Discussion:
Digg Digs earthday: Sid Harth
(too old to reply)
cogitoergosum
2010-04-23 14:31:47 UTC
Permalink
Digg Digs Earthday: Sid Harth
http://bakulaji.typepad.com/blog/digg-digs-earthday-sid-harth.html

Digg Dialogg: Earth Day Edition with President Bill Clinton

Digg Dialogg: Earth Day Edition with President Bill Clinton
We were honored to sit down with President Bill Clinton for a very
special Earth Day edition of Digg Dialogg. He tackled your top
questions on the environment, Earth Day and climate change. Watch the
full interview below!

The questions

The top questions submitted and voted on by the Digg community are:

How can we best engage our nation's youth on the issues surrounding
climate change? (+179 diggs, submitted by jerryjamesstone)
http://digg.com/dialogg/bill_clinton_1?t=32176835#c32176835
If you were President today, what different steps would you be taking
today to ensure environmental conservation that you hadn't taken when
you were President in the 90's? (+158 diggs, submitted by danielrh9)
http://digg.com/dialogg/bill_clinton_1?t=32174722#c32174722
For a country that sets the standard for so many things, how have we
fallen so far behind on issues like waste management and
sustainability? How can we change that? (+114 diggs, submitted by
themadhatter444)
http://digg.com/dialogg/bill_clinton_1?t=32175128#c32175128
What really happened to the electric car? (+110 diggs, submitted by
mediamon)
http://digg.com/dialogg/bill_clinton_1?t=32176095#c32176095
What do you say to people who think global warming isn't a real issue?
(+91 diggs, submitted by vfabella)
http://digg.com/dialogg/bill_clinton_1?t=32175577#c32175577
What steps are you personally taking to lessen your carbon footprint?
(+90 diggs, submitted by danielrh9)
http://digg.com/dialogg/bill_clinton_1?t=32174669#c32174669

+180 diggs +229 / -49

jerryjamesstone
on 04/14/2010 How can we best engage our nation's youth on the issues
surrounding climate change?
Thread / Reply+158 diggs +189 / -31

danielrh9
on 04/14/2010 If you were President today, what different steps would
you be taking today to ensure environmental conservation that you
hadn't taken when you were President in the 90's?
Thread / Reply+135 diggs +174 / -39

IronJ146
on 04/14/2010 Do you think President Obama did the right thing by
compromising on off-shore drilling in spite of it's possible
environmental effects?
Thread / Reply+114 diggs +141 / -27

themadhatter444
on 04/14/2010 For a country that sets the standard for so many things,
how have we fallen so far behind on issues like waste management and
sustainability? How can we change that?
Thread / Reply+113 diggs +151 / -38

mediamon
on 04/14/2010 What really happened to the electric car?
Thread / Reply+93 diggs +122 / -29

vfabella
on 04/14/2010 What do you say to people who think global warming isn't
a real issue?
Thread / Reply+93 diggs +149 / -56

danielrh9
on 04/14/2010 What steps are you personally taking to lessen your
carbon footprint?
Thread / Reply+81 diggs +107 / -26

poweredsince85
on 04/14/2010 Could the resurgence of a nuclear power program be one
of the most important shifts in environmental and economic change?
Considering the lack of pollution, the lower dependence of foreign
oil, and job growth, do you see nuclear energy as an answer to a
better future for the United States?
Thread / Reply+73 diggs +88 / -15

oldwhitebeard
on 04/14/2010 We know that trees absorb carbon dioxide. During the
1930s, the CCC hired unemployed men who planted 2.3 billion trees.
With our high unemployment today, why can't the federal government
hire a million people to plant 6 billion trees throughout the United
States?
Thread / Reply+66 diggs +99 / -33

gr3yskull
on 04/14/2010 Are there any plans to clean up the trash vortex that is
floating north of Hawaii?
Thread / Reply+41 diggs +60 / -19

MarilynOliva
on 04/14/2010 What can we do, from a governmental point of view, to
get US farmers to adopt environmentally friendly ways or farming, like
less use of pesticides and more organic farming?
Thread / Reply+27 diggs +66 / -39

pumpkinazalea
on 04/14/2010 If could give just one actionable suggestion for people
to help combat climate change, what would it be?
Thread / Reply+26 diggs +41 / -15

killrrabit
on 04/14/2010 How may we divorce environmentalism from politics? And
who can the American people listen to? It seems that even the most
environmentally minded politicians aren't able to leave politics at
the door when discussing environmental issues (i.e. Al Gore's 20
minute non sequitur in the middle of An Inconvenient Truth about being
cheated in the election).
Thread / Reply+22 diggs +30 / -8

joeycashmere
on 04/14/2010 Dear Mr President,

Why doesn't the government fund more innovative alternative energy
projects? There are a lot of interesting things going on that could be
aided by a genuine interest of the U.S government.

