Discussion:
Dravida must be a separate country from India
(too old to reply)
Satish Kumar
2011-07-09 21:34:15 UTC
Permalink
On Jul 9, 10:45 am, "Myself, Mallu. Yourself?"
   Dravida or commonly known as South India should be a separate
country.  The Hindustanis are not favourable allies for most
Dravidians or people from Dravida.  The Hindustanis are very
prejudiced and hateful toward most Dravidians and we as Dravidians or
people from Dravida should not mix with them.
     A Dravida separatist movement needs to occur so that the people of
Dravida are liberated from the Gandhian extremism of Secularism.
Notice how the people of Dravida were given no place in the forming of
Bharat ("India").  We Dravidians have to do our part to separate from
the hateful forces of the Hindustanis.
     The Hindustanis are demented and Satanic people.  The strong hold
of Hinduism is among the Hindustanis and not the Dravidians.  Dravida
is a place for broad minded people who accept many religions but
definetely mixing with the Hindustanis and their supporters is a
loss.  Aligning with the Hindustanis is a total loss for all
concerned.
     A new country of Dravidasthana must be formed so that we as
Dravidians have our rightful place among the nations of this world so
as to exert our sovereignty for the betterment of mankind.  The
Hindustanis have time and time again mismanaged our resources and our
ways so that their hateful agendas are propped for the sake of their
Satanic religious ideologies.
     We as Dravidians need to set up a great wall similar to China
between Hindustan and Dravida so that the Satanis influence of the
Hindustanis does not affect us.  The Hindustanis are a total blight on
our ways of life.  From Vegetarianism to Satanism the Hindustanis have
totally corrupted our lives.
Jai Dravidasthana!
Actually Brahma did create a wall to separate Dravidasthan from the
rest of blessed India (Aryavarta). I am referring to the Vindhya
mountains, which in a pique, had blown himself up so tall that that
the Sun (Aditya) could no longer cross into the now ever-dark Deccan.
It was then that the gods approached sage Agastya to arrange an end to
the 24/7 night that had engulfed the poor Dravidasthanis.
Why Agastya? Because the great sage was also the guru of the Vindhya
mountain. Thew gods knew that only sage Agastya could bring relief to
the Dravidasthanis who were suffering for no fault of their own.
So what did guru Agastya do? On the 1st of Bhadra (roughly mid-August)
he approached the tall and stately Vindhya mountais from the north
(Aryavarta). As a dutiful disciple, Vindhya Mountain right away bowed
down to his guru Agastya.
Agastya told the Vindhya mountains that this would be his first visit
to Dravidasthana and requested the mountain to remain bowed down till
Agastya came back from his mission in Dravidasthana to his home in
Aryavarta.
Sage Agastya crossed into Dravidasthana and built an ashram near
modern day Chennai (in Sriperumbudur to be exact). Sage Agastya found
out it would take him a lifetime to civilize the Dravidasthanis and he
devoted himself headlong into that stupendous task.
To make a long story short, sage Agastya was never able to get back to
Aryavarta. The Vindhya Mountain remains bowed down to this day to a
height much less than that of the majestic Himalayas where Shiv
resides.
Aryavarta misses sage Agastya. But Aryavarta's loss has been
Dravidasthana's gain as the people have gradually picked up the
Sanatan Dharma.
In Kaliyug, Sriperumbudur would be the place where Rajiv Gandhi would
be assassinated by a Dravida rakshasi, but that's another story.
According to the Bhattathiri puran, the story of is slightly different.
Bhatthiri Puran is just coming into existence at this fag end of
Kaliyug, I wish it a place in a nook of our folklore.


But any Bhaiya worth his salt will point out that Bhatthiri Puran
fails to do full justice to the mighty sage from Yugs of yore. The
real Agastya, a Bhaiya to the bottom of his heart, had once obliged
the gods by drinking up all the salty water of all the ocens. And, no
shit, he had even digested demon king Ilwal's brother into oblivion.


The only person on earth who ever got the better of this sage was his
better half Lopamudra who refused him sex in his horniest kshan unless
he met certain conditions. These conditions had Agastya scurrying far
and wide and eventually to demon king Ilwal's court to bring home
what Lopamudra desired.


Agastya proved himself up to the task by bringing home the needful
while Lopamudra was still in ovulation. It was all worth the effort
because the resulting son (Drirhasyu) saved not just Agastya from
Punnarak but even Agastya's ancestors who had been left hanging upside
down in a dark cave.
Agasty reincarnated as Agasty 1008 (note no Roman numerals) in
bhaiyyasthan after Adi Shankar's moksh.
Once a Bhaiya, always a Bhaiya. Bhatthiri Puran indeed has it right
that if Agastya had actually come back to Jagat that is Mithya in Kali
Yug, it would have been definitely as a Bhaiya.
Apparently he was very very
concerned that this new advait philosophy was being completely
misinterpreted by doodhdvaitis (doodh aur paani philosophy) to the point
that "doodh aur paani ka mel" was being used to demonstrate advait
(misinterpreted as doodh aur paani, donon ek. baaqi sab kuchh maya hai)
in action in day to day life.
Bhaiyas do take their doodh (Jeevatma) and paani (Paramatma) very very
seriously. Doodh is non-existent without paani just as the Jeevatma is
non-existent without Paramatma. The twain shall ever meet. Bhaiyas
always add pani to doodh to make life even more meaningful. Not for
him the abdication of his spiritual duties for chasing the philistine
mirage of Jagat that is Mithya in India that is Bharat.


It goes to the credit of Varanasi (the very heart of Bhaiyaland) that
it was instrumental in blessing Adi Shankar with the most ecstatic
moments in his life. It was the Bhaiyas who made Adi Shankar aware, at
least implicitly, that there is much more to life than to disdain
karma yogi Bhaiyas who bring meaning to life by adding paani to doodh


When Adi Shankar entered into a debate in Varanasi with Mandan
Mishra's wife, it was stipulated that the debate would be only on sex.
If Adi Shankar had continued to believe in a Jagat that is Mithya, he
would never have agreed to the sex debate nor would he have taken time
off before the debate to learn everything about sex from two just-
widowed queens.


And, of course, it goes to the credit of Adi Shankar that even as he
touted faith in Jagat that is Mithya, he made the Jagat very very
meaningful by his tryst with Ubhaya Baharati and the two just-widowed
queens of Bhaiyaland. Adi Shankar had never experienced such ecstasy
in the land south of the Vindhyas. No wonder that he spent the last
days of his short life as far north as possible of the Vindhyas. He
even felt a kinship with Bhaiya Buddha as he contemplated Nirvana at
Kedar !!


Dravidasthan didn't remain a lost cause either. It went on to be
redeemed subsequently by local lads, first by Ramanujacharya and then
decisively by Madhavacharya.
So, he decided to go on a pilgrimage to
Shringeri and seek an upaay to the problem.
Besides, he was getting
quite tired of the culture rooted in agriculture, and the increasing
emphasis of people on santan karm and gender selection to avoid punnarak
for several generations.
Bhatthiri Puran seems to be starting off with a wrong solution for a
wrong problem !!


Bhatthiri Puran's Agastya 1008 is living in a Jagat that is Mithya if
he is under the maya that his doodh has no paani. He must also learn
to appreciate the yeoman's job by Bhaiyas in adding even more paani to
his doodh whether it gets milked in Kerala, Maharashtra or California.
This is what makes life worth living.
As he sauntered down southwards, with dhoti and lota (langot and
kamandal in matrubhasha),
Langot is better translated as Kaupin. It is an abbreviated but a
semen-proof version of dhoti. It certainly minimizes seepage loss of a
key ingredient of the stuff that goes a long way toward avoiding
Punnarak. Sperm banks are now seriously looking into the possibility
of accepting donations collected in kaupins.


The dhoti (especially if worn in the lungi-style of Dravidasthan) is
not equipped to collect sperm. If people south of the Vindhyas find
it difficult to master the art of wearing dhoti in anything other than
in lungi-style, they must always wear the kaupin underneath to prevent
seepage loss of semen.
he encountered the mighty Vindhys [Note: he
got to Chowpatty on his way back to bhaiyyasthan].
Mighty Vindhyas! :-D


Vindhyas had been diminished long time back by the real Agastya never
to rise again. The fake Agastya (Bhatthiri Puran's Agastya 1008) is
barking up the wrong tree if not the wrong mountain. In fact,
Bhatthiri Puran should refer to Vindhya asa hill, nay, a mound instead
of contributing to Jagat Mithya by referring to it as a mountain.
To his dismay, Agasty
found that Vindhyas had been made mightier by years and years of
cut-and-paste prayers and assorted radiation blocking products from
several punnarakiya maharajs, who often had to get up that hill to bray
to Yamdev.
That's Mithya Jagat for you. In real life, Vindhya remains as
diminished as Bhaiya Agastya had left it on 1st of Bhadra many
millennia ago. In fact, mother nature has diminished it further
through denudation and erosion. Aditya no longer faces a road block on
his way to the South Land. Even the lowly idli and vada have
effortlessly made their way past the diminished Vindhyas to create a
niche for themselves even in Chowpatty !!
It took Agasty several years of hard work and penance to trim the
mountains back to size, and having done so he left instructions to
bhaiyyas, "punnarakiya maharajs or not, mountains and streams should be
left clean and no agricultural products be put on or into them, even if
such products would keep alpha, beta, and gamma radiation away from
bhaiyyasthan." He added, "I want to be able to speak about y'all in
glowing terms when I reach the land of Adi Shankar, the last asli
sanatan dharmi".
The real Agastya was a Bhaiya par excellence. He would have never
needed "years of hard work" to bring down even the mighty Himalyas. As
for the upstart Vindhya, a simple order many millennia ago left it
bent and bowed for eternity in this Jagat that is Mithya in India that
is Bharat.


But Adi Shankar, after his tryst with sex in Bhaiyaland, never
bothered to cross the Vindhya Hills back to Dravidasthan again. He was
content with his life in Aryavarta where his doodh always came diluted
with plenty of paani.
Agasty did cross that great hill
Bhatthiri Puran finally gets it right. The mighty Vindhyas is just a
hill. No ifs, buts or greats about it.
and get to dravidanadu (called madras
these days) and was completely shocked by the existence of a through z
mk people, and people whose matru and pitribhasha was not saniskrit.
However, people were very respectful and added a double honorfic to
peoples' names, e.g. Agastya-ji-ji, because they was all into 2ji/2G.
Bhatthiri Puran is being written in Kali Yug. It will do well to
reflect Kali Yug realities. When PJ Thomas (Poor Joke Thomas) from the
land of Adi Shankar was deemed too corrupt to become CVC, Pradeep
Kumar from the land of the Bhaiyas had to be appointed the CVC to
bring justice to the land where nidhis tend to look past karuna to
preferentially contain lakhs of crores of ill-gotten money to make
sense of Jagat that is Mithya in India that is Bharat.
There is one peculiarity about the people of dravidanadu. They had the
ability to become vedically invisible after sunset. Being from the
cowbelt, little did Agasty know that it was the 'unfyear' (but lovely)
complexion of madrasis that contributed to the invisibility.
Bhaiyas brook no competition. They can be darker than the darkest of
Southies. But Bhaiyas prefer the Middle Path of moderation. That is
why they add paani to doodh to make it less white. Madrasis and Mallus
should take the path greased at all times by ample amounts of Fair &
Lovely for a smooth glide through Jagat that is Mithya especially in
India that is Bharat.
Traveling by day to avoid people invisible after sunset, our intrepid
seeker of Adi Shankar reached mallunadu, where there was a strange
upbhransh of saniskrit called manipravalam in use. There were all kinds
of people in "Goad's kendry" who said things like, "there is no goad but
goad", "he is a loving goad who died four auver sins", "there is no
goad, karl mars says so" ... blah, blah.
Sounds like people who are well into becoming favored sons of
Madhavacharya. Bhatthiri Puran might also want to point out that these
semi-Vaishnavites generally tend to be poor Marxmen during elections.
The LDF would love to cut off their left arm to bring these God's very
own people over to the ways of Marx.
Getting past this din, and all
the stills installed by PPS Bevdosinhji Bahadur from Suret, Agastay
reached Shringeri. The long journey, with nothing but kanji for
sustenance, was an arduous one, but one that was vedically accomplished.
Bhatthiri's fake Agastya (Agastya 1008) is making a virtue of
sustaining on nothing. All culture, and no agriculture, ca indeed
leave you with an empty stomach.

The real Agastaya (not the fake on of Bhatthiri Puran) always knew
which side of the toast was buttered. His doodh was always full of
paani. To oblige the gods he drank all the salt water of the oceans in
just one sip. And, no shit, Agastya of yore completely digested the
demon king Ilwal's brother into nothingness inside his intestine.
Reaching Shringeri, Agasty asked about an upaay for "problem in
bhaiyyasthan" (note there is no article preceding the word problem).
Adi Shankaracharya, in a moment of candor, had said in Kashyap's land
(Kashmir) no less, that those that use the definite article with
abundance shall inherit the earth. Bhaiya Pradeep Kumar's appointment
as CVC is a good step toward putting the fear of God into those that
choose to live in Jagat that is Mithya even as they inundate India
that is Bharat with lakhs of crores of rupees of ill-gotten wealth.
"Agam brahmasmi", came the upbhranshed reply from a latter day
Shankarchary (like Kamar Roy's Bhattachary). The Shankarchary went on
further to say in suitably upbhranshed saniskrit, "bhaj govindam, bhaj
govindam, govindam bhaj moodhmate".
May the good lord Govinda who is Padmanabha bring as much wealth to
all Vaishnavite centers as he has to Padmanabhaswamy Temple of
Thiruvatapuram. That will usher in a lot of sathya into Jagat that is
Mithya in India that is Bharat.
Shankarchary then added, "Sanatan dharmis have become obsessed with
padres, madre de dios, kuj dosh - mars obsession, and salacious crap
(don't know equivalent manipravalam word) about these. Dhanyavaadsutr is
the only known book. The Vindhys have grown again, thanks to the efforts
of Bonehead Kuru(illa) Muckeraj, to the point that any and all radiation
has been blocked signaling an ice age in the gangetic plain. Mumbadevi's
people are getting unholy water from Thane creek, and the sena only
sells vada paav. Upaay lies in bringing ganga jal to Mumbadevi's people.
Jobs, jobs, jobs in the gangetic plain." [Note: all of these words were
said in upbhranshed matru/pitrubhasha, but are in inglis here for
benephit of readers].
The Agastay of Bhatthiri Puran is the fake Agastya of Kaliyug. He
lives only in Bhatthiri Puran which is still being written.


The real Agastya (Agastya the Bhaiya) lives for ever. Agastya amar
rahe. His self-exile into Dravidasthan will never be in vain. The
Vindhyas shall remain a mound as long as Surya lives in this Jagat
that is Mithya. Aditya shall always be able to take a stroll into
Dravidastahn.
Upon hearing these words, Agasty said, "Yes, we can" and headed off to
Chowpatty with dhoti and lota in hand - journey immortalized in the
movie Dhoti Lota aut Chowpatty. Reaching Chowpatty, he sent e-mail to
Gajodhar, Manohar, Baijnath, Biraj Bihari, Gupta, Shirivastav, ... The
awesome engineering skills and santan karm paid off handsomely - Ganga
was finally brought to Mumbai along with gaai, bhains, ...
The Bhaiyas have always harbored wanderlust not just in their heart
but even inside their kaupin.


Kaupin on his loin, the great Agastya had crossed into Dravidasthan at
the dawn of history. They never had to wait for Bhatthiri Puran to be
written to conquer Chowpatty.


Bhaiyas shall tread where even the Thackerays fear to tread. Doodh and
paani shall never be parted. Thanks to Bhaiyas, paani will always be
there to help out doodh just as the Paramatma will always be there to
make life worth living for the Jeevatma.




Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
2011-07-10 06:15:35 UTC
Permalink
On Jul 9, 10:45 am, "Myself, Mallu. Yourself?"
Dravida or commonly known as South India should be a separate
country. The Hindustanis are not favourable allies for most
Dravidians or people from Dravida. The Hindustanis are very
prejudiced and hateful toward most Dravidians and we as Dravidians or
people from Dravida should not mix with them.
A Dravida separatist movement needs to occur so that the people of
Dravida are liberated from the Gandhian extremism of Secularism.
Notice how the people of Dravida were given no place in the forming of
Bharat ("India"). We Dravidians have to do our part to separate from
the hateful forces of the Hindustanis.
The Hindustanis are demented and Satanic people. The strong hold
of Hinduism is among the Hindustanis and not the Dravidians. Dravida
is a place for broad minded people who accept many religions but
definetely mixing with the Hindustanis and their supporters is a
loss. Aligning with the Hindustanis is a total loss for all
concerned.
A new country of Dravidasthana must be formed so that we as
Dravidians have our rightful place among the nations of this world so
as to exert our sovereignty for the betterment of mankind. The
Hindustanis have time and time again mismanaged our resources and our
ways so that their hateful agendas are propped for the sake of their
Satanic religious ideologies.
We as Dravidians need to set up a great wall similar to China
between Hindustan and Dravida so that the Satanis influence of the
Hindustanis does not affect us. The Hindustanis are a total blight on
our ways of life. From Vegetarianism to Satanism the Hindustanis have
totally corrupted our lives.
Jai Dravidasthana!
Actually Brahma did create a wall to separate Dravidasthan from the
rest of blessed India (Aryavarta). I am referring to the Vindhya
mountains, which in a pique, had blown himself up so tall that that
the Sun (Aditya) could no longer cross into the now ever-dark Deccan.
It was then that the gods approached sage Agastya to arrange an end to
the 24/7 night that had engulfed the poor Dravidasthanis.
Why Agastya? Because the great sage was also the guru of the Vindhya
mountain. Thew gods knew that only sage Agastya could bring relief to
the Dravidasthanis who were suffering for no fault of their own.
So what did guru Agastya do? On the 1st of Bhadra (roughly mid-August)
he approached the tall and stately Vindhya mountais from the north
(Aryavarta). As a dutiful disciple, Vindhya Mountain right away bowed
down to his guru Agastya.
Agastya told the Vindhya mountains that this would be his first visit
to Dravidasthana and requested the mountain to remain bowed down till
Agastya came back from his mission in Dravidasthana to his home in
Aryavarta.
Sage Agastya crossed into Dravidasthana and built an ashram near
modern day Chennai (in Sriperumbudur to be exact). Sage Agastya found
out it would take him a lifetime to civilize the Dravidasthanis and he
devoted himself headlong into that stupendous task.
To make a long story short, sage Agastya was never able to get back to
Aryavarta. The Vindhya Mountain remains bowed down to this day to a
height much less than that of the majestic Himalayas where Shiv
resides.
Aryavarta misses sage Agastya. But Aryavarta's loss has been
Dravidasthana's gain as the people have gradually picked up the
Sanatan Dharma.
In Kaliyug, Sriperumbudur would be the place where Rajiv Gandhi would
be assassinated by a Dravida rakshasi, but that's another story.
According to the Bhattathiri puran, the story of is slightly different.
Bhatthiri Puran is just coming into existence at this fag end of
Kaliyug, I wish it a place in a nook of our folklore.
Cool! 'Bhatthiri Puran' - nice touch! Very nice 'upbhransh'. Suitable
for Kuru(illa) Muckeraj, Ph.D., to cut and paste this crap, over and
over again until the end of Kaliyug - the dude's got to hang on to avoid
'punnarak'.
But any Bhaiya worth his salt will point out that Bhatthiri Puran
fails to do full justice to the mighty sage from Yugs of yore. The
real Agastya, a Bhaiya to the bottom of his heart, had once obliged
the gods by drinking up all the salty water of all the ocens. And, no
shit, he had even digested demon king Ilwal's brother into oblivion.
True. The original Agasty has been give the short shrift in the newest
Puran, which is all about the 1008th avatar of the original. So, there
are no references to any cannibalism. Anyways, in the southern
tradition, Agasty is a dravidian named Agastya (downbhranshed) and not a
bhaiyya. Gotta figure out a north-south reconciliation of this story.
The only person on earth who ever got the better of this sage was his
better half Lopamudra who refused him sex in his horniest kshan unless
he met certain conditions. These conditions had Agastya scurrying far
and wide and eventually to demon king Ilwal's court to bring home
what Lopamudra desired.
Agastya proved himself up to the task by bringing home the needful
while Lopamudra was still in ovulation. It was all worth the effort
because the resulting son (Drirhasyu) saved not just Agastya from
Punnarak but even Agastya's ancestors who had been left hanging upside
down in a dark cave.
Agasty's ancestors were bats?
Agasty reincarnated as Agasty 1008 (note no Roman numerals) in
bhaiyyasthan after Adi Shankar's moksh.
Once a Bhaiya, always a Bhaiya. Bhatthiri Puran indeed has it right
that if Agastya had actually come back to Jagat that is Mithya in Kali
Yug, it would have been definitely as a Bhaiya.
Nah. He was originally a madrasi, who reincarnated as a bhaiyya to
prevent an explosion of bhaiyya population - "sanatan dharm, not santan
karm, you twits," is what he supposedly said, while Kuru(illa) Muckeraj
was firing blanks on NH8.
Apparently he was very very
concerned that this new advait philosophy was being completely
misinterpreted by doodhdvaitis (doodh aur paani philosophy) to the point
that "doodh aur paani ka mel" was being used to demonstrate advait
(misinterpreted as doodh aur paani, donon ek. baaqi sab kuchh maya hai)
in action in day to day life.
Bhaiyas do take their doodh (Jeevatma) and paani (Paramatma) very very
seriously. Doodh is non-existent without paani just as the Jeevatma is
non-existent without Paramatma. The twain shall ever meet. Bhaiyas
always add pani to doodh to make life even more meaningful. Not for
him the abdication of his spiritual duties for chasing the philistine
mirage of Jagat that is Mithya in India that is Bharat.
Wonderful! Hopefully the water is pure 'ganga jal' and not something
from thane creek.
It goes to the credit of Varanasi (the very heart of Bhaiyaland) that
it was instrumental in blessing Adi Shankar with the most ecstatic
moments in his life. It was the Bhaiyas who made Adi Shankar aware, at
least implicitly, that there is much more to life than to disdain
karma yogi Bhaiyas who bring meaning to life by adding paani to doodh
When Adi Shankar entered into a debate in Varanasi with Mandan
Mishra's wife, it was stipulated that the debate would be only on sex.
If Adi Shankar had continued to believe in a Jagat that is Mithya, he
would never have agreed to the sex debate nor would he have taken time
off before the debate to learn everything about sex from two just-
widowed queens.
Yeah, so I've heard many a time from your sex-obsessed buddy Rakesh
Tiwary. Do y'all hunt as a pack?
And, of course, it goes to the credit of Adi Shankar that even as he
touted faith in Jagat that is Mithya, he made the Jagat very very
meaningful by his tryst with Ubhaya Baharati and the two just-widowed
queens of Bhaiyaland. Adi Shankar had never experienced such ecstasy
in the land south of the Vindhyas. No wonder that he spent the last
days of his short life as far north as possible of the Vindhyas. He
even felt a kinship with Bhaiya Buddha as he contemplated Nirvana at
Kedar !!
Yeah, yeah. Rehash. Y'all might want to spin this story another way.
Dravidasthan didn't remain a lost cause either. It went on to be
redeemed subsequently by local lads, first by Ramanujacharya and then
decisively by Madhavacharya.
And many more including Nimbarka. One doesn't hear too much about any
bhaiyyas having contributed anything to Hinduism after the 8th cent. The
20th/21st version is Kuru(illa) Muckeraj, Ph.D., and he only cuts and
pastes everything, including his 'dhanyavaads' (unfortunately in
pitrubhasha).
So, he decided to go on a pilgrimage to
Shringeri and seek an upaay to the problem.
Besides, he was getting
quite tired of the culture rooted in agriculture, and the increasing
emphasis of people on santan karm and gender selection to avoid punnarak
for several generations.
Bhatthiri Puran seems to be starting off with a wrong solution for a
wrong problem !!
Procreation as the solution to agriculture?
Bhatthiri Puran's Agastya 1008 is living in a Jagat that is Mithya if
he is under the maya that his doodh has no paani. He must also learn
to appreciate the yeoman's job by Bhaiyas in adding even more paani to
his doodh whether it gets milked in Kerala, Maharashtra or California.
This is what makes life worth living.
I'll take a bhaiyya's word for it.
As he sauntered down southwards, with dhoti and lota (langot and
kamandal in matrubhasha),
Langot is better translated as Kaupin. It is an abbreviated but a
semen-proof version of dhoti. It certainly minimizes seepage loss of a
key ingredient of the stuff that goes a long way toward avoiding
Punnarak. Sperm banks are now seriously looking into the possibility
of accepting donations collected in kaupins.
Kuru(illa) Muckeraj apparently has many of these (the low porosity kind
- porosity measured against the density of his brains). However, these
'cowpins' won't help - no swimmers, man!
The dhoti (especially if worn in the lungi-style of Dravidasthan) is
not equipped to collect sperm. If people south of the Vindhyas find
it difficult to master the art of wearing dhoti in anything other than
in lungi-style, they must always wear the kaupin underneath to prevent
seepage loss of semen.
he encountered the mighty Vindhys [Note: he
got to Chowpatty on his way back to bhaiyyasthan].
Mighty Vindhyas! :-D
Downbhransh.
Vindhyas had been diminished long time back by the real Agastya never
to rise again. The fake Agastya (Bhatthiri Puran's Agastya 1008) is
barking up the wrong tree if not the wrong mountain. In fact,
Bhatthiri Puran should refer to Vindhya asa hill, nay, a mound instead
of contributing to Jagat Mithya by referring to it as a mountain.
To his dismay, Agasty
found that Vindhyas had been made mightier by years and years of
cut-and-paste prayers and assorted radiation blocking products from
several punnarakiya maharajs, who often had to get up that hill to bray
to Yamdev.
That's Mithya Jagat for you. In real life, Vindhya remains as
diminished as Bhaiya Agastya had left it on 1st of Bhadra many
millennia ago. In fact, mother nature has diminished it further
through denudation and erosion. Aditya no longer faces a road block on
his way to the South Land. Even the lowly idli and vada have
effortlessly made their way past the diminished Vindhyas to create a
niche for themselves even in Chowpatty !!
One doesn't have to cross the Vindhys to get to Chowpatty, and
idlis/vada did make their way into the land of puran poli without any
Agasty assist. Making their way into bhaiyyasthan is a different matter
all together.
It took Agasty several years of hard work and penance to trim the
mountains back to size, and having done so he left instructions to
bhaiyyas, "punnarakiya maharajs or not, mountains and streams should be
left clean and no agricultural products be put on or into them, even if
such products would keep alpha, beta, and gamma radiation away from
bhaiyyasthan." He added, "I want to be able to speak about y'all in
glowing terms when I reach the land of Adi Shankar, the last asli
sanatan dharmi".
The real Agastya was a Bhaiya par excellence. He would have never
needed "years of hard work" to bring down even the mighty Himalyas. As
for the upstart Vindhya, a simple order many millennia ago left it
bent and bowed for eternity in this Jagat that is Mithya in India that
is Bharat.
Nope. A Tamil dude.
But Adi Shankar, after his tryst with sex in Bhaiyaland, never
bothered to cross the Vindhya Hills back to Dravidasthan again. He was
content with his life in Aryavarta where his doodh always came diluted
with plenty of paani.
No wonder he shuffled off in this 30s - done in by diluted doodh.
Agasty did cross that great hill
Bhatthiri Puran finally gets it right. The mighty Vindhyas is just a
hill. No ifs, buts or greats about it.
and get to dravidanadu (called madras
these days) and was completely shocked by the existence of a through z
mk people, and people whose matru and pitribhasha was not saniskrit.
However, people were very respectful and added a double honorfic to
peoples' names, e.g. Agastya-ji-ji, because they was all into 2ji/2G.
Bhatthiri Puran is being written in Kali Yug. It will do well to
reflect Kali Yug realities. When PJ Thomas (Poor Joke Thomas) from the
land of Adi Shankar was deemed too corrupt to become CVC, Pradeep
Kumar from the land of the Bhaiyas had to be appointed the CVC to
bring justice to the land where nidhis tend to look past karuna to
preferentially contain lakhs of crores of ill-gotten money to make
sense of Jagat that is Mithya in India that is Bharat.
Heh, gotta to wait and watch how much 'justice' the supposedly
incorruptible bhaiyya brings.
There is one peculiarity about the people of dravidanadu. They had the
ability to become vedically invisible after sunset. Being from the
cowbelt, little did Agasty know that it was the 'unfyear' (but lovely)
complexion of madrasis that contributed to the invisibility.
Bhaiyas brook no competition. They can be darker than the darkest of
Southies. But Bhaiyas prefer the Middle Path of moderation. That is
why they add paani to doodh to make it less white. Madrasis and Mallus
should take the path greased at all times by ample amounts of Fair&
Lovely for a smooth glide through Jagat that is Mithya especially in
India that is Bharat.
Fyear and Lovely provide a "smooth glide" - yeh shaving cream naheen hai
re. Raat mein bijli provider hai. Naheen to daanton le light se padhna
padta hai.
Traveling by day to avoid people invisible after sunset, our intrepid
seeker of Adi Shankar reached mallunadu, where there was a strange
upbhransh of saniskrit called manipravalam in use. There were all kinds
of people in "Goad's kendry" who said things like, "there is no goad but
goad", "he is a loving goad who died four auver sins", "there is no
goad, karl mars says so" ... blah, blah.
Sounds like people who are well into becoming favored sons of
Madhavacharya. Bhatthiri Puran might also want to point out that these
semi-Vaishnavites generally tend to be poor Marxmen during elections.
The LDF would love to cut off their left arm to bring these God's very
own people over to the ways of Marx.
Okay, these 'evil' vaishnavites can fend for themselves.
Getting past this din, and all
the stills installed by PPS Bevdosinhji Bahadur from Suret, Agastay
reached Shringeri. The long journey, with nothing but kanji for
sustenance, was an arduous one, but one that was vedically accomplished.
Bhatthiri's fake Agastya (Agastya 1008) is making a virtue of
sustaining on nothing. All culture, and no agriculture, ca indeed
leave you with an empty stomach.
The real Agastaya (not the fake on of Bhatthiri Puran) always knew
which side of the toast was buttered. His doodh was always full of
paani. To oblige the gods he drank all the salt water of the oceans in
just one sip. And, no shit, Agastya of yore completely digested the
demon king Ilwal's brother into nothingness inside his intestine.
Cannibalism (and headhunting?) was practices only in bhaiyyasthan.
Reaching Shringeri, Agasty asked about an upaay for "problem in
bhaiyyasthan" (note there is no article preceding the word problem).
Adi Shankaracharya, in a moment of candor, had said in Kashyap's land
(Kashmir) no less, that those that use the definite article with
abundance shall inherit the earth. Bhaiya Pradeep Kumar's appointment
as CVC is a good step toward putting the fear of God into those that
choose to live in Jagat that is Mithya even as they inundate India
that is Bharat with lakhs of crores of rupees of ill-gotten wealth.
Will he be uprooting the corruption from the India?
"Agam brahmasmi", came the upbhranshed reply from a latter day
Shankarchary (like Kamar Roy's Bhattachary). The Shankarchary went on
further to say in suitably upbhranshed saniskrit, "bhaj govindam, bhaj
govindam, govindam bhaj moodhmate".
May the good lord Govinda who is Padmanabha bring as much wealth to
all Vaishnavite centers as he has to Padmanabhaswamy Temple of
Thiruvatapuram. That will usher in a lot of sathya into Jagat that is
Mithya in India that is Bharat.
Let's hope that happens. In the meantime, keep a close look on Sotheby's
catalogs ;-)
Shankarchary then added, "Sanatan dharmis have become obsessed with
padres, madre de dios, kuj dosh - mars obsession, and salacious crap
(don't know equivalent manipravalam word) about these. Dhanyavaadsutr is
the only known book. The Vindhys have grown again, thanks to the efforts
of Bonehead Kuru(illa) Muckeraj, to the point that any and all radiation
has been blocked signaling an ice age in the gangetic plain. Mumbadevi's
people are getting unholy water from Thane creek, and the sena only
sells vada paav. Upaay lies in bringing ganga jal to Mumbadevi's people.
Jobs, jobs, jobs in the gangetic plain." [Note: all of these words were
said in upbhranshed matru/pitrubhasha, but are in inglis here for
benephit of readers].
The Agastay of Bhatthiri Puran is the fake Agastya of Kaliyug. He
lives only in Bhatthiri Puran which is still being written.
Verily.
The real Agastya (Agastya the Bhaiya) lives for ever. Agastya amar
rahe. His self-exile into Dravidasthan will never be in vain. The
Vindhyas shall remain a mound as long as Surya lives in this Jagat
that is Mithya. Aditya shall always be able to take a stroll into
Dravidastahn.
Quick, tell Kamar Roy about this.
Upon hearing these words, Agasty said, "Yes, we can" and headed off to
Chowpatty with dhoti and lota in hand - journey immortalized in the
movie Dhoti Lota aut Chowpatty. Reaching Chowpatty, he sent e-mail to
Gajodhar, Manohar, Baijnath, Biraj Bihari, Gupta, Shirivastav, ... The
awesome engineering skills and santan karm paid off handsomely - Ganga
was finally brought to Mumbai along with gaai, bhains, ...
The Bhaiyas have always harbored wanderlust not just in their heart
but even inside their kaupin.
Kaupin on his loin, the great Agastya had crossed into Dravidasthan at
the dawn of history. They never had to wait for Bhatthiri Puran to be
written to conquer Chowpatty.
Yeah, there was not a trace of bhaiyyas in Maharashtr until the 1960s :-)
Bhaiyas shall tread where even the Thackerays fear to tread. Doodh and
paani shall never be parted. Thanks to Bhaiyas, paani will always be
there to help out doodh just as the Paramatma will always be there to
make life worth living for the Jeevatma.
But bhaiyyas and their money are definitely parted by the Sena.
http://youtu.be/YuEvOx2zgxQ
http://youtu.be/tbAg4L15Psc
http://youtu.be/_ylPN65PxM4
http://youtu.be/wvzXe7ZqFLo
--
VB, Just itchy
'ome=shanty
Satish Kumar
2011-07-12 08:32:52 UTC
Permalink
On Jul 9, 11:15 pm, "Myself, Mallu. Yourself?"
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
On Jul 9, 10:45 am, "Myself, Mallu. Yourself?"
Actually Brahma did create a wall to separate Dravidasthan from the
rest of blessed India (Aryavarta). I am referring to the Vindhya
mountains, which in a pique, had blown himself up so tall that that
the Sun (Aditya) could no longer cross into the now ever-dark Deccan.
It was then that the gods approached sage Agastya to arrange an end to
the 24/7 night that had engulfed the poor Dravidasthanis.
Why Agastya? Because the great sage was also the guru of the Vindhya
mountain. Thew gods knew that only sage Agastya could bring relief to
the Dravidasthanis who were suffering for no fault of their own.
So what did guru Agastya do? On the 1st of Bhadra (roughly mid-August)
he approached the tall and stately Vindhya mountais from the north
(Aryavarta). As a dutiful disciple, Vindhya Mountain right away bowed
down to his guru Agastya.
Agastya told the Vindhya mountains that this would be his first visit
to Dravidasthana and requested the mountain to remain bowed down till
Agastya came back from his mission in Dravidasthana to his home in
Aryavarta.
Sage Agastya crossed into Dravidasthana and built an ashram near
modern day Chennai (in Sriperumbudur to be exact). Sage Agastya found
out it would take him a lifetime to civilize the Dravidasthanis and he
devoted himself headlong into that stupendous task.
To make a long story short, sage Agastya was never able to get back to
Aryavarta. The Vindhya Mountain remains bowed down to this day to a
height much less than that of the majestic Himalayas where Shiv
resides.
Aryavarta misses sage Agastya. But Aryavarta's loss has been
Dravidasthana's gain as the people have gradually picked up the
Sanatan Dharma.
In Kaliyug, Sriperumbudur would be the place where Rajiv Gandhi would
be assassinated by a Dravida rakshasi, but that's another story.
According to the Bhattathiri puran, the story of is slightly different.
Bhatthiri Puran is just coming into existence at this fag end of
Kaliyug, I wish it a place in a nook of our folklore.
Cool! 'Bhatthiri Puran' - nice touch! Very nice 'upbhransh'. Suitable
for Kuru(illa) Muckeraj, Ph.D., to cut and paste this crap, over and
over again until the end of Kaliyug - the dude's got to hang on to avoid
'punnarak'.
But any Bhaiya worth his salt will point out that Bhatthiri Puran
fails to do full justice to the mighty sage from Yugs of yore.  The
real Agastya, a Bhaiya to the bottom of his heart,  had once obliged
the gods by drinking up all the salty water of all the ocens. And, no
shit, he had even digested demon king Ilwal's brother into oblivion.
True. The original Agasty has been give the short shrift in the newest
Puran, which is all about the 1008th avatar of the original. So, there
are no references to any cannibalism. Anyways, in the southern
tradition, Agasty is a dravidian named Agastya (downbhranshed) and not a
bhaiyya. Gotta figure out a north-south reconciliation of this story.
In Adi Shankar's native land, semi-vowels like "y" are a burden.
Comrade VS didn't spare even himself when he took to shedding "y" left
and right (with an understandable partiality for the the left).
Comrade VS and Achyuta (Lord Vishnu) no longer go together. Achyuta
has been "upbhranshed" into Achuta. Comrade VS from Adi Shankar's land
would rather remember the sage who crossed into the Deccan from north
of the Vindhyas as Agast rather than as Agastya.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
The only person on earth who ever got the better of this sage was his
better half Lopamudra who refused him sex in his horniest kshan unless
he met certain conditions. These conditions had Agastya scurrying far
and wide and eventually to demon king Ilwal's court  to bring home
what Lopamudra desired.
Agastya proved himself up to the task by bringing home the needful
while Lopamudra was still in ovulation. It was all worth the effort
because the resulting son (Drirhasyu) saved not just Agastya from
Punnarak but even Agastya's ancestors who had been left hanging upside
down in a dark cave.
Agasty's ancestors were bats?
Were they? According to which Puran? Markat Puran?

