Chief Minister of Jharkhand,
defeated the JMM's Champa Verma. Significantly enough, this victory
was made possible because the JMM and the Congress could not arrive at
an understanding on the seat and the anti-BJP vote got split.

V. SUDERSHAN

Arjun Munda.

In fact, it was this fear of the BJP's return, in case more such
"friendly contests" occurred in the Assembly elections as well, that
finally forced the Congress to concede the JMM's demand for more
seats. JMM leaders also point to another "friendly contest", in
Rajmahal, in the Lok Sabha elections, in which JMM candidate Hemlal
Murmu defeated State Congress chief of the time Thomas Hansda.

Now that the seat-sharing process is over, the other most important
factor facing the alliance is that of leadership. This is one issue
that will not be talked about until the declaration of results. The
JMM argues that since it was at the forefront of the struggle for the
creation of the separate State of Jharkhand, it deserved to get
"rewarded" with the chief ministership.

"The JMM has fought for the tribal people here for more than 100 years
now. If it does not get the Chief Minister's post, who should?" JMM
leaders ask. According to them, the only compensation for the long-
neglected tribal people of Jharkhand can be a tribal Chief Minister
from the JMM. Who else will qualify for this but guruji, as Soren is
fondly called by his supporters?

Ask guruji and he refuses to be drawn into a discussion on this issue.
"Who am I to decide this? The people will decide," he says. But though
he would not like to say it in so many words, this has been the prime
consideration for insisting on the maximum number of seats. The JMM
hopes that if it wins a higher number of seats than the Congress, its
claim for the chief ministership can be strengthened.

The Congress, however, has given no indication yet whether it will
accept his claim. "Have we rejected his claim? These things cannot be
decided in questions and answers. Let the results be announced first,"
Arjun Singh, who has been entrusted with the task of negotiating with
both Soren and Laloo Prasad Yadav (in Bihar), told Frontline. He said
it was too early to talk about the leadership issue now. "Our first
priority is to fight together in alliance and work in the interest of
the nation to defeat communal forces. Everyone will get his due share
when the time comes," he said.

Fotedar, however, was more forthright. He said such talks were
meaningless at the moment. "Let the baby be born first; then we can
decide the name," he quipped.

But indications are that though the Congress may have yielded ground
to the JMM now, it may not do so after the elections. It could be a
repeat of Maharashtra. The party knows that the JMM will have no
choice then but to accept its terms. "The State needs a leadership
that can provide stability - political, social as well as economic.
The social unrest unleashed by the BJP in the last four years has
taken the State to the brink of collapse. Only the Congress can
provide such a leadership which can take the State forward on the path
of progress," said senior Congress leader from the State and Union
Food Processing Minister Subodhkant Sahay. Sahay, himself an aspirant
for the Chief Minister's post, said the JMM might have led the
movement for the creation of Jharkhand, but now the issue was who
could provide development. "A party with a national perspective alone
can take the State forward. If Jharkhand is not saved now, it can
affect the entire country's economy because militancy in Jharkhand
feeds on coal and it could paralyse the country's economy if not
handled properly," he said.

But what can queer the Congress' pitch would be the role of RJD chief
Laloo Prasad. Laloo Prasad, who has already tied the Congress up in
knots in Bihar, would prefer a weak Congress in Jharkhand because it
suits his political survival. A strong JMM is not threat for him;
hence his support to Soren for the Chief Minister's post. He is known
to be unhappy at the way he was marginalised in the seat-sharing talks
in Jharkhand and is believed to have conveyed his displeasure to the
Congress leaders.

Irrespective of the leadership tussle, there is no denying the fact
that the UPA is on a stronger footing than the ruling BJP, which
continues to grapple with the anti-incumbency factor on account of its
dismal track record on the development front. Besides, the feud
between the Arjun Munda and Babulal Marandi factions in the party is
persisting. It is in view of this that the BJP has decided not to
project anyone as Chief Minister and "fight the election
collectively".

Besides, the people of Jharkhand are wary of the BJP's "divisive
politics", which manifested itself in Babulal Marandi's decision to
implement a domicile policy. The latest move of the Munda government,
declaring Kurmis as tribal people, has also upset both tribal and non-
tribal people. Although the move was put in abeyance because of the
announcement of elections, people fear that the BJP will try to
implement it if it comes back to power, fuelling further social
unrest.

The people are disenchanted with the BJP also because it has achieved
little on the development front in its four years in power. Industries
that had closed down still remain so, infrastructure continues to be
poor, and law and order has taken a beating. Despite BJP president
L.K. Advani's fond hope that for his party this election will be a
"giant leap forward in 2005", indications are that the party will find
the going tough. It has alienated its core non-tribal voters, who
constitute 73 per cent of the electorate, in its effort to wean away
the tribal population from the JMM. In the process, it has been left
with neither.

http://www.flonnet.com/fl2202/stories/20050128002703500.htm

...and I am Sid Harth
cogitoergosum
2010-05-31 17:35:21 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-18/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-20/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-22/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-23/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-24/

Not Mayawati, Akhilesh framed me in fraud case: Amar
Express news service
Posted: May 31, 2010 at 1004 hrs IST

New Delhi Expelled Samajwadi Party leader Amar Singh on Sunday mounted
a frontal attack against SP chief Mulayam Singh Yadav’s son and Lok
Sabha MP Akhilesh Yadav, alleging that he was behind the case of Rs
500 crore financial fraud registered against him in Kanpur last year.
“First of all, I want to apologise to UP CM Mayawati because it was
not she but the brother and son of the SP supremo (Mulayam Singh
Yadav) who got me framed in the case lodged at Babupurva police
station (in Kanpur),” Amar Singh wrote in his latest blog post,
without naming Ram Gopal Yadav (Mulayam’s brother) and Akhilesh.