Thanks
Joey
Thread / Reply+21 diggs +35 / -14

LanMark
on 04/14/2010 Why do we constantly support fuel products based on food
crops when there is a worldwide food shortage which is only getting
worse? (Example: Corn Ethanol)
Thread / Reply+19 diggs +24 / -5

jerryjamesstone
on 04/15/2010 You understand they eventually will, yes? :-)
Thread +17 diggs +24 / -7

spacemanspiff92
on 04/14/2010 Bicycle infrastructure in major cities in the United
States lags far behind many European cities. Do you support expanding
bicycle infrastructure in order to limit emissions from transportation
sources – a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions and make
cycling a more attractive and feasible option in the United States? If
so, how do you propose changing the transportation infrastructure in
major cities and metropolitan areas in this country to accomplish
this?
Thread / Reply+17 diggs +30 / -13

solargroupies
on 04/14/2010 1. The issue of climate change is politically polarized,
thanks to 'An Inconvenient Truth' railing against Republicans. How can
we de-polarize it in order to get bi-partisan support for change.

2. How can we expect to protect the environment when the fossil fuel
companies have lobbied congress with tens of billions of dollars to
keep us addicted to oil?
Thread / Reply+14 diggs +29 / -15

awesomeideas
on 04/14/2010 Do you believe that individuals or corporations will
need to make the largest sacrifices in order to protect our
environment?
Thread / Reply+13 diggs +14 / -1

AmberIris
on 04/15/2010 Dear President Clinton,

The US war on marijuana has created a situation in which millions of
acres of public land are now being taken over by criminals with no
oversight or accountability to their agricultural practices.
Indigenous species of plants are being threatened, uncontrolled
pesticides are being dumped on fragile ecosystems and conservation
workers are unable to safely conduct imperative scientific research.

In addition, industrial cannabis can more readily produce fiber than
cotton for clothes or paper for trees and its oil is on par with that
of soy or corn, only requiring less input.

Can we reasonably create a system of taxation, regulation and
oversight on the cannabis plant that would benefit instead of harm our
environment and our society?
Thread / Reply+13 diggs +27 / -14

usptoattorney
on 04/14/2010 What invention do you think has made the biggest
difference to protect our environment or significantly reduce
pollutants?
Thread / Reply+10 diggs +24 / -14

Shuukyoku
on 04/14/2010 Ethanol has been called into question as a plausible
'alternative fuel source' for the future. What alternative fuels would
you like to see in the future? What do you believe to be the role of
the Federal Government in making those alternatives available?
Thread / Reply+9 diggs +22 / -13

smitty7789
on 04/14/2010 What do you think about sustainable farming, and how can
we encourage more of it?
Thread / Reply+8 diggs +19 / -11

creationismlol
on 04/14/2010 Dear Mr. President,

The past several decades have seen nuclear energy stagnate in the
United States. Given the pressing need for cleaner sources of energy
and action on climate change what role should nuclear energy play in
the USA?
Thread / Reply+7 diggs +13 / -6

Ch0mpr
on 04/14/2010 Why hasn't the United States moved away from oil based
plastics (which are virtually non-degradable) towards corn based
containers (biodegradable)? Thinking of comparative advantage, America
can grow corn like no other nation, and to move towards these
containers would be beneficial not only to the environment, but also
to our agricultural industry. Or do you think that special interests
(Oil industry) will disallow this change of materials to happen?
Thread / Reply+4 diggs +11 / -7

chevyorange
on 04/14/2010 Dear Mr. President,

Do any of these questions matter as long as money and lobbying rule
Washington? How come we can’t just end money being given to
politicians at all since it NEVER is in the interest of the people?
Thread / Reply+4 diggs +5 / -1

nwojewoda
on 04/15/2010 How come the world's youth have such a limited influence
on political decisions taken around long-term environmental issues,
like climate change, when their generation will be affected more than
any other by the consequences of those decisions? What can they do to
make sure their concerns and ideas are given top priority by the
leaders of our planet?
Thread / Reply+4 diggs +22 / -18

limbclock
on 04/14/2010 I was wondering: Does the carbon footprint of a
Recycling plant offset the positive aspects of recycling, rendering
Recycling Plants harmful to the environment as a whole?
Thread / Reply+4 diggs +9 / -5

SouthernHope1
on 04/14/2010 I have 2 questions that I imagine myself asking Clinton
(who I regard as a very smart fellow):

1. Why do you think many people refer to environmentalist as a
“special interest group?“ - why haven’t these concerns gone more
mainstream.

2. Is there a way to penetrate the fog of politics that prevents a
greater understanding of (and commitment to develop solutions to) long-
run environmental problems?
Thread / Reply+4 diggs +8 / -4

RicardoWilliams
on 04/14/2010 incorporate it into the plot of the Avatar sequel, that
will surely reach billions
Thread / Reply+4 diggs +20 / -16

inspirewbn
on 04/14/2010 What can small groups do on a community level to make a
collective impact on climate change? And how can we engage children on
a larger scale so that the efforts we make today can be carried into
future?

