and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
2010-12-29 23:32:17 UTC
Forwarded message from A. C.
Tuesday, December 28, 2010
'Why doesn't SRK raise funds for 26/11 martyrs?'
Tehelka December 11, 2010
Intro: Shiv Sena MP Sanjay Raut tells Kunal Majumder that Shah Rukh
Khan should not dance to Pakistan's tune
What is your problem with Shah Rukh Khan now?
Shah Rukh lives in Mumbai and is an Indian citizen. Everybody knows
the kind of relationship India has with Pakistan. All terror
activities that are taking place in our country originate from
Pakistan. When people in Mumbai were taking part in memorial services
for those who lost their lives in the 26/11 terror attacks, this
gentleman planned to dance at a show organised by a Pakistani channel
in London on 28 November. This is an insult to the martyrs and the
country. When his own country is mourning the loss of so many lives
due to terrorist attacks from Pakistan, he was planning to dance for
a Pakistani channel. He should be ashamed. The Congress government
gave a lot of protection to the theatres where Shah Rukh's films were
being screened and to his house, so he thinks he has become a very
important person.
Would you have protested if Shah Rukh's last name was Sharma or
Singh?
No, there are no issues with his surname. We would have still
protested if it was someone else. It has nothing to do with caste or
religion. If you recall, we had protested when Mahesh Bhatt did
something similar. His surname is not Khan.
Shah Rukh was just planning to help raise funds for the flood
victims. Is everything associated with Pakistan evil?
This is not about flood victims. We have flood victims in Assam,
Odisha and Bihar. Why hasn't he organised musical shows to raise
funds for them? Why hasn't he raised money for the 26/11 Mumbai
martyrs? So many places in our country are flooded all the time, why
doesn't he help us? We understand that on issues like floods, there
should be no politics. But after Pakistan was flooded, the Indian
government had offered help but was rebuffed. The reason was because
India is considered the enemy. Pakistan doesn't want to take help
from our government but wants help from Shah Rukh. And he wants to
help. This is a serious matter.
We can understand that you might have problems with Pakistan because
of 26/11. But why does the Shiv Sena want to get the burqa banned?
Isn't the demand against the spirit of the Indian Constitution?
The issue of banning the burqa doesn't have a religious angle. For
the past couple of years, women dressed in burqas have kidnapped many
children from government hospitals in Mumbai. Most of them might not
even be Muslims but they use the burqa to commit this heinous crime.
All over the world, questions are being raised about the utility of
the burqa. It is not linked to religion. Muslim women don't want to
wear the burqa. Progressive Muslims don't want the burqa.
Popular reality television show Bigg Boss 4 continues to have
Pakistani participants. Has the Shiv Sena come to an agreement with
the producers of the show?
No, we don't have an agreement with them. There were two participants
from Pakistan. Begum Nawazish Ali has already left. Veena Malik would
also leave soon.
When will the Shiv Sena, as the principal opposition party in
Maharashtra, raise serious issues such as land scams?
Terrorism from Pakistan is not the Shiv Sena's personal issue. It is
a national issue. Our party is committed to raise issues that affect
the common man. The Assembly session has just begun. We will
certainly raise our concerns about the Lavasa and Adarsh land scams.
End of forwarded message from A. C.
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.
Tuesday, December 28, 2010
'Why doesn't SRK raise funds for 26/11 martyrs?'
Tehelka December 11, 2010
Intro: Shiv Sena MP Sanjay Raut tells Kunal Majumder that Shah Rukh
Khan should not dance to Pakistan's tune
What is your problem with Shah Rukh Khan now?
Shah Rukh lives in Mumbai and is an Indian citizen. Everybody knows
the kind of relationship India has with Pakistan. All terror
activities that are taking place in our country originate from
Pakistan. When people in Mumbai were taking part in memorial services
for those who lost their lives in the 26/11 terror attacks, this
gentleman planned to dance at a show organised by a Pakistani channel
in London on 28 November. This is an insult to the martyrs and the
country. When his own country is mourning the loss of so many lives
due to terrorist attacks from Pakistan, he was planning to dance for
a Pakistani channel. He should be ashamed. The Congress government
gave a lot of protection to the theatres where Shah Rukh's films were
being screened and to his house, so he thinks he has become a very
important person.
Would you have protested if Shah Rukh's last name was Sharma or
Singh?
No, there are no issues with his surname. We would have still
protested if it was someone else. It has nothing to do with caste or
religion. If you recall, we had protested when Mahesh Bhatt did
something similar. His surname is not Khan.
Shah Rukh was just planning to help raise funds for the flood
victims. Is everything associated with Pakistan evil?
This is not about flood victims. We have flood victims in Assam,
Odisha and Bihar. Why hasn't he organised musical shows to raise
funds for them? Why hasn't he raised money for the 26/11 Mumbai
martyrs? So many places in our country are flooded all the time, why
doesn't he help us? We understand that on issues like floods, there
should be no politics. But after Pakistan was flooded, the Indian
government had offered help but was rebuffed. The reason was because
India is considered the enemy. Pakistan doesn't want to take help
from our government but wants help from Shah Rukh. And he wants to
help. This is a serious matter.
We can understand that you might have problems with Pakistan because
of 26/11. But why does the Shiv Sena want to get the burqa banned?
Isn't the demand against the spirit of the Indian Constitution?
The issue of banning the burqa doesn't have a religious angle. For
the past couple of years, women dressed in burqas have kidnapped many
children from government hospitals in Mumbai. Most of them might not
even be Muslims but they use the burqa to commit this heinous crime.
All over the world, questions are being raised about the utility of
the burqa. It is not linked to religion. Muslim women don't want to
wear the burqa. Progressive Muslims don't want the burqa.
Popular reality television show Bigg Boss 4 continues to have
Pakistani participants. Has the Shiv Sena come to an agreement with
the producers of the show?
No, we don't have an agreement with them. There were two participants
from Pakistan. Begum Nawazish Ali has already left. Veena Malik would
also leave soon.
When will the Shiv Sena, as the principal opposition party in
Maharashtra, raise serious issues such as land scams?
Terrorism from Pakistan is not the Shiv Sena's personal issue. It is
a national issue. Our party is committed to raise issues that affect
the common man. The Assembly session has just begun. We will
certainly raise our concerns about the Lavasa and Adarsh land scams.
End of forwarded message from A. C.
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.