Amar Singh was referring to an FIR lodged against him and his wife
Pankaja in Babupurva police station (in Kanpur) in October last year
in connection with a financial fraud. The complainant, advocate Shiv
Kant Tiwari, had alleged that the couple had amassed nearly Rs 500
crore between 2003 and 2008.

“A functionary of my old party (SP) was given Rs 5 crore in first
tranche and then Rs 2 crore in second trance, a total of Rs 7 crore,
to frame me,” he alleged, claiming that one Dhirendra Sahay, whom he
describes as Akhilesh Yadav’s friend, among others, which included a
Congress Member of Parliament and a senior bureaucrat in Mayawati
administration, were aware of the conspiracy from the very beginning.

Akhilesh rejects charges

NEW DELHI: Akhilesh Yadav rejected Amar Singh’s charge that he was
behind framing him in the financial fraud case. “I don’t have any
friend by the name of Dhirendra Sahay. It is neither in my character
or nature nor in my habit to frame anybody in false charges ostensibly
to settle political scores,” Akhilesh told The Indian Express . ENS

http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/Not-Mayawati--Akhilesh-framed-me-in-fraud-case--Amar/627111/

J'khand issue: BJP seeks time, Cong short of nos
Font Size -A +A

Agencies
Posted: May 31, 2010 at 1301 hrs IST
Print Email To Editor Post Comments
Most Read ArticlesRelated ArticlesRavishankar denies firing was due to
interna...
India cheers as Monsoon hits Kerala
‘We’re sorry... Target was goods train’
‘We’re sorry... Target was goods train’
Train tragedy: 'Needle of suspicion points t...
‘We’re sorry... Target was goods train’
Tribals oppose land acquisition for Force On...
Action replay: Soren out, Prez rule loom...J'Khand: BJP to decide
future plan after...Jharkhand has become theatre of the absu...

Ranchi BJP sought a day's time for its view on the prospects of
government formation, while the Congress said it did not have the
numbers when Jharkhand Governor M O H Farooq sought their opinion
following Chief Minister Shibu Soren's resignation.
Soren, whose government was reduced to a minority after BJP had
withdrawn its support, quit last night after failing to get the
support of Congress and its ally JVM(P).

BJP state president Raghuvar Das who met the governor twice in the
morning over prospects of government formation told reporters that he
has sought time till tomorrow.

He said he would consult with leaders and MLAs and place the
governor's proposal before them. "The governor will be informed about
whatever decision is taken," Das said.

To a question that most MLAs were for exploring possibilities of
government formation, he said, "The state leadership has no such
information. All MLAs and leaders are united and will follow the
directive of the central leadership."

Meanwhile, Leader of the Opposition and Congress leader Rajendra
Prasad Singh told reporters after meeting the governor that his party
did not have the required number in the 82-member House to form an
alternative government.

"As of now we don't have numbers. Can we stake claim with only 14
MLAs? We told the governor that we will come to him only when we will
have sufficient numbers," he said.

Congress is against imposition of President's Rule or mid-term polls
in Jharkhand. The party would discuss with its allies before taking
any decision, Singh said.

On whether the party is willing to talk to the JMM, the Congress
leader said, "We are talking to different parties."

Among the major parties, JMM and BJP have 18 MLAs each followed by
Congress with 14 members and its ally Jharkhand Vikas Morcha
(Prajatantric) 11.

http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/Jkhand-issue-BJP-seeks-time-Cong-short-of-nos/627212/

Sorry to Mayawati, Cong; SP conspired against me: Amar Singh
Ads by Google

Fly US - India @ $399
Get Cheap AirFares to India Only With MakeMyTrip™. Book Now & Save!
us.makemytrip.com/Special-Fares

Killer Penny Stock Alerts
100% Free. Killer Returns. Make money fast with our alerts.
www.KillerPennyStocks.com

Delhi Special Fare
Roundtrip to Delhi from $956. Only at China Airlines website.
www.china-airlines.com

Press Trust Of India
New Delhi, May 30, 2010
First Published: 20:02 IST(30/5/2010)
Last Updated: 20:04 IST(30/5/2010)

Print




Charging Samajwadi Party leaders with conspiring against him, expelled
party leader Amar Singh today apologised to Uttar Pradesh Chief
Minister Mayawati and the Congress party for accusing them of framing
him in a Rs 500 crore financial fraud case.

"Fellow bloggers, this is my last blog posting on my previous party,
the Samajwadi Party. I want to apologise to Chief Minister Mayawati
because it was not she but the brother and son of SP supremo (Mulayam
Singh Yadav) who got me framed in the case lodged at Babupurva police
station (in Kanpur)," Singh said.

"The truth came to light after two brothers of a leading Mumbai-based
industrial family ended hostilities," he said apparently referring to
the Ambani brothers.

His latest blog posting is being seen as an effort to mend relations
with the BSP and Congress.

Singh claimed after the two brothers ended their rivalry, the
conspirators gave him all the details as they were worried about being
exposed.

"The two (brothers) would now set the matter straight with people who
have benefited from their rivalry," he added.

