navanavonmilita
2010-04-17 15:09:03 UTC
Hindu Philosophy: Sid Harth
Samkhya
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hindu philosophy
Persons
Ancient
Gautama · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aksapada_Gautama
Jaimini · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaimini
Kanada · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanada
Kapila · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kapila
Markandeya · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markandeya
Patañjali · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pata%C3%B1jali
Valmiki · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valmiki
Vyasa http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vyasa
Medieval
Adi Shankara · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adi_Shankara
Basava · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basavanna
Dnyaneshwar · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dnyaneshwar
Chaitanya · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaitanya_Mahaprabhu
Gangesha Upadhyaya · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gangesha_Upadhyaya
Gaudapada · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaudapada
Jayanta Bhatta · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jayanta_Bhatta
Kabir · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kabir
Kumarila Bhatta · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kum%C4%81rila_Bha%E1%B9%AD%E1%B9%ADa
Madhusudana · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madhus%C5%ABdana_Sarasvat%C4%AB
Madhva · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madhvacharya
Namdeva · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namdev
Nimbarka · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nimbarka
Prabhakara · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prabh%C4%81kara
Raghunatha Siromani · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raghunatha_Siromani
Ramanuja · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramanuja
Vedanta Desika · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vedanta_Desika
Tukaram · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tukaram
Tulsidas · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsidas
Vachaspati Mishra · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V%C4%81caspati_Mi%C5%9Bra
Vallabha http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vallabha_Acharya
Modern
Aurobindo · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Aurobindo
Coomaraswamy · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ananda_Coomaraswamy
Dayananda Saraswati · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dayananda_Saraswati
Gandhi · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gandhi
Krishnananda · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krishnananda
Narayana Guru · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narayana_Guru
Prabhupada · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prabhupada
Ramakrishna · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramakrishna
Ramana Maharshi · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramana_Maharshi
Radhakrishnan · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radhakrishnan
Sivananda · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sivananda
Vivekananda · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivekananda
Yogananda http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yogananda
MIA Dr Jai Maharaj http://www.bing.com/search?q=Dr+Jai+Maharaj+is+a+sad+Monkey&go=&form=QBRE&qs=n&sk=
This box: view • talk • edit
Samkhya, also Sankhya, Sāṃkhya, or Sāṅkhya (Sanskrit: सांख्य, IAST:
sāṃkhya - 'enumeration') is one of the six schools of classical Indian
philosophy. Sage Kapila is traditionally considered as the founder of
the Samkhya school, although no historical verification is possible.
It is regarded as one of the oldest philosophical systems in India.[1]
Samkhya was one of the six orthodox systems (astika, those systems
that recognize vedic authority) of Hindu philosophy. The major text of
this Vedic school is the extant Samkhya Karika, circa 200 CE. This
text (in karika 70) identifies Sankhya as a Tantra[2] and its
philosophy was one of the main influences both on the rise of the
Tantras as a body of literature, as well as Tantra sadhana[3]. There
are no purely Sankhya schools existing today in Hinduism, but its
influence is felt in the Yoga and Vedanta schools.
Samkhya is an enumerationist philosophy that is strongly dualist.[4][5]
[6] Samkhya philosophy regards the universe as consisting of two
realities: Purusha (consciousness) and Prakriti (phenomenal realm of
matter). They are the experiencer and the experienced, not unlike the
res cogitans and res extensa of René Descartes. Prakriti further
bifurcates into animate and inanimate realms. On the other hand,
Purusha separates out into countless Jivas or individual units of
consciousness as souls which fuse into the mind and body of the
animate branch of Prakriti.
There are differences between Sankhya and Western forms of dualism. In
the West, the fundamental distinction is between mind and body. In
Samkhya, however, it is between the self (as Purusha) and matter
(Prakriti).
Literature
Sage Kapila is considered as the founder of the Samkhya school, but
there is no evidence to prove that the texts attributed to him, the
Sāṁkhyapravacana Sūtra and the Tattvasamāsa were actually composed by
him. The earliest extant text of this school is Sāṁkhya Kārikā of
Iśvarakṛṣṇa (3rd century). Iśvarakṛṣṇa in his Kārikā described himself
as being in the succession of the disciples from Kapila, through Āsuri
and Pañcaśikha. Gauḍapāda wrote a commentary on this Kārikā. The next
important work is Vācaspati’s Sāṁkhyatattvakaumudī (9th century AD).
Nārāyaṇa’s treatise Sāṁkhyacandrikā is based on the Kārikā. The
Sāṁkhyapravacana Sūtra is assigned to the 14th century, as Guṇaratna
(14th century) did not refer to this text but referred to the Kārikā.