Thread / Reply+4 diggs +7 / -3

OnShakedown
on 04/14/2010 How do we explain science to people like this?
Thread / Reply+3 diggs +7 / -4

davenguyen
on 04/14/2010 What do you feel would be the most important steps for
everyday people to do in order to help preserve our environment?
Thread / Reply+3 diggs +5 / -2

inactive
on 04/15/2010 The destruction of our environment is ultimately rooted
in our consumption. We eat too much, we use, and destroy more land
than we require and we buy too many "things" (electronics, household
goods, fashions). This over-consumption leads to the destruction of
our wildlife, forests and oceans. Yet, our economic prowess is based
upon this principle of consumerism. What role could the government
have to shift our focus from this unsustainable system, while
maintaining our economic well-being?

Thread / Reply+3 diggs +8 / -5

jivatmanx
on 04/14/2010 Mr. Clinton, hydroponic and aeroponic agriculture uses
1/20 or less of the water of conventional agriculture and produces no
runoff from fertilizer and pesticides, grows year round, amongst other
benefits.

Shouldn't the environmental movement focus on soiless agriculture, in
addition to clean energy?

Thread / Reply+3 diggs +11 / -8

asteeper
on 04/14/2010 Whats your option on America's stand point regarding the
Kyoto Protocol?
Thread / Reply+3 diggs +13 / -10

nerkid
on 04/14/2010 Mr. President,
If you had to pose a concise argument to persuade a climate-change
denier to recognize that the threat is real, what would it be? Thank
you.
Thread / Reply+2 diggs +7 / -5

ZenPirate
on 04/14/2010 Do you think Jimmy Carter's 1977 speech on energy holds
any relevance toward solving the problems we face 30+ years later?

/ Reply+2 diggs +6 /
-4 eddyb123
on 04/14/2010 American consumption and waste is reaching unprecedented
levels. Do you feel that stricter regulation and taxes are needed to
save this planet from future disaster?
Thread / Reply+2 diggs +6 / -4

nwojewoda
on 04/15/2010 How come young people have such a limited influence on
decisions taken around environmental issues, when their generation
will be affected more than any other by the consequences of those
decisions? What can they do to make sure their concerns and ideas are
given top priority by the leaders of the world?
Thread / Reply+2 diggs +4 / -2

detacheddiva
on 04/14/2010 I believe we need to educate our children better through
the schools. Organizations like the Go Green Initiative are free,
comprehensive, and allow teacher autonomy. Will the American
government ever start utilizing programs like these to help? These are
volunteer organizations with dedicated people.

Thanks,

Casey Magnuson, Texas GGI Coordinator
Thread / Reply+2 diggs +6 / -4

gvitis
on 04/14/2010 President Clinton during your Presidency you eliminated
Tariffs on imports from Asia causing a boom in goods imported from
Asia and highly praised economic growth for the USA. How do you feel
your foreign trade policy has effected the environment?
Thread / Reply+2 diggs +14 / -12

vfabella
on 04/14/2010 What can be done about laws overprotecting large food
corporations and how can the government hold them more accountable for
actions that negatively impact the environment?
Thread / Reply+2 diggs +6 / -4

Drcheeseburger
on 04/14/2010 The giant oil companies don't want any changes on the
present situation. How can we make any progress on the energy
policies, with this tremendous negative force working against ?
Thread / Reply+2 diggs +7 / -5

rygo796
on 04/14/2010 Mr. President,

One of the keys to preventing climate change seems to be focused on
transportation. The US is a very Car-centric culture, but it seems
that it is a requirement of life in America.

Do you have any ideas as to how Americans might be able to combat
urban sprawl such that the American people would be more likely to use
and support public transportation?

Thread / Reply+2 diggs +4 / -2

L0NER
on 04/15/2010 As the sitting president in 2000, What was going through
your head during Gore v Bush?
Thread / Reply+2 diggs +2 / -0

elmartonio
on 04/15/2010 What is your opinion on geothermal energy as an
alternative sourse of energy? Iceland proves that the technology is
out there and is working. If you had the power to do so, how would you
go about in rolling out geothermic energy worldwide and do you think
that it is even possoble?
Thread / Reply+2 diggs +3 / -1

joarchieg
on 04/15/2010 How do we focus attention on the environment and climate
change in the current political, social climate? It seems to us that
many, including members of our own family, are right now actively
promoting fear, strife, and anger against what they perceive is
holding them back or threatening their country, lifestyle and views.
Thread / Reply+2 diggs +6 / -4

quoutmole
on 04/15/2010 What would you say to a person who refuses to believe in
climate change?
Thread / Reply+2 diggs +2 / -0

0bamaclintobush
on 04/15/2010 Mr President, Do you honestly feel that Former Vice-
President Al Gore is the best choice to represent the environment for
the United States? Can you honestly agree with his views? I mean to be
honest, the restriction set in place, by his efforts, to help fix the
ozone layer have helped to nearly cripple the HVAC industry due to the
price for freon used in our central air conditioning systems to sky
rocket. Many people can not afford the high cost to get their systems
charged due to the price of freon.

Respectfully submitted,
0bamaClintoBush
Thread / Reply+2 diggs +5 / -3

toeMas
on 04/15/2010 Did it bother you when former President George W. Bush
used you as a napkin during your recent trip to Haiti? It seemed
disrespectful, not only to you but to the people of Haiti as well.
Thread / Reply+2 diggs +4 / -2

thechuckknoblog
on 04/15/2010 What is your definition of "is"?
Thread / Reply+1 digg +1 / -0

iavant
on 04/14/2010 FANTASTIC Ideas!!!