He said he felt "shameful" for accusing Mayawati and Congress party
when fingers were pointed towards him in the fraud case.

Singh said what he has mentioned in the blog cannot be denied as he
has documentary evidence, which he would bring before the people.

Claiming he was framed to damage his political prospects, Singh
alleged an SP office bearer was paid Rs seven crore for the purpose.
He, however, did not elaborate on this point.

In October last year, an FIR was lodged against Singh and his wife
Pankaja in Kanpur in connection with a fraud amounting to about Rs 500
crore.

In his 12-page document, the complainant, advocate Shiv Kant Tiwari
alleged that between 2003-2008 the couple amalgamated their companies
with other holdings and had amassed nearly Rs 500 crore in the
process.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/Sorry-to-Mayawati-Cong-SP-conspired-against-me-Amar-Singh/Article1-550811.aspx

Cong's tactic of distancing from RJD an eyewash: JD(U)
Press Trust Of India
Patna, May 31, 2010

First Published: 20:49 IST(31/5/2010)
Last Updated: 20:54 IST(31/5/2010)

The Janata Dal(U) today alleged that Congress' plans to distance
itself from Lalu Prasad ahead of assembly polls was an "eyewash" and
said the move would not negate the impact of its support to successive
RJD governments in "ruining" the state.

The Congress stand was a "political eye wash" with an aim to seek the
votes of anti-Lalu forces in the coming assembly polls, Bihar JD(U)
general secretary-cum-spokesman Sambhu Nath Singh said in a statement.

"Congress wants to play the role of 'vote katwa' (vote catcher). It
cannot forget the fact that it had extended unconditional support to
RJD governments in the past during which the state witnessed anarchy
and economic ruin," he said.

Congress was as much guilty as Lalu Prasad for plunging the state into
backwardness and anarchy. The collusion between the two parties was
proved recently when the UPA government at the Centre did not give
permission to CBI to challenge the disproportionate assets case
against Lalu in spite of the investigative agency's claim that it had
clinching evidence against him, he said.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/patna/Cong-s-tactic-of-distancing-from-RJD-an-eyewash-JD-U/Article1-551247.aspx

...and I am Sid Harth
cogitoergosum
2010-06-01 07:56:47 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-18/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-20/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-22/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-23/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-24/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth-25/

Soren's political bandwagon
Madan Kumar , Hindustan Times
Ranchi, May 31, 2010

First Published: 01:17 IST(31/5/2010)
Last Updated: 01:18 IST(31/5/2010)

When Sibu Soren on Sunday put in his papers to the Raj Bhawan, it was
his sixth resignation during a short span of six years. Each of the
time he was compelled by legal-political circumstances to step down.
But with the latest resignation on Sunday late night, Soren created a
short of record in his name. He has become the only politician in
India who has to resign under pressure thrice as union minister and
thrice as Jharkhand chief minister.

In fact, politics and court cases proved like the play of ladder and
snake for the veteran of Jharkhand movement since May 23, 2004 when he
was first inducted in the union cabinet as the minister of coal and
mines.

Just within two months of his swearing-in as a minister in the
Manmohan Singh Government, Soren was forced to resign from the cabinet
on July 24, 2004, after a district court at Jamtara (Jharkhand) issued
a non-bailable warrant of arrest against him in the famous Chirudih
massacre case.

Soren was re-inducted in union cabinet on November 27, 2004 as
minister of coal, after he secured bail in the Chirudih case following
a three-month stay in Jamtara camp jail.

But he has to resign again from the union cabinet on March 2, 2005,
when he was sworn- in as Jharkhand chief minister, for the first
time.

The bad luck, however, kept chasing him without a miss. Soren had to
resign on the ninth day of becoming CM, after he failed to obtain
majority in the assembly on March 11, 2005.

As happens in the play of ladder and snake, Soren was once again re-
inducted in union cabinet with the same portfolio on January 29, 2006.
But the snake again did its act. This time, the snakebite was
stronger. Soren was again forced to resign from union cabinet on
November 28, 2006 after a Delhi Court convicted him in the famous
Shashinath Jha murder case. He was acquitted in this murder case from
Delhi High Court on August 22, 2007.

After a long wait of over 12 months, Soren was sworn-in as Chief
Minister of Jharkhand, for the second time, on August 27, 2008. But he
again had to resign on January 12, 2009 after he faced humiliating
defeat in Tamar by-poll and receiving flaks from different quarters on
the charges of clinging to the CM's post despite losing by-election.

After his fifth resignation, Jharkhand was put under the President's
Rule on January 19, 2009.

But luck again smiled on Soren. He was sworn-in as chief minister for
the third term on December 30, 2009. But within five months, he was
again forced to resign tonight as no major political parties including
BJP and JVM (P), were ready to back his government in the floor test,
scheduled on Monday.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/jharkhand/Soren-s-political-bandwagon/551470/H1-Article1-550961.aspx

Cabinet approves imposition of President's Rule in Jharkhand
Press Trust Of India
New Delhi, June 01, 2010

First Published: 11:01 IST(1/6/2010)
Last Updated: 11:54 IST(1/6/2010)

The Union Cabinet on Tuesday recommended to President Pratibha Patil
to impose Central rule in Jharkhand after the resignation of Chief
Minister Shibu Soren ahead of a trust vote in the Assembly.

The Cabinet, at a meeting chaired by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh,
decided to recommend to the President to keep the state Assembly in
suspended animation and impose Central rule.

