Discussion:
Indian-American Syndrome: Sid Harth
(too old to reply)
cogitoergosum
2010-06-09 21:52:39 UTC
Permalink
Indian-American Syndrome: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/2010/06/09/indian-american-syndrome-sid-harth/

The trouble with Indians in America is that they like to toot their
horns every time the opportunity presents. Not that I am against it.
Good for their souls. Poor rich Indians of America. If one relies on
news available on the internet
you are relying on the India related news version, specially tailored
and targeted to Indians in America. Just look at the advertisements.
They all refer to American or multinational companies dishing products
and services for such Indians.
That means, most of the real news or local news that interests fewer
readers is not presented.

The picture gets murkier, in news categories. Political news in Indian
newspapers, magazines and Indian TV channels can also be read and
searched. Some Indian newspapers can be accessed on their internet
versions. They don't filter news for
Indians in America. Some of them have sections devoted to overseas
Indians, Non Resident Indians. Such news is heavily loaded with
positive news. Crimes committed by NRIs are excluded but their real or
imaginary success stories are highlighted.
That is not criminal. Each newspaper has an editorial policy that
serves them well.

The trouble comes when claims of Indians in America, as per the narrow
definition of particular publication is challenged. Following article
about one Kamala Harris, African-American, not an Indian-American,
shows the Indian-American syndrome.

The article is innocuous. The discussion is devastating.

Kamla Harris wins Democratic nomination for attorney general
Last updated on: June 09, 2010 21:09 IST

Tags: Kamla Harris, University of California, San Francisco Attorney
General, National District Attorney's Association, Kamala Harris

Eminent Indian American activist Kamla Harris has won the Democratic
Party nomination for California attorney general, giving her a chance
to become the first woman to hold the office if she emerges victorious
in the November race.

Harris handsomely defeated six other rivals including Facebook
executive Chris Kelly, who had pumped in more than $12 million into
the primary elections held on Tuesday.

Daughter of an Indian mother and African American father, Harris is
currently the San Francisco Attorney General.

She faces Steve Cooley, the Los Angeles District Attorney General, in
the November elections, to replace Democratic Jerry Brown, who is
running for Governor.

If elected, Harris will be the first woman to hold the office of
Attorney General in California.

"We have a lot of work to do before November… but we are clear of
purpose, clear of mind. We believe in hard work, but we also believe
that it can be fun work. Let's celebrate tonight," she said in her
victory speech on Tuesday night.

In December 2003, Kamala Harris was elected as the first woman
district attorney in San Francisco's history, and as the first African
American woman and South Asian American woman in California to hold
the office.

She was overwhelmingly reelected to a second term in November 2007.

Born and raised in the East Bay, Kamala is the daughter of Shyamala
Gopalan, a Tamilian breast cancer specialist who traveled to the
United States from Chennai, to pursue her graduate studies at UC
Berkeley.

After attending public schools, her strong commitment to justice and
public service led her to Howard University, America's oldest
historically black university, and then to the University of
California, Hastings College of the Law.

Harris is the recipient of numerous awards.

California's largest legal newspaper, The Daily Journal, designated
Harris as one of the top 75 women litigators in California -- the only
elected official to receive that honour – as well as one of the top
100 lawyers in the state.

She was recognised as a 'Woman of Power' by the National Urban League
and received the Thurgood Marshall Award from the National Black
Prosecutors Association.

She has been featured on the Oprah [ Images ] Show and in Newsweek as
one of "America's 20 Most Powerful Women".

She was selected as one of 24 elected leaders from throughout the
country to serve as a Rodel Fellow with the Aspen Institute.

Additionally, Harris was elected to the board of directors of the
California District Attorneys Association and is a vice president of
the National District Attorney's Association.

Image: San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Devi Harris

© Copyright 2010 PTI.

Discussion Board

Showing 1-10 of total 12 messages

She is NOT Indian !!!!
by pyare mohan on Jun 10, 2010 01:40 AM | Hide replies

She is NOT Indian !!!!
Then why to publish such news. rediff jokers

She is not Indian
by Me on Jun 10, 2010 12:31 AM

If her father is an African American, she is an African American, not
an Indian American. Otherwise her father should have been Indian, or
should have had Indian citizenship or atleast she should have been
born in India. Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi are called Indians because
their father is an Indian. Same applies everywhere.

Am not taking off her achievements, but just stating her fact. If she
does something good for the Indian Americans, good for the people.
Thats all.

Re: She is not Indian
by biji george on Jun 10, 2010 12:38 AM
what a stupid answer, father or mother doesnt matter, if one of them
are indian they are called half indian or half american african.

Re: Re: She is not Indian
by Me on Jun 10, 2010 01:25 AM
Is it? I never saw anywhere that Rahul and Priyanka are called as half
Italian, or Katrina Kaif as half British, or Jackie Shroff as half
Belgian (not sure if Belgium, but certainly some European country),
Omar Abdullah (Kashmir CM) as half British etc. There is a big list of
celebrities in India where the mother is not an Indian. None of them
are called 'Half Indians', although biologically they are. In India,
we consider only the origin of the father.