This text consists of 6 chapters and 526 sūtras. The most important
commentary on the Sāṁkhyapravacana Sūtra is Vijñānabhikṣu’s
Sāṁkhyapravacanabhāṣya (16th century). Anirruddha’s
Kāpilasāṁkhyapravacanasūtravṛtti (15th century) and Mahādeva’s
Sāṁkhyapravacanasūtravṛttisāra (c. 1600) and Nāgeśa’s
Laghusāṁkhyasūtravṛtti are the other important commentaries on this
text.[7]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samkhyapravachana_Sutra
Epistemology
According to the Sankhya school, all knowledge is possible through
three pramanas (means of valid knowledge)[8] -
Pratyaksha or Drishtam - direct sense perception,
Anumana - logical inference and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inference
Sabda or Aptavacana - verbal testimony.
Sankhya cites two kinds of perceptions: Indeterminate (nirvikalpa)
perceptions and determinate (savikalpa) perceptions.
Indeterminate perceptions are merely impressions without understanding
or knowledge. They reveal no knowledge of the form or the name of the
object. There is only external awareness about an object. There is
cognition of the object, but no discriminative recognition.
For example, a baby’s initial experience is full of impression. There
is a lot of data from sensory perception, but there is little or no
understanding of the inputs. Hence they can be neither differentiated
nor labeled. Most of them are indeterminate perceptions.
Determinate perceptions are the mature state of perceptions which have
been processed and differentiated appropriately. Once the sensations
have been processed, categorized, and interpreted properly, they
become determinate perceptions. They can lead to identification and
also generate knowledge.
Metaphysics
Ontology
Broadly, the Samkhya system classifies all objects as falling into one
of the two categories: Purusha and Prakriti. Metaphysically, Samkhya
maintains an intermingled duality between spirit/consciousness
(Purusha) and matter (Prakrti).
Purusha
Purusha is the Transcendental Self or Pure Consciousness. It is
absolute, independent, free, imperceptible, unknowable, above any
experience and beyond any words or explanation. It remains pure,
“nonattributive consciousness ”. Purusha is neither produced nor does
it produce. Unlike Advaita Vedanta and like Purva-Mimamsa, Samkhya
believes in plurality of the Purushas.[9]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advaita_Vedanta
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purva-Mimamsa
Prakriti
Prakriti is the first cause of the universe--of everything except the
Purusha, which is uncaused, and accounts for whatever is physical,
both matter and force. Since it is the first principle (tattva) of the
universe, it is called the Pradhana, but, as it is the unconscious and
unintelligent principle, it is also called the Jada. It is composed of
three essential characteristics (trigunas). These are:
sattva - fineness, lightness, illumination, and joy;
rajas - activity, excitation, and pain;
tamas - coarseness, heavyness, obstruction, and sloth.[10][11][12]
All physical events are considered to be manifestations of the
evolution of Prakriti, or primal nature (from which all physical
bodies are derived). Each sentient being is a Purusha, and is
limitless and unrestricted by its physical body. Samsaara or bondage
arises when the Purusha does not have the discriminate knowledge and
so is misled as to its own identity, confusing itself with the
physical body, which is actually an evolute of Prakriti. The spirit is
liberated when the discriminate knowledge of the difference between
conscious Purusha and unconscious Prakriti is realized.
Ishvara (Creationist God)
The Sāṁkhyapravacana Sūtra states that there is no philosophical place
for a creationist God in this system. It is also argued in this text
that the existence of Ishvara cannot be proved and hence cannot be
admitted to exist[13] and an unchanging Ishvara as the cause cannot be
the source of a changing world as the effect. Almost all modern
scholars are of view that the concept of Ishvara was incorporated into
the nirishvara (atheistic) Samkhya viewpoint only after it became
associated with the Yoga, the Pasupata and the Bhagavata schools of
philosophy. This theistic Samkhya philosophy is described in the
Mahabharata, the Puranas and the Bhagavad Gita[14]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoga
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pasupata
Nature of Duality
The Samkhya recognizes only two ultimate entities, Prakriti and
Purusha. While the Prakriti is a single entity, the Samkhya admits a
plurality of the Purushas. Unintelligent, unmanifest, uncaused, ever-
active, imperceptible and eternal Prakriti is alone the final source
of the world of objects which is implicitly and potentially contained
in its bosom. The Purusha is considered as the intelligent principle,
a passive enjoyer (bhokta) and the Prakriti is the enjoyed (bhogya).
Samkhya believes that the Purusha cannot be regarded as the source of
inanimate world, because an intelligent principle cannot transform
itself into the unintelligent world. It is a pluralistic spiritualism,
atheistic realism and uncompromising dualism.[12] See
Dualism#Consciousness/Matter_dualism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dualism#Consciousness.2FMatter_dualism
Theory of Existence
The Sankhya system is based on Satkaryavada. According to
Satkaryavada, the effect pre-exists in the cause. Cause and effect are
seen as different temporal aspects of the same thing - the effect lies
latent in the cause which in turn seeds the next effect.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality
More specifically, Sankhya system follows the Prakriti-Parinama Vada.
Parinama denotes that the effect is a real transformation of the
cause. The cause under consideration here is Prakriti or more
precisely Mula-Prakriti (Primordial Matter). The Sankhya system is
therefore an exponent of an evolutionary theory of matter beginning
with primordial matter. In evolution, Prakriti is transformed and
differentiated into multiplicity of objects. Evolution is followed by
dissolution. In dissolution the physical existence, all the worldly
objects mingle back into Prakriti, which now remains as the
undifferentiated, primordial substance. This is how the cycles of
evolution and dissolution follow each other.