Jharkhand Governor M O H Farooq had sent his report to the Centre
yesterday after Congress and the BJP gave up efforts to form a
government.

Farooq is understood to have recommended President's Rule after
meeting leaders of major political parties in Ranchi.

The Soren government was reduced to a minority on May 24 when BJP,
with 18 MLAs and JD(U) with two, withdrew support to it. The JMM, with
18 MLAs and having the support of seven other legislators, was short
of the required 42 in the 82-member House.

The BJP took the decision after Soren voted against the cut motions
sponsored by the opposition in Lok Sabha on April 27.

Congress, with a strength of 14, and its ally JVM(P) with 11 members,
said it did not have the numbers to stake claim to form a government.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/Cabinet-approves-imposition-of-President-s-Rule-in-Jharkhand/H1-Article1-551470.aspx

...and I am Sid Harth
cogitoergosum
2010-06-02 20:44:36 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth

Battle for Ranchi on hold
Sonali Das, TNN, Jun 2, 2010, 06.26am IST

Tags:Congress|BJP|Nitin gadkari|Supreme Court|Bengal|Shibu Soren

RANCHI: When BJP brought the cut motion against price rise in
Parliament on April 27, residents of Jharkhand gave only a cursory
glance at their television screens. Little did they guess then that
the state’s chief minister, Shibu Soren — who ensured his presence in
the House as a Lok Sabha MP — would press the (supposedly) wrong
button and lead the seventh government in Jharkhand to doom.

The recent political crisis, however, was the worst ever instance of
power-grabbing by both national parties, BJP and Congress. “It was the
game plan of the Congress to plunge Jharkhand into political
instability and wrest power by imposing central rule,” said state BJP
president Raghubar Das.

Notwithstanding BJP’s allegation against the Congress, which possibly
found the best pawn in Soren (with a murder case pending against him
in the Supreme Court) to have its way in Jharkhand, BJP, too, did not
leave any stone unturned to grab power in the state. “What Soren did
to the BJP was exactly what the party deserved,” said Babulal Marandi,
first chief minister of the state and now president of Jharkhand Vikas
Morcha (Prajatantrik).

First with 20 MLAs in the NDA kitty after Assembly elections, the
alleged communal party chose to join hands with the so-called secular
JMM. Second though it screamed “humiliation” after JMM played “foul”
during the cut motion, the party refused to withdraw support from the
Soren government even after its president, Nitin Gadkari, announced
the party’s decision to do so.

As if that was not enough, the party even sought to re-align with JMM
to remain in power in the state. All this while the Congress watched
from the sidelines, allowing BJP to lurch from one mistake to the
other. On Tuesday, when the Centre recommended President’s Rule, it is
the Congress, which is having the last laugh. “Why go into the
arithmetic of 14 and 18 (alliance partners) when a single stroke of
imposing central rule can do the trick,” remarked a Congressman.

The timing for unleashing political instability to wrest power could
not have been more inappropriate. The JMM-NDA alliance, which came to
power almost after 12 months of the first and second stints of central
rule in 2009, was yet to settle down. No new scheme had taken off in
the five months apart from rice being given at Re 1 to BPL families. A
recent outburst of home secretary JB Tubid to ToI saying the
bureaucracy does not run to the legislature with every single file was
in itself a commentary on how the executive played first fiddle in
Soren’s system.

While bank loots, murders and kidnappings were rampant, Soren was also
flayed for soft-pedalling on the Maoist issue after he refrained from
attending meetings convened by Union home minister P Chidambaram for
launching an all-out offensive against the rebels at a time when the
Dhalbhumgarh BDO was abducted and there were several other incidents
of Maoist-triggered violence in the state. Maoists also forced
Congress leaders and workers to resign from the party that had
launched an offensive by joint paramilitary forces against them in the
state.

Police, however, now fear that with the state coming directly under
central rule, Maoists may once again go all out in their offensive as
they have done in Bengal and Chhattisgarh.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/City/Ranchi/Battle-for-Ranchi-on-hold/articleshow/6001236.cms

Governor to meet PM & home minister
TNN, Jun 1, 2010, 09.29pm IST

Tags:Governor|Raj Bhavan|President

RANCHI: Minutes after imposition of President's Rule in Jharkhand on
Tuesday, Raj Bhavan swung into action. Without wasting time, governor
MOH Farook convened a meeting of all the secretaries and the director-
general of police (DGP) to discuss the nitty-gritty of functioning of
the government in the state.

The governor asked all the secretaries to visit the districts and
assess the progress of work under their departments. "The officers
should keep in mind that they will be punished if there is any lapse.
At the same time, the officer will be rewarded for good work," said
the governor while addressing the first meeting of secretaries after
imposition of President's Rule.

He also directed chief secretary A K Singh to make necessary
amendments to the rules of the Panchayati Raj Act, if needed, within
24-hours of constituting the governor's advisory council and holding
panchayat polls at the earliest.
Claiming that the governor was unhappy with the lapse of central funds
every year, Raj Bhavan PRO S N Jha said: "The common man should get
the feeling that the government is there to look after his welfare."

To check corruption in the state, DGP Neyaz Ahmad was to expedite the
disposal of pending vigilance cases and start proceedings against
guilty officers.

The governor is likely to visit Delhi on Wednesday to meet President,
Prime Minister and home minister to discuss the modalities of
functioning under central rule.