I have read a different account.


Sage Agastya had vowed to remain a bachelor (presumably with no
intention of indulging in extra marital hanky-panky to save himself
from Punnarak). This triggered so much grief in his ancestors that
they took to hanging upside down inside a dark cave. When Agastya
pleaded with them to relent, they said they would if Agastya did the
needful to save himself from Punnarak. Agastya, a dutiful descendant,
quickly promised that he would do his best. Agastya went on to fulfill
his promise to his topsy turvy ancestors. And all was hunky-dory with
the Agastya clan.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Agasty reincarnated as Agasty 1008 (note no Roman numerals) in
bhaiyyasthan after Adi Shankar's moksh.
Once a Bhaiya, always a Bhaiya. Bhatthiri Puran indeed has it right
that if Agastya had actually come back to Jagat that is Mithya in Kali
Yug, it would have been definitely as a Bhaiya.
Nah. He was originally a madrasi, who reincarnated as a bhaiyya to
prevent an explosion of bhaiyya population - "sanatan dharm, not santan
karm, you twits," is what he supposedly said, while Kuru(illa) Muckeraj
was firing blanks on NH8.
Regardless of what Bhatthiri Puran might be trying to cook up in Kali
Yug, the sages of yore have it differently. 1st of Bhadra is now a
famous anniversary. That was the day, many kalpas ago, that Agastya
crossed into the Deccan. Vindhya still awaits return of the sage into
his native Aryavarta.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Apparently he was very very
concerned that this new advait philosophy was being completely
misinterpreted by doodhdvaitis (doodh aur paani philosophy) to the point
that "doodh aur paani ka mel" was being used to demonstrate advait
(misinterpreted as doodh aur paani, donon ek. baaqi sab kuchh maya hai)
in action in day to day life.
Bhaiyas do take their doodh (Jeevatma) and paani (Paramatma) very very
seriously. Doodh is non-existent without paani just as the Jeevatma is
non-existent without  Paramatma. The twain shall ever meet. Bhaiyas
always add pani to doodh to make life even more meaningful. Not for
him the abdication of his spiritual duties for chasing the philistine
mirage of Jagat that is Mithya in India that is Bharat.
Wonderful! Hopefully the water is pure 'ganga jal' and not something
from thane creek.
Jal, like truth, is one but sages call it by different names. The
Bhaiya sages have candidly kept you informed that the jal in your milk
was from Thane Creek. But rest assured, it would not have made the
slightest difference in your life if you had grown up on milk diluted
with Ganga Jal instead.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
It goes to the credit of Varanasi (the very heart of Bhaiyaland) that
it was instrumental in blessing Adi Shankar with the most ecstatic
moments in his life. It was the Bhaiyas who made Adi Shankar aware, at
least implicitly, that there is much more to life than to disdain
karma yogi Bhaiyas who bring meaning to life by adding paani to doodh
When Adi Shankar entered into a debate in Varanasi with Mandan
Mishra's wife, it was stipulated that the debate would be only on sex.
If Adi Shankar had continued to believe in a Jagat that is Mithya, he
would never have agreed to the sex debate nor would he have taken time
off before the debate  to learn everything about sex from two just-
widowed queens.
Yeah, so I've heard many a time from your sex-obsessed buddy Rakesh
Tiwary. Do y'all hunt as a pack?
Your belief in the brotherhood of men is commendable. May you continue
to see a "buddy" in everyone you encounter in this Jagat that is
Mithya.


But aren't you getting a little too overwhelmed by Jagat that is
Mithya? Adi Shankar gets to have sex with two widowed queens and a
sexy "debate" with Mandana Mishra's wife. And you choose to be
outraged by someone else's obsession with sex !!