The twenty-four principles
Sankhya theorizes that Prakriti is the source of the world of
becoming. It is pure potentiality that evolves itself successively
into twenty four tattvas or principles. The evolution itself is
possible because Prakriti is always in a state of tension among its
constituent strands -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prakriti
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tattva
Sattva - a template of balance or equilibrium; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sattva
Rajas - a template of expansion or activity; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajas
Tamas - a template of inertia or resistance to action.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamas_(philosophy)
All macrocosmic and microcosmic creation uses these templates. The
twenty four principles that evolve are -
Prakriti - The most subtle potentiality that is behind whatever is
created in the physical universe, also called "primordial Matter". It
is also a state of equilibrium amongst the Three Gunas.
Mahat - first product of evolution from Prakriti, pure potentiality.
Mahat is also considered to be the principle responsible for the rise
of buddhi or intelligence in living beings.
Ahamkara or ego-sense - second product of evolution. It is responsible
for the self-sense in living beings. It is also one's identification
with the outer world and its content.
"Panch Tanmatras" are a simultaneous product from Mahat Tattva, along
with the Ahamkara. They are the subtle form of Panch Mahabhutas which
result from grossification or Panchikaran of the Tanmatras. Each of
these Tanmatras are made of all three Gunas.
Manas or "Antahkaran" evolves from the total sum of the sattva aspect
of Panch Tanmatras or the "Ahamkara"
Panch jnana indriyas or five sense organs - also evolves from the
sattva aspect of Ahamkara.
Pancha karma indriya or five organs of action - The organs of action
are hands, legs, vocal apparatus, urino-genital organ and anus. They
evolve from the rajas aspect of Ahamkara.
Pancha mahabhuta or five great substances - ether, air, fire, water
and earth. They evolve from the "tamas" aspect of the "Ahamkara". This
is the revealed aspect of the physical universe.
The evolution of primal nature is also considered to be purposeful -
Prakrti evolves for the spirit in bondage. The spirit who is always
free is only a witness to the evolution, even though due to the
absence of discriminate knowledge, he misidentifies himself with
Purusha (body).[citation needed]
The evolution obeys causality relationships, with primal Nature itself
being the material cause of all physical creation. The cause and
effect theory of Sankhya is called Satkaarya-vaada (theory of existent
causes), and holds that nothing can really be created from or
destroyed into nothingness - all evolution is simply the
transformation of primal Nature from one form to another.
The evolution of matter occurs when the relative strengths of the
attributes change. The evolution ceases when the spirit realizes that
it is distinct from primal Nature and thus cannot evolve. This
destroys the purpose of evolution, thus stopping Prakrti from evolving
for Purusha.
Sankhyan cosmology describes how life emerges in the universe; the
relationship between Purusha and Prakriti is crucial to Patanjali's
yoga system. The evolution of forms at the basis of Sankhya is quite
remarkable. The strands of Sankhyan thought can be traced back to the
Vedic speculation of creation. It is also frequently mentioned in the
Mahabharata and Yogavasishta.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esoteric_cosmology
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patanjali
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veda
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahabharata
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yogavasishta
Moksha
Like other major systems of Indian philosophy, Sankhya regards
ignorance as the root cause of bondage and suffering (Samsara).
According to Sankhya, the Purusha is eternal, pure consciousness. Due
to ignorance, it identifies itself with the physical body and its
constituents - Manas, Ahamkara and Mahat, which are products of
Prakriti. Once it becomes free of this false identification and the
material bonds, Moksha ensues. Other forms of Sankhya teach that
Moksha is attained by one's own development of the higher faculties of
discrimination achieved by meditation and other yogic practices as
prescribed through the Hindu Vedas.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsara
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moksha
Views of what happens to the soul after liberation vary tremendously,
as the Sankhya view is used by many different Hindu sects and is
rarely practiced alone.
See also
Hinduism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinduism
Yoga http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoga
Darshanas http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darshanas
Hindu philosophy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu_philosophy
Indian philosophy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_philosophy
Linga sarira http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linga_sarira
Advaita Vedanta http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advaita_Vedanta
of Adi Shankara http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adi_Shankara
Dualism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dualism_(philosophy_of_mind)
Notes
^ Sharma, C. (1997). A Critical Survey of Indian Philosophy, Delhi:
Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 81-208-0365-5, p.149
^ P.C. Bagchi, Evolution of the Tantras, Studies on the Tantras,
Ramakrishna Mission Institute of Culture, Kolkata, 1989, ISBN
81-85843-36-8, pp.6
^ P.C. Bagchi, Evolution of the Tantras, Studies on the Tantras,
Ramakrishna Mission Institute of Culture, Kolkata, 1989, ISBN
81-85843-36-8, pp.10
^ For the basis of Samkhya as dualist Purusha and Prakriti, see:
Michaels, p. 264.
^ For the separation between Purusha and Prakriti as the "cardinal
doctrine" of Sankhya philosophy, see: Sen Gupta, p. 6.