President's Rule was imposed in the state on Tuesday following the
governor's recommendation to the Union government on Monday in which
he had mentioned that no party or alliance was in a position to form
government in the state. He had also mentioned in detail the political
drama that was going on in the state for the past one month owing to
the differences between BJP and Jharkhand Mukti Morcha, the two
important ruling alliance partners, since April 27 and how the Soren
government plunged into a minority on May 24.

Sources in Raj Bhavan said the governor intends to utilize the tenure
of President's Rule for the speedy implementation of welfare projects
and government-sponsored schemes. "It would be the governor's priority
to strengthen the delivery mechanism of the state as it was during
last year's President's Rule so that people get the benefit of welfare
and development schemes," said a source. Last time, the state was
under President's Rule from January 19 to December 30, 2009.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/City/Ranchi/Governor-to-meet-PM-home-minister/articleshow/6000060.cms

...and I am Sid Harth
cogitoergosum
2010-06-05 23:52:16 UTC
Permalink
Of Dalliances and Unholy-Alliances: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/2010/06/05/of-dalliances-and-unholy-alliances-sid-harth/

Battle for Ranchi on hold
Sonali Das, TNN, Jun 2, 2010, 06.26am IST

Tags:Congress|BJP|Nitin gadkari|Supreme Court|Bengal|Shibu Soren

RANCHI: When BJP brought the cut motion against price rise in
Parliament on April 27, residents of Jharkhand gave only a cursory
glance at their television screens. Little did they guess then that
the state’s chief minister, Shibu Soren — who ensured his presence in
the House as a Lok Sabha MP — would press the (supposedly) wrong
button and lead the seventh government in Jharkhand to doom.

The recent political crisis, however, was the worst ever instance of
power-grabbing by both national parties, BJP and Congress. “It was the
game plan of the Congress to plunge Jharkhand into political
instability and wrest power by imposing central rule,” said state BJP
president Raghubar Das.

Notwithstanding BJP’s allegation against the Congress, which possibly
found the best pawn in Soren (with a murder case pending against him
in the Supreme Court) to have its way in Jharkhand, BJP, too, did not
leave any stone unturned to grab power in the state. “What Soren did
to the BJP was exactly what the party deserved,” said Babulal Marandi,
first chief minister of the state and now president of Jharkhand Vikas
Morcha (Prajatantrik).

First with 20 MLAs in the NDA kitty after Assembly elections, the
alleged communal party chose to join hands with the so-called secular
JMM. Second though it screamed “humiliation” after JMM played “foul”
during the cut motion, the party refused to withdraw support from the
Soren government even after its president, Nitin Gadkari, announced
the party’s decision to do so.

As if that was not enough, the party even sought to re-align with JMM
to remain in power in the state. All this while the Congress watched
from the sidelines, allowing BJP to lurch from one mistake to the
other. On Tuesday, when the Centre recommended President’s Rule, it is
the Congress, which is having the last laugh. “Why go into the
arithmetic of 14 and 18 (alliance partners) when a single stroke of
imposing central rule can do the trick,” remarked a Congressman.

The timing for unleashing political instability to wrest power could
not have been more inappropriate. The JMM-NDA alliance, which came to
power almost after 12 months of the first and second stints of central
rule in 2009, was yet to settle down. No new scheme had taken off in
the five months apart from rice being given at Re 1 to BPL families. A
recent outburst of home secretary JB Tubid to ToI saying the
bureaucracy does not run to the legislature with every single file was
in itself a commentary on how the executive played first fiddle in
Soren’s system.

While bank loots, murders and kidnappings were rampant, Soren was also
flayed for soft-pedalling on the Maoist issue after he refrained from
attending meetings convened by Union home minister P Chidambaram for
launching an all-out offensive against the rebels at a time when the
Dhalbhumgarh BDO was abducted and there were several other incidents
of Maoist-triggered violence in the state. Maoists also forced
Congress leaders and workers to resign from the party that had
launched an offensive by joint paramilitary forces against them in the
state.

Police, however, now fear that with the state coming directly under
central rule, Maoists may once again go all out in their offensive as
they have done in Bengal and Chhattisgarh.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/City/Ranchi/Battle-for-Ranchi-on-hold/articleshow/6001236.cms

Governor to meet PM & home minister
TNN, Jun 1, 2010, 09.29pm IST

Tags:Governor|Raj Bhavan|President

RANCHI: Minutes after imposition of President's Rule in Jharkhand on
Tuesday, Raj Bhavan swung into action. Without wasting time, governor
MOH Farook convened a meeting of all the secretaries and the director-
general of police (DGP) to discuss the nitty-gritty of functioning of
the government in the state.

The governor asked all the secretaries to visit the districts and
assess the progress of work under their departments. "The officers
should keep in mind that they will be punished if there is any lapse.
At the same time, the officer will be rewarded for good work," said
the governor while addressing the first meeting of secretaries after
imposition of President's Rule.

He also directed chief secretary A K Singh to make necessary
amendments to the rules of the Panchayati Raj Act, if needed, within
24-hours of constituting the governor's advisory council and holding
panchayat polls at the earliest.
Claiming that the governor was unhappy with the lapse of central funds
every year, Raj Bhavan PRO S N Jha said: "The common man should get
the feeling that the government is there to look after his welfare."

To check corruption in the state, DGP Neyaz Ahmad was to expedite the
disposal of pending vigilance cases and start proceedings against
guilty officers.

The governor is likely to visit Delhi on Wednesday to meet President,
Prime Minister and home minister to discuss the modalities of
functioning under central rule.