Indians have this craze of finding out these people of Indian origin
who achieve some success in some other country, and then trumpets it
around. An Indra Nooyi or an Amartya Sen is another matter, as they
are real Indian people, even if they have some other citizenship now.

But pls stop trumpeting these people who has a mother or father of
Indian origin born in another country, and who have no idea of what
India is.

Praise them for their achievements, not because of some Indian
connection they have.

Indian??
by sambamoorthy jambunathan on Jun 10, 2010 12:27 AM

What is your South Asian background?
My mother, Shyamala Gopalan Harris, was born in Chennai (formerly
Madras), India. She was the daughter of a diplomat who traveled the
world as a government official and didn't think twice about sending
his 20 year-old daughter to America to pursue her passion and talent
for science, specifically endocrinology and the complex mechanisms of
cancer.
When I was a child, every two or three years we traveled to India to
visit my mother's family. My earliest memories are of walking along
the beach with my grandfather and his friends - retired public
servants who had spent their careers trying to make India a better
place.
My grandfather would talk to me about the importance of applying an
unflinching ethical lens to every single problem you face. He was
Joint Secretary for the Indian government, a post akin to our Deputy
Secretary of State, and he had numerous fascinating assignments,
including several years as an advisor to the government of Zambia in
Africa.

Kamla bai....
by kukku on Jun 09, 2010 11:28 PM

hahahaHAAAA

Nikki Haley could be South Carolina's first female Governor
by Loan Shark on Jun 09, 2010 11:10 PM

Formerly Randhawa, she finished at the top in Republican primaries.

Message awaiting moderator review.

hi
by kgkjgjhfkjkjhkgg on Jun 09, 2010 10:52 PM

nice site logic funda dot com

hahahahahah
by Sharique sami on Jun 09, 2010 10:27 PM | Hide replies

rediff u r such a nonsence, up to how long u publish this crap.

she is never called herself indian and u r beating the drum of indian
american.

there r no provision of dual nationality in our constitution.

either american or indian.

go to hell

Re: hahahahahah
by Ram Online on Jun 09, 2010 11:29 PM
Its nothing to do with her nationality. In US, its very common to
identify people with their ethnicity or roots. For eg: Obama is
identified as African American or Kenyan American. It does not mean he
has dual citizenship in Kenya or in any African country. You hear
words like Jewish American, Irish, Italian etc even though they never
had dual citizenship.

Fyi, rediff is read by Indian Americans in USA. This report is to
serve Indian Amricans. Of course Indians in India are proud to see the
success of Indian migrants and thier descandants. India will have
friends in America strenthn ties between two countries. India having
good ties and strong bond with world's only super power is a good
thing for India. It serves Indian interests well.

Re: Re: hahahahahah
by wangdu on Jun 10, 2010 12:08 AM
What Roots!!! Do you belive that Jay Leno is known at all in Italy
b'coz of his Italian roots. Let's cut the crap. Jewish is American is
known for its strong lobbying power. Italians are known for its
gangsters. African Americans are known for its crime/poverty. Indians
are known for its BPO jobs (nothing else). Pakistanis are known for
its Taliban links and so on.. So stop beating the drums about roots.
America is country dominated by 73% white.
Rest can go to hell..
Even the so called Indian Nikki Haley was abused (racial slur) along
with Prsident Obama by one of the GOP White candidate

Re: hahahahahah
by C M on Jun 09, 2010 11:03 PM
You r such a pathetic looser...Look at her achievements...Dont you get
an iota of inspiration from it...?? Have u heard something called "
being positive" Whther constitution has provision of dual citizen or
not thats differ Q but Having narrow minded stupid citizens likw you
is always burden to any country ...All the best for growing up, if you
will

Re: Re: hahahahahah
by rakesh jani on Jun 09, 2010 11:23 PM
you are a pathetic loser, She is by no means indian At all, She is the
born In US and probebly never been to Inda, How is she an Indian
american. She is Just American.

Re: Re: Re: hahahahahah
by C M on Jun 09, 2010 11:51 PM
Idiot in US ppl are proud of their roots, the wordn
IndianAmerican ...just tells abt her roots..No one can take it away
from her...

Re: Re: Re: hahahahahah
by Loan Shark on Jun 09, 2010 11:28 PM
by definition, being born to an Indian parent makes her Indian
american ... it's doesn't matter if she has been to India or to Africa
or to Iraq or japan or newzealand

Re: Re: hahahahahah
by Gopal Elayavalli on Jun 09, 2010 11:28 PM
Dear CM,

No offense. Just my 2 cents.

Achievements apart, lets get couple of facts clarified. She touted her
African American roots all along her Political campaign.

Look at her past relationship history and there will emerge a clearer
picture of how an intelligent lady is using the government machinery /
people for her rise on the political ladder.

Even in the S.Carolina where Niki Haley ( nee Nitu Randhawa ) is going
great guns, she would have been a non-starter had she not converted to
Christianity.

I have initially amazed at how organized institutions in America are.
Look thro it, they are probably more corrupt than the one's in India
and have intriguing terminology to label the same.