^ For Sankhya as a dualist school, see: Radhakrishnan and Moore, p.
89.
^ Radhakrishnan, S. Indian Philosophy, Vol. II, Oxford University
Press, New Delhi, 2006, ISBN 0-19-563820-4, pp.253-56
^ Samkhya Karika, śloka4
^ Sharma, C. (1997). A Critical Survey of Indian Philosophy, Delhi:
Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 81-208-0365-5, pp.155-7
^ Hiriyanna, M. (1993, reprint 2000). Outlines of Indian Philosophy,
Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 81-208-1099-6, pp.270-2
^ Chattopadhyaya, D. (1986). Indian Philosophy: A popular
Introduction, New Delhi: People's Publishing House, ISBN
81-7007-023-6, pp.109-110
^ a b Sharma, C. (1997). A Critical Survey of Indian Philosophy,
Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 81-208-0365-5, pp.149-68
^ Sāṁkhyapravacana Sūtra, I.92
^ Karmarkar, A.P. (1962). Religion and Philosophy of Epics in S.
Radhakrishnan ed. The Cultural Heritage of India, Vol.II, Calcutta:
The Ramakrishna Mission Institute of Culture, ISBN 81-85843-03-1, pp.
90-1
References
Eliade, Mircea (1969). Yoga: Immortality and Freedom. Bollingen Series
LVI. New York, New York: Bollingen Foundation, Inc.. ISBN
0-691-01764-6. Second Edition. Translated from the French by Willard
R. Trask.
Michaels, Axel (2004). Hinduism: Past and Present. Princeton, New
Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-08953-1.
Radhakrishnan, S.; Moore, C. A. (1957). A Source Book in Indian
Philosophy. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN
0-691-01958-4. Princeton paperback 12th printing, 1989.
Sen Gupta, Anima. The Evolution of the Sāṃkhya School of Thought.
Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt. Ltd.: New Delhi, 1986.
Further reading
Chatterjee, Satischandra; Datta, Dhirendramohan (1984). An
Introduction to Indian Philosophy (Eighth Reprint Edition ed.).
Calcutta: University of Calcutta.
Müeller, Max (1899). Six Systems of Indian Philosophy; Samkhya and
Yoga, Naya and Vaiseshika. Calcutta: Susil Gupta (India) Ltd.. ISBN
0-7661-4296-5. Reprint edition; Originally published under the title
of The Six Systems of Indian Philosophy.
Radhakrishnan, S.; Moore, CA (1967). A Sourcebook in Indian
Philosophy. Princeton. ISBN 0-691-01958-4.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarvepalli_Radhakrishnan
R.A. Ramaswami Shastri, A Short History Of The Purva Mimamsa Shastra,
Annamalai University Sanskrit Series No. 3 (1936).
Zimmer, Heinrich (1951). Philosophies of India. New York, New York:
Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-01758-1. Bollingen Series
XXVI; Edited by Joseph Cambell.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinrich_Zimmer
Larson, Gerald J., Classical Samkhya, New Delhi 1979, sec. rev. ed.,
(includes translation of Isvarakrsna's Samkhyakarika).
Weerasinghe, S.G.M., The Sankhya Philosophy; A Critical Evaluation of
Its Origins and Development, New Delhi 1993.
Garbe, Richard, Die Samkhya-Philosophie, eine Darstellung des
indischen Rationalismus, Leipzig 1894.
Kambhampati, Parvathi Kumar (1993). Sankya - The Sacred Doctrine
(First Edition ed.). Visakhapatnam: Dhanishta. ISBN 8-190-03323-9. .
External links
Samkhya entry in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
http://www.iep.utm.edu/sankhya/Sankhya philosophy (archive)
http://web.archive.org/web/20041023062627/http://www.philo.demon.co.uk/enumerat.htm
Comparison between Indian and Greek cosmology
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0303001
Maharshi Vyasa and Sankhya Shastra
http://www.indology.net/article71.html
PDF file of Ishwarkrishna's sankhyakarikaa - 200BC (in Sanskrit)
available for research purposes only
http://sanskritdocuments.org/all_pdf/IshvarakRiShNasAnkyakArikA.pdf
v • d • e
Indian philosophy
Topics
Logic · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_logic
Idealism · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu_idealism
Monotheism · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu_views_on_monotheism
Atheism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism_in_Hinduism
Āstika http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu_philosophy
Samkhya · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samkhya
Nyaya · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyaya
Vaisheshika · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaisheshika
Yoga · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raja_Yoga
Mimamsa · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mimamsa
Vedanta (Advaita · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advaita_Vedanta
Vishishtadvaita · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vishishtadvaita
Dvaita · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dvaita
Acintya bheda abheda) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acintya_bheda_abheda
Nāstika http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nastika
Cārvāka · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%C4%81rv%C4%81ka
Jaina (Anekantavada · Syadvada) ·
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anekantavada
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syadvada
Bauddha (Shunyata · Madhyamaka ·
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shunyata
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madhyamaka
Yogacara · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yogacara
Sautrantika · Svatantrika)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sautrantika
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svatantrika
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samkhya
http://renedescate.blogspot.com/
...and I am Sid Harth
Samkhya
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hindu philosophy
Persons
Ancient
Gautama · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aksapada_Gautama
Jaimini · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaimini
Kanada · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanada
Kapila · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kapila
Markandeya · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markandeya
Patañjali · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pata%C3%B1jali