Will you initiate a CCI type plan as a Federal WPA-ish jobs and funds
program to ensure Wind and Transmission lines implementation?

Will you support Commercial scale Solar Steam and PV generation with
Fed. Scale resources for Design Build programs?
Thread / Reply+1 digg +1 / -0

pmccray
on 04/14/2010 What do you say to the nay sayers on environmental
issues?
Thread / Reply+1 digg +4 / -3

surgeryabroad
on 04/14/2010 If you were the American president today, what is the
first step you would take... to show the rest of the world America IS
serious about saving THIS planet.


Thread / Reply+1 digg +1 / -0

fattehboi
on 04/14/2010 Do you think electric cars are going to be the new
things in the future, with electric charge stations located at gas
stations.
Thread / Reply+1 digg +4 / -3

acapobia
on 04/14/2010 Do you support President Obama's choice to open off-
shore drilling here in North America that will hopefully contribute to
the United States becoming less dependent on foreign oil? Also, I view
this as a temporary fix while we develop and implement new and
environmentally friendly energy sources.
Thread / Reply+1 digg +4 / -3

rcwendel
on 04/14/2010 What are the biggest issues facing President Obama now
regarding the creation of a sustainable energy policy that both
Republicans and Democrats can get behind. How can he break the log
jam? Does the argument need to be re-positioned so that Republicans
will jump on board the initiative?
Thread / Reply+1 digg +5 / -4

Growthbuster
on 04/14/2010 You've hinted in the past that you understand how
economic growth makes real progress in reducing total carbon emissions
nearly or actually impossible. Are you ready and willing to lead the
conversation about getting unhooked from growth addiction and moving
to a steady state economy, in the interest of every environmental
cause?
Thread / Reply+1 digg +7 / -6

depheyez
on 04/14/2010 Where were you before coming to do this Earth Day
Edition of Digg Dialogg; What mode of transportation did you choose?
Where will you be going after this interview and how?
Thread / Reply+1 digg +10 / -9

layokk
on 04/14/2010 Dear Mr. Clinton,

During your presidency, we experienced the insanity (both good and
bad) of the dot com boom. The growth in Information Technology was
both astounding and unsustainable. Since the early 2000s, this
enthusiasm and interest from the private sector as well as the
educational sector has stagnated. Very few students are majoring in
the IS/CS/IT field and it is leading to the decay of our technical
might. How do you think we might get students interested in this all
important field again? The thought of increasing H1B visas to support
technical growth is backwards thinking.

Thank You,
Dr. Michael Lapke
Thread / Reply+1 digg +1 / -0

dianelgaw
on 04/14/2010 Could you propose to opponents of the environmental
movement that we act responsibly, with or without proof of
catastrophic climate change, simply because it's the right thing to
do? Our country used to have that kind of image. Profits shouldn't
stand in the way of right action.
Thread / Reply+1 digg +3 / -2

buzaman
on 04/14/2010 Former President Clinton, to what level is your
foundation applying any of the learning you gained from your earlier
agricultural transportation activities in Mena, Arkansas and how does
that relate to your environmental activities specifically sustainable
farming and agricultural distribution models?
Thread / Reply+1 digg +9 / -8

IronJ146
on 04/14/2010 Do you feel you have more of an ability to impact issues
such as climate change and supporting sustainable agriculture in
developing nations after being President then you did when you were in
office?
Thread / Reply+1 digg +3 / -2

TannhauserHero
on 04/14/2010 Over the last several decades, the United States has
attempted to wean its dependency from foreign oil. Little progress has
been made. Each heralded breakthrough turns out to be a trojan horse -
ethanol and subsidies for it has highlighted the food versus fuel
debate, the opening of the American coastline to drilling won't
produce enough oil to significantly reduce our imports, and clean
energy has not proved cost-effective in competing with foreign oil,
let alone coal. Given that these numerous attempts have ended in
failure, what changes do you foresee in either American policies,
culture and society, and government that may be necessary in order to
finally end our dependency on foreign oil?
Thread / Reply+1 digg +2 / -1

DrEthan725
on 04/14/2010 Mr. President: The United Nations as well as many other
reputable organizations have definitively shown that more than any
other single source, our overproduction and over-consumption of
Animals (particularly Factory Farmed Animals) is the leading cause of
global warming, climate change and the devastating grain and water
shortages which are rapidly becoming the norm on our planet. Putting
aside, for the moment, the ethical issues of speciesism and the bias
we have towards non-humans and using their bodies, we also know that
switching to a plant-based diet and removing animal fats and proteins
from ours is better for our health. Knowing this, why aren't you (and
more Americans and world leaders) getting behind organizations like
EarthSave, who promote a kind and animal-free diet for the sake of our
planet, our individual health, and the greatest impact to quickly and
sustainably reverse climate change?
Thread / Reply+1 digg +7 / -6

judahjernigan
on 04/14/2010 Which president so far has done the best to help the
environment?
Thread / Reply+1 digg +6 / -5