And what's all this about getting hunted by "others" hunting in a
pack? How often do you feel that way ? This is verily paranoia without
cause in a Jagat that is Mithya.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
And, of course, it goes to the credit of Adi Shankar that even as he
touted faith in Jagat that is Mithya, he made the Jagat very very
meaningful by his tryst with Ubhaya Baharati and the two just-widowed
queens of Bhaiyaland. Adi Shankar had never experienced such ecstasy
in the land south of the Vindhyas. No wonder that he spent the last
days of his short life as far north as possible of the Vindhyas. He
even felt a kinship with Bhaiya Buddha as he contemplated Nirvana at
Kedar !!
Yeah, yeah. Rehash. Y'all might want to spin this story another way.
But Adi Shankar, himself, spun it no other way. It is Aryavarta that
rewarded Adi Shankar with ultimate ecstasy in Jagat that is Mithya. He
never bothered to cross the Vindhyas again.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Dravidasthan didn't remain a lost cause either. It went on to be
redeemed subsequently by local lads, first by Ramanujacharya and then
decisively by Madhavacharya.
And many more including Nimbarka. One doesn't hear too much about any
bhaiyyas having contributed anything to Hinduism after the 8th cent.
That's very very far from the truth. You were either playing hooky
during lessons on Bhakti Yug or else your teacher had resorted to
using a Readers' Digest version of Bhakti Yug as the text book for
your class.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
The
20th/21st version is Kuru(illa) Muckeraj, Ph.D., and he only cuts and
pastes everything, including his 'dhanyavaads' (unfortunately in
pitrubhasha).
So, he decided to go on a pilgrimage to
Shringeri and seek an upaay to the problem.
Besides, he was getting
quite tired of the culture rooted in agriculture, and the increasing
emphasis of people on santan karm and gender selection to avoid punnarak
for several generations.
Bhatthiri Puran seems to be starting off with a wrong solution for a
wrong problem !!
Procreation as the solution to agriculture?
That too would be a wrong solution for a wrong problem.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Bhatthiri Puran's Agastya 1008 is living in a Jagat that is Mithya if
he is under the maya that his doodh has no paani. He must also learn
to appreciate the yeoman's job by Bhaiyas in adding even more paani to
his doodh whether it gets milked in Kerala, Maharashtra or California.
This is what makes life worth living.
I'll take a bhaiyya's word for it.
Good boy. May you be born as a Bhaiya in your next life. In your next
life, may you experience bliss as you fetch water from the Thane Creek
to dilute the milk that you intend to sell in Puran Poli.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
As he sauntered down southwards, with dhoti and lota (langot and
kamandal in matrubhasha),
Langot is better translated as Kaupin. It is an abbreviated but a
semen-proof version of dhoti. It certainly minimizes seepage loss of a
key ingredient of the stuff that goes a long way toward avoiding
Punnarak. Sperm banks are now seriously  looking into the possibility
of accepting donations collected in kaupins.
Kuru(illa) Muckeraj apparently has many of these (the low porosity kind
- porosity measured against the density of his brains). However, these
'cowpins' won't help - no swimmers, man!
The dhoti (especially if worn in the lungi-style of Dravidasthan) is
not equipped to collect sperm.  If people south of the Vindhyas find
it difficult to master the art of wearing dhoti in anything other than
in lungi-style, they must always wear the kaupin underneath to prevent
seepage loss of semen.
he encountered the mighty Vindhys [Note: he
got to Chowpatty on his way back to bhaiyyasthan].
Mighty Vindhyas!    :-D
Downbhransh.
"y"-challenged Comrade VS (the redoubtable Achutananda) would no doubt
attain sachchidananda as he turns "mighty Vindhyas" into blissful
"might Vindh".
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Vindhyas had been diminished long time back by the real Agastya never
to rise again. The fake Agastya (Bhatthiri Puran's Agastya 1008) is
barking up the wrong tree if not the wrong mountain. In fact,
Bhatthiri Puran should refer to Vindhya asa hill, nay, a mound instead
of  contributing to Jagat Mithya by referring to it as a mountain.
To his dismay, Agasty
found that Vindhyas had been made mightier by years and years of
cut-and-paste prayers and assorted radiation blocking products from
several punnarakiya maharajs, who often had to get up that hill to bray
to Yamdev.
That's Mithya Jagat for you. In real life, Vindhya remains as
diminished as Bhaiya Agastya had left it on 1st of Bhadra many
millennia ago. In fact, mother nature has diminished it further
through denudation and erosion. Aditya no longer faces a road block on
his way to the South Land. Even the lowly idli and vada have
effortlessly made their way past the diminished Vindhyas to create a
niche for themselves even in Chowpatty !!
One doesn't have to cross the Vindhys to get to Chowpatty, and
idlis/vada did make their way into the land of puran poli without any
Agasty assist. Making their way into bhaiyyasthan is a different matter
all together.
Blessed are the idlis and the vadas that have made their way into
Bhaiyaland after crossing the "might Vindh".
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
It took Agasty several years of hard work and penance to trim the
mountains back to size, and having done so he left instructions to
bhaiyyas, "punnarakiya maharajs or not, mountains and streams should be
left clean and no agricultural products be put on or into them, even if
such products would keep alpha, beta, and gamma radiation away from
bhaiyyasthan." He added, "I want to be able to speak about y'all in
glowing terms when I reach the land of Adi Shankar, the last asli
sanatan dharmi".
The real Agastya was a Bhaiya par excellence. He would have never
needed "years of hard work" to bring down even the mighty Himalyas. As
for the upstart Vindhya, a simple order many millennia ago left it
bent and bowed for eternity in this Jagat that is Mithya in India that
is Bharat.
Nope. A Tamil dude.
If Agastay were a Tamil dude, he would have gone north on that fateful
1st of Bhadra many kalpas ago. When Agastya crossed the Vindhyas he
was stepping into Dravidasthan for the very first time. It is
Tamilnadu's good fortune that Agastya of Aryavarta set up his ashram
in Sriperumbudur to educate the natives.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
But Adi Shankar, after his tryst with sex in Bhaiyaland, never
bothered to cross the Vindhya Hills back to Dravidasthan again. He was
content with his life in Aryavarta where his doodh always came diluted
with plenty of paani.
No wonder he shuffled off in this 30s - done in by diluted doodh.
There was no question of Adi Shankar ever going back to Dravidasthan.
Adi Shankar did not just shuffle, but he sprinted, to escape from
Jagat that is Mithya in India that is Bharat.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Agasty did cross that great hill
Bhatthiri Puran finally gets it right. The mighty Vindhyas is just a
hill. No ifs, buts or greats about it.
and get to dravidanadu (called madras
these days) and was completely shocked by the existence of a through z
mk people, and people whose matru and pitribhasha was not saniskrit.
However, people were very respectful and added a double honorfic to
peoples' names, e.g. Agastya-ji-ji, because they was all into 2ji/2G.
Bhatthiri Puran is being written in Kali Yug. It will do well to
reflect Kali Yug realities. When PJ Thomas (Poor Joke Thomas) from the
land of Adi Shankar was deemed too corrupt to become CVC, Pradeep
Kumar from the land of the Bhaiyas had to be appointed the CVC to
bring justice to the land where nidhis tend to look past karuna to
preferentially contain lakhs of crores of ill-gotten money to make
sense of Jagat that is Mithya in India that is Bharat.
Heh, gotta to wait and watch how much 'justice' the supposedly
incorruptible bhaiyya brings.
Has to be more than what Poor Joke Thomas would have provided us.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
There is one peculiarity about the people of dravidanadu. They had the
ability to become vedically invisible after sunset. Being from the
cowbelt, little did Agasty know that it was the 'unfyear' (but lovely)
complexion of madrasis that contributed to the invisibility.
Bhaiyas brook no competition. They can be darker than the darkest of
Southies. But Bhaiyas prefer the Middle Path of moderation. That is
why they add paani to doodh to make it less white. Madrasis and Mallus
should take the path greased at all times by ample amounts of Fair&
Lovely for a  smooth glide through Jagat that is Mithya especially in
India that is Bharat.
Fyear and Lovely provide a "smooth glide" - yeh shaving cream naheen hai
re. Raat mein bijli provider hai. Naheen to daanton le light se padhna
padta hai.
Dual-use technology?
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Traveling by day to avoid people invisible after sunset, our intrepid
seeker of Adi Shankar reached mallunadu, where there was a strange
upbhransh of saniskrit called manipravalam in use. There were all kinds
of people in "Goad's kendry" who said things like, "there is no goad but
goad", "he is a loving goad who died four auver sins", "there is no
goad, karl mars says so" ... blah, blah.
Sounds like people who are well into  becoming favored sons of
Madhavacharya. Bhatthiri Puran might also want to point out that these
semi-Vaishnavites generally tend to be poor Marxmen during elections.
The LDF would love to cut off their left arm to bring these God's very
own people over to the ways of Marx.
Okay, these 'evil' vaishnavites can fend for themselves.
May Bhatthiri Puran accomodate these semi-Vaishnavites who love Isha
and Isha loves them.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Getting past this din, and all
the stills installed by PPS Bevdosinhji Bahadur from Suret, Agastay
reached Shringeri. The long journey, with nothing but kanji for
sustenance, was an arduous one, but one that was vedically accomplished.
Bhatthiri's fake Agastya (Agastya 1008) is making a virtue of
sustaining on nothing. All culture, and no agriculture, ca indeed
leave you with an empty stomach.
The real Agastaya (not the fake on of Bhatthiri Puran) always knew
which side of the toast was buttered. His doodh was always full of
paani. To oblige the gods he drank all the salt water of the oceans in
just one sip. And, no shit, Agastya of yore completely digested the
demon king Ilwal's brother  into nothingness inside his intestine.
Cannibalism (and headhunting?) was practices only in bhaiyyasthan.
Ilawal the rakshas raj was from the netherworld that is Deccan.
Unfortunately for him, his mayajaal backfired when his brother got
hoisted on his own petard. Agastya was no ordinary sage and the
rakshas mayajaal failed miserably to down him. Instead, it was Ilwal's
brother who ended up digested.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Reaching Shringeri, Agasty asked about an upaay for "problem in
bhaiyyasthan" (note there is no article preceding the word problem).
Adi Shankaracharya, in a moment of candor, had said in Kashyap's land
(Kashmir) no less, that those that use the definite article with
abundance shall inherit the earth. Bhaiya Pradeep Kumar's appointment
as CVC is a good step toward putting the fear of God into those that
choose to live in Jagat that is Mithya even as they inundate India
that is Bharat with lakhs of crores of rupees of ill-gotten wealth.
Will he be uprooting the corruption from the India?
Pradeep Kumar's appointment has come after a lot of scrutiny after the
Thomas fiasco. Pradeep Kumar has to be an improvement on Thomas.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
"Agam brahmasmi", came the upbhranshed reply from a latter day
Shankarchary (like Kamar Roy's Bhattachary). The Shankarchary went on
further to say in suitably upbhranshed saniskrit, "bhaj govindam, bhaj
govindam, govindam bhaj moodhmate".
May the good lord Govinda who is Padmanabha bring as much wealth to
all Vaishnavite centers as he has to Padmanabhaswamy Temple of
Thiruvatapuram. That will usher in a lot of sathya into Jagat that is
Mithya in India that is Bharat.
Let's hope that happens. In the meantime, keep a close look on Sotheby's
catalogs ;-)
Are you volunteering?
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Shankarchary then added, "Sanatan dharmis have become obsessed with
padres, madre de dios, kuj dosh - mars obsession, and salacious crap
(don't know equivalent manipravalam word) about these. Dhanyavaadsutr is
the only known book. The Vindhys have grown again, thanks to the efforts
of Bonehead Kuru(illa) Muckeraj, to the point that any and all radiation
has been blocked signaling an ice age in the gangetic plain. Mumbadevi's
people are getting unholy water from Thane creek, and the sena only
sells vada paav. Upaay lies in bringing ganga jal to Mumbadevi's people.
Jobs, jobs, jobs in the gangetic plain." [Note: all of these words were
said in upbhranshed matru/pitrubhasha, but are in inglis here for
benephit of readers].
The Agastay of Bhatthiri Puran is the fake Agastya of Kaliyug.  He
lives only in Bhatthiri Puran which is still being written.
Verily.
The real Agastya (Agastya the Bhaiya) lives for ever. Agastya amar
rahe. His self-exile into Dravidasthan will never be in vain. The
Vindhyas shall remain a mound as long as Surya lives in this Jagat
that is Mithya. Aditya shall always be able to take a stroll into
Dravidastahn.
Quick, tell Kamar Roy about this.
Who is Kamar Roy? Is he a Vaishnavite or an evil Adwaitavaadi?
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Upon hearing these words, Agasty said, "Yes, we can" and headed off to
Chowpatty with dhoti and lota in hand - journey immortalized in the
movie Dhoti Lota aut Chowpatty. Reaching Chowpatty, he sent e-mail to
Gajodhar, Manohar, Baijnath, Biraj Bihari, Gupta, Shirivastav, ... The
awesome engineering skills and santan karm paid off handsomely - Ganga
was finally brought to Mumbai along with gaai, bhains, ...
The Bhaiyas have always harbored wanderlust not just in their heart
but even inside their kaupin.
Kaupin on his loin, the great Agastya had crossed into Dravidasthan at
the dawn of history. They never had to wait for Bhatthiri Puran to be
written to conquer Chowpatty.
Yeah, there was not a trace of bhaiyyas in Maharashtr until the 1960s :-)
Seeing is believing. Now that the Thackerays can see Bhaiyas in
Chowpatty even without glasses, they have come to believe in the
Bhaiyas. Doodh diluted with ample paani is a bonus for the Thackerays.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Bhaiyas shall tread where even the Thackerays fear to tread. Doodh and
paani shall never be parted. Thanks to Bhaiyas, paani will always be
there to help out doodh just as the Paramatma will always be there to
make life worth living for the Jeevatma.
But bhaiyyas and their money are definitely parted by the Sena.
Senas are in temporary eclipse. When they make a come back, they
would make the Business House of Karunanidhi look like epitome of
probity.
Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
2011-07-12 15:32:58 UTC
Permalink
On Jul 9, 11:15 pm, "Myself, Mallu. Yourself?"
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
On Jul 9, 10:45 am, "Myself, Mallu. Yourself?"
Actually Brahma did create a wall to separate Dravidasthan from the
rest of blessed India (Aryavarta). I am referring to the Vindhya
mountains, which in a pique, had blown himself up so tall that that
the Sun (Aditya) could no longer cross into the now ever-dark Deccan.
It was then that the gods approached sage Agastya to arrange an end to
the 24/7 night that had engulfed the poor Dravidasthanis.
Why Agastya? Because the great sage was also the guru of the Vindhya
mountain. Thew gods knew that only sage Agastya could bring relief to
the Dravidasthanis who were suffering for no fault of their own.
So what did guru Agastya do? On the 1st of Bhadra (roughly mid-August)
he approached the tall and stately Vindhya mountais from the north
(Aryavarta). As a dutiful disciple, Vindhya Mountain right away bowed
down to his guru Agastya.
Agastya told the Vindhya mountains that this would be his first visit
to Dravidasthana and requested the mountain to remain bowed down till
Agastya came back from his mission in Dravidasthana to his home in
Aryavarta.
Sage Agastya crossed into Dravidasthana and built an ashram near
modern day Chennai (in Sriperumbudur to be exact). Sage Agastya found
out it would take him a lifetime to civilize the Dravidasthanis and he
devoted himself headlong into that stupendous task.
To make a long story short, sage Agastya was never able to get back to
Aryavarta. The Vindhya Mountain remains bowed down to this day to a
height much less than that of the majestic Himalayas where Shiv
resides.
Aryavarta misses sage Agastya. But Aryavarta's loss has been
Dravidasthana's gain as the people have gradually picked up the
Sanatan Dharma.
In Kaliyug, Sriperumbudur would be the place where Rajiv Gandhi would
be assassinated by a Dravida rakshasi, but that's another story.
According to the Bhattathiri puran, the story of is slightly different.
Bhatthiri Puran is just coming into existence at this fag end of
Kaliyug, I wish it a place in a nook of our folklore.
Cool! 'Bhatthiri Puran' - nice touch! Very nice 'upbhransh'. Suitable
for Kuru(illa) Muckeraj, Ph.D., to cut and paste this crap, over and
over again until the end of Kaliyug - the dude's got to hang on to avoid
'punnarak'.
But any Bhaiya worth his salt will point out that Bhatthiri Puran
fails to do full justice to the mighty sage from Yugs of yore. The
real Agastya, a Bhaiya to the bottom of his heart, had once obliged
the gods by drinking up all the salty water of all the ocens. And, no
shit, he had even digested demon king Ilwal's brother into oblivion.
True. The original Agasty has been give the short shrift in the newest
Puran, which is all about the 1008th avatar of the original. So, there
are no references to any cannibalism. Anyways, in the southern
tradition, Agasty is a dravidian named Agastya (downbhranshed) and not a
bhaiyya. Gotta figure out a north-south reconciliation of this story.
In Adi Shankar's native land, semi-vowels like "y" are a burden.
Comrade VS didn't spare even himself when he took to shedding "y" left
and right (with an understandable partiality for the the left).
Comrade VS and Achyuta (Lord Vishnu) no longer go together. Achyuta
has been "upbhranshed" into Achuta. Comrade VS from Adi Shankar's land
would rather remember the sage who crossed into the Deccan from north
of the Vindhyas as Agast rather than as Agastya.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
The only person on earth who ever got the better of this sage was his
better half Lopamudra who refused him sex in his horniest kshan unless
he met certain conditions. These conditions had Agastya scurrying far
and wide and eventually to demon king Ilwal's court to bring home
what Lopamudra desired.
Agastya proved himself up to the task by bringing home the needful
while Lopamudra was still in ovulation. It was all worth the effort
because the resulting son (Drirhasyu) saved not just Agastya from
Punnarak but even Agastya's ancestors who had been left hanging upside
down in a dark cave.
Agasty's ancestors were bats?
Were they? According to which Puran? Markat Puran?
Narkat Puran
I have read a different account.
Sage Agastya had vowed to remain a bachelor (presumably with no
intention of indulging in extra marital hanky-panky to save himself
from Punnarak). This triggered so much grief in his ancestors that
they took to hanging upside down inside a dark cave. When Agastya
pleaded with them to relent, they said they would if Agastya did the
needful to save himself from Punnarak. Agastya, a dutiful descendant,
quickly promised that he would do his best. Agastya went on to fulfill
his promise to his topsy turvy ancestors. And all was hunky-dory with
the Agastya clan.