Valmiki · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valmiki
Vyasa http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vyasa
Medieval
Adi Shankara · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adi_Shankara
Basava · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basavanna
Dnyaneshwar · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dnyaneshwar
Chaitanya · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaitanya_Mahaprabhu
Gangesha Upadhyaya · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gangesha_Upadhyaya
Gaudapada · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaudapada
Jayanta Bhatta · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jayanta_Bhatta
Kabir · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kabir
Kumarila Bhatta · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kum%C4%81rila_Bha%E1%B9%AD%E1%B9%ADa
Madhusudana · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madhus%C5%ABdana_Sarasvat%C4%AB
Madhva · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madhvacharya
Namdeva · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namdev
Nimbarka · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nimbarka
Prabhakara · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prabh%C4%81kara
Raghunatha Siromani · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raghunatha_Siromani
Ramanuja · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramanuja
Vedanta Desika · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vedanta_Desika
Tukaram · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tukaram
Tulsidas · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsidas
Vachaspati Mishra · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V%C4%81caspati_Mi%C5%9Bra
Vallabha http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vallabha_Acharya
Modern
Aurobindo · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Aurobindo
Coomaraswamy · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ananda_Coomaraswamy
Dayananda Saraswati · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dayananda_Saraswati
Gandhi · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gandhi
Krishnananda · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krishnananda
Narayana Guru · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narayana_Guru
Prabhupada · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prabhupada
Ramakrishna · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramakrishna
Ramana Maharshi · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramana_Maharshi
Radhakrishnan · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radhakrishnan
Sivananda · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sivananda
Vivekananda · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivekananda
Yogananda http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yogananda
MIA Dr Jai Maharaj http://www.bing.com/search?q=Dr+Jai+Maharaj+is+a+sad+Monkey&go=&form=QBRE&qs=n&sk=
This box: view • talk • edit
Samkhya, also Sankhya, Sāṃkhya, or Sāṅkhya (Sanskrit: सांख्य, IAST:
sāṃkhya - 'enumeration') is one of the six schools of classical Indian
philosophy. Sage Kapila is traditionally considered as the founder of
the Samkhya school, although no historical verification is possible.
It is regarded as one of the oldest philosophical systems in India.[1]
Samkhya was one of the six orthodox systems (astika, those systems
that recognize vedic authority) of Hindu philosophy. The major text of
this Vedic school is the extant Samkhya Karika, circa 200 CE. This
text (in karika 70) identifies Sankhya as a Tantra[2] and its
philosophy was one of the main influences both on the rise of the
Tantras as a body of literature, as well as Tantra sadhana[3]. There
are no purely Sankhya schools existing today in Hinduism, but its
influence is felt in the Yoga and Vedanta schools.
Samkhya is an enumerationist philosophy that is strongly dualist.[4][5]
[6] Samkhya philosophy regards the universe as consisting of two
realities: Purusha (consciousness) and Prakriti (phenomenal realm of
matter). They are the experiencer and the experienced, not unlike the
res cogitans and res extensa of René Descartes. Prakriti further
bifurcates into animate and inanimate realms. On the other hand,
Purusha separates out into countless Jivas or individual units of
consciousness as souls which fuse into the mind and body of the
animate branch of Prakriti.
There are differences between Sankhya and Western forms of dualism. In
the West, the fundamental distinction is between mind and body. In
Samkhya, however, it is between the self (as Purusha) and matter
(Prakriti).
Literature
Sage Kapila is considered as the founder of the Samkhya school, but
there is no evidence to prove that the texts attributed to him, the
Sāṁkhyapravacana Sūtra and the Tattvasamāsa were actually composed by
him. The earliest extant text of this school is Sāṁkhya Kārikā of
Iśvarakṛṣṇa (3rd century). Iśvarakṛṣṇa in his Kārikā described himself
as being in the succession of the disciples from Kapila, through Āsuri
and Pañcaśikha. Gauḍapāda wrote a commentary on this Kārikā. The next
important work is Vācaspati’s Sāṁkhyatattvakaumudī (9th century AD).
Nārāyaṇa’s treatise Sāṁkhyacandrikā is based on the Kārikā. The
Sāṁkhyapravacana Sūtra is assigned to the 14th century, as Guṇaratna
(14th century) did not refer to this text but referred to the Kārikā.
This text consists of 6 chapters and 526 sūtras. The most important
commentary on the Sāṁkhyapravacana Sūtra is Vijñānabhikṣu’s
Sāṁkhyapravacanabhāṣya (16th century). Anirruddha’s
Kāpilasāṁkhyapravacanasūtravṛtti (15th century) and Mahādeva’s
Sāṁkhyapravacanasūtravṛttisāra (c. 1600) and Nāgeśa’s
Laghusāṁkhyasūtravṛtti are the other important commentaries on this
text.[7]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samkhyapravachana_Sutra
Epistemology
According to the Sankhya school, all knowledge is possible through
three pramanas (means of valid knowledge)[8] -
Pratyaksha or Drishtam - direct sense perception,
Anumana - logical inference and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inference
Sabda or Aptavacana - verbal testimony.