President's Rule was imposed in the state on Tuesday following the
governor's recommendation to the Union government on Monday in which
he had mentioned that no party or alliance was in a position to form
government in the state. He had also mentioned in detail the political
drama that was going on in the state for the past one month owing to
the differences between BJP and Jharkhand Mukti Morcha, the two
important ruling alliance partners, since April 27 and how the Soren
government plunged into a minority on May 24.

Sources in Raj Bhavan said the governor intends to utilize the tenure
of President's Rule for the speedy implementation of welfare projects
and government-sponsored schemes. "It would be the governor's priority
to strengthen the delivery mechanism of the state as it was during
last year's President's Rule so that people get the benefit of welfare
and development schemes," said a source. Last time, the state was
under President's Rule from January 19 to December 30, 2009.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/City/Ranchi/Governor-to-meet-PM-home-minister/articleshow/6000060.cms

| Sunday , June 6 , 2010 |

Alchemist chief is JMM’s man
- Kanwar Deep Upper House nominee
SUDHIR KUMAR MISHRA

Kanwar Deep Singh in Ranchi on Saturday. Picture by Prashant Mitra

Ranchi, June 5: After Congress, it was the JMM’s turn today to propose
the name of its nominee for the Rajya Sabha biennials.

The JMM fielded Alchemist Hospitals Group chairman Kanwar Deep Singh
as its candidate. Assembly secretary Kaushal Kishore Prasad confirmed
that Singh filed his nomination today though JMM chief Shibu Soren had
initially proposed Supreme Court lawyer Sanjeev Kumar’s name.

When Soren left for Delhi yesterday, it was presumed that he had been
summoned by the Congress leadership and that preparations for the
Rajya Sabha elections and formation of an alternative government in
Jharkhand were the main agenda of the meeting.

However, Soren did not meet the Congress president in Delhi. Instead,
he came back by a special flight in the morning, accompanied by Singh.
They proceeded to senior JMM leader Teklal Mahto’s residence, where
party MLAs and office bearers were already waiting. Soren ordered that
necessary arrangements be made to allow Singh to file his nomination
papers at the earliest.

“Only Guruji can say what happened in Delhi. According to his orders,
we have begun campaigning for Singh’s success. Let us hope that things
work out well,” senior JMM leader Hemlal Murmu told The Telegraph.

Meanwhile, sources said Ajsu chief Sudesh Mahto was not happy with
Soren’s decision to field Singh. Mahto confined himself to his Silli
residence instead of participating in the nomination process. He had
earlier proposed that a local leader be sent to the Rajya Sabha
instead of bringing in “outsiders”. Mahto also reportedly turned down
BJP chief Nitin Gadkari’s invitation to go to Delhi for talks.

“We will soon decide what to do during the biennial,” Mahto said over
telephone.

Singh claimed he decided to contest the Rajya Sabha seat in Jharkhand
only after getting assurances from Shibu Soren, Hemant Soren and
Sudesh Mahto and was confident of their full support. He promised to
make honest efforts to improve medical facilities in Jharkhand.

“I have closely been associated with Jharkhand for long. I run a
flying club in Jamshedpur, which has trained over 200 pilots. I am
also running super speciality hospitals in Delhi and Chandigrah and
want to do something new in Jharkhand also,” he added.

Irked by the Congress decision to field Dheeraj Prasad Sahu for the
Rajya Sabha seat, the JVM (P) too today resolved to field its own
candidate. It authorised party president Babulal Marandi to finalise
the nominee. “The Congress dare not take our support for granted and
treat our party president like the JMM supremo. Even if our candidate
doesn’t win, we will ensure a Congress defeat,” fumed a senior JVM
leader.

Congress state unit chief Pradeep Kumar Balmuchu admitted that his
party had made certain strategic mistakes while declaring Sahu’s
candidature. However, he also claimed that the Congress-JVM alliance
was intact and that the Congress candidate would get at least 30 first
preference votes during polling on June 17.

The BJP is likely to declare its candidate tomorrow.

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100606/jsp/frontpage/story_12534620.jsp

Opinion » Editorial

Want smaller states? Look at Jharkhand...