adamrl07
on 04/14/2010 Why is the United States incapable of ratifying the
environment treaty that it helped to write?
Thread / Reply+1 digg +5 / -4

themadhatter444
on 04/14/2010 How do you feel about sustainable agriculture and how
can we better support this industry?
Thread / Reply+1 digg +13 / -12

danielrh9
on 04/14/2010 What do you think the state of our environment will be
in fifty years if we don't take appropriate steps to safeguard it now?
Thread / Reply+1 digg +12 / -11

manlyandy
on 04/14/2010 What is your take on GM foods and do you think there
should be stricter regulations or more intensive research on them to
ensure that they are truly beneficial to both humans and the
environment in the long run?
+1 digg +10 / -9

fastrunnerny
on 04/14/2010 I was a member of your Clinton Global Initiative
Conference last year at the University of Texas at Austin. I was
amazed by the selfless effort many of the college students in
attendance put into helping make the world a better place. Now that
the conference is into its third year, I was just wondering what you
personally thought was the most impressive student effort to help
better our world.
Thread / Reply+1 digg +2 / -1

colddigits
on 04/14/2010 Mr. President,
I'd like to know if you support "fracking" in the US and how do you
feel about off-shore drilling exploration as a means to blind-side
Americans about peak oil?
+1 digg +7 / -6

karmastic
on 04/14/2010 Stories highlighting an energy innovation rivalry
between U.S. and China has heated up in the media lately. What is your
perspective on joint R&D with other nations?
+1 digg +1 / -0

radicaldementia
on 04/14/2010 Unfortunately many of the arguments on both sides of the
debate regarding environmental legislation are often based on
misunderstandings of scientific studies and a general lack of
scientific education. What steps do you think can be taken to better
educate both lawmakers and the public so that the science behind these
issues is not subverted and better-informed decisions can be made on
potential legislation?
+1 digg +9 / -8

FibrillatorD
on 04/14/2010 what can we do to ensure proliferation of nuclear power
as a clean energy source while protecting against nuclear weaponry? is
that even a viable goal?
+1 digg +5 / -4

OnShakedown
on 04/14/2010 I'm from Hot Springs, Arkansas and am frustrated that
Arkansas and The South are so reluctant to accept energy efficiency
and renewable power. We are powered by energy monopolies, who have a
vested interest in not encouraging efficiency and the population seems
complacent. Why do you think this is and what can we do about it?

There are 1038 discussion posts here.

http://digg.com/dialogg/Bill_Clinton_1?OTC-em-fu17d

http://www.clintonfoundation.org/earthday/

Global Warming, Indian Views: Sid Harth
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.indian.marathi/browse_thread/thread/c9873750bcd497c0/2c3cfa6978669318?lnk=gst&q=Global+Warming+Indian+Views%3A+Sid+Harth#2c3cfa6978669318

The Truth About Global Warming: Sid Harth
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.indian.marathi/browse_thread/thread/1da623822c70478e/6ecedd4558dd4fca?lnk=gst&q=The+Truth+About+Global+Warming+%3A+Sid+Harth#6ecedd4558dd4fca

...and I am Sid Harth
cogitoergosum
2010-04-24 00:17:52 UTC
Permalink
Digg Digs Earthday: Sid Harth
http://bakulaji.typepad.com/blog/digg-digs-earthday-sid-harth-1.html

Switchboard posts about Earth Day 2010
The 40th Anniversary of Earth Day
1970 was a momentous one for the environmental movement, some 20
million people across the country rallied for the first Earth Day and
a group of young idealistic lawyers founded NRDC. NRDC staff reflect
back on 40 years of environmental advocacy and the road ahead.

http://switchboard.nrdc.org/40earthday.php

On Earth Day, A Warning Sign From India
Anjali Jaiswal
Senior Attorney, San Francisco

Posted April 22, 2010 in Solving Global Warming

As people across the globe celebrate the 40th anniversary of Earth
Day, India is experiencing its second warmest temperatures for this
time of year since 1901 and suffering from reduced grain outputs as a
result of these rising temperatures and inadequate rainfall.
Developing nations like India are the most vulnerable to the effects
of climate change. This Earth Day we should acknowledge these alarming
developments around the world and recognize that they are predicted to
only become worse and more prevalent if we don’t take significant
global action to mitigate and adapt to climate change.

In India, impacts from climate change include changes in average
temperatures, rainfall patterns and monsoon timings. These changes
affect the nation’s water resources, sea-levels, and biodiversity,
with implications for a wide variety of sectors, especially
agriculture.

With India’s economy so closely tied to natural resources, a large
portion of the population is vulnerable to the impacts of climate
change. More than 56% of workers are engaged in agriculture and
related sectors, according to the United Nations Development Program.
Many others in India live in coastal areas and depend on fishing or
tourism for their income. Also, the majority of India’s population
lives in rural areas where they rely on natural resources for food,
shelter, and their income.

India also depends on its annual monsoon for water and food. Last
year’s monsoon proved to be significantly less plentiful than most
years previous. Indian newspapers have reported that the country’s
economy “cannot bear another successive year of inadequate rainfall.”
Experts are predicting this year’s monsoon will be better despite
prevailing El Nino conditions that contributed to the poor monsoon
last year. However, Indian communities and farmers are increasingly
distressed about the changing patterns of the monsoon and food
shortages.