Agasty's problem is really not one of concern right now. The real
concern is getting Param Poojy Shri Punnarakiy Kuruillanand Muckeraj,
Ph.D., some relief from the being in the bad book (and bat cave) of
Chitragupt.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Agasty reincarnated as Agasty 1008 (note no Roman numerals) in
bhaiyyasthan after Adi Shankar's moksh.
Once a Bhaiya, always a Bhaiya. Bhatthiri Puran indeed has it right
that if Agastya had actually come back to Jagat that is Mithya in Kali
Yug, it would have been definitely as a Bhaiya.
Nah. He was originally a madrasi, who reincarnated as a bhaiyya to
prevent an explosion of bhaiyya population - "sanatan dharm, not santan
karm, you twits," is what he supposedly said, while Kuru(illa) Muckeraj
was firing blanks on NH8.
Regardless of what Bhatthiri Puran might be trying to cook up in Kali
Yug, the sages of yore have it differently. 1st of Bhadra is now a
famous anniversary. That was the day, many kalpas ago, that Agastya
crossed into the Deccan. Vindhya still awaits return of the sage into
his native Aryavarta.
The other way around per MIT (Madrasi Invasion Theory) or OMT (Out of
Madras Theory).
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Apparently he was very very
concerned that this new advait philosophy was being completely
misinterpreted by doodhdvaitis (doodh aur paani philosophy) to the point
that "doodh aur paani ka mel" was being used to demonstrate advait
(misinterpreted as doodh aur paani, donon ek. baaqi sab kuchh maya hai)
in action in day to day life.
Bhaiyas do take their doodh (Jeevatma) and paani (Paramatma) very very
seriously. Doodh is non-existent without paani just as the Jeevatma is
non-existent without Paramatma. The twain shall ever meet. Bhaiyas
always add pani to doodh to make life even more meaningful. Not for
him the abdication of his spiritual duties for chasing the philistine
mirage of Jagat that is Mithya in India that is Bharat.
Wonderful! Hopefully the water is pure 'ganga jal' and not something
from thane creek.
Jal, like truth, is one but sages call it by different names. The
Bhaiya sages have candidly kept you informed that the jal in your milk
was from Thane Creek. But rest assured, it would not have made the
slightest difference in your life if you had grown up on milk diluted
with Ganga Jal instead.
Ekam sat bhaiyyaa: bahuda vadanti. I can dig it. However, evidence
points to ganga jal stunting intellectual growth of punnarak-bound bhaiyyas.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
It goes to the credit of Varanasi (the very heart of Bhaiyaland) that
it was instrumental in blessing Adi Shankar with the most ecstatic
moments in his life. It was the Bhaiyas who made Adi Shankar aware, at
least implicitly, that there is much more to life than to disdain
karma yogi Bhaiyas who bring meaning to life by adding paani to doodh
When Adi Shankar entered into a debate in Varanasi with Mandan
Mishra's wife, it was stipulated that the debate would be only on sex.
If Adi Shankar had continued to believe in a Jagat that is Mithya, he
would never have agreed to the sex debate nor would he have taken time
off before the debate to learn everything about sex from two just-
widowed queens.
Yeah, so I've heard many a time from your sex-obsessed buddy Rakesh
Tiwary. Do y'all hunt as a pack?
Your belief in the brotherhood of men is commendable. May you continue
to see a "buddy" in everyone you encounter in this Jagat that is
Mithya.
But aren't you getting a little too overwhelmed by Jagat that is
Mithya? Adi Shankar gets to have sex with two widowed queens and a
sexy "debate" with Mandana Mishra's wife. And you choose to be
outraged by someone else's obsession with sex !!
Not outraged, just amused by idiocy.
And what's all this about getting hunted by "others" hunting in a
pack? How often do you feel that way ? This is verily paranoia without
cause in a Jagat that is Mithya.
I'll take that under advisement.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
And, of course, it goes to the credit of Adi Shankar that even as he
touted faith in Jagat that is Mithya, he made the Jagat very very
meaningful by his tryst with Ubhaya Baharati and the two just-widowed
queens of Bhaiyaland. Adi Shankar had never experienced such ecstasy
in the land south of the Vindhyas. No wonder that he spent the last
days of his short life as far north as possible of the Vindhyas. He
even felt a kinship with Bhaiya Buddha as he contemplated Nirvana at
Kedar !!
Yeah, yeah. Rehash. Y'all might want to spin this story another way.
But Adi Shankar, himself, spun it no other way. It is Aryavarta that
rewarded Adi Shankar with ultimate ecstasy in Jagat that is Mithya. He
never bothered to cross the Vindhyas again.
The experience must have killed him, or maybe he drank doodh in
bhaiyyasthan.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Dravidasthan didn't remain a lost cause either. It went on to be
redeemed subsequently by local lads, first by Ramanujacharya and then
decisively by Madhavacharya.
And many more including Nimbarka. One doesn't hear too much about any
bhaiyyas having contributed anything to Hinduism after the 8th cent.
That's very very far from the truth. You were either playing hooky
during lessons on Bhakti Yug or else your teacher had resorted to
using a Readers' Digest version of Bhakti Yug as the text book for
your class.
Reader's Digest or not, ain't no "Bhakti Jug" in Hinduism, except in
Indian History. Get with the program.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
The
20th/21st version is Kuru(illa) Muckeraj, Ph.D., and he only cuts and
pastes everything, including his 'dhanyavaads' (unfortunately in
pitrubhasha).
So, he decided to go on a pilgrimage to
Shringeri and seek an upaay to the problem.
Besides, he was getting
quite tired of the culture rooted in agriculture, and the increasing
emphasis of people on santan karm and gender selection to avoid punnarak
for several generations.
Bhatthiri Puran seems to be starting off with a wrong solution for a
wrong problem !!
Procreation as the solution to agriculture?
That too would be a wrong solution for a wrong problem.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Bhatthiri Puran's Agastya 1008 is living in a Jagat that is Mithya if
he is under the maya that his doodh has no paani. He must also learn
to appreciate the yeoman's job by Bhaiyas in adding even more paani to
his doodh whether it gets milked in Kerala, Maharashtra or California.
This is what makes life worth living.
I'll take a bhaiyya's word for it.
Good boy. May you be born as a Bhaiya in your next life. In your next
life, may you experience bliss as you fetch water from the Thane Creek
to dilute the milk that you intend to sell in Puran Poli.
Ain't no next life, and so no problem.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
As he sauntered down southwards, with dhoti and lota (langot and
kamandal in matrubhasha),
Langot is better translated as Kaupin. It is an abbreviated but a
semen-proof version of dhoti. It certainly minimizes seepage loss of a
key ingredient of the stuff that goes a long way toward avoiding
Punnarak. Sperm banks are now seriously looking into the possibility
of accepting donations collected in kaupins.
Kuru(illa) Muckeraj apparently has many of these (the low porosity kind
- porosity measured against the density of his brains). However, these
'cowpins' won't help - no swimmers, man!
The dhoti (especially if worn in the lungi-style of Dravidasthan) is
not equipped to collect sperm. If people south of the Vindhyas find
it difficult to master the art of wearing dhoti in anything other than
in lungi-style, they must always wear the kaupin underneath to prevent
seepage loss of semen.
he encountered the mighty Vindhys [Note: he
got to Chowpatty on his way back to bhaiyyasthan].
Mighty Vindhyas! :-D
Downbhransh.
"y"-challenged Comrade VS (the redoubtable Achutananda) would no doubt
attain sachchidananda as he turns "mighty Vindhyas" into blissful
"might Vindh".
Repeat.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Vindhyas had been diminished long time back by the real Agastya never
to rise again. The fake Agastya (Bhatthiri Puran's Agastya 1008) is
barking up the wrong tree if not the wrong mountain. In fact,
Bhatthiri Puran should refer to Vindhya asa hill, nay, a mound instead
of contributing to Jagat Mithya by referring to it as a mountain.
To his dismay, Agasty
found that Vindhyas had been made mightier by years and years of
cut-and-paste prayers and assorted radiation blocking products from
several punnarakiya maharajs, who often had to get up that hill to bray
to Yamdev.
That's Mithya Jagat for you. In real life, Vindhya remains as
diminished as Bhaiya Agastya had left it on 1st of Bhadra many
millennia ago. In fact, mother nature has diminished it further
through denudation and erosion. Aditya no longer faces a road block on
his way to the South Land. Even the lowly idli and vada have
effortlessly made their way past the diminished Vindhyas to create a
niche for themselves even in Chowpatty !!
One doesn't have to cross the Vindhys to get to Chowpatty, and
idlis/vada did make their way into the land of puran poli without any
Agasty assist. Making their way into bhaiyyasthan is a different matter
all together.
Blessed are the idlis and the vadas that have made their way into
Bhaiyaland after crossing the "might Vindh".
Gotta feed 'em, boy. Else they might end up like Laloo or Jhakar -
fodder only gets you so far.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
It took Agasty several years of hard work and penance to trim the
mountains back to size, and having done so he left instructions to
bhaiyyas, "punnarakiya maharajs or not, mountains and streams should be
left clean and no agricultural products be put on or into them, even if
such products would keep alpha, beta, and gamma radiation away from
bhaiyyasthan." He added, "I want to be able to speak about y'all in
glowing terms when I reach the land of Adi Shankar, the last asli
sanatan dharmi".
The real Agastya was a Bhaiya par excellence. He would have never
needed "years of hard work" to bring down even the mighty Himalyas. As
for the upstart Vindhya, a simple order many millennia ago left it
bent and bowed for eternity in this Jagat that is Mithya in India that
is Bharat.
Nope. A Tamil dude.
If Agastay were a Tamil dude, he would have gone north on that fateful
1st of Bhadra many kalpas ago. When Agastya crossed the Vindhyas he
was stepping into Dravidasthan for the very first time. It is
Tamilnadu's good fortune that Agastya of Aryavarta set up his ashram
in Sriperumbudur to educate the natives.
Tell that to Raja-ji-ji (2G ka Raja) and bhaiyyas will end with a second
pair of chappals (assuming there was a first pair)
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
But Adi Shankar, after his tryst with sex in Bhaiyaland, never
bothered to cross the Vindhya Hills back to Dravidasthan again. He was
content with his life in Aryavarta where his doodh always came diluted
with plenty of paani.
No wonder he shuffled off in this 30s - done in by diluted doodh.
There was no question of Adi Shankar ever going back to Dravidasthan.
Adi Shankar did not just shuffle, but he sprinted, to escape from
Jagat that is Mithya in India that is Bharat.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Agasty did cross that great hill
Bhatthiri Puran finally gets it right. The mighty Vindhyas is just a
hill. No ifs, buts or greats about it.
and get to dravidanadu (called madras
these days) and was completely shocked by the existence of a through z
mk people, and people whose matru and pitribhasha was not saniskrit.
However, people were very respectful and added a double honorfic to
peoples' names, e.g. Agastya-ji-ji, because they was all into 2ji/2G.
Bhatthiri Puran is being written in Kali Yug. It will do well to
reflect Kali Yug realities. When PJ Thomas (Poor Joke Thomas) from the
land of Adi Shankar was deemed too corrupt to become CVC, Pradeep
Kumar from the land of the Bhaiyas had to be appointed the CVC to
bring justice to the land where nidhis tend to look past karuna to
preferentially contain lakhs of crores of ill-gotten money to make
sense of Jagat that is Mithya in India that is Bharat.
Heh, gotta to wait and watch how much 'justice' the supposedly
incorruptible bhaiyya brings.
Has to be more than what Poor Joke Thomas would have provided us.
Yeah, right!
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
There is one peculiarity about the people of dravidanadu. They had the
ability to become vedically invisible after sunset. Being from the
cowbelt, little did Agasty know that it was the 'unfyear' (but lovely)
complexion of madrasis that contributed to the invisibility.
Bhaiyas brook no competition. They can be darker than the darkest of
Southies. But Bhaiyas prefer the Middle Path of moderation. That is
why they add paani to doodh to make it less white. Madrasis and Mallus
should take the path greased at all times by ample amounts of Fair&
Lovely for a smooth glide through Jagat that is Mithya especially in
India that is Bharat.
Fyear and Lovely provide a "smooth glide" - yeh shaving cream naheen hai
re. Raat mein bijli provider hai. Naheen to daanton le light se padhna
padta hai.
Dual-use technology?
You bet.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Traveling by day to avoid people invisible after sunset, our intrepid
seeker of Adi Shankar reached mallunadu, where there was a strange
upbhransh of saniskrit called manipravalam in use. There were all kinds
of people in "Goad's kendry" who said things like, "there is no goad but
goad", "he is a loving goad who died four auver sins", "there is no
goad, karl mars says so" ... blah, blah.
Sounds like people who are well into becoming favored sons of
Madhavacharya. Bhatthiri Puran might also want to point out that these
semi-Vaishnavites generally tend to be poor Marxmen during elections.
The LDF would love to cut off their left arm to bring these God's very
own people over to the ways of Marx.
Okay, these 'evil' vaishnavites can fend for themselves.
May Bhatthiri Puran accomodate these semi-Vaishnavites who love Isha
and Isha loves them.
Ain't such thing going to happen.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Getting past this din, and all
the stills installed by PPS Bevdosinhji Bahadur from Suret, Agastay
reached Shringeri. The long journey, with nothing but kanji for
sustenance, was an arduous one, but one that was vedically accomplished.
Bhatthiri's fake Agastya (Agastya 1008) is making a virtue of
sustaining on nothing. All culture, and no agriculture, ca indeed
leave you with an empty stomach.
The real Agastaya (not the fake on of Bhatthiri Puran) always knew
which side of the toast was buttered. His doodh was always full of
paani. To oblige the gods he drank all the salt water of the oceans in
just one sip. And, no shit, Agastya of yore completely digested the
demon king Ilwal's brother into nothingness inside his intestine.
Cannibalism (and headhunting?) was practices only in bhaiyyasthan.
Ilawal the rakshas raj was from the netherworld that is Deccan.
Unfortunately for him, his mayajaal backfired when his brother got
hoisted on his own petard. Agastya was no ordinary sage and the
rakshas mayajaal failed miserably to down him. Instead, it was Ilwal's
brother who ended up digested.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Reaching Shringeri, Agasty asked about an upaay for "problem in
bhaiyyasthan" (note there is no article preceding the word problem).
Adi Shankaracharya, in a moment of candor, had said in Kashyap's land
(Kashmir) no less, that those that use the definite article with
abundance shall inherit the earth. Bhaiya Pradeep Kumar's appointment
as CVC is a good step toward putting the fear of God into those that
choose to live in Jagat that is Mithya even as they inundate India
that is Bharat with lakhs of crores of rupees of ill-gotten wealth.
Will he be uprooting the corruption from the India?
Pradeep Kumar's appointment has come after a lot of scrutiny after the
Thomas fiasco. Pradeep Kumar has to be an improvement on Thomas.
Yeah, right! One less zero in the total intake. Reflects loss of IQ points.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
"Agam brahmasmi", came the upbhranshed reply from a latter day
Shankarchary (like Kamar Roy's Bhattachary). The Shankarchary went on
further to say in suitably upbhranshed saniskrit, "bhaj govindam, bhaj
govindam, govindam bhaj moodhmate".
May the good lord Govinda who is Padmanabha bring as much wealth to
all Vaishnavite centers as he has to Padmanabhaswamy Temple of
Thiruvatapuram. That will usher in a lot of sathya into Jagat that is
Mithya in India that is Bharat.
Let's hope that happens. In the meantime, keep a close look on Sotheby's
catalogs ;-)
Are you volunteering?
Being continually tense, I like the continuous tense. You bet, I'll look
at Sotheby's catalogs. Who knows what one could get from Travancore.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Shankarchary then added, "Sanatan dharmis have become obsessed with
padres, madre de dios, kuj dosh - mars obsession, and salacious crap
(don't know equivalent manipravalam word) about these. Dhanyavaadsutr is
the only known book. The Vindhys have grown again, thanks to the efforts
of Bonehead Kuru(illa) Muckeraj, to the point that any and all radiation
has been blocked signaling an ice age in the gangetic plain. Mumbadevi's
people are getting unholy water from Thane creek, and the sena only
sells vada paav. Upaay lies in bringing ganga jal to Mumbadevi's people.
Jobs, jobs, jobs in the gangetic plain." [Note: all of these words were
said in upbhranshed matru/pitrubhasha, but are in inglis here for
benephit of readers].
The Agastay of Bhatthiri Puran is the fake Agastya of Kaliyug. He
lives only in Bhatthiri Puran which is still being written.
Verily.
The real Agastya (Agastya the Bhaiya) lives for ever. Agastya amar
rahe. His self-exile into Dravidasthan will never be in vain. The
Vindhyas shall remain a mound as long as Surya lives in this Jagat
that is Mithya. Aditya shall always be able to take a stroll into
Dravidastahn.
Quick, tell Kamar Roy about this.
Who is Kamar Roy? Is he a Vaishnavite or an evil Adwaitavaadi?
Neither. Simply wants to promote Agast to Augustus in bhaiyyaland.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Upon hearing these words, Agasty said, "Yes, we can" and headed off to
Chowpatty with dhoti and lota in hand - journey immortalized in the
movie Dhoti Lota aut Chowpatty. Reaching Chowpatty, he sent e-mail to
Gajodhar, Manohar, Baijnath, Biraj Bihari, Gupta, Shirivastav, ... The
awesome engineering skills and santan karm paid off handsomely - Ganga
was finally brought to Mumbai along with gaai, bhains, ...
The Bhaiyas have always harbored wanderlust not just in their heart
but even inside their kaupin.
Kaupin on his loin, the great Agastya had crossed into Dravidasthan at
the dawn of history. They never had to wait for Bhatthiri Puran to be
written to conquer Chowpatty.
Yeah, there was not a trace of bhaiyyas in Maharashtr until the 1960s :-)
Seeing is believing. Now that the Thackerays can see Bhaiyas in
Chowpatty even without glasses, they have come to believe in the
Bhaiyas. Doodh diluted with ample paani is a bonus for the Thackerays.
Thakerays get their bonus from vada paav, not doodh.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Bhaiyas shall tread where even the Thackerays fear to tread. Doodh and
paani shall never be parted. Thanks to Bhaiyas, paani will always be
there to help out doodh just as the Paramatma will always be there to
make life worth living for the Jeevatma.
But bhaiyyas and their money are definitely parted by the Sena.
Senas are in temporary eclipse. When they make a come back, they
would make the Business House of Karunanidhi look like epitome of
probity.
That'll be day, when small time hoods can match the skills and finesse
of the "business house."
--
VB, Just itchy
'ome=shanty
and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
2011-07-12 18:06:20 UTC
Permalink
Is V. Bhattathiri <***@gmail.com> a Christian?
What's wrong in being a Christian?