Sankhya cites two kinds of perceptions: Indeterminate (nirvikalpa)
perceptions and determinate (savikalpa) perceptions.
Indeterminate perceptions are merely impressions without understanding
or knowledge. They reveal no knowledge of the form or the name of the
object. There is only external awareness about an object. There is
cognition of the object, but no discriminative recognition.
For example, a baby’s initial experience is full of impression. There
is a lot of data from sensory perception, but there is little or no
understanding of the inputs. Hence they can be neither differentiated
nor labeled. Most of them are indeterminate perceptions.
Determinate perceptions are the mature state of perceptions which have
been processed and differentiated appropriately. Once the sensations
have been processed, categorized, and interpreted properly, they
become determinate perceptions. They can lead to identification and
also generate knowledge.
Metaphysics
Ontology
Broadly, the Samkhya system classifies all objects as falling into one
of the two categories: Purusha and Prakriti. Metaphysically, Samkhya
maintains an intermingled duality between spirit/consciousness
(Purusha) and matter (Prakrti).
Purusha
Purusha is the Transcendental Self or Pure Consciousness. It is
absolute, independent, free, imperceptible, unknowable, above any
experience and beyond any words or explanation. It remains pure,
“nonattributive consciousness ”. Purusha is neither produced nor does
it produce. Unlike Advaita Vedanta and like Purva-Mimamsa, Samkhya
believes in plurality of the Purushas.[9]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advaita_Vedanta
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purva-Mimamsa
Prakriti
Prakriti is the first cause of the universe--of everything except the
Purusha, which is uncaused, and accounts for whatever is physical,
both matter and force. Since it is the first principle (tattva) of the
universe, it is called the Pradhana, but, as it is the unconscious and
unintelligent principle, it is also called the Jada. It is composed of
three essential characteristics (trigunas). These are:
sattva - fineness, lightness, illumination, and joy;
rajas - activity, excitation, and pain;
tamas - coarseness, heavyness, obstruction, and sloth.[10][11][12]
All physical events are considered to be manifestations of the
evolution of Prakriti, or primal nature (from which all physical
bodies are derived). Each sentient being is a Purusha, and is
limitless and unrestricted by its physical body. Samsaara or bondage
arises when the Purusha does not have the discriminate knowledge and
so is misled as to its own identity, confusing itself with the
physical body, which is actually an evolute of Prakriti. The spirit is
liberated when the discriminate knowledge of the difference between
conscious Purusha and unconscious Prakriti is realized.
Ishvara (Creationist God)
The Sāṁkhyapravacana Sūtra states that there is no philosophical place
for a creationist God in this system. It is also argued in this text
that the existence of Ishvara cannot be proved and hence cannot be
admitted to exist[13] and an unchanging Ishvara as the cause cannot be
the source of a changing world as the effect. Almost all modern
scholars are of view that the concept of Ishvara was incorporated into
the nirishvara (atheistic) Samkhya viewpoint only after it became
associated with the Yoga, the Pasupata and the Bhagavata schools of
philosophy. This theistic Samkhya philosophy is described in the
Mahabharata, the Puranas and the Bhagavad Gita[14]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoga
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pasupata
Nature of Duality
The Samkhya recognizes only two ultimate entities, Prakriti and
Purusha. While the Prakriti is a single entity, the Samkhya admits a
plurality of the Purushas. Unintelligent, unmanifest, uncaused, ever-
active, imperceptible and eternal Prakriti is alone the final source
of the world of objects which is implicitly and potentially contained
in its bosom. The Purusha is considered as the intelligent principle,
a passive enjoyer (bhokta) and the Prakriti is the enjoyed (bhogya).
Samkhya believes that the Purusha cannot be regarded as the source of
inanimate world, because an intelligent principle cannot transform
itself into the unintelligent world. It is a pluralistic spiritualism,
atheistic realism and uncompromising dualism.[12] See
Dualism#Consciousness/Matter_dualism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dualism#Consciousness.2FMatter_dualism
Theory of Existence
The Sankhya system is based on Satkaryavada. According to
Satkaryavada, the effect pre-exists in the cause. Cause and effect are
seen as different temporal aspects of the same thing - the effect lies
latent in the cause which in turn seeds the next effect.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality
More specifically, Sankhya system follows the Prakriti-Parinama Vada.
Parinama denotes that the effect is a real transformation of the
cause. The cause under consideration here is Prakriti or more
precisely Mula-Prakriti (Primordial Matter). The Sankhya system is
therefore an exponent of an evolutionary theory of matter beginning
with primordial matter. In evolution, Prakriti is transformed and
differentiated into multiplicity of objects. Evolution is followed by
dissolution. In dissolution the physical existence, all the worldly
objects mingle back into Prakriti, which now remains as the
undifferentiated, primordial substance. This is how the cycles of
evolution and dissolution follow each other.