It’s true that India has taken significant steps to set national goals
and put policies in place to support a transition to clean energy
technology and developing a low-carbon growth strategy. But as the
Major Economies Forum – a platform for ministerial discussions on
energy and climate issues – ended earlier this week with a focus on
preparing for the summit on climate change in Cancun in November 2010,
we need action. The increasing temperatures and erratic monsoon in
India alert us that there is a need to channel discussion into global
action to support large developing economies, like India, into
intensifying national action and expediting implementation of climate
mitigation to drive a clean energy revolution and climate adaption to
protect public health.

(Co-Authored by Melissa Donnelly, NRDC India Initiative Intern)

Tags:40 earthday, adaptation, climatechange, earthday, india, monsoon,
temperature

Comments (Add yours)

Mary Johnson — Apr 23 2010 04:18 AM

How about we think seriously about the huge global population and
trying to bring the growth rate to zero in a humane fashion?? For some
reason this subject is taboo in the media. Why? Do people not realize
the impact our population exerts on the planet's resources? What is so
wrong with trying to persuade the planet's people to reduce the birth
rate to something that is more earth-friendly?

http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/ajaiswal/on_earth_day_a_warning_sign_fr.html

40 Years of Activism: Earth Day and NRDC

On April 22, 1970, some 20 million people across the country rallied
to protest the state of the planet. Cleveland’s Cuyahoga River, a dump
for steel mills and other industries, had caught fire. A massive oil
spill swamped the coast off Santa Barbara, and concerns about smog,
DDT and water pollution were rising. The very first Earth Day was a
grassroots revolution that spurred Congress to create America’s core
environmental protection laws, and continues to be a day of
celebration and activism worldwide.

NRDC was also born in 1970, as a group of lawyers dedicated to
defending the health of the planet and its people. Over the past 40
years, we’ve fought – and won – some historic environmental battles.
Explore the history of our victories below, and join us this Earth Day
as we fight for a clean energy revolution in America. Tell Congress to
take action now on clean energy and climate.

Explore our progress from 1970 to the present

More on Switchboard about Earth Day
Today Earth Day is Family Day for Me
http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/anotthoff/today_earth_day_is_family_day.html
posted by Annie Notthoff, 4/23/10
This morning on my way to work in San Francisco, I joined 50 other
people on a street corner in Oakland, ...
Earth Day Water Solutions Can Create More Livable Communities
posted by David Beckman, 4/23/10
http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/dbeckman/earth_day_water_solutions_foun.html
Yesterday I blogged about the issue of how well-suited the Clean Water
Act is today, forty or so years ...
On Earth Day, A Warning Sign From India
posted by Anjali Jaiswal, 4/23/10
http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/ajaiswal/on_earth_day_a_warning_sign_fr.html
As people across the globe celebrate the 40th anniversary of Earth
Day, India is experiencing its second ...
"Hanging in There" - Inspiration for Earth Day from the Goldman Prize
Winners
posted by Jacob Scherr, 4/22/10 http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/jscherr/hanging_in_there_inspiration_f.html
For more than two decades, NRDC has been one of organizations that
submits nominations each year for ...
Happy Earth Day (and Thank You) to the Scientists Working for the
Federal Government
posted by Doug Obegi, 4/22/10 http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/dobegi/happy_earth_day_and_thank_you.html
I recently returned from two weeks of trial in the federal district
court in Fresno, on the validity ...

http://www.nrdc.org/earthday/

http://www.nrdc.org/

http://www.nrdc.org/earthday/

Today Earth Day is Family Day for Me

Annie Notthoff

California Advocacy Director, San Francisco office and Sacramento

Posted April 22, 2010 in Curbing Pollution , Living Sustainably ,
Solving Global Warming

This morning on my way to work in San Francisco, I joined 50 other
people on a street corner in Oakland, just around the corner from
where both my mother and father grew up and down the street from where
both my children were born. So it was a bit of old home week for me.
As a fifth generation Californian I’ve always been proud of the way
our state has been on the cutting edge of pragmatic and effective
environmental policy, but its citizens are facing a dire threat on
Earth Day, 2010: an assault by Texas oil refiners on AB 32, the
state’s clean energy law.

Valero Energy Corp. and a consortium of Texas-based refiners have
pumped more than $2 million into a signature-gathering campaign to
place an initiative on the November ballot that would delay or prevent
full implementation of AB 32. This landmark legislation is creating
thousands of new jobs and stimulating new technologies in the emerging
clean energy sector while simultaneously cutting emissions of
greenhouse gases.

Valero’s campaign – cynically and inaccurately tagged the California
Jobs Initiative -- is a bald-faced ploy to maximize petroleum industry
profits by scotching the drive toward cleaner, greener fuels. But
Californians are not fooled: they have responded to this stealth
campaign by Oil Patch bigwigs with outrage. Earth Day protests were
held at Valero gas stations in Oakland, Sacramento, San Diego, Los
Angeles and Santa Barbara. And this is just the beginning. Clean
energy advocates will continue this fight to Election Day.