In article
Why, does V. Bhattathiri (KalluMallu) give thanks only at
Thanksgiving and Christmas?
what is wrong in being a christian ?
CHRISTIAN PRIESTS IN WEEKLY ABUSE CLAIMS

Forwarded message from "G.Subramaniam" <***@comcast.net>

[ From: "G.Subramaniam" <***@comcast.net>
[ Subject: Catholic priests in weekly abuse claims
[ Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004

Catholic priests in weekly abuse claims

Tuesday 13 July, LONDON - An average of one Roman Catholic priest
every week is accused of sexual abuse in England and Wales last year
but none has been prosecuted and all but two are still in their jobs,
a report has said.

A further 10 allegations were made of physical, emotional or other
abuse by priests, volunteers and employees of the church, bringing
total complaints for the year to 62, according to the report by the
Catholic Office for the Protection of Children (COPCA).

There were also 51 reports of "inappropriate behaviour" towards
children which were dealt with internally by the church after
consultation with police and social services.

COPCA was set up on the recommendation of the Nolan report, which was
commissioned in 2001 by the leader of the Roman Catholic Church in
England and Wales, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor, to look into the
problem of abuse in the church.

Murphy-O'Connor became embroiled in the scandal himself after he
admitted making mistakes as a bishop in the 1980s when he moved a
priest suspected of child abuse to a new job instead of investigating
fully. The priest has since served two prison terms for abuse.

Lord Nolan, who conducted the 2001 inquiry, said Tuesday's report
showed progress was now being made in the fight against abuse which
has dogged the Catholic church for years.

"Progress has been achieved at a time of continuing public awareness
and concern about the handling of such issues by the Catholic Church,
not only in England and Wales but also in Ireland, America Canada and
Australia," he said in the report.

"Abuse is not solely a problem among priests ... sadly within the
Church community it is also committed by employees and volunteers."

The United States Catholic Church has been rocked by an abuse scandal
this year after two studies released in February showed that more
than 10,600 children said they were molested by priests since 1950 in
an epidemic of child sexual abuse involving at least 4 percent of the
U.S. Catholic clergy.

Most of the victims were male, many of them boys aged between 11 and
14.

The COPCA report showed that the 62 UK claims last year were made by
a total of 86 victims, suggesting some employees had been the subject
of multiple accusations.

Only one case had resulted in a police caution, 22 were undergoing an
initial assessment by authorities and 23 were under investigation.

cnvi.us/dtdsp.php?date=13-07-2004&group=NW&sgroup=HD&seqno=9

End of forwarded message from "G.Subramaniam" <***@comcast.net>

Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti

o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.

Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.
Satish Kumar
2011-07-15 20:44:23 UTC
Permalink
On Jul 12, 8:32 am, "Myself, Mallu. Yourself?"
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
I have read a different account.
Sage Agastya had vowed to remain a bachelor (presumably with no
intention of indulging in extra marital hanky-panky to save himself
from Punnarak). This triggered so much grief in his ancestors that
they took to hanging upside down inside a dark cave. When Agastya
pleaded with them to relent, they said they would if Agastya did the
needful to save himself from Punnarak. Agastya, a dutiful descendant,
quickly promised that he would do his best. Agastya went on to fulfill
his promise to his topsy turvy ancestors. And all was hunky-dory with
the Agastya clan.
Agasty's problem is really not one of concern right now. The real
concern is getting Param Poojy Shri Punnarakiy Kuruillanand Muckeraj,
Ph.D., some relief from the being in the bad book (and bat cave) of
Chitragupt.
A stint in Punnarak or a bat cave is only be temporary event - perhaps
of a few kalpas (one kalpa = 432 crore years) at worst. After that he
should be back in martyalok with another sporting chance for a merger/
acquisition with brahmasatya.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
Regardless of what Bhatthiri Puran might be trying to cook up in Kali
Yug, the sages of yore have it differently.  1st of Bhadra is now a
famous anniversary. That was the day, many kalpas ago, that Agastya
crossed into the Deccan. Vindhya still awaits  return of the sage into
his native Aryavarta.
The other way around per MIT (Madrasi Invasion Theory) or OMT (Out of
Madras Theory).
Agastya won't be back home in Aryavarta till the cows come home. His
exile in Dravidasthan ensures that Vindhya continues to sit prone on
the fence and that Surya continues to be in possession of a daily
ticket to Dravidasthan for enlightening the natives with his dazzle.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
Jal, like truth, is one but sages call it by different names. The
Bhaiya sages have candidly kept you informed that the jal in your milk
was from Thane Creek. But rest assured, it would not have made the
slightest difference in your life if you had grown up on milk diluted
with Ganga Jal instead.
Ekam sat bhaiyyaa: bahuda vadanti. I can dig it. However, evidence
points to ganga jal stunting intellectual growth of punnarak-bound bhaiyyas.
Did this wrong diagnosis lead you to prefer doodh diluted with jal
from Thane Creek rather than with Ganga-jal? That's inconsequential -
much ado about nothing - in Jagat that is Mithya in India that is
Bahat.


Mumbaikars will thrive even if they have doodh diluted with jal from
Mumbai's fabled sewers. But Bhaiyas can be picky. They would rather
use jal from Thane Creek unless a Mumbaikar has really done enough to
deserve jal from the sewer.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Yeah, so I've heard many a time from your sex-obsessed buddy Rakesh
Tiwary. Do y'all hunt as a pack?
Your belief in the brotherhood of men is commendable. May you continue
to see a "buddy" in everyone you encounter in this Jagat that is
Mithya.
But aren't you getting a little too overwhelmed by Jagat that is
Mithya?  Adi Shankar gets to have sex with two widowed queens and a
sexy "debate" with Mandana Mishra's wife. And you choose to be
outraged by someone else's obsession with sex !!
Not outraged, just amused by idiocy.
Amusement, like laughter, is a good medicine. May you continue to be
amused by Adi Shankar's two week intensive course on sex from two
Bhaiya queens and his intense "debate" on sex with Mandana Mishra's
wife.


Adi Shankar could have studied sage Vatsayan's treatise on sex. But he
must have surmised that a text book by a Brahmachari might land him
with a false sense of accomplishment. In my opinion, Adi Shankar made
the right choice by taking lessons from the experienced queens as a
prelude to the "debate" with Mandana Mishra's wife who was no less
experienced.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
And what's all this about getting hunted by "others" hunting in a
pack? How often do you feel that way ? This is verily paranoia without
cause in a Jagat that is Mithya.
I'll take that under advisement.
If you continue to feel hunted, perhaps you can ask Dayashankar to get
you in touch with his court-appointed psychiatrist at Cygnet
Hospital. A session or two on the couch might ease your paranoia to a
bearable amount. If Dayashankar would only stop skipping his sessions,
he might be a different person all together on the newsgroup.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
But Adi Shankar, himself, spun it no other way. It is Aryavarta that
rewarded Adi Shankar with ultimate ecstasy in Jagat that is Mithya. He
never bothered to cross the Vindhyas again.
The experience must have killed him, or maybe he drank doodh in
bhaiyyasthan.
Both are experiences that he should never have missed even it meant
taking leave of Jagat that is Mithya in India that is Bharat.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
That's very very far from the truth. You were either playing hooky
during lessons on Bhakti Yug or else your teacher had resorted to
using a Readers' Digest version of Bhakti Yug as the text book for
your class.
Reader's Digest or not, ain't no "Bhakti Jug" in Hinduism, except in
Indian History. Get with the program.
In Jagat that is Mithya, are you so overwhelmed by maya that you have
concluded that Adi Shankar is not part of Indian history?!!!


Too bad you have been led astray to distrust Indian History by your
faith in Jagat Mithya.


May Lord Govinda get you in touch with a nice Vaishnavite teacher some
day to set you back on the right path.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
Bhatthiri Puran's Agastya 1008 is living in a Jagat that is Mithya if
he is under the maya that his doodh has no paani. He must also learn
to appreciate the yeoman's job by Bhaiyas in adding even more paani to
his doodh whether it gets milked in Kerala, Maharashtra or California.
This is what makes life worth living.
I'll take a bhaiyya's word for it.
Good boy. May you be born as a Bhaiya in your next life. In your next
life, may you experience bliss as you fetch water from the Thane Creek
to dilute the milk that you intend to sell in Puran Poli.
Ain't no next life, and so no problem.
You can take a permanent leave from Jagat that is Mithya only after
you learn to appreciate that there is life after death, even if it is
after a stint in Punnarak. That's when you get another chance to get
in touch with brahmasatya.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
"y"-challenged Comrade VS (the redoubtable Achutananda) would no doubt
attain sachchidananda as he turns "mighty Vindhyas" into blissful
"might Vindh".
Repeat.
A good mantra is a repeat mantra - it escorts you, one step at a time,
toward brahmasatya.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
Blessed are the idlis and the vadas that have made their way into
Bhaiyaland after crossing the "might Vindh".
Gotta feed 'em, boy. Else they might end up like Laloo or Jhakar -
fodder only gets you so far.
I have nothing against a good meal of idlis and vadas as long as you
have paid your dues to the Bhaiyas with a glass of milk diluted with
jal from Thane Creek.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
If Agastay were a Tamil dude, he would have gone north on that fateful
1st of Bhadra many kalpas ago. When Agastya crossed the Vindhyas he
was stepping into Dravidasthan for the very first time. It is
Tamilnadu's good fortune that Agastya of Aryavarta set up his ashram
in Sriperumbudur to educate the natives.
Tell that to Raja-ji-ji (2G ka Raja) and bhaiyyas will end with a second
pair of chappals (assuming there was a first pair)
Only an ingrate would disown his debt. No honest Tamil will stoop
down to that level. Ergo, 2G ka Raja is not an honest Tamil even if
his lawyers can manage to keep the case going till his Maker summons
him.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
Has to be more than what Poor Joke Thomas would have provided us.
Yeah, right!
Glad you agreed. The exclamation was no doubt to emphasize how
agreeable you are to my thought on Poor Joke Thomas.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
Dual-use technology?
You bet.
Bet? Have you been dreaming of Dharmaputra Yudhishthir? Polonius had
very good reasons to admonish, "Neither a bettor nor a Dharmaputra
be."
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
May Bhatthiri Puran accomodate these semi-Vaishnavites who love Isha
and Isha loves them.
Ain't such thing going to happen.
That's peeve, not facts, that's doing the talking.


Love conquers all. Vaishnavites and semi-Vaishnavites shall inherit
the earth if they haven't already done so.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
Pradeep Kumar's appointment has come after a lot of scrutiny after the
Thomas fiasco. Pradeep Kumar has to be an improvement on Thomas.
Yeah, right! One less zero in the total intake. Reflects loss of IQ points.
Poor Joke Thomas's IQ isn't something to write home about. And Comrade
VS didn't. He wrote to the appropriate authorities instead. The Thomas
fiasco could have been averted if people had paid attention to this
nice Vashnavite Comrade VS in time.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
Are you volunteering?
Being continually tense, I like the continuous tense. You bet, I'll look
at Sotheby's catalogs. Who knows what one could get from Travancore.
Good for you. May your dreams mate with catalog entries from
Travancore.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
Who is Kamar Roy? Is he a Vaishnavite or an evil Adwaitavaadi?
Neither. Simply wants to promote Agast to Augustus in bhaiyyaland.
Tell Kamar Roy that there is no way but the Vaishnavite way.