The clear difference : Aam / Aadmi is not put to difficulties for
petty things like birth / death certificates etc.

Best

Message awaiting moderator review.

Re: Re: Re: hahahahahah
by Loan Shark on Jun 09, 2010 11:33 PM
quote "She touted her African American roots all along her Political
campaign. "

see, her motther was a tamilian ... almost African

Re: Re: Re: hahahahahah
by Loan Shark on Jun 09, 2010 11:31 PM
quote "she would have been a non-starter had she not converted to
Christianity. "

if converting to chr1st1anity makes you eligible for being a governor,
then one should

religion is a very personal choice .... what your parents selected for
you, may not be the best anyways ... no?

Re: Re: Re: Re: hahahahahah
by Gopal Elayavalli on Jun 09, 2010 11:53 PM
Loan Shark,

I didn't mean to say Conversion alone will get you the coveted post.
But beyond your talents, contacts you need this tag also to carry
futher in this country.

Compared to that don't you think things are little better despite the
odds ?

Best

Re: Re: Re: hahahahahah
by C M on Jun 09, 2010 11:57 PM
Gopal..I am not comparing corruption in Ind or America as u
wrote ...And i m not saying anything abt her relationships etc (Are we
social police...??) All i am saying the lady has achievements..ppl
should read it ratehr than just whine about Indo american, only
afroamerican stuff...I am sayign read news positively.. is it that
difficult..?? Relationships, religions all are personal things no one
should dictate or judge othr person based on his/her choices...

Re: Re: Re: Re: hahahahahah
by Loan Shark on Jun 10, 2010 12:08 AM
excellent ... totally agree

do not
by chintan jhunjhunwala on Jun 09, 2010 10:06 PM

cannot understand why these news items are published about indian
origin diaspora who have given up their indian citizenship for other
nationalities.least interested in their achievements . is rediff
trying to tell us to give up or indian citizenship for some foreign
one if we want to achieve something.achivements of indians in india
seems to hold no value.

Re: do not
by Partha Choudhury on Jun 09, 2010 10:17 PM
These messages are for the diaspora... you re welcome to skip it...

Re: Re: do not
by Fluffy Kumar on Jun 09, 2010 10:43 PM
As a Diaspora- I find such news dull- boring. Who gioves a rat's
Asssss about these idiots turned politicians? Nothing changes- more of
the same.

Re: Re: do not
by chintan jhunjhunwala on Jun 09, 2010 10:23 PM
next time certainly will.

Re: Re: Re: do not
by Loan Shark on Jun 09, 2010 10:27 PM
no, you won't

LOL

Re: do not
by C M on Jun 09, 2010 11:06 PM
Two men saw Outta Bars , one saw Mud one saw stars...You are wht you
choose...Rediff didnt tell to change anyone citizenship or
anything..If you U do something great rediff will publish that
too...Quesition is Will you...?? You dont even aconowledge otehrs
achievements...Your name shoud be chinta rather than chintan LoL

Indian American
by siddharth on Jun 09, 2010 10:05 PM

How can she called as Indian American. Why this is a news in india

Re: Indian American
by C M on Jun 09, 2010 11:09 PM
Becoz one word specifies about ehr present citizenship status and
other her roots...Did u read the rest of the artical or just clung
onto her IndianAmerican or whatevr stuff

Re: Indian American
by Kumar M on Jun 09, 2010 10:13 PM
u r right. She's an American. Why Indian American?

Re: Re: Indian American
by this that on Jun 09, 2010 10:21 PM
WHY ARE YOU READING THIS?

Re: Indian American
by Anwar Ali on Jun 09, 2010 10:29 PM
I agree. If Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi are both considered
Indians because of birth and having an Indian father, then howcome
this dame is considered Indian American, she should be called African
American. She was not born in India, never LIVED in India, her father
was an African American. She should not be considered Indian American
at all. She is only involved as an Indian American activist because
she wants their loyal Democratic votes since most Indians vote for the
Democratic party. Please don't call her Indian.

Re: Re: Indian American
by rakesh jani on Jun 09, 2010 11:26 PM
Rightly said Mr. Anwar.

Re: Re: Indian American
by Loan Shark on Jun 09, 2010 10:49 PM
She is half Indian, half African and completely American

get the math?

Re: Re: Indian American
by kamlesh wadhwani on Jun 09, 2010 11:17 PM
Your are right Anwar.

Re: Re: Indian American
by C M on Jun 09, 2010 11:10 PM
Most Indians vote for Democratic party...?? Thats not true...

Re: Re: Re: Indian American
by rakesh jani on Jun 09, 2010 11:26 PM
I am a Indian-American and I don't vote for democrates.

What a crap news !
by Mohammed Riyaz on Jun 09, 2010 01:53 PM

Rediff news priority level has now a days stooped to all time low
level. The website keeps publishing news not at all relevent to India.

Re: What a crap news !
by this that on Jun 09, 2010 10:21 PM
DO NOT READ THIS IF YOU DON'T WANT TO.