Make no mistake-- there is no bigger threat to economic growth, job
creation and clean air than this effort by Texas oil companies to kill
AB 32, our roadmap to a clean energy future. Californians know they
can have both a thriving economy and a healthy environment. The
protests we saw on Earth Day are telling the company they can’t sneak
this ‘Dirty Energy Initiative’ through. We’re ready and eager for
battle – and when we get through with these carpet baggers, they’re
going to wish they’d stayed in Texas and concentrated on their
barbecue recipes.

According to a recent Field Poll, support for AB 32 remains strong,
with 58 percent of residents backing the legislation. Many of the
state’s major newspapers – including the San Jose Mercury News, the
Sacramento Bee and the Santa Rosa Press Democrat – already have run
editorials blasting the Valero initiative. There’s a very good
reason for this: Valero has a long and lamentable record of pursuing
short-term profits over the public good. The Political Economy
Research Institute at the University of Massachusetts deemed the firm
one of the worst polluters in the United States, and in 2005 the
company was hit with $711 million in fines by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency.

Contrary to Valero’s invidious claims, AB 32 is a boon to California.
According to a recent University of California analysis, the
legislation will create about 112,000 new jobs and generate $20
billion for the state’s economy. Additionally, the bill sets the
standard for the nation in reducing harmful carbon emissions and puts
California at the vanguard of energy research and development. AB 32
points the way to the technology we’ll need to meet 21st Century
economic and environmental challenges. Valero’s initiative does just
the opposite, harkening to bankrupt technologies, shrinking job and
energy sectors and a polluted planet. We’re getting the word out—
don’t sign this initiative. It’s a stalking horse for Big Oil and
expensive, dirty energy. If it does get on the ballot, don’t vote for
it.

Tags:40earthday, AB32, airpollution, annienotthoff, california,
globalwarming, valero

Comments (Add yours)

Kevin Rice — Apr 22 2010 10:39 PM
Not only am I signing and collecting signatures for this petition, I
am voting for it as well.

I am not "Big Oil". I am a Californian.

Enough eco-religious enviro-whactivism. It's cost billions already.
The reasonable balance point has been exceeded with AB32, and it will
be suspended.

http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/anotthoff/today_earth_day_is_family_day.html

Earth Day Water Solutions Can Create More Livable Communities

David Beckman
Senior Attorney & Director, Water Program, Los Angeles

Posted April 22, 2010 in Curbing Pollution , Green Enterprise , Living
Sustainably

Yesterday I blogged about the issue of how well-suited the Clean Water
Act is today, forty or so years after it was enacted, to address
modern water pollution problems—namely polluted runoff. Today I want
to highlight the solutions that exist today to solve our most pressing
water pollution problems. In 2010, “green infrastructure,” a
collection of approaches which collectively make built urban
environments function from a hydrological perspective more like the
natural environment, come as close to “win-win” solutions as we are
likely to find. Collecting runoff and infiltrating into the ground
or collecting and reusing it onsite solves a range of problems and
creates, literally, greener and more attractive communities.

In the West (and increasingly in other parts of the country suffering
water shortages), these techniques create low-cost, low-energy water
supplies, and hedge against drought and climate change. NRDC has
completed a report with researchers at the Bren School of
Environmental Science & Management at the University of California,
Santa Barbara that illustrates the broad range of social benefits that
green infrastructure can create.

Our report, entitled “A Clear Blue Future: How Greening California
Cities Can Address Water Resources and Climate Challenges in the 21st
Century,” reveals that widespread implementation of low impact
development (LID) in a few major regions in California can have a wide
range of positive impacts. By infiltrating and retaining water
onsite, it can “create” enough water for 2 to 3 million people. By
reducing at the margin the massive energy input needed to move water
within the state, LID can save enough electricity for a city of 96,000
people. By reducing energy consumption it can create corresponding
reductions of CO2 by an amount equivalent to 90,000 cars.

NRDC is focusing its clean water work on green infrastructure
solutions because we are convinced that these solutions offer a
constructive pathway that all reasonable stakeholders—
environmentalists, cities, developers, and others—should be able to
agree is worth pursuing. For its part, EPA needs to seize the
moment, help quantify the benefits of LID nationally, and identify and
remove barriers to its mainstream use in the U.S. And the good news
is that a plan for controlling water pollution in the Nation’s
capitol, released by EPA today, suggests that in important ways the
agency is moving in a positive direction.

The availability today of attractive solutions to the runoff problem
can soften debates about Clean Water Act requirements, such as those I
blogged about yesterday. Once you see a greener city—green streets,
roofs, less hardscape and more soft, shaded by trees, and cooler—you
don’t need to consult the law books to say, “I want that.”