Tell him also that Agastya shall stay put in Chennai lest he forces
Surya to remain confined in Aryavarta leaving Dravidasthan with an
unintended all nighter at hand.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
Seeing is believing. Now that the Thackerays can see Bhaiyas in
Chowpatty even without glasses, they have come to believe in the
Bhaiyas. Doodh diluted with ample paani is a bonus for the Thackerays.
Thakerays get their bonus from vada paav, not doodh.
Too bad. They are missing the real thing. Bhaiyas shall yet make them
see the light or at least the doodh.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
Senas are in temporary eclipse.  When they make a come back, they
would make the Business House of Karunanidhi look like epitome of
probity.
That'll be day, when small time hoods can match the skills and finesse
of the "business house."
That will also be the night!!
Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
2011-07-16 16:29:52 UTC
Permalink
On Jul 12, 8:32 am, "Myself, Mallu. Yourself?"
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
I have read a different account.
Sage Agastya had vowed to remain a bachelor (presumably with no
intention of indulging in extra marital hanky-panky to save himself
from Punnarak). This triggered so much grief in his ancestors that
they took to hanging upside down inside a dark cave. When Agastya
pleaded with them to relent, they said they would if Agastya did the
needful to save himself from Punnarak. Agastya, a dutiful descendant,
quickly promised that he would do his best. Agastya went on to fulfill
his promise to his topsy turvy ancestors. And all was hunky-dory with
the Agastya clan.
Agasty's problem is really not one of concern right now. The real
concern is getting Param Poojy Shri Punnarakiy Kuruillanand Muckeraj,
Ph.D., some relief from the being in the bad book (and bat cave) of
Chitragupt.
A stint in Punnarak or a bat cave is only be temporary event - perhaps
of a few kalpas (one kalpa = 432 crore years) at worst. After that he
should be back in martyalok with another sporting chance for a merger/
acquisition with brahmasatya.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
Regardless of what Bhatthiri Puran might be trying to cook up in Kali
Yug, the sages of yore have it differently. 1st of Bhadra is now a
famous anniversary. That was the day, many kalpas ago, that Agastya
crossed into the Deccan. Vindhya still awaits return of the sage into
his native Aryavarta.
The other way around per MIT (Madrasi Invasion Theory) or OMT (Out of
Madras Theory).
Agastya won't be back home in Aryavarta till the cows come home. His
exile in Dravidasthan ensures that Vindhya continues to sit prone on
the fence and that Surya continues to be in possession of a daily
ticket to Dravidasthan for enlightening the natives with his dazzle.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
Jal, like truth, is one but sages call it by different names. The
Bhaiya sages have candidly kept you informed that the jal in your milk
was from Thane Creek. But rest assured, it would not have made the
slightest difference in your life if you had grown up on milk diluted
with Ganga Jal instead.
Ekam sat bhaiyyaa: bahuda vadanti. I can dig it. However, evidence
points to ganga jal stunting intellectual growth of punnarak-bound bhaiyyas.
Did this wrong diagnosis lead you to prefer doodh diluted with jal
from Thane Creek rather than with Ganga-jal? That's inconsequential -
much ado about nothing - in Jagat that is Mithya in India that is
Bahat.
Mumbaikars will thrive even if they have doodh diluted with jal from
Mumbai's fabled sewers. But Bhaiyas can be picky. They would rather
use jal from Thane Creek unless a Mumbaikar has really done enough to
deserve jal from the sewer.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Yeah, so I've heard many a time from your sex-obsessed buddy Rakesh
Tiwary. Do y'all hunt as a pack?
Your belief in the brotherhood of men is commendable. May you continue
to see a "buddy" in everyone you encounter in this Jagat that is
Mithya.
But aren't you getting a little too overwhelmed by Jagat that is
Mithya? Adi Shankar gets to have sex with two widowed queens and a
sexy "debate" with Mandana Mishra's wife. And you choose to be
outraged by someone else's obsession with sex !!
Not outraged, just amused by idiocy.
Amusement, like laughter, is a good medicine. May you continue to be
amused by Adi Shankar's two week intensive course on sex from two
Bhaiya queens and his intense "debate" on sex with Mandana Mishra's
wife.
Adi Shankar could have studied sage Vatsayan's treatise on sex. But he
must have surmised that a text book by a Brahmachari might land him
with a false sense of accomplishment. In my opinion, Adi Shankar made
the right choice by taking lessons from the experienced queens as a
prelude to the "debate" with Mandana Mishra's wife who was no less
experienced.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
And what's all this about getting hunted by "others" hunting in a
pack? How often do you feel that way ? This is verily paranoia without
cause in a Jagat that is Mithya.
I'll take that under advisement.
If you continue to feel hunted, perhaps you can ask Dayashankar to get
you in touch with his court-appointed psychiatrist at Cygnet
Hospital. A session or two on the couch might ease your paranoia to a
bearable amount. If Dayashankar would only stop skipping his sessions,
he might be a different person all together on the newsgroup.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
But Adi Shankar, himself, spun it no other way. It is Aryavarta that
rewarded Adi Shankar with ultimate ecstasy in Jagat that is Mithya. He
never bothered to cross the Vindhyas again.
The experience must have killed him, or maybe he drank doodh in
bhaiyyasthan.
Both are experiences that he should never have missed even it meant
taking leave of Jagat that is Mithya in India that is Bharat.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
That's very very far from the truth. You were either playing hooky
during lessons on Bhakti Yug or else your teacher had resorted to
using a Readers' Digest version of Bhakti Yug as the text book for
your class.
Reader's Digest or not, ain't no "Bhakti Jug" in Hinduism, except in
Indian History. Get with the program.
In Jagat that is Mithya, are you so overwhelmed by maya that you have
concluded that Adi Shankar is not part of Indian history?!!!
Too bad you have been led astray to distrust Indian History by your
faith in Jagat Mithya.
May Lord Govinda get you in touch with a nice Vaishnavite teacher some
day to set you back on the right path.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
Bhatthiri Puran's Agastya 1008 is living in a Jagat that is Mithya if
he is under the maya that his doodh has no paani. He must also learn
to appreciate the yeoman's job by Bhaiyas in adding even more paani to
his doodh whether it gets milked in Kerala, Maharashtra or California.
This is what makes life worth living.
I'll take a bhaiyya's word for it.
Good boy. May you be born as a Bhaiya in your next life. In your next
life, may you experience bliss as you fetch water from the Thane Creek
to dilute the milk that you intend to sell in Puran Poli.
Ain't no next life, and so no problem.
You can take a permanent leave from Jagat that is Mithya only after
you learn to appreciate that there is life after death, even if it is
after a stint in Punnarak. That's when you get another chance to get
in touch with brahmasatya.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
"y"-challenged Comrade VS (the redoubtable Achutananda) would no doubt
attain sachchidananda as he turns "mighty Vindhyas" into blissful
"might Vindh".
Repeat.
A good mantra is a repeat mantra - it escorts you, one step at a time,
toward brahmasatya.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
Blessed are the idlis and the vadas that have made their way into
Bhaiyaland after crossing the "might Vindh".
Gotta feed 'em, boy. Else they might end up like Laloo or Jhakar -
fodder only gets you so far.
I have nothing against a good meal of idlis and vadas as long as you
have paid your dues to the Bhaiyas with a glass of milk diluted with
jal from Thane Creek.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
If Agastay were a Tamil dude, he would have gone north on that fateful
1st of Bhadra many kalpas ago. When Agastya crossed the Vindhyas he
was stepping into Dravidasthan for the very first time. It is
Tamilnadu's good fortune that Agastya of Aryavarta set up his ashram
in Sriperumbudur to educate the natives.
Tell that to Raja-ji-ji (2G ka Raja) and bhaiyyas will end with a second
pair of chappals (assuming there was a first pair)
Only an ingrate would disown his debt. No honest Tamil will stoop
down to that level. Ergo, 2G ka Raja is not an honest Tamil even if
his lawyers can manage to keep the case going till his Maker summons
him.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
Has to be more than what Poor Joke Thomas would have provided us.
Yeah, right!
Glad you agreed. The exclamation was no doubt to emphasize how
agreeable you are to my thought on Poor Joke Thomas.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
Dual-use technology?
You bet.
Bet? Have you been dreaming of Dharmaputra Yudhishthir? Polonius had
very good reasons to admonish, "Neither a bettor nor a Dharmaputra
be."
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
May Bhatthiri Puran accomodate these semi-Vaishnavites who love Isha
and Isha loves them.
Ain't such thing going to happen.
That's peeve, not facts, that's doing the talking.
Love conquers all. Vaishnavites and semi-Vaishnavites shall inherit
the earth if they haven't already done so.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
Pradeep Kumar's appointment has come after a lot of scrutiny after the
Thomas fiasco. Pradeep Kumar has to be an improvement on Thomas.
Yeah, right! One less zero in the total intake. Reflects loss of IQ points.
Poor Joke Thomas's IQ isn't something to write home about. And Comrade
VS didn't. He wrote to the appropriate authorities instead. The Thomas
fiasco could have been averted if people had paid attention to this
nice Vashnavite Comrade VS in time.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
Are you volunteering?
Being continually tense, I like the continuous tense. You bet, I'll look
at Sotheby's catalogs. Who knows what one could get from Travancore.
Good for you. May your dreams mate with catalog entries from
Travancore.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
Who is Kamar Roy? Is he a Vaishnavite or an evil Adwaitavaadi?
Neither. Simply wants to promote Agast to Augustus in bhaiyyaland.
Tell Kamar Roy that there is no way but the Vaishnavite way.
Tell him also that Agastya shall stay put in Chennai lest he forces
Surya to remain confined in Aryavarta leaving Dravidasthan with an
unintended all nighter at hand.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
Seeing is believing. Now that the Thackerays can see Bhaiyas in
Chowpatty even without glasses, they have come to believe in the
Bhaiyas. Doodh diluted with ample paani is a bonus for the Thackerays.
Thakerays get their bonus from vada paav, not doodh.
Too bad. They are missing the real thing. Bhaiyas shall yet make them
see the light or at least the doodh.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by Satish Kumar
Senas are in temporary eclipse. When they make a come back, they
would make the Business House of Karunanidhi look like epitome of
probity.
That'll be day, when small time hoods can match the skills and finesse
of the "business house."
That will also be the night!!
You post is simply too long, and boring, to respond to. Despite all the
exhortations to line up behind bhaiyya (agri)culture and budging over to
Govinda, smaart(h) people are content with being "chidanandaroopa".

BTW, Polonius-volonius ko maar goli. The original Omlet was written by
Seshappa Iyer, a nice old dravidasthani.
--
VB, Just itchy
'ome=shanty
Satish Kumar
2011-07-16 21:41:23 UTC
Permalink
On Jul 16, 9:29 am, "Myself, Mallu. Yourself?"
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
You post is simply too long, and boring, to respond to. Despite all the
exhortations to line up behind bhaiyya (agri)culture and budging over to
Govinda, smaart(h) people are content with being "chidanandaroopa".
Sorry, no sympathies from me if you have managed to bore yourself to
death.


Sachchidananda is just not your cup of tea/coffee.


But Chowpatty shall always be there to part you from your money with
doodh diluted with paani from Thane Creek.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
BTW, Polonius-volonius ko maar goli. The original Omlet was written by
Seshappa Iyer, a nice old dravidasthani.
This is an Iyer who brought oopprobrium upon himself by dabbling in
omelette. He is no doubt languishing in shookarnakh narak till
Brahmanda come.
Satish Kumar
2011-07-16 22:44:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Satish Kumar
On Jul 16, 9:29 am, "Myself, Mallu. Yourself?"
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
You post is simply too long, and boring, to respond to. Despite all the
exhortations to line up behind bhaiyya (agri)culture and budging over to
Govinda, smaart(h) people are content with being "chidanandaroopa".
Sorry, no sympathies from me if you have managed to bore yourself to
death.
Sachchidananda is just not your cup of tea/coffee.
But Chowpatty shall always be there to part you from your money with
doodh diluted with paani from Thane Creek.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
BTW, Polonius-volonius ko maar goli. The original Omlet was written by
Seshappa Iyer, a nice old dravidasthani.
This is an Iyer who brought oopprobrium upon himself by dabbling in
omelette. He is no doubt languishing in shookarmukh narak till
Brahmanda come.
Come to think f it, indulging in omelette was among lesser failings of
this Sheshappa Iyer. I realize why he was unhappy with his
Dravidasthani name. But if one must change his name, why not go for a
nice desi name from Bhaiyaland?


That's what Daravidasthanis are doing these days. Bhaiyafication is
spreading like wildfire in lans south of the Vindhyas. Dravidasthani
parents in increasing numbers are discarding names like Venkata,
Bhattahiri and Mudakara in favor of good old Bhaiya names like
Abhinav, Ramesh and Anand.


The use of ancestral village as a part of the traditional
Dravidasthani name still poses a challenge. You can't really change
the name of the village you belong to. But at least one Dravidasthani
has found a way around it. He has Bhaiyafied what he could of his name
and is using the PIN instead of his village name.


The man used to be:


Pukkotumpadam Markatarajam Vikatalingam.


No more. He went to court to change his name. He is now officially:


679332 Mohan Vikash.


The man seems very happy with his name change. He is no longer bashful
about introducing himself in polite society anywhere in the world.


Furthermore, he no longer has to sweat it out while trying to fit his
name n the limited space provided for names in application forms.
P. Rajah
2011-07-17 04:19:24 UTC
Permalink
On Jul 16, 9:29 am, "Myself, Mallu. Yourself?"
[....]
BTW, Polonius-volonius ko maar goli. The original Omlet was written by
Seshappa Iyer, a nice old dravidasthani.
This is an Iyer who brought oopprobrium upon himself by dabbling in
omelette.
Was that yegg om-late, or veggy-table om-late?
--
Astrology: Fraud or Superstition?
http://www.seesharppress.com/astro.html

Ass-troll-ogers/jyotishitheads are the bane of humanity, and must be
cleansed or otherwise purified for the benefit of society.

http://www.nowpublic.com/world/vhp-terrorism
Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
2011-07-17 16:49:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by P. Rajah
On Jul 16, 9:29 am, "Myself, Mallu. Yourself?"
[....]
BTW, Polonius-volonius ko maar goli. The original Omlet was written by
Seshappa Iyer, a nice old dravidasthani.
This is an Iyer who brought oopprobrium upon himself by dabbling in
omelette.
Was that yegg om-late, or veggy-table om-late?
Ayyo! Veggy-table, veggy-table. Sheshappa Iyer did face the dilemma - to
be, or not to be - and decided to be a veggy-eaterian. :-)
--
VB, Just itchy
'ome=shanty
Satish Kumar
2011-07-17 20:32:31 UTC
Permalink
On Jul 17, 9:49 am, "Myself, Mallu. Yourself?"
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by P. Rajah
On Jul 16, 9:29 am, "Myself, Mallu. Yourself?"
[....]
BTW, Polonius-volonius ko maar goli. The original Omlet was written by
Seshappa Iyer, a nice old dravidasthani.
This is an Iyer who brought oopprobrium upon himself by dabbling in
omelette.
Was that yegg om-late, or veggy-table om-late?
Ayyo! Veggy-table, veggy-table. Sheshappa Iyer did face the dilemma - to
be, or not to be - and decided to be a veggy-eaterian. :-)
Veggy-table om-late is the less traversed path he faced at that fork
in his life. But this Iyer dude no doubt thanked himself and his stars
at his interview with Chitragupta for taking that route, It did make a
difference during allocation of his Narak of Residence. He can easily
sing:


"I shall be telling this with a sigh
Somewhere ages and ages hence:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I,
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference. "


But Sheshappan Iyer did lose out by choosing Shakespeare as his non de
plume. He could have blazed a trail by opting for Bhaiyafication in
his choice of name. He would have stood out as an avant garde in
Dravidasthan.



That's what Daravidasthanis are doing these days. Bhaiyafication is
spreading like wildfire in lands south of the Vindhyas. Dravidasthani
parents in increasing numbers are discarding hackneyed names like
Venkata, Bhattahiri and Mudakara in favor of nice Bhaiya names like
Abhinav, Ramesh and Anand.


The use of ancestral village as a part of the traditional
Dravidasthani name still poses a challenge. It is not that easy to
change the name of the village you belong to. But at least one
Dravidasthani has found a way around it. He has Bhaiyafied what he
could of his name and is using the PIN instead of his village name.


The man used to be:


Pukkotumpadam Markatarajam Vikatalingam.


No more. He went to court to change his name. He is now officially:


679332 Mohan Vikash.


The man seems very happy with his name change. He is no longer bashful
about introducing himself in polite society anywhere in the world.


Furthermore, he no longer has to sweat it out while trying to fit his
name in the limited space provided for names in application forms of
multiple genre.
Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
2011-07-17 21:02:38 UTC
Permalink
On Jul 17, 9:49 am, "Myself, Mallu. Yourself?"
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by P. Rajah
On Jul 16, 9:29 am, "Myself, Mallu. Yourself?"
[....]
BTW, Polonius-volonius ko maar goli. The original Omlet was written by
Seshappa Iyer, a nice old dravidasthani.
This is an Iyer who brought oopprobrium upon himself by dabbling in
omelette.
Was that yegg om-late, or veggy-table om-late?
Ayyo! Veggy-table, veggy-table. Sheshappa Iyer did face the dilemma - to
be, or not to be - and decided to be a veggy-eaterian. :-)
Veggy-table om-late is the less traversed path he faced at that fork
in his life. But this Iyer dude no doubt thanked himself and his stars
at his interview with Chitragupta for taking that route, It did make a
difference during allocation of his Narak of Residence. He can easily
"I shall be telling this with a sigh
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I,
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference. "
Seshappa Iyer ko Ajit ka sidekick bana diya. Naam hai Seshappa Iyer,
Raabert (Frost) naheen.
But Sheshappan Iyer did lose out by choosing Shakespeare as his non de
plume. He could have blazed a trail by opting for Bhaiyafication in
his choice of name. He would have stood out as an avant garde in
Dravidasthan.
Nah, Seshappa Iyer decided to write in a tongue completely alien to
doodhwala bhaiyyas. Couldn't stand the idea of having Gobar Singh say
something stupid like, "Arre, Romeo kahaan gayelba?"