Jun 05th, 2010

Some see President’s rule in Jharkhand as an inevitability. But this
need not have been the case. Theoretically, the Congress and Babulal
Marandi’s Jharkhand Vikas Morcha (JVM) could have got together with
the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha — although the JMM leadership is a
carpetbaggers’ conglomerate — and a few greedy Independents, and
sprung another government on the hapless state. But it is just as well
such a course was not adopted. It would have produced a government
conceived and constituted in bad faith — in the full knowledge that
its stability was far from assured, and that an attempt to rule was
being launched with no objective other than to loot the treasury.
Something similar happened after December’s Assembly election in the
state. The post-poll alliance that the JMM and the BJP got into was
wholly opportunistic. The BJP had no business being in government — it
was a defeated party and many of its senior leaders in New Delhi had
advised caution and counselled against trying to get into the driver’s
seat yet again. Nor did this desperate search for shortsighted gains
end there. After saying it was ending support to the Shibu Soren
government as the JMM had backed the UPA government’s budget in
Parliament, the BJP did a somersault when a desperate JMM tempted it
with an offer of the chief minister’s post. This was shabby on the
BJP’s part: the party will have to do better and keep its nose clean
if it wishes to be taken seriously at the national level.
In sum, the decision on President’s rule, keeping the Assembly in
suspended animation, was possibly the best of a bad bargain. Where the
state goes next is uncertain. After all, the flimsy numbers of various
parties in the Assembly cannot change, and the question will arise
after six months whether a viable political front can be brought into
being. If not, the state can look forward to another six months of
Central rule, followed by elections. This is hardly a good
advertisement for a democratic order. The prospect of another state
election in a year can possibly be avoided if an all-party government
could be devised with a clearly-laid-down programme. Much would depend
on the Congress. If the Centre suggests an all-party dispensation in
Jharkhand, Congress MLAs — eager for power — are likely to be
disappointed as they will have to share the spoils of office. Will the
Congress leadership be ready to make the sacrifice?
Governments in Jharkhand have been unstable ever since the state was
formed. None of the promise of development for its tribal population —
the reason for creation of the state — has been realised. Jharkhand
offers the perfect example that, in general, small states are
politically unviable. The preponderance of small parties with too few
MLAs, and a multiplicity of Independents — all extraordinarily eager
to drive hard bargains, usually throws the political scene into
turmoil. The story is repeated much too often to sustain the view that
small states are fundamentally good for democratic governance which
keeps people at the centre. Punjab and Haryana are exceptions that
prove the rule, and it is worthwhile to recall that it was Haryana
that acquainted the country with the “aya Ram, gaya Ram” phenomenon.
While a new round of Central rule is being ushered into Jharkhand, the
Union home ministry should take steps to post officials with a proven
record of service to the people. Only then would the Central
intervention be deemed worthwhile. Besides development goals, the time
of President’s rule will have to be utilised to put down lawlessness
and the Maoist menace.

http://www.asianage.com/editorial/want-smaller-states-look-jharkhand-385

Opinion » Editorial

Triumphant Mamata must show sobriety

Jun 04th, 2010

Trinamul Congress founder-chief Mamata Banerjee has had little
difficulty demonstrating to the demoralised leaders of the Left Front
that their day is done. This is the key lesson from the recent
municipal elections in West Bengal. It is also now more than evident
that Trinamul, which is a crucial ally of the Congress in the UPA at
the Centre, will dictate partnership terms to the older but enfeebled
party in the state when the Assembly elections are called next year.
Ms Banerjee’s party is on a roll. In 2008 it had netted handsome
dividends in the panchayat polls in the state and last May stunned the
Left Front in the election for Parliament. In general, the story is
both of the sharp decline of the CPI(M)-led Left, and of Trinamul’s
steep rise. There is a caveat here, however. That rise is not
commensurate with the rate of the Left’s fall in the municipal wards
across West Bengal.
When Ms Banerjee pooled efforts with the Congress in last year’s Lok
Sabha polls, it was able to throw the Left into the Hooghly. In the
municipal election earlier this week, the UPA partners fought
separately. Trinamul still did very well indeed but could not
replicate the magic of its Lok Sabha performance when it won nearly
half the Parliament seats in the state. Indeed, it could capture
barely a third of the municipalities, although it took the prestigious
Kolkata Municipal Corporation like a tidal wave. This would suggest
that the Left parties are holding out for dear life in several
districts, although they have taken a battering and indeed have
surrendered some of their strongholds to Trinamul. More than anything
else, the municipal polls, coming on the heels of the Lok Sabha and
panchayat elections, indicate that the hegemony of the Left in the
state has been badly dented after their 33-year-old rule, although
they are holding on in terms of voting numbers in several areas. This
casts the Left in poor light. It is to be seen if Trinamul and
Congress together are able to seize the hegemony and the imagination
of the people in the way that the Left had once done. This is not
likely to be easy, given Ms Banerjee’s innately volatile temperament.
Let’s face it, she is no Jyoti Basu or Bidhan Chandra Roy. The
Trinamul Congress will have to employ responsibility and sobriety and
the Congress will be required to abjure peevishness. They will have to
enter the Assembly election fray without making a spectacle of
themselves, and at all costs avoid the Bihar experience when Lalu
Prasad Yadav’s RJD and the Congress made each other look boorish on
the issue of seat distribution for the 2009 Lok Sabha election.
Ms Banerjee’s call for a “mahajot” (grand alliance) against the Left
Front betrays a nervousness that she can afford to shed. Besides, it
appears to be a false move, politically. If the call implies an
invitation to the state BJP to join her front to take on the CPI(M)
and its allies, Trinamul might not be expected to draw in the vote of
the minorities in sufficiently large numbers. That could make it
anybody’s game in the Assembly election. In any case, voters are
expected to evaluate how Trinamul and Congress get on with one another
and whether or not they show each other respect, as that might
indicate whether or not they will be able to execute policy if they
came to power together in Writers’ Buildings. Politically, Ms Banerjee
cannot hurt herself by demanding Assembly elections before schedule
even though there is a whole year to go. However, it might be counter-
productive for her to unleash violent mobs on the streets in support
of her strident demand. Political restraint is the need of the hour.

http://www.asianage.com/editorial/triumphant-mamata-must-show-sobriety-241

RS carrot in hand, Soren in Delhi
SUMAN K. SHRIVASTAVA AND SHASHANK SHEKHAR

JMM chief Shibu Soren at his Bokaro residence before leaving for New
Delhi on Friday. Picture by Pankaj Singh
Ranchi/Bokaro, June 4:

JMM chief Shibu Soren today rushed to Delhi with son Hemant to explore
the possibility of forming a government in the state, using the Rajya
Sabha elections as a bait.