Re: What a crap news !
by chandrashekhar iyer on Jun 09, 2010 09:41 PM
THE THIRD GENERATION FROM THE THIRD PARTY IN THE THIRD COUNTRY !! WHY
THE HELL ALL THE SHIT BEING NOTICED BY REDIFF AND PUBLISHED !! AND
THAT TOO JUST FOR INDIA ! WHEN WILL BE REDIFF BECOME PROFESSIONAL!!

Re: What a crap news !
by sun vin on Jun 09, 2010 09:22 PM
Totally totally agree man. We always try to take solace in things
which are completely irrelevant to our social problems.

Re: Re: What a crap news !
by Loan Shark on Jun 09, 2010 10:26 PM
solace? what solace did you get from this news? and if you did get
some solace, the news was worth it. no?

Re: Re: Re: What a crap news !
by sun vin on Jun 09, 2010 10:39 PM
What the heck are you doing here??? I don't see you today defending
congress when it is proven killing 15000 indian citizens.

Re: Re: Re: Re: What a crap news !
by Loan Shark on Jun 09, 2010 10:51 PM
15000 in a billion ... who is counting?

LOL

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What a crap news !
by sun vin on Jun 10, 2010 12:22 AM
you don't count if it is done by congress party.

Re: Re: What a crap news !
by C M on Jun 09, 2010 11:12 PM
Are u social worker or something..?? then go do social work..But u
wont be even good social worker..you cant appreciate someones
achievement wht the heck you are talking abt social problems...

Re: What a crap news !
by Loan Shark on Jun 09, 2010 10:25 PM
rediff is viewed all over the world, not just in India

She is of Indian origin and that makes the news suitable for rediff.

No one is putting a gun to your head to read this news, but not only
will you waste time in reading it, but waste more time in commenting
on it, and then waste even more time reading all the responses ....
LOL

Re:What a crap news !
by Mohammed Riyaz on Jun 09, 2010 01:53 PM

Rediff news priority level has now a days stooped to all time low
level. The website keeps publishing news not at all relevent to India.

Re: What a crap news !
by this that on Jun 09, 2010 10:21 PM
DO NOT READ THIS IF YOU DON'T WANT TO.

Re: What a crap news !
by chandrashekhar iyer on Jun 09, 2010 09:41 PM
THE THIRD GENERATION FROM THE THIRD PARTY IN THE THIRD COUNTRY !! WHY
THE HELL ALL THE SHIT BEING NOTICED BY REDIFF AND PUBLISHED !! AND
THAT TOO JUST FOR INDIA ! WHEN WILL BE REDIFF BECOME PROFESSIONAL!!

Re: What a crap news !
by sun vin on Jun 09, 2010 09:22 PM
Totally totally agree man. We always try to take solace in things
which are completely irrelevant to our social problems.

Re: Re: What a crap news !
by Loan Shark on Jun 09, 2010 10:26 PM
solace? what solace did you get from this news? and if you did get
some solace, the news was worth it. no?

Re: Re: Re: What a crap news !
by sun vin on Jun 09, 2010 10:39 PM
What the heck are you doing here??? I don't see you today defending
congress when it is proven killing 15000 indian citizens.

Re: Re: Re: Re: What a crap news !
by Loan Shark on Jun 09, 2010 10:51 PM
15000 in a billion ... who is counting?

LOL

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What a crap news !
by sun vin on Jun 10, 2010 12:22 AM
you don't count if it is done by congress party.

Re: Re: What a crap news !
by C M on Jun 09, 2010 11:12 PM
Are u social worker or something..?? then go do social work..But u
wont be even good social worker..you cant appreciate someones
achievement wht the heck you are talking abt social problems...

Re: What a crap news !
by Loan Shark on Jun 09, 2010 10:25 PM
rediff is viewed all over the world, not just in India

She is of Indian origin and that makes the news suitable for rediff.

No one is putting a gun to your head to read this news, but not only
will you waste time in reading it, but waste more time in commenting
on it, and then waste even more time reading all the responses ....
LOL

Bull s h i t
by Nellore Nagaiah on Jun 09, 2010 01:26 PM | Hide replies

Let us stop battling out arm pits about some one just because she has
an Indian sounding name. What she does in US or where that country
goes is none of our business. Neither does it inspire anybody.

Re: Bull s h i t
by C M on Jun 09, 2010 11:15 PM
Neitehr does it inspire anybody...?? dude do u know wht inspire
means...?? Looks liek u just a movie lover and actor follower ..So
funny ppl can appreciate ACTING but can not appreciate real
achievements...

Re: Bull s h i t
by JAKE on Jun 09, 2010 01:36 PM
Are you the relative of that famous yesteryear Telugu filmstar
Chittoor Nagaih? Who acted in that old classic 'Vemanna'

Re: Re: Bull s h i t
by Nellore Nagaiah on Jun 09, 2010 01:42 PM
I would be blessed if I were the relative of Chittoor Nagaiah. I am
not his relative.