The twenty-four principles
Sankhya theorizes that Prakriti is the source of the world of
becoming. It is pure potentiality that evolves itself successively
into twenty four tattvas or principles. The evolution itself is
possible because Prakriti is always in a state of tension among its
constituent strands -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prakriti
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tattva
Sattva - a template of balance or equilibrium; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sattva
Rajas - a template of expansion or activity; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajas
Tamas - a template of inertia or resistance to action.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamas_(philosophy)
All macrocosmic and microcosmic creation uses these templates. The
twenty four principles that evolve are -
Prakriti - The most subtle potentiality that is behind whatever is
created in the physical universe, also called "primordial Matter". It
is also a state of equilibrium amongst the Three Gunas.
Mahat - first product of evolution from Prakriti, pure potentiality.
Mahat is also considered to be the principle responsible for the rise
of buddhi or intelligence in living beings.
Ahamkara or ego-sense - second product of evolution. It is responsible
for the self-sense in living beings. It is also one's identification
with the outer world and its content.
"Panch Tanmatras" are a simultaneous product from Mahat Tattva, along
with the Ahamkara. They are the subtle form of Panch Mahabhutas which
result from grossification or Panchikaran of the Tanmatras. Each of
these Tanmatras are made of all three Gunas.
Manas or "Antahkaran" evolves from the total sum of the sattva aspect
of Panch Tanmatras or the "Ahamkara"
Panch jnana indriyas or five sense organs - also evolves from the
sattva aspect of Ahamkara.
Pancha karma indriya or five organs of action - The organs of action
are hands, legs, vocal apparatus, urino-genital organ and anus. They
evolve from the rajas aspect of Ahamkara.
Pancha mahabhuta or five great substances - ether, air, fire, water
and earth. They evolve from the "tamas" aspect of the "Ahamkara". This
is the revealed aspect of the physical universe.
The evolution of primal nature is also considered to be purposeful -
Prakrti evolves for the spirit in bondage. The spirit who is always
free is only a witness to the evolution, even though due to the
absence of discriminate knowledge, he misidentifies himself with
Purusha (body).[citation needed]
The evolution obeys causality relationships, with primal Nature itself
being the material cause of all physical creation. The cause and
effect theory of Sankhya is called Satkaarya-vaada (theory of existent
causes), and holds that nothing can really be created from or
destroyed into nothingness - all evolution is simply the
transformation of primal Nature from one form to another.
The evolution of matter occurs when the relative strengths of the
attributes change. The evolution ceases when the spirit realizes that
it is distinct from primal Nature and thus cannot evolve. This
destroys the purpose of evolution, thus stopping Prakrti from evolving
for Purusha.
Sankhyan cosmology describes how life emerges in the universe; the
relationship between Purusha and Prakriti is crucial to Patanjali's
yoga system. The evolution of forms at the basis of Sankhya is quite
remarkable. The strands of Sankhyan thought can be traced back to the
Vedic speculation of creation. It is also frequently mentioned in the
Mahabharata and Yogavasishta.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esoteric_cosmology
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patanjali
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veda
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahabharata
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yogavasishta
Moksha
Like other major systems of Indian philosophy, Sankhya regards
ignorance as the root cause of bondage and suffering (Samsara).
According to Sankhya, the Purusha is eternal, pure consciousness. Due
to ignorance, it identifies itself with the physical body and its
constituents - Manas, Ahamkara and Mahat, which are products of
Prakriti. Once it becomes free of this false identification and the
material bonds, Moksha ensues. Other forms of Sankhya teach that
Moksha is attained by one's own development of the higher faculties of
discrimination achieved by meditation and other yogic practices as
prescribed through the Hindu Vedas.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsara
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moksha
Views of what happens to the soul after liberation vary tremendously,
as the Sankhya view is used by many different Hindu sects and is
rarely practiced alone.
See also
Hinduism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinduism
Yoga http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoga
Darshanas http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darshanas
Hindu philosophy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu_philosophy
Indian philosophy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_philosophy
Linga sarira http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linga_sarira
Advaita Vedanta http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advaita_Vedanta
of Adi Shankara http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adi_Shankara
Dualism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dualism_(philosophy_of_mind)
Notes
^ Sharma, C. (1997). A Critical Survey of Indian Philosophy, Delhi:
Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 81-208-0365-5, p.149
^ P.C. Bagchi, Evolution of the Tantras, Studies on the Tantras,
Ramakrishna Mission Institute of Culture, Kolkata, 1989, ISBN
81-85843-36-8, pp.6
^ P.C. Bagchi, Evolution of the Tantras, Studies on the Tantras,
Ramakrishna Mission Institute of Culture, Kolkata, 1989, ISBN
81-85843-36-8, pp.10
^ For the basis of Samkhya as dualist Purusha and Prakriti, see:
Michaels, p. 264.
^ For the separation between Purusha and Prakriti as the "cardinal
doctrine" of Sankhya philosophy, see: Sen Gupta, p. 6.
^ For Sankhya as a dualist school, see: Radhakrishnan and Moore, p.