Soren’s move comes amid signals that Babulal Marandi is upset with the
Congress for “unilaterally” renominating Dheeraj Prasad Sahu as its
Rajya Sabha nominee.

The BJP central election committee, meanwhile, put the decision to
announce its RS nominee on hold and authorised party chief Nitin
Gadkari to decide by June 6, a day ahead of the deadline for filing
nominations. The polls are scheduled for June 17.

Though the Sorens could not be contacted, party sources said they
would be exploring options for talks with leaders of both Congress and
BJP. “They will try to buy support to form a government in lieu of the
JMM’s support to the other party’s nominees for the Upper House,” a
JMM source said.

The JMM chief earlier clarified in Bokaro that his party was talking
to top leaders of both UPA and NDA, but insisted that letting the cat
out of the bag at this juncture would not be advisable.

A few JMM MLAs, including Mathura Mahto, held a meeting with Ajsu
chief Sudesh Mahto at the residence of Haji Hussain Ansari, only to
reiterate that the JMM nominee for the Upper House was not final.

As the arithmetic for the Rajya Sabha polls stands, no alliance has
the numbers necessary to bag a seat. So, the JMM-Ajsu approach will be
crucial and could see the realignment of political forces after the
elections.

The Assembly with 81 seats is divided into three blocks — Congress-JVM
(25), JMM-Ajsu-Independents (25) and BJP-JD(U) (20). The role of the
five-member Ajsu, too, will be crucial if the JMM does not put up its
candidate. The support of 28 MLAs is required to elect a member of the
Rajya Sabha.

Little wonder then that Congress state president Pradeep Balmuchu
discussed the issue with Ajsu chief Sudesh Mahto, before announcing
the party nominee. The BJP is also in touch with Ajsu.

Meanwhile, Babulal Marandi said he had called a meeting of JVM office-
bearers tomorrow in the aftermath of the Congress’s unilateral
decision to announce its candidate. “We will neither indulge in horse-
trading nor allow anybody else to do so,” he reiterated.

Though Marandi would not elaborate on party strategy, a senior JVM
leader said the Congress had declared its candidate without speaking
to Marandi. The Congress wanted to talk to Marandi after announcing
Sahu’s name, but he refused to oblige.

“It won’t be surprising if the JVM parts ways with the Congress and
put up its own candidate in order to keep its 11 legislators
together,” said a senior JVM leader, requesting anonymity.

According to BJP sources, there is a keen tussle among three
contenders — Dhirendra Agarwal, Ajay Maroo and Anil Sinha. Gadkari,
according to sources, is already on a sticky wicket for “mishandling”
the political crisis in Jharkhand. A defeat in the RS election will
put a question mark on his leadership further, said a source in the
BJP.

Earlier, speaking in Bokaro, Soren said the state would have a new
government within four weeks as President’s rule would not solve its
problems. “The JMM is in touch with bigger parties as well as
Independent MLAs and also smaller parties for the formation of the
next government,” he declared, adding that one must keep in mind that
without JMM support, no government in the state could survive.

Soren held two rounds of talks with Congress leader Rajendra Singh at
the Bokaro steel plant guesthouse where the latter was understood to
have delivered an important political message from Sonia Gandhi.
Singh, however, said he discussed the Rajya Sabha elections with
Guruji with a request that he should not nominate any outsider to the
Upper House.

In another U-turn, Guruji said there were several candidates and
leaders in the fray for a Rajya Sabha ticket, including former deputy
chief minister Sudhir Mahto and Sanjiv Kumar. Soren had declared
Sanjiv Kumar’s name in Giridih yesterday.

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100605/jsp/frontpage/story_12531184.jsp

Talks on with Cong, BJP: Soren
STAFF WRITER 21:24 HRS IST

Bokaro (Jharkhand), June 4 (PTI) JMM president Shibu Soren today said
he was in touch with both BJP and Congress to explore ways of
government formation without any conditions as President's Rule,
imposed in the state, was no alternative to popular government.

"We (JMM) are in touch with both Congress and BJP, exploring the
possibility to form the government at the earliest, because
President's Rule is not in the interest of the state as development
work comes to a grinding halt," Soren told here.

Stating that the BJP was not "less responsible" for imposition of
Central rule, Soren said his party would not set any condition in the
formation of a government.

"I am not in favour of midterm polls," said the veteran tribal leader.

http://www.ptinews.com/news/692840_Talks-on-with-Cong--BJP--Soren

Advani asks Mamata not to seek early polls in WB
STAFF WRITER 19:34 HRS IST

New Delhi, Jun 5 (PTI) BJP leader L K Advani today advised Trinamool
Congress Chief Mamata Banerjee not to seek early assembly elections in
West Bengal after her party's victory in the urban civic polls and
suggested that patience would pay richer dividends.

In his latest blog, Advani said that by this victory Banerjee had
created history and reports stating that she may rule over Bengal may
turn out to be true in future.

"She may well become that (Queen of Bengal) also; she need not be
impatient for an Assembly encounter earlier than scheduled. Patience
may pay her richer dividends," he said, referring to a newspaper
headline, "Queen of Calcutta, Not of Bengal yet".

However, Advani credited Banerjee's victory to alienation of people by
the Left parties more than her performance.

"If the Marxist citadel of Kolkata has collapsed, Mamata has served
only as an instrument.

http://www.ptinews.com/news/694289_Advani-asks-Mamata-not-to-seek-early-polls-in-WB

...and I am Sid Harth

Loading...