I adore his movies Vemana, Tyagaiah and others. He was an acting
legend and a great human being.

http://news.rediff.com/report/2010/jun/09/kamala-harris-leads-in-attorney-generals-race.htm

See also:

veni vidi vici: Sid Harth
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.indian.marathi/browse_thread/thread/8995c57b38f7584d#

...and I am Sid Harth
cogitoergosum
2010-06-10 01:10:49 UTC
Permalink
Indian-American Syndrome: Sid Harth
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/2010/06/09/indian-american-syndrome-sid-harth/
http://navanavonmilita.wordpress.com/2010/06/09/indian-american-syndrome-sid-harth-2/

Hindutva garbage, usually, comes from RSS headquarters at Jhandewalan,
Delhi. It is served by BJP Hotdogs like L K Advani and his ilk. It is
never interpreted, defined properly or discussed in fair arguments/
discussions. Either you are for it or you are a secular scumbag.
Hindutva, simply mean "Indian." Why so much fuss made about being
Indian? The fact that Hindutva is used as a rod, if not a lightening
rod to beat up upon minority population. At the time of partition,
Muslims of India were free to go to Pakistan. Some did and the others
did not. Those who stayed behind were happy to be a minority group.
This fact is never acknowledged by Hindutva chanting Hindu hoodlums.

Nobody asked Hindus to migrate to America. They did so on their own.
Yet, such migrant Hindu diaspora still harbor hatred for Indian
minority and support communal and fascist party like BJP. Why would
Indian-Americans worry about India, Indian politics, Indian interests
when they voluntarily accepted American, canadian, British, Australian
nationality? If they could enjoy the freedom of speech feature,
freedom of association feature, freedom of religion feature of their
respective countries, why should Indian Muslim not do the same? Lot
has been made about Indian Muslims waving Pakistani flags and dancing
in the streets whenever pakistani cricket wins a match. The same
spirit
is shown by Indian-Americans whenever Indian achievement is at hand.
never mind, they are Americans and show some respect and admiration to
American problems, achievements or simply American foreign policy.
They don't. This is a selfish, slave mentality. Filthy rich Indian-
Americans give not a penny to the American charity organization. This
same lot pore millions of dollars to the saffron projects without even
asking for the evidence of proper use. Some of this money goes
straight to fund political purposes. Shame upon you, Indian-Americans.
If you bozos like India so much, why not go back to that Hindu Hell-
hole,called Bharat?

Hindu Lobby
26-12-2007

U Mahesh Prabhu

'In a country that prides itself on its religious diversity and its
secular constitution, may see the rise of Modi and his pro Hindu
agenda as a terrifying chapter of intolerance. They say he is
dangerous fire brand and too comfortable inciting the politics of
hatred and violence.' States Sam Dolonick in his article published in
the recent issue of 'The Economist'. Besides holding Narendra Modi
solely responsible for the riots of 2002 he also makes the baseless
and completely concocted allegation that 'The RSS was influenced by
1930s German fascism."

It's not that he doesn't acknowledge the unparalleled achievements of
Gujarat Chief Minister. In fact he does when he says 'Modi has
attracted more than 20% of the India's total investment of $69 billion
last year' but he makes a foul attempt of trying to make it irrelevant
by adding 'But despite his achievement, for may of India's 1.1 billion
people – 14 per cent of who are Muslims – Modi will always be defined
by the anti-Muslim violence…' The 'cause of hate' against Modi is,
frankly speaking, owing to his Rastriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS)
background, the organization which is today whipping boy of the
mainline media and, so called, 'secular' organizations.

'The Economist says is influenced by the Fascist ideology. Need I say
how concocted is this idea, i.e. of RSS being influenced by Fascist?
Absolute bunk! RSS is, in fact, in response to the brutal history of
Islamic Conquest, that which American Historian Mr. Will Durant called
'the bloodiest in history'. The current aspersions against the RSS
mostly by the media, Congress and Communist followers to the effect
that it is a 'communal organization, most dangerous to the country
than even communism' are a complete travesty of fact.

The Ideology of Hindutva which is propounded by the RSS, and followed
by Modi, offers a room for all minorities on a condition of their
whole hearted submission to the supreme value of the nation in their
lives. The nation is a vehicle of universal truths and is not an
entity above them. This is no chauvinist nationalism of the kind
associated with Mussolini or Hitler. It teaches loyalty and devotion
to the national society in the national homeland under the image of
the mother. The unity and solidarity of the motherland taught to claim
the highest sacrificial devotion from the citizen body.

Whoever enters into this spirit of devotion to the nation as a
spiritual unity of the land and people are Indians or Hindus in
essence. The mental commitment should be final and supreme. The
Muslims and Christians have perfect freedom of worship, so long as
they do not destroy and undermine the faith and symbolism of the
national society. They should subordinate their exclusive claims for
final and sole revelation vis-à-vis the national society. They could
bear witness to their faith in life and speech but they should not
indulge in any unfair and unspiritual modes of conversions. The
national identity requires that the whole of the national society,
including minorities, should share in the best values of the past.
They should appreciate national Dharma – the code of ethical
principles and ways of life. The cultural history, they should all
give their mind and hearts whole-heartedly to an appreciation of the
best types.