89.
^ Radhakrishnan, S. Indian Philosophy, Vol. II, Oxford University
Press, New Delhi, 2006, ISBN 0-19-563820-4, pp.253-56
^ Samkhya Karika, śloka4
^ Sharma, C. (1997). A Critical Survey of Indian Philosophy, Delhi:
Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 81-208-0365-5, pp.155-7
^ Hiriyanna, M. (1993, reprint 2000). Outlines of Indian Philosophy,
Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 81-208-1099-6, pp.270-2
^ Chattopadhyaya, D. (1986). Indian Philosophy: A popular
Introduction, New Delhi: People's Publishing House, ISBN
81-7007-023-6, pp.109-110
^ a b Sharma, C. (1997). A Critical Survey of Indian Philosophy,
Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 81-208-0365-5, pp.149-68
^ Sāṁkhyapravacana Sūtra, I.92
^ Karmarkar, A.P. (1962). Religion and Philosophy of Epics in S.
Radhakrishnan ed. The Cultural Heritage of India, Vol.II, Calcutta:
The Ramakrishna Mission Institute of Culture, ISBN 81-85843-03-1, pp.
90-1
References
Eliade, Mircea (1969). Yoga: Immortality and Freedom. Bollingen Series
LVI. New York, New York: Bollingen Foundation, Inc.. ISBN
0-691-01764-6. Second Edition. Translated from the French by Willard
R. Trask.
Michaels, Axel (2004). Hinduism: Past and Present. Princeton, New
Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-08953-1.
Radhakrishnan, S.; Moore, C. A. (1957). A Source Book in Indian
Philosophy. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN
0-691-01958-4. Princeton paperback 12th printing, 1989.
Sen Gupta, Anima. The Evolution of the Sāṃkhya School of Thought.
Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt. Ltd.: New Delhi, 1986.
Further reading
Chatterjee, Satischandra; Datta, Dhirendramohan (1984). An
Introduction to Indian Philosophy (Eighth Reprint Edition ed.).
Calcutta: University of Calcutta.
Müeller, Max (1899). Six Systems of Indian Philosophy; Samkhya and
Yoga, Naya and Vaiseshika. Calcutta: Susil Gupta (India) Ltd.. ISBN
0-7661-4296-5. Reprint edition; Originally published under the title
of The Six Systems of Indian Philosophy.
Radhakrishnan, S.; Moore, CA (1967). A Sourcebook in Indian
Philosophy. Princeton. ISBN 0-691-01958-4.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarvepalli_Radhakrishnan
R.A. Ramaswami Shastri, A Short History Of The Purva Mimamsa Shastra,
Annamalai University Sanskrit Series No. 3 (1936).
Zimmer, Heinrich (1951). Philosophies of India. New York, New York:
Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-01758-1. Bollingen Series
XXVI; Edited by Joseph Cambell.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinrich_Zimmer
Larson, Gerald J., Classical Samkhya, New Delhi 1979, sec. rev. ed.,
(includes translation of Isvarakrsna's Samkhyakarika).
Weerasinghe, S.G.M., The Sankhya Philosophy; A Critical Evaluation of
Its Origins and Development, New Delhi 1993.
Garbe, Richard, Die Samkhya-Philosophie, eine Darstellung des
indischen Rationalismus, Leipzig 1894.
Kambhampati, Parvathi Kumar (1993). Sankya - The Sacred Doctrine
(First Edition ed.). Visakhapatnam: Dhanishta. ISBN 8-190-03323-9. .
External links
Samkhya entry in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
http://www.iep.utm.edu/sankhya/Sankhya philosophy (archive)
http://web.archive.org/web/20041023062627/http://www.philo.demon.co.uk/enumerat.htm
Comparison between Indian and Greek cosmology
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0303001
Maharshi Vyasa and Sankhya Shastra
http://www.indology.net/article71.html
PDF file of Ishwarkrishna's sankhyakarikaa - 200BC (in Sanskrit)
available for research purposes only
http://sanskritdocuments.org/all_pdf/IshvarakRiShNasAnkyakArikA.pdf
v • d • e
Indian philosophy
Topics
Logic · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_logic
Idealism · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu_idealism
Monotheism · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu_views_on_monotheism
Atheism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism_in_Hinduism
Āstika http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu_philosophy
Samkhya · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samkhya
Nyaya · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyaya
Vaisheshika · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaisheshika
Yoga · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raja_Yoga
Mimamsa · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mimamsa
Vedanta (Advaita · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advaita_Vedanta
Vishishtadvaita · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vishishtadvaita
Dvaita · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dvaita
Acintya bheda abheda) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acintya_bheda_abheda
Nāstika http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nastika
Cārvāka · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%C4%81rv%C4%81ka
Jaina (Anekantavada · Syadvada) ·
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anekantavada
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syadvada
Bauddha (Shunyata · Madhyamaka ·
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shunyata
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madhyamaka
Yogacara · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yogacara
Sautrantika · Svatantrika)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sautrantika
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svatantrika
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samkhya
http://renedescate.blogspot.com/
...and I am Sid Harth