Stuff below is a repeat. Need a fresh new take.
That's what Daravidasthanis are doing these days. Bhaiyafication is
spreading like wildfire in lands south of the Vindhyas. Dravidasthani
parents in increasing numbers are discarding hackneyed names like
Venkata, Bhattahiri and Mudakara in favor of nice Bhaiya names like
Abhinav, Ramesh and Anand.
"Hackneyed" are names like Satis, Rakes, ... Nice dravidsthani names
give blabbermouth doodhwala bhaiyyas a good tongue workout. Besides,
having to pronounce tongue twisters will mean getting all that paan,
tobacco, ..., fodder out of the mouth.
The use of ancestral village as a part of the traditional
Dravidasthani name still poses a challenge. It is not that easy to
change the name of the village you belong to. But at least one
Dravidasthani has found a way around it. He has Bhaiyafied what he
could of his name and is using the PIN instead of his village name.
Pukkotumpadam Markatarajam Vikatalingam.
679332 Mohan Vikash.
The man seems very happy with his name change. He is no longer bashful
about introducing himself in polite society anywhere in the world.
Furthermore, he no longer has to sweat it out while trying to fit his
name in the limited space provided for names in application forms of
multiple genre.
--
VB, Just itchy
'ome=shanty
Satish Kumar
2011-07-17 22:13:03 UTC
Permalink
On Jul 17, 2:02 pm, "Myself, Mallu. Yourself?"
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
On Jul 17, 9:49 am, "Myself, Mallu. Yourself?"
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Post by P. Rajah
On Jul 16, 9:29 am, "Myself, Mallu. Yourself?"
[....]
BTW, Polonius-volonius ko maar goli. The original Omlet was written by
Seshappa Iyer, a nice old dravidasthani.
This is an Iyer who brought oopprobrium upon himself by dabbling in
omelette.
Was that yegg om-late, or veggy-table om-late?
Ayyo! Veggy-table, veggy-table. Sheshappa Iyer did face the dilemma - to
be, or not to be - and decided to be a veggy-eaterian. :-)
Veggy-table om-late is the less traversed path he faced at that fork
in his life. But this Iyer dude no doubt thanked himself and his stars
at his interview with Chitragupta for taking that route, It did make a
difference during allocation of his Narak of Residence. He can easily
"I shall be telling this with a sigh
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I,
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference. "
Seshappa Iyer ko Ajit ka sidekick bana diya. Naam hai Seshappa Iyer,
Raabert (Frost) naheen.
The way he astutely solved his om-late dilemma, this Sheshappa dude
would do well sing to a Raabert.

But they do need good Bhaiya names. It would be nice to say, for
example, that Shekhar sang a Ravi.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
But Sheshappan Iyer did lose out by choosing Shakespeare as his non de
plume. He could have blazed a trail by opting for Bhaiyafication in
his choice of name. He would have stood out as an avant garde in
Dravidasthan.
Nah, Seshappa Iyer decided to write in a tongue completely alien to
doodhwala bhaiyyas. Couldn't stand the idea of having Gobar Singh say
something stupid like, "Arre, Romeo kahaan gayelba?"
Sheshappa must have been a tortured soul - he did anything he could to
flee the tongue twisters he had inherited at birth. Changing his
parents-given name was a part of the process. Too bad he didn't know
(unlike the modern day Dravidasthanis) that he would be doing far
better by Bhaiyafying his name.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Stuff below is a repeat. Need a fresh new take.
Thanks for your fresh outtake.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
That's what Daravidasthanis are doing these days. Bhaiyafication is
spreading like wildfire in lands south of the Vindhyas. Dravidasthani
parents in increasing numbers are discarding hackneyed names like
Venkata, Bhattahiri  and Mudakara  in favor of nice Bhaiya names like
Abhinav, Ramesh and Anand.
"Hackneyed" are names like Satis, Rakes, ...
Nope. Hackneyed are names like Venkata, Bhattahiri and Mudakara which
have been around since Brahmanda come.


Modern day Dravidasthansi are proving themselves to be far more
considerate than their forefathers by refusing to burden their
offsprings with hackneyed tongue twisters. The fetters are finally
off. The new generation in Dravidasthan is taking to Bhaiya names like
Abhinav, Ramesh and Anand as a duck takes to water.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Nice dravidsthani names
give blabbermouth doodhwala bhaiyyas a good tongue workout.
A strong distaste for painful tongue workouts is prompting considerate
Dravidasthani parents to Bhaiyafy the names of their offsprings.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
Besides,
having to pronounce tongue twisters will mean getting all that paan,
tobacco, ..., fodder out of the mouth.
Why do you think a good Dravidasthani like Pukkotumpadam Markatarajam
Vikatalingam went to court to change his tongue twisting name into
679332  Mohan Vikash?


You might argue that he did it to retain paan, tobacco and fodder
inside his mouth. But you would be far more credible to say that
Pukkotumpadam Markatarajam Vikatalingam changed his parents-given name
so that he would no longer be bashful to introduce himself in polite
society anywhere in the world.


Furthermore, the erstwhile Pukkotumpadam Markatarajam Vikatalingam no
longer sweats it out while trying to fit his erstwhile name in the
limited space provided for names in application forms of multiple
genre.
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
The use of ancestral village as a part of the traditional
Dravidasthani name still poses a challenge. It is not that easy to
change the name of the village you belong to. But at least one
Dravidasthani has found a way around it. He has Bhaiyafied what he
could of his name and is using the PIN instead of his village name.
Pukkotumpadam Markatarajam Vikatalingam.
679332  Mohan Vikash.
The man seems very happy with his name change. He is no longer bashful
about introducing himself in polite society anywhere in the world.
Furthermore, he no longer has to sweat it out while trying to fit his
name in the limited space provided for names in application forms of
multiple genre.
Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
2011-07-17 17:01:59 UTC
Permalink
On Jul 16, 9:29 am, "Myself, Mallu. Yourself?"
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
You post is simply too long, and boring, to respond to. Despite all the
exhortations to line up behind bhaiyya (agri)culture and budging over to
Govinda, smaart(h) people are content with being "chidanandaroopa".
Sorry, no sympathies from me if you have managed to bore yourself to
death.
No worries as long as the story of Kushanabha does not appear in the
Markandeya Purana.
Sachchidananda is just not your cup of tea/coffee.
Coffee.
But Chowpatty shall always be there to part you from your money with
doodh diluted with paani from Thane Creek.
No worries there either. I no longer have to deal with bhaiyyas, except
in this newsgroup. :-)
Post by Myself, Mallu. Yourself?
BTW, Polonius-volonius ko maar goli. The original Omlet was written by
Seshappa Iyer, a nice old dravidasthani.
This is an Iyer who brought oopprobrium upon himself by dabbling in
omelette. He is no doubt languishing in shookarnakh narak till
Brahmanda come.
Why would dabbling in omlets lead to a "narak"? Anyways, Seshappa Iyer
is long dead and gone, and I wouldn't worry about his "narak" condition.
The immediate worry is "punnarak" for a dedicated cut-and-paste Hindu
warrior who is conflicted by his matru- and pitrubhasha. I would think
doodh and pani (mixed in any proportion) would appease Chitragupt (yet
another bhaiyya) to the point that Yamraj (bade bhaiyya) would call of
his punnarak doot (chhote bhaiyya).
--
VB, Just itchy
'ome=shanty
and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)
2011-07-17 17:17:48 UTC
Permalink
Is V. Bhattathiri <***@gmail.com> a Christian? What's wrong
with being a Christian?

In article
Why, does V. Bhattathiri (KalluMallu) give thanks only at
Thanksgiving and Christmas?
what is wrong in being a christian ?
CHRISTIAN CHAPLAIN, A DEACON, BUSTED FOR PAYING PRISON INMATE FOR SEX
ACTS

Named and shamed priest still won't apologise for raping teenage
victim

By Luke Byrne
Irish Independent
Saturday July 16 2011

One of the paedophile priests investigated in the Cloyne Report into
allegations of sexual abuse in the diocese has refused to apologise
for raping his teenage victim.

Fr Brendan Wrixon (75) is the only one of the 19 priests referred to
in the report who has been convicted by the courts.

Identified as Fr Caden in the report, he began fondling a 16-year-old
boy in the early 1980s and moved on to penetration and oral sex, it
is alleged.

His victim, named Patrick in the report, went on to become a priest
in the diocese of Cloyne.

Fr Wrixon is retired and no longer says Mass in the parish church. He
doesn't live in the parochial house but he has never been defrocked.

A spokesman for the Cloyne diocese said he was in receipt of a
"modest" pension from the church.

The Irish Independent tracked him down to an address on the outskirts
of Newmarket, Co Cork, yesterday.

He refused to answer the door, and later refused to speak when asked
if he would apologise to his victim or if he had anything to say
about the Cloyne report.

He quickly drove away.

In 2010, Fr Wrixon was charged with three counts of gross indecency
between October 16, 1982, and February 15, 1983, and was given an 18-
month suspended sentence after he pleaded guilty to one count.

He appeared before Judge Sean O Donnabhain in Cork Circuit Criminal
Court in November last year.

Fr Wrixon's case was singled out in the Cloyne Report as an example
of how Bishop John Magee and Monsignor Denis O'Callaghan dealt
insufficiently with allegations of sexual abuse.

- Luke Byrne

Related Article

Five years on, laws to crack down on abusers are unused

More at
http://www.independent.ie/national-news/named-and-shamed-priest-still-wont-apologise-for-raping-teenage-victim-2823390.html
Queens prison chaplain busted for paying inmate for sex acts
By Doug Auer
New York Post
Monday, July 11, 2011
An elderly Catholic deacon working as a chaplain at a Queens prison
has been arrested for allegedly paying an inmate to perform sex acts
on him.
The deacon, Frank DeTucci, 70, allegedly paid the male inmate $120
and $150 on two occasions to perform oral sex on him inside his
chaplain’s office at the Queensboro Correctional Facility in Long
Island City, sources said today.
One alleged incident happened at around 9 a.m. on July 5, the sources
said. The second occurred Sunday, at which time he was arrested by
State Police, they added.
DeTucci was hired by the state Department of Corrections in 1992.
He is charged with criminal sex act, attempted criminal sex act,
sexual misconduct, attempted sexual misconduct and official
misconduct, said a spokeswoman for Queens DA Richard Brown.
DeTucci, who lives in Astoria, is paid $79,819 a year to perform
priestly duties at the prison. He has been put on leave without pay,
said a prison spokeswoman.
DeTucci, who also serves as a deacon at the Our Lady of Mount Carmel
RC Church in Astoria, could not be reached for comment.
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/queens/queens_prison_chaplain_busted_for_Ju9MGySj2Nm6u8ozlievrK
CHARGED - CHRISTIAN PRIEST WHO RAPED 14-YEAR-OLD GIRL
German Catholic priest charged with girl's rape: prosecutors
AFP
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
German prosecutors said Tuesday they had charged a Catholic priest
with raping an underage girl after a tip-off from a special body set
up to combat abuse scandals that have rocked the Church.
The priest, 50, allegedly abused the girl, aged 14 at the time, over
a three-year period from 1990, telling her she "wouldn't go to
heaven" if she did not comply, Alexander Retemeyer, a spokesman for
prosecutors, told AFP.
Hermann Haarmann, a spokesman for the diocese in Osnabrueck, western
Germany, where the alleged rape took place, said the priest was
suspended from duty in March when the woman came forward and a probe
was launched.
The case was handed to prosecutors when the priest refused to turn
himself in to police, Haarmann told AFP.
Like other European countries, Germany has been rocked in recent
months by revelations that hundreds of children were physically or
sexually abused in institutions, the vast majority Catholic-run.
The scandal has badly damaged the standing of the Church in Germany,
five years after the German Pope Benedict XVI's appointment as leader
of the world's 1.1 billion Catholics, a source of great national
pride.
http://www.expatica.com/de/news/german-news/german-catholic-priest-charged-with-girl-s-rape-prosecutors_91699.html
150,000 CHILDREN KIDNAPPED, TORTURED, RAPED AND KILLED BY CHRISTIANS IN
SCHOOLS FOR NATIVES
More Canadians need to know about our "dark chapter" of residential
schools
By Charlotte Kingston
Sheldon Chumir Foundation
Loading Image...
Troy Media
Wednesday, June 8, 2011
Calgary, AB, June 8, 2011 (Troy Media) - June 11 marks the third
anniversary of the Government of Canada's apology to survivors of
Indian Residential Schools. On this day, the federal government
recognized that "the legacy of Indian Residential Schools has
contributed to social problems that continue to exist in many
communities today."
The anniversary should remind non-aboriginal Canadians of how far we
have come in our relationship with first peoples, and of how very far
we have left to go. But that will require that many more non-
aboriginal Canadians become aware of the history and consequences of
this period in our history. This lack of awareness must be rectified
if the apology is to lead to meaningful change, rather than becoming
a historical footnote.
History of residential schools
From 1831 to 1996, more than 150,000 First Nations, Inuit and Metis
children were taken from their communities and sent to one of the 130
federally-funded boarding schools administered by Catholic, United
and Anglican Church authorities. For decades there was no choice: if
families did not hand over their children, they were forcibly seized.
The "aggressive assimilation" policies pursued by the government and
the schools sought to stamp out aboriginal language, culture and
spiritual beliefs in order to "kill the Indian in the child," as
Duncan Campbell Scott, Head of Indian Affairs, wrote in 1920.
The record of death and abuse in these schools is well documented. As
early as 1909 Dr. Peter Bryce reported that mortality rates at
residential schools in Western Canada ranged from 30 to 60 per cent.
Over time, more than 12,000 individual allegations of physical and
sexual abuse were brought to Canada's courts.
Survivors of Canada's residential school system do not speak of
injury only to themselves. They tell of the effect their turning to
drugs and alcohol to deal with those injuries has had on their own
children and families. They talk about the loss of language, cultural
traditions and the spirituality that was once the life blood of their
communities. They know too well the consequences for children of
being born to a generation of parents without any experience of being
parented themselves. In these ways, the "dark chapter" of Indian
Residential Schools lives on today.
Ignorance of history obscures present
Yet less than one third of Canadians are familiar with the history of
Indian Residential Schools, according to national surveys by the
Aboriginal Healing Foundation.
This lack of knowledge is dangerous because history and historical
myths shape contemporary actions and attitudes. Though most non-
aboriginal Canadians are blind to the legacy of residential
schooling, assumptions continue to be made about the causes and
prescriptions for the ongoing vulnerability and marginalization of
first peoples. Yet, where we misdiagnose the problem, we are likely
to incorrectly treat the symptoms.
Many people continue to argue that no good can come from opening old
wounds or that we are not responsible for the sins of the past. This
is wrong, because where it is evident that the past continues to
affect the present we have an ethical imperative to know the truth
and to act appropriately on it.
Tackling the darkest chapters of our history is a demanding task. We
cannot deny or shy away from a time when systemic racism and
discrimination were the norm. For Canadians, the history of Indian
Residential Schools must be recalled so that we can deal with its
effects.
First truth, then reconciliation
Through the work of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC),
the government of Canada has created an opportunity for Canadians to
better understand our history. Unfortunately, the biggest problem the
TRC faces is bringing non-aboriginal Canadians into the conversation.
"Our audience is not survivors. It is all Canadians. The rest of
Canada cannot think this is just about survivors telling their truth,
having a measure of catharsis, and that's it. It's about healing
Canada's amnesia . . .," explains Commissioner Marie Wilson. The
ethical imperative rests not only with government but with each
individual.. All Canadians must engage this difficult past if we hope
for a healthier and more cohesive future. There can be no
reconciliation without remembrance.
Let the June 11 anniversary of the apology to Residential School
survivors be a reminder to all Canadians of the need to learn more
about this dark chapter of our history and to reflect on what it
means for our collective present and our future.
Charlotte Kingston is an intern with the Sheldon Chumir Foundation
for Ethics in Leadership.
It's time to focus on Aboriginal healing
http://www.troymedia.com/2010/07/15/its-time-to-focus-on-aboriginal-healing/
Let's get over the collective apology thing; it's not all that
helpful
http://www.troymedia.com/2010/07/08/let%e2%80%99s-get-over-the-collective-apology-thing-it%e2%80%99s-not-all-that-helpful/
Aboriginal Canadians should have rights to their land
http://www.troymedia.com/2011/03/18/aboriginal-canadians-should-have-rights-to-their-land/
Native Canadians denied true democracy
http://www.troymedia.com/2010/10/20/native-canadians-denied-true-democracy/
Canadians should ignore Europe's misgivings about multiculturalism
http://www.troymedia.com/2011/02/18/canadians-should-ignore-europes-misgivings-about-multiculturalism/
http://www.troymedia.com/2011/06/08/more-canadians-need-to-know-about-our-dark-chapter-of-residential-schools/
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.
Loading...