Rama and Krishna may be appreciated by non-Hindus as secular examples
while the Hindus will see them as full spiritual exemplars, or
avatars. Now considering this ideology, I wonder as to what is so
'dangerous' about it, so as to look at it dangerous than communism? I
would be delighted if the people who put in such allegation help me to
understand. Be that as it may. Let's consider the following case: In
the late 1980s, Abdul Latif was the underworld king of Gujarat. Later,
he became Dawood Ibrahim's business manager in the state and was one
of criminal dons to make what now seems to be the shameless transition
from organized crime to terrorism. Latif was also the suspect in the
Mumbai blasts case of 1993; the RDX and other explosive devices for
that operation landed, remember, on the Gujarat coast. In November
1997, Latif was killed in an encounter with the Ahmadabad police.

Many of the Latif's cohorts were put under watch. One of them was his
driver, apparently responsible for, in one daring move, hiding a huge
cache of weapons meant for terrorist groups. This was part of the
consignment that had arrived before Mumbai blasts of 1993. Latif was
under surveillance so his driver had hidden the arms in a well in his
(the driver's) native village near Ujjain. The driver eventually faced
over 50 cases including some under the National Security Act; He was
arrested at various stages, by the Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh police,
but avoided conviction. When not facilitating terror networks, he was
engaged in extortion rackets in Rajasthan, acting almost certainly on
behalf of others. His principals, the police believe, may be linked to
terror funding groups. The Latif's driver's name was Sohrabuddin
Sheikh. Yes this was the same Sohrabuddin for whose encounter Modi was
being scrutinized by his political rivals and the media. 'A
nationalist is being harassed for having exterminated a terrorist!' by
the media that calls itself 'secular' and 'nationalist'.

What a pity. If you may observe in detail of the propaganda carried on
by the Media in Gujarat and in other part of the world, at the same
time, you would find that: While Dr. Haneef, a doctor who flew from
Glasgow in UK to Australia under mysterious circumstances, and who was
arrested by the Australian authorities was given such a terrific
support by the media as if they were convinced and simply wanted to
convince the world that he wasn't a terrorist. It may be noted that
simply because he was allowed to return to India on benefit of doubt
the media almost declared his victory as theirs, before even he was
tried in the court of law. Our Prime Minister, Mr. Manmohan Singh,
went on record to say that he 'lost his sleep' for Haneef. On contrary
to this when ethnic Hindus in Malaysia made a peaceful demonstration
against the destruction of their temples by pro-Islamic-fundamentalist
regime and were sabotaged ruthlessly and put to jail, our very own
Karunanidhi's grievances, put forth the Central Government, were
simply brushed aside, he was asked to lay off the issue rather
ruthlessly. Media made little publicity of the issue. When it\'s a
question of Hindus getting unfair treatment in a Muslim majority
region, the 'civil, sophisticated and articulate' Muslim intellectuals
take refuge in the statement that it's a matter concerning a foreign
country. But when it\'s a question regarding a cartoon or a fatwa for
beheading a writer, they say - we are a global Ummah, anything
happening anywhere to Muslims is our common concern! All big lies and
a bigger hypocrisy traded in the name of a religion. So much for their
hypocrisy! But why is it so? Let's go in to a bit detail. When Muslims
are in trouble there is a cry of intolerance from the whole of the
Islamic world led by the Arabs.

The Pope cries foul when there is problem facing Christians.
Communists in India are supported by their comrades in China. But why
is it that none cries or express even a word of concern when Hindus
are in trouble? Today thousands of Kashmiri pundits, who were driven
out of their homes by Jihadi Muslims after torturing them and even
raping the women, are living as refugees in their own country. No
media cares for them. Instead more special privileges are given to the
Kashmir as an incentive and they continue to play lame politics of
'Azad Kashmir' (read Independent Kashmir) with Indian Government. Our
forces who risk their lives are blamed and abused for unproven
allegations. Recently, in Kashmir, an Army Jawan was stripped off and
made to walk nude in the public for attempting to rape a woman.

Is it so? Then why is it that the same people were sitting so silently
when those terrorists were killing and raping their people? Why didn't
they ever boycotted them and gave a similar treatment? Why doesn't a
Maulvi, anywhere in India, issue a fatwa against a Jihadi terrorist?
No answers. But that is understandable. The pure hypocrisy, of the
Muslim Clergy and Politicians, is the answer. But why is the media
sitting mum? Why aren't they speaking? Have you ever thought of a
reason? I did. The reason is because Hindus don't have a strong Lobby
of their own. If you take the case of Israel, you will find that
though it is a small land they continue to live against all odds
surrounded by their enemies from all the directions with rightful
support of Americans. Americans are under obligation to support Israel
because Jews, who also form a majority in Israel, control American
Economy.