Tags:40earthday, brenschool, cleanwateract, climatechange, EPA,
greeninfrastructure, llowimpactdevelopment, runoff, sustainability,
waterpermit, waterpollution

http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/dbeckman/earth_day_water_solutions_foun.html

Home › Contributors › Doug Obegi › Happy Earth Day (and Thank You) to
the Scientists Working for the Federal Government

Doug Obegi's BlogHappy Earth Day (and Thank You) to the Scientists
Working for the Federal Government

Doug Obegi
Staff Attorney, Western Water Project, San Francisco
Blog | AboutPosted April 22, 2010 in Saving Wildlife and Wild Places
I recently returned from two weeks of trial in the federal district
court in Fresno, on the validity of Endangered Species Act protections
for salmon, steelhead, delta smelt, and other fish in California’s Bay-
Delta estuary. The plaintiffs (Westlands Water District and other
water users) had sought an emergency injunction to prevent
implementation of the protections for endangered salmon and steelhead,
but the Court denied their motion, concluding that the Plaintiffs had
not demonstrated that they were likely to be able to prove that the
biological opinion failed to use the best available science, and
further concluding that the harm suffered by the commercial fishermen
and the Winnemem Wintu Tribe who are defending the biological opinion,
was “no less” than that suffered by agricultural communities in the
Central Valley. The plaintiffs’ motions to prevent implementation of
other protections for endangered species later this spring are still
pending before the Court, with a ruling expected in the next several
weeks.

What most impressed me at the hearing was the testimony of the
government scientists (from NMFS, USFWS, and USBR) who had worked
nights and weekends, toiling in near anonymity, to develop these plans
to protect and sustain salmon and other endangered fish in the Delta,
while attempting to minimize impacts on water supply. They went above
and beyond legal requirements by subjecting their work to numerous
independent peer reviews. The most recent of these peer reviews – now
totaling at least five reviews by outside scientists, which have
generally confirmed the analysis and conclusions of these biologists –
was conducted by the prestigious National Research Council of the
National Academy of Sciences, which concluded that the protections in
the biological opinions generally were “scientifically justified.”
They made personal sacrifices in order to be in court for a week or
more, so that they could testify in Court about the need for these
protections in the imperiled Bay-Delta estuary. They were cross
examined for hours by many of the 25 or so lawyers for the water users
who attended the trial – most of whom make ten times or more money
than they do – and answered questions honestly and with humility.
They squared off against experts who were paid up to $350 per hour for
their testimony, one of whom will receive as much as $300,000 of
ratepayer money for his testimony and work in these cases, far more
than any of these government biologists. Despite these seemingly
uneven odds, the Court at one point described hearing the testimony of
the competing experts as a “prize fight. Because it was blow for
blow.”

All too often we think of the federal government as a giant behemoth,
populated by nameless, faceless bureaucrats. But this trial reminded
me that government is made up of individuals, most of whom are working
hard in service of the public – that would be you and me – and with
very limited resources. They don’t make the big bucks. They don’t get
their names in lights. But these agency biologists and scientists
truly try to follow the law and do the right thing for the
environment. And without their hard work – issuing permits to reduce
air and water pollution, to protect endangered species and wildlife,
to sustainably manage our fisheries and wild lands – America would be
a heck of a lot worse off.

And that’s why I was so disappointed when lawyers for the plaintiffs
accused these government scientists of acting in “bad faith,” of
intentionally suppressing science in order to intentionally cause harm
to the Plaintiffs, and of acting in concert with the “agency and
academic research complex.” “Bad faith” occurs when political
appointees personally profit from decisions that are supposed to be
made in the public’s interest. “Bad faith” is when science and
scientists are suppressed to achieve a more politically expedient
result. Cases of bad faith and political interference in scientific
decisions do occur, but these biological opinions are not such a
case. Quite the opposite: these biological opinions have been
reviewed by numerous scientific peer reviews, which have generally
validated these endangered species protections. And there has been
no evidence whatsoever presented in this case of political
interference, of any data or studies that were ignored or suppressed.
Such baseless allegations give the legal profession a bad name, and
deservedly so in this case.

As an environmental advocate, I disagree frequently with positions
taken by the government. Government employees hear my and others’
complaints constantly, and that won’t change. I will continue to
advocate for changes to better protect the fish and wildlife in
California's Bay-Delta, and to better manage and efficiently use our
finite water resources. But I also deeply respect the integrity, hard
work, and commitment of the men and women who serve as ecologists,
biologists, and scientists for the federal government – for our
government. And we simply don’t thank them enough for all of their
hard work.

So to all of you, Happy Earth Day, and thank you for helping to
protect our Nation's fisheries, public lands, and waters.

Tags:40earthday, baydelta, california, endangered, salmon, water,
waterprogram
permalinkcomments (3)trackback url
ShareThis(bookmark or email this entry)

Comments (Add yours)
Kevin Wattier — Apr 23 2010 10:48 AM
Doug:

I really enjoyed reading your article. Thank you for recognizing the
fine work of the men and women of the USFWS,NMFS and USBR.

concerned scientist — Apr 23 2010 01:06 PM
Now watch as these hard working scientific experts are pulled from
their projects and their teams disbanded because of powerful
politicians looking out for themselves.

Matt H — Apr 23 2010 02:16 PM
Thanks for this post. And thanks to the scientists who are protecting
our rivers and wildlife

http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/dobegi/happy_earth_day_and_thank_you.html

...and I am Sid Harth

Loading...