Palestinians though haven't been anywhere successful to have a
worthwhile economy for themselves and having spend six decades in
building a legacy of hatred and violence continue to gain 'sympathy'
and 'support' from the Media as a result of the financial expenditure
by the Arab Lobby Supported by Arab Nations. When Christians are
persecuted in Pakistan Pope cries foul and American along bring in
their pressure to put a halt on it. But what is the case with Hindus?
Who are they to look for? As Arabs for the Muslims, Vatican for the
Christian and Israel for the Jews who is for Hindus? It's sad but true
that Hindus have none to look far. The only Hindu country, Nepal, is
today under the clutches of Communists, with its King virtually in
exile. India has, what it is proudly called, a 'Free Press' that which
is run by private organization without governmental controls. We have
series of Television News Channels in various languages. And not a
single one ever clarifies its source of income. They never specify who
funds them in their websites do they? Yet they have with them millions
of dollars. Where did this money come from? You must agree with me
that a majority of funding comes from international sources. But why
would any organization invest in a media organization? Yes it would be
for profitability, if you say it just like that. But there is more
than profitability, don't you think? Every journalist has with him/her
an inclination towards the Arab or the American or the European world.
Don't they? Isn't it possible then that they also subscribe to
ideologies of that part of the world? Certainly they will, and beyond
doubt. So if they have with them an ideological inclination then it is
very much possible that they would have hardly any chance to criticize
those people who are of interest to their principals. So when you have
so many Medias everyone is certain to have one kind of the ideology or
the other, except Hindu, represented. Thus the only favorite whipping
boy available is the RSS and its allied organizations. Isn't it so? So
there you are. These different lobbies have a phenomenal financial
power. The Jews gain their financial power, as said before, through
the various business enterprises that are vital for American Economy
including the press. Jews are said to be controlling the American
Economy virtually.

Muslim Lobby led by Arabs gain their financial muscle through petro
economy, where billions of dollars are earned by them almost without
any efforts and also invested in Global Terrorist endeavors. Since
true journalistic spirits exists hardly anywhere in the modern day,
media corporations are exclusively concentrated on financial
profitability. Given this it's not a great deal to make these Lobbies
to run the propaganda of their kind in their supported Medias. And
given there isn't any Lobby for the Hindutva faction; they are to be
the easy target of such propaganda. Won't you agree? This is high time
for Hindus to organize an internationally influential Hindu Lobby. Do
you think that it is difficult to form one? Certainly not! Consider
this: When NDA government had organized 'Pravasi Bharatiya Divas'
there were so many Non Resident Indians, most of whom were Hindus who
had expressed their interest to be of some use to their land. When,
after Pokharan II, India was showered with various international
sanctions, let us never forget it was our fellow NRI's who came to the
rescue by subscribing to Yashwanth Sinha's, then Finance Minister's,
Resurgent India Bonds. Before NDA regime was over India had with it a
Foreign Exchange in excess of $100 billion. Doesn't this portray the
willingness of our Diaspora? The only thing that would be needed is
desire, first, followed by unrelenting determination. Simply put
'Creating a Pro Hindu Lobby is not an option… but a sheer necessity.'

The author is the Editor-in-Chief of Aseemaa: Journal for National
Resurgence.
The views expressed here are those of the writer and not necessarily
of expressindia.com

http://blogs.expressindia.com/showblogdetails.php?contentid=254456

BP and Hindutva
07-07-2009
Print Email Bookmark To Editor Post Comments

Sharrayu Aroskar

I have been following the BJP quiet regularly in the media. There was
a sizeable population who wanted BJP to be in power for intellect and
integrity reasons. However, the rule was not destined to be in hand
for next five years. Never the less BJP has emerged as a largest
Opposition party and has a myriad contribution to make to influence
the government policy decisions positively. BJP supporters in India
and living abroad have been waiting since the results for the BJP top
brass meeting and lessons thus learnt from introspection.

The media had BJP "atma-chintan" meeting on beat. Some did the job
genuinely others either wanted to paint it black or gather news of
street side gossip quality. Of the statements that came first from the
print media, I was surprised to read one that stated "BJP would re-
cast "Hindutva” Knowing the quality of journalism in this country in
recent election times, I was waiting for the prints of speeches given
by L.K. Advani and Rajnath Singh. It was good to see how BJP supported
cultural nationalism.

Ever since I opened my mind and head to politics the word Hindutva was
always talked of as a brand that is pro Hindu and anti Muslim. The
word to ears also sounds like Hindu extremism these days. I have heard
young college girls talk of voting for Congress because BJP is all
good except for too much of Hindutva in them. Even educated urban
population both settled in India and abroad abhors this word or
translates it into Hindu communalism and hates the party or
organization that uses it. Naturally its the BJP and RSS that bear the
popular brunt.

It is surprising to see how cultural nationalism was tainted by
handful of politicians. More surprising is how the people in general
have accepted it and even more surprising is the irresponsible print
and visual media that leaves the cultural pride of this country on
back tracks to make sure they are running on fast TRP tracks.

In my opinion the term Hindutva coined by Vinayak Damodar Sawarkar is
an exemplary concept that unites India with its various colors. It is
one that makes the blue complement the orange and orange complement
the green. It is one that is so essential within this country that it
makes the intrusion of foreign rotten brain difficult to penetrate.
This concept of Akhanda Bharat houses and encompasses every religion
sect and cast. What is refers to is not those who pray like "Hindus"
but those that call this motherland their "aai" "ma" "ammi" "mother"
etc. When you analyze this a little more, you start observing examples
around that support this concept.

I have relished the sheer kurama at friends place on Id. I was born on
Pateti and hence Parsi New Year is celebrated in my home in India
every year. Having studied in a convent school and alternatively
living outside India for a while I and many of my friends who follow
other religions except Christianity celebrate Christmas. All Hindu
festivals are always celebrated. We look at the office holidays and
regardless of the reason of Diwali, Id or Independence Day, it is
always welcomed with all zest. In school what binds you in a group is
not your caste or religion or language but it’s the culture that you
share with your classmates and like experiences. A random someone
following Islam doesn't backfire on Miyan Musharraf because he is a
Muslim. He does that because he stands for a culture and knows that
the rest, regardless of their religion will stand by his statement in
praise and prove him right. It is not out of coincidence that you see
Md. Azzaruddin of the Slumdog Millionaire fame touch feet on the
podium in spite of being a Muslim. It is not random that a Muslim
stands against imposed “Ghunghat” and a Hindu woman stands against
forced “Burkha”.

What this states is that something that binds us all in this Indian
subcontinent is not our religion or language it’s the culture that we
grow in and experience till our death. This beautiful concept of
"Akhanda Bharat" or United India was termed as "Hindutva" and every
person who calls India his motherland was called a Hindu.

In light of this discussion, the word Hindutva essentially belongs to
neither the Congress nor the BJP. It was coined by Vinayak Damodar
Sawarkar who was an ardent freedom fighter and an iron man of Sardar
Patel cadre. Thus it is the sub standard quality of the Congress
thought and other pseudo secular parties to malign a concept that
holds Indian culture together for petty votes. It is the arrogance and
lack of understanding of common and historical India within the so
called "High Command" that has further perpetuated this. It is
shameful that the media endorses such actions and maligns parties like
BJP and organizations like RSS. The aftermath of which is anti BJP
undercurrent because of the use of the word Hindutva.

In my opinion, no party in this country has a right to recast Hindutva
as they anyways weren't the creators of it. Only thing possible is to
champion the concept to build a stronger India or build a secular
concept better defined than “Hindutva” itself
The views expressed here are those of the writer and not necessarily
of expressindia.com

http://blogs.expressindia.com/showblogdetails.php?contentid=486177

Advani for Ram Temple
29-03-2010

The reported public statement of Shri Lal Krishna Advani as recorded
by Anju Gupta and reported in media as headline is not at all new.

The media seems to be harping on the material that can remotely be
used against Hindu interests and the BJP. Otherwise, what is new in
telling that Advani emphasized for the RamJanmbhoomi Mandir to be
built at RamJanmasthan where the Babri structure was built by the
Moughal Invader- Babar in 16th century.

Therefore, what is the new revelation that made the Indian media to
put this revelation on the top of the newspapers claiming to have
found new arsenal against Advani- BJP- Hindus and thereby BHARAT.

Only the naive can deny about the knowledge of the fact that the
RamJanmabhoomi movement was to build Ram Mandir at the very place
where the Babri structure stood. The Congress Governments facilitated
the opening of the lock of the premises and the Shilanyas. Bharat was
governed by a congress government in New Delhi. The news once again
proved media bias.
The views expressed here are those of the writer and not necessarily
of expressindia.com

Comments:

ADVANI AND TEMPLES

ADVANI OR SONIA ALL ARE PLAYING CRUEL JOKES WITH POOR INDIAN
POPULACE.THE HINDUS SHOULD UNDERSTAND THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN
MAYA WASTING MONEY ON STATUES,GARLANDS AND CONGRESSMEN STORING IN
SWISS BANKS,ALL ARE WASTING PUBLIC MONEY IN THE NAME OF THEIR DEMI
GODS,RAMA ,GANDHIS AND NEHRUS.THE MONEY GOING TO TEMPLES FOR CENTURIES
COULD HAVE FUNDED WELFARE OF TOTAL POPULATION OF WORLD MANY TIMES
FORGET ABOUT THE MONEY WASTED IN ERECTING CHURCHES AND MOSQUES WORLD
OVER,BUT I HAVE REQUEST TO MY HINDU BRETHRENS TO DESIST FROM SPENDING
MONEY ON TEMPLES INSTEAD SPEND ON FELLOW HINDU POOR AND RETURN TO
ANCIENT GLORY OF INDIA PRIOR TO ADVENT OF SANATANI IDOLATORS OTHER
WISE HIDUISM IS HEADING FOR DESTRUCTION FOR THE GOOD OF INDIA AND THE
WORLD.SAYING IS SARWAGYANI KNOWS THAT GOD EXISTS IN ALL LIVING BEINGS
IN THE UNIVERSE THAT IS SARWVYAPI,ONLY SELFLESS HUMANBEINGS CAN CREATE
WORLD PEACE NOT THE PRESENT DAY CORRUPT GOVERNMENTS AND RELIGIOUS
BODIES AROUND THE GLOBE.

Posted by SAHEB on 2010-04-15 10:41:07.475149+05:30

http://blogs.expressindia.com/showblogdetails.php?contentid=597072

See also:

veni vidi vici: Sid Harth
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.indian.marathi/browse_thread/thread/8995c57b38f7584d#

...and I am Sid Harth